President Biden Announces 100% Tariff on Chinese EV Imports: Escalating Trade War with China Over Strategic Sectors

Washington D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
China expresses strong dissatisfaction with the actions
President Biden announces 100% tariff on Chinese EV imports
Protecting strategic sectors like EVs, steel and critical minerals
Review of tariffs imposed during trade war between US and China
Tariffs also apply to semiconductors
President Biden Announces 100% Tariff on Chinese EV Imports: Escalating Trade War with China Over Strategic Sectors

In a significant escalation of the ongoing trade war between the US and China, President Biden has announced an increase in tariffs on Chinese imports, particularly targeting electric vehicles (EVs) and semiconductors. The US is imposing new tariffs on $18 billion worth of imports from China, with the White House quadrupling EV tariffs to 100% and increasing those for semiconductors from 25% to 50%. These moves are aimed at protecting strategic sectors like EVs, steel and critical minerals. The decision comes as President Joe Biden gears up for a re-run of his 2020 contest with Republican rival Donald Trump in November, with officials criticizing Trump’s record on trade as they made the announcement. This follows a review of tariffs imposed during a trade war between Washington and Beijing, during which then president Trump introduced levies on some $300 billion in goods from China. The so-called Section 301 investigation was the primary tool the Trump administration used to justify tariffs, and the US Trade Representative is required to look into the impact of the levies after four years. Beijing has warned that these actions will severely affect relations between the two countries and expressed its strong dissatisfaction with what it calls “politicizing and instrumentalising economic and trade issues”. The Chinese government also pledged to take resolute measures to defend its own rights and interests, while the US maintains that these actions are necessary to protect American workers and businesses from unfair practices.

The increased tariffs on EVs aim to encourage the elimination of China's unfair technology transfer-related policies and practices that have burdened U.S. commerce and harmed American workers and businesses. The move is part of a broader strategy to protect U.S. industries from competitive pressures, particularly from Chinese firms that have benefited from state subsidies, although the U.S. EV industry received improved subsidies as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.

American auto industry groups have expressed concerns about the threat China's EV competition poses to U.S. domestic production, with an Alliance for American Manufacturing report describing it as an “existential threat” to the U.S. auto industry. The White House has stated that if China retaliates, they have the means and the will to defend their interests, while also working to ensure supply chains are resilient and secure.

In April, the U.S. Government warned that Chinese-made smart cars could “collect sensitive data about our citizens and our infrastructure and send this data back to the People's Republic of China.” Speaking on behalf of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, spokesperson Wang Wenbin stated that China has always opposed unilateral imposition of tariffs in violation of World Trade Organization rules and will take all necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests. The Chinese government has not yet specified what actions they may take in response to these increased tariffs.

The US's move comes amidst ongoing tensions between the two superpowers, with both countries heavily investing in EV technology and infrastructure as they strive to dominate the rapidly growing market. As of now, it remains unclear how this latest development will impact the ongoing trade war and relations between the two nations.

Sources: 1)



Confidence

96%

Doubts
  • How will this impact the US-China relationship?
  • Is the US justified in imposing these tariffs?
  • What is China's response likely to be?

Sources

94%

  • Unique Points
    • The US has raised tariffs on Chinese EVs and semiconductor imports.
  • Accuracy
    • Tariffs will also increase for semiconductors.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

