Elie Honig, a former FBI agent and assistant special counsel in Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, has described President Biden as having memory loss.
President Biden's claims about classified documents have been undermined by the facts of this case.
President Biden's claims about classified documents have been undermined by the facts of this case, according to Elie Honig. While the Special Counsel's description of President Biden's memory loss is over-the-top and more colorful than necessary, it is relevant to the prosecutorial determination because a lot of Joe Biden's statements have been seriously undermined by the facts of this case.
Jill Biden offered an explanation for why President Biden forgot the year of his son Beau's death in a special counsel interview.
President Joe Biden came across as a 'sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory'
Accuracy
President Joe Biden came across as a 'sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory' after he forgot key details in an interview.
Special Counsel Robert Hur described President Biden as a 'well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory'
Elie Honig says that while the Special Counsel's description of President Biden's memory loss is over-the-top and more colorful than necessary, it is relevant to the prosecutorial determination because a lot of Joe Biden's statements have been seriously undermined by the facts of this case. He knew he had these documents.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Jill Biden offered an explanation for why President Biden forgot the year of his son Beau's death in a special counsel interview with Robert Hur. However, this statement is false as there was no such offer made by Jill Biden.
The article states that First Lady Jill Biden offered an explanation for why President Joe Biden blanked on the year of his son Beau's death in a special counsel interview with Robert Hur. However, according to the report from Special Counsel Robert Hur, no such offer was made by Jill Biden.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The first lady's explanation for why President Biden forgot the year of his son Beau's death is an example of a false dilemma. She presents two options: measuring grief in years or not at all, implying that these are the only two possibilities when in fact there may be other ways to measure grief. Additionally, her statement about how everyone should give each other grace and not use tragedy for political gain is an example of an appeal to emotion fallacy. The article also contains examples of inflammatory rhetoric such as Jill Biden's accusation that Special Counsel Robert Hur was attempting to score political points by criticizing President Biden's memory.
The first lady presented two options for measuring grief: in years or not at all, implying these are the only possibilities. This is an example of a false dilemma fallacy.
Jill Biden accused Special Counsel Robert Hur of attempting to score political points by criticizing President Biden's memory. This is an example of an appeal to emotion fallacy.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Anders Hagstrom and he has a history of bias against President Biden. The article contains examples where the author uses language that dehumanizes Beau Biden by saying 'never leave him' which implies that his death was not significant enough to be mourned properly, despite Jill Biden stating otherwise in her email to donors.
Jill said of Beau's death: 'What helped me, and what helped Joe, was to find purpose. That's what keeps Joe going, serving you and the country we love.'
The first lady lashed out at Hur in a campaign email to donors, arguing that the Justice Department official only included the detail to score 'political points.'
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Jill Biden and Beau Biden. The article discusses how Jill Biden blanked out during an interview when asked about her son's death, which could be seen as a personal relationship that may compromise her ability to act objectively.
Jill Biden blanked out during the special counsel interview when asked about Beau’s death. She said she was thinking of other things and didn’t want to get into it.
Elie Honig says that while the Special Counsel's description of President Biden's memory loss is over-the-top and more colorful than necessary, it is relevant to the prosecutorial determination because a lot of Joe Biden's statements have been seriously undermined by the facts of this case. He knew he had these documents.
Accuracy
President Biden had just spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the morning of Oct. 8, agonizing over how to rescue hostages taken by Hamas in its bloody attack the previous day, pledging American assistance.
The president's personal attorney and White House counsel arrived at the White House for interviews with special counsel Robert K. Hur who was investigating Biden's handling of classified documents.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in that it presents Elie Honig's statement as if he was saying something new or different when in fact his statement aligns with the Special Counsel report. The author also uses sensational language such as 'over-the-top and more colorful than necessary' to make it seem like Honig is attacking Biden, but this is not the case.
While the Special Counsel's description of President Biden's memory loss "is over-the-top and more colorful than necessary," says Elie Honig, itƔ relevant to the prosecutorial determination,
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Special Counsel's report as evidence for their claims about President Biden's memory loss. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when they describe President Biden's statements being 'seriously undermined by the facts of this case'. There is also a dichotomous depiction of President Biden and his actions in regards to classified documents.
The Special Counsel's description of President Biden's memory loss "is over-the-top and more colorful than necessary," says Elie Honig, itΔ relevant to the prosecutorial determination,
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from Elie Honig that President Biden's claims about classified documents were undermined by the facts of this case. This is an example of ideological bias as it implies that there are two sides to the story and one side (President Biden) is being unfairly criticized.
Elie Honig: President Biden's claims about classified documents were undermined by the facts of this case.
President Biden had just spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the morning of Oct. 8, agonizing over how to rescue hostages taken by Hamas in its bloody attack the previous day, pledging American assistance.
The president's personal attorney and White House counsel arrived at the White House for interviews with special counsel Robert K. Hur who was investigating Biden's handling of classified documents.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it implies that Biden's memory problems are a result of his age and not a deliberate attempt to conceal anything. It also suggests that the investigation was routine and boring when in fact it had significant political implications for Biden. The author uses emotional manipulation by portraying Biden as an innocent, elderly man who cannot remember things, rather than a politician who is trying to avoid accountability.
The article states that Hur described Biden as
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that Hur's description of Biden's demeanor as a 'well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory' would infuriate Biden's aides. This statement implies that the author has insider knowledge and therefore his opinion should be taken as fact. However, this is not supported by any evidence or citation in the article.
Hur’s description of Biden’s demeanor as a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” would infuriate Biden’s aides.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts the president as an elderly man with a poor memory, which is not supported by evidence presented in the interview. Additionally, there are instances where the author implies that President Biden's handling of classified documents was due to his age rather than intentional mishandling.
The article describes President Biden as a 'well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory'
The author uses language such as 'ostensible memory problems' which implies that the president's handling of classified documents was due to his age rather than intentional mishandling.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in the article. The author Matt Viser has a personal relationship with Bob Bauer who is mentioned as having been involved in the investigation into former President Donald Trump.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
Matt Viser has conflicts of interest on the topics of Biden, Hamas, Middle East and classified documents. He also has a personal relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu.
