President Biden Faces Criticism Over Strikes in Yemen and Middle East from Interventionists, Isolationists in Congress

Dovish lawmakers argue that President Biden lacks authority to unilaterally carry out the strikes while foreign policy hawks say he's not going far enough. A group of 14 House Democrats and eight House Republicans signed onto a letter raising concerns about what they labeled 'unauthorized' strikes against the Houthis on Friday, urging the administration to seek authorization from Congress before involving US in another conflict in the Middle East.
President Biden is facing criticism from interventionists and isolationists in Congress over his recent strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East.
The Senate passed a measure repealing a 2002 AUMH that sanctioned Iraq War last year but it has stalled in House due to opposition from GOP foreign policy hawks.
President Biden Faces Criticism Over Strikes in Yemen and Middle East from Interventionists, Isolationists in Congress

President Biden is facing criticism from interventionists and isolationists in Congress over his recent strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East. Dovish lawmakers argue that President Biden lacks authority to unilaterally carry out the strikes while foreign policy hawks say he's not going far enough. A group of 14 House Democrats and eight House Republicans signed onto a letter raising concerns about what they labeled 'unauthorized' strikes against the Houthis on Friday, urging the administration to seek authorization from Congress before involving US in another conflict in the Middle East. The Senate passed a measure repealing a 2002 AUMH that sanctioned Iraq War last year but it has stalled in House due to opposition from GOP foreign policy hawks.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if President Biden's strikes against Houthi rebels were legal or justified.

Sources

55%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Yemen calls to 'eliminate' Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping

i24news Unknown i24NEWS Saturday, 27 January 2024 19:36
  • Unique Points
    • The chairman of the Yemen Presidential leadership council, Rashad al-Alimi, has called on the United States and Saudi Arabia to take decisive action to 'eliminate' the military capabilities of Houthi rebels
    • Houthi rebels have been accused of staging attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes, raising concerns about maritime security
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'eliminate' to describe the actions that should be taken against Houthi rebels. This creates a false sense of urgency and implies that immediate action must be taken without considering alternative solutions or consequences.
    • According to al-Alimi, these actions are not a comprehensive solution to the threat posed by the rebels
    • The chairman of Yemen Presidential leadership council urges U.S. and Saudi action during a press briefing in Riyadh
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by quoting the chairman of Yemen's Presidential leadership council and stating that he called for decisive action against Houthi rebels. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Houthis as a threat to maritime security, but does not provide any evidence or quotes from experts in this field.
    • The chairman of Yemen's Presidential leadership council called for decisive action against Houthi rebels.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains language that dehumanizes the Houthi rebels by referring to them as a threat and calling for their elimination. The author also uses loaded words such as 'eliminate' which implies violence and destruction.
    • According to al-Alimi, these actions are not a comprehensive solution to the threat posed by the rebels, who have been accused of staging attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.
      • The Houthis have intensified their maritime attacks since November, launching several missiles and drones at sea.
        • > Yemen calls to 'eliminate' Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          The article discusses the threat of Houthi rebels to Red Sea shipping lanes and maritime security. The author is i24NEWS which has a financial stake in Israel-Hamas war.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            The author i24NEWS has a conflict of interest on the topics Yemen and Houthi rebels as they are involved in an ongoing war with Israel-Hamas. The article also mentions Red Sea shipping lanes which could be affected by this conflict.

            71%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Biden hit from all sides in Congress on Middle East strikes

            Axios News Site: https://www.axios.com/2024/01-30/prior-authorization-gap-insurer-drug-decisions Andrew Solender Saturday, 27 January 2024 13:24
            • Unique Points
              • President Biden is facing criticism from interventionists and isolationists in Congress over his recent strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East.
              • Dovish lawmakers argue that President Biden lacks authority to unilaterally carry out the strikes while foreign policy hawks say he's not going far enough.
              • A group of 14 House Democrats and eight House Republicans signed onto a letter raising concerns about what they labeled 'unauthorized' strikes against the Houthis on Friday, urging the administration to seek authorization from Congress before involving US in another conflict in the Middle East.
              • The Senate passed a measure repealing a 2002 AUMH that sanctioned Iraq War last year but it has stalled in House due to opposition from GOP foreign policy hawks.
              • White House cited constitutional authority to protect US citizens abroad or, in case of strike against Iran-linked militias, the much broader 2001 AUMH as justification for recent actions.
            • Accuracy
              • The chairman of the Yemen Presidential leadership council, Rashad al-Alimi, has called on the United States and Saudi Arabia to take decisive action to 'eliminate' the military capabilities of Houthi rebels
              • Houthi fighters and tribesmen stage a rally against the U.S. and the U.K. strikes on Houthi-run military sites near Sanaa, Yemen.
            • Deception (30%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that President Biden is facing rare simultaneous criticism from interventionists and isolationists in Congress over his recent strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that there are only two sides to the issue when there are actually more than just two positions on foreign policy. Secondly, the author quotes a group of 14 House Democrats and eight House Republicans who signed onto a letter raising concerns about what they labeled 'unauthorized' strikes against the Houthis. However, this statement is also misleading as it implies that these lawmakers are representative of all Congress members when in fact there are many other members who hold different views on the issue. Lastly, the author quotes an administration official stating that U.S actions against Houthi targets are consistent with international and domestic law without providing any evidence to support this claim.
              • The article is deceptive in several ways.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the author cites a group of lawmakers who signed onto a letter raising concerns about the strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East. This statement implies that their opinions are valid because they hold positions of power, but this does not necessarily mean that their arguments are sound or based on evidence. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when the author uses phrases such as
              • Bias (85%)
                The article contains examples of both ideological and religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the Houthis by referring to them as 'rebels' and portrays their actions as a threat to American security. This is an example of monetary bias, where the US government is presented as having a vested interest in protecting its citizens abroad.
                • President Biden cites embattled Bush-era measures to sanction Iraq strike
                  • The Houthis are portrayed as 'rebels' and their actions are described as a threat to American security.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Andrew Solender has conflicts of interest on the topics of Biden, Congress, Middle East strikes, Houthi rebels in Yemen and other militia groups in the Middle East. He also reports on interventionists and isolationists in Congress.
                    • Andrew Solender reports on Congresswoman Cori Bush's criticism of President Biden's decision to strike Iran-linked militias in Iraq and Syria, but does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships between them.
                      • In his article about President Biden's decision to strike Iran-linked militias in Iraq and Syria, Andrew Solender mentions that he has spoken with administration officials who are familiar with the situation. This could be seen as a conflict of interest because it suggests that Mr. Solender may have access to information not available to the general public.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                      65%

                      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                      ABC News Exclusive: Joint Chiefs chairman says goal in Red Sea is to deter Iran-backed Houthis

                      ABC NEWS SITE NAMES Name: ABC News Site Names URL: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-officially-blames-iran_106834435 ABC News Saturday, 27 January 2024 19:42
                      • Unique Points
                        • The U.S.-led retaliatory strikes launched against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in the Red Sea are intended to prevent future conflict.
                        • Houthi fighters and tribesmen stage a rally against the U.S. and the U.K. strikes on Houthi-run military sites near Sanaa, Yemen.
                      • Accuracy
                        • The chairman of the Yemen Presidential leadership council, Rashad al-Alimi, has called on the United States and Saudi Arabia to take decisive action to 'eliminate' the military capabilities of Houthi rebels
                        • Houthi rebels have been accused of staging attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes, raising concerns about maritime security
                        • The Houthis have intensified their maritime attacks since November, launching several missiles and drones at sea, specifically targeting ships associated with Israel
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the U.S.-led retaliatory strikes launched against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in the Red Sea are intended to prevent future conflict and not go down a path of greater escalation. However, this contradicts statements made by Gen. CQ Brown in his interview with Martha Raddatz where he states that the goal is deterrence while protecting U.S. forces, which implies an intention for further action if necessary.
                        • The article claims that the U.S.-led retaliatory strikes launched against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in the Red Sea are intended to prevent future conflict and not go down a path of greater escalation. However, this contradicts statements made by Gen. CQ Brown in his interview with Martha Raddatz where he states that the goal is deterrence while protecting U.S. forces.
                        • The article claims that the U.S.-led retaliatory strikes launched against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in the Red Sea are intended to prevent future conflict and not go down a path of greater escalation, but this contradicts statements made by Gen. CQ Brown in his interview with Martha Raddatz where he states that the goal is deterrence while protecting U.S. forces.
                      • Fallacies (70%)
                        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority when they quote Gen. CQ Brown without providing any context or evidence for his statements. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by presenting only two options: either go down a path of greater escalation or not take action at all.
                        • Gen. CQ Brown's statement that 'we don't want to go down a path of greater escalation'
                        • The use of an appeal to authority when quoting Gen. CQ Brown without providing any context or evidence for his statements.
                      • Bias (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        ABC News has a conflict of interest on the topics of Joint Chiefs chairman and Red Sea as they are reporting on US-led retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in the Red Sea. The article does not disclose any conflicts of interest.
                        • The article reports that Gen. CQ Brown, the Joint Chiefs chairman, said that the goal is to deter Iran-backed Houthis from attacking US ships and allies in the region.
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          ABC News has a conflict of interest on the topics of Joint Chiefs chairman, Red Sea, U.S.-led retaliatory strikes against Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen and anti-ship ballistic missiles as they are all related to military matters which ABC News is covering extensively.
                          • ABC News is covering the ongoing conflict between Yemen and Iranian-backed Houthi militants, which has led to U.S.-led retaliatory strikes against them in the Red Sea.
                            • The article mentions the Joint Chiefs chairman, Gen. CQ Brown, who has a vested interest in maintaining U.S. military dominance in the Red Sea and preventing Iranian-backed Houthi militants from launching anti-ship ballistic missiles.