79%

  • Unique Points
    • The Biden administration is increasing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles from 25 percent to 100 percent.
    • Both countries are investing heavily in EV technology and infrastructure to dominate the market.
    • U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai made a statement about eliminating China’s unfair technology transfer policies.
    • Tariffs will also increase for semiconductors and solar cells.
  • Accuracy
    • Tariffs will also increase for semiconductors.
    • Biden’s strategy relies on bringing international allies together to counter China through a mix of domestic incentives and potentially coordinated tariffs on Chinese goods.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by describing the tariffs as 'significantly increasing' and 'escalating' the US-China trade war. The author also uses sensational language by describing China as an 'existential threat' to the US auto industry. The article selectively reports details that support the author's position, such as quoting a White House spokesperson stating that China's practices have resulted in significantly lower costs driven by subsidies and market distortions, without providing any counter-evidence or context. The article also implies facts without linking to peer-reviewed studies regarding the security risks of Chinese-made smart cars.
    • This announcement followed a four-year review into the effectiveness of U.S. tariffs on China.
    • The move is the latest salvo in a trade war between the two superpowers that kicked off in 2918, during the Trump administration.
    • An Alliance for American Manufacturing report described it an ‘existential threat’ to the U.S. auto industry.
    • Outside estimates suggest that China’s unfair practices have resulted in significantly lower costs driven by subsidies and market distortions.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai and a White House spokesperson. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing China's practices as 'unfair' and an 'existential threat'. No formal fallacies were found.
    • "to encourage the elimination of the People's Republic of China's unfair technology transfer-related policies and practices that continue to burden U.S. commerce and harm American workers and businesses."
    • "Outside estimates suggest that China's unfair practices have resulted in significantly lower costs driven by subsidies and market distortions."
  • Bias (90%)
    The author expresses a clear bias towards the US perspective in the trade war with China. The language used to describe China's actions is negative and portrays them as an 'existential threat' to US industries. The author also quotes White House spokespersons making similar statements, further emphasizing this bias.
    • An Alliance for American Manufacturing report described it an ‘existential threat’ to the U.S. auto industry.
      • Outside estimates suggest that China’s unfair practices have resulted in significantly lower costs driven by subsidies and market distortions...These tariffs will combat those practices and level the playing field for America’s automakers, which have been the bedrock of our manufacturing sector for decades.
        • This announcement followed a four-year review into the effectiveness of U.S. tariffs on China...to encourage the elimination of the People’s Republic of China’s unfair technology transfer-related policies and practices that continue to burden U.S. commerce and harm American workers and businesses.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        96%

        • Unique Points
          • Biden's trade war with China differs from Trump's in that Biden is seeking to increase production and jobs in select high-tech industries, including clean energy sectors.
          • Biden has imposed more restrictions on trade with China and funneled federal subsidies to American manufacturers trying to compete with Chinese production.
        • Accuracy
          • President Biden has decided not to roll back any of the original tariffs that his predecessor imposed on Chinese products.
          • The US has raised tariffs on Chinese EVs and semiconductor imports.
          • Biden's strategy relies on bringing international allies together to counter China through a mix of domestic incentives and potentially coordinated tariffs on Chinese goods.
          • The Biden administration is increasing tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles from 25 percent to 100 percent.
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        99%

        • Unique Points
          • The US is imposing new tariffs on $18 billion worth of imports from China.
          • Beijing has warned that the new US tariffs will severely affect relations between the two countries.
          • The White House announced a quadrupling of tariffs on EVs to 100 percent and a surge in tariffs for semiconductors from 25 percent to 50 percent this year and next year respectively.
          • China opposes the new US tariffs and has made stern representations against them.
          • The US Trade Representative is required to review the impact of the levies after four years as part of a Section 301 investigation.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (95%)
          The author is making a statement about the Chinese government's response to new US tariffs. This statement is not a fallacy as it is reporting the facts of the situation. However, there are some instances of inflammatory rhetoric used by both parties that could be considered fallacies if taken out of context. For example, China calling Trump's actions 'politicizing and instrumentalising economic and trade issues' and 'a typical case of political manipulation' is an appeal to emotion. Similarly, the White House referring to the tariffs as a response to Trump's record on trade is an appeal to audience emotions. However, these instances do not significantly impact the overall integrity of the article and do not detract from its informational value. Therefore, I would score this article a 95.
          • ][China] expresses its strong dissatisfaction with this.[/]
          • [The White House] referred to the tariffs as a response to Trump's record on trade.
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication