Prince Harry to Receive Controversial Pat Tillman Award at 2024 ESPYs for Invictus Games Work with Veterans

Los Angeles, California, California United States of America
Criticism from some quarters due to Prince Harry's polarizing status and controversy surrounding his royal life
ESPN honors Prince Harry for making a positive impact on veteran community through Invictus Games
Mary Tillman, Pat Tillman's mother, criticizes ESPN's decision to honor Prince Harry with her son's award
Previous recipients include team members of US football team Buffalo Bills training staff who saved a player's life on the field and Marcus Rashford, a British football player and campaigner
Prince Harry to receive Pat Tillman Award at 2024 ESPYs for Invictus Games work with veterans
Prince Harry to Receive Controversial Pat Tillman Award at 2024 ESPYs for Invictus Games Work with Veterans

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is set to receive the Pat Tillman Award at the 2024 ESPYs for his work with injured veterans through the Invictus Games. However, this decision has been met with criticism from some quarters due to Prince Harry's polarizing status and controversy surrounding his royal life.

Pat Tillman was an American football player who gave up his professional career after 9/11 to enlist in the US army. He served in Iraq and then Afghanistan, where he was killed by friendly fire in 2004. The Pat Tillman Award is usually given to unsung heroes who embody courage, perseverance, and service.

ESPN announced that Prince Harry is being honored for his tireless work in making a positive impact for the veteran community through the power of sport with his Invictus Games. However, some believe that there are more deserving individuals who should have been considered instead.

Mary Tillman, Pat Tillman's mother, has criticized ESPN's decision to honor Prince Harry with her son's award. She told the Daily Mail that she was shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award. She also pointed out that there are individuals working in the veteran community who are doing tremendous things to assist veterans, but do not have the same level of resources, connections or privilege as Prince Harry.

Previous recipients of the ESPY Pat Tillman award include team members of US football team Buffalo Bills training staff who saved a player's life on the field and Marcus Rashford, a British football player and campaigner. Retired US army Sergeant Major Gretchen Evans, who suffered traumatic brain injury and founded adaptive racing squad Team Unbroken, is also among the previous recipients.

ESPN VP of Production Kate Jackson touted the honorees as individuals who have used their platforms to change the world and make it more inclusive for marginalized and suffering communities. However, some in the sports world have criticized ESPN's decision to honor Prince Harry with this award, labeling it embarrassing.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there more deserving individuals who should have been considered for the Pat Tillman Award instead of Prince Harry?
  • Is it appropriate for Prince Harry to receive an award named after Pat Tillman, given his polarizing status and controversy surrounding his royal life?

Sources

94%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Mother of slain US hero Pat Tillman slams decision to honor Prince Harry with son's award: 'I am shocked'

New York Post Ronny Reyes Sunday, 30 June 2024 16:02
  • Unique Points
    • Mary Tillman, the mother of US hero and former NFL player Pat Tillman, criticized ESPN’s decision to honor Prince Harry with the Pat Tillman Award.
    • Prince Harry is already well-known and has received numerous awards throughout his life, so Mary Tillman believes someone less famous should have been considered.
    • ESPN chose Prince Harry for his work in launching the Invictus Games, which serve as multi-sport events for wounded or injured servicemen and veterans. However, this decision has been met with criticism due to Prince Harry’s polarizing status.
    • Pat Tillman enlisted in the US Army following the September 11 terrorist attack and served in Iraq and Afghanistan, giving up a lucrative career as a player for the Arizona Cardinals.
  • Accuracy
    • Prince Harry is being honoured for his 'tireless work in making a positive impact for the veteran community through the power of sport' with his Invictus Games.
    • Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPY awards for his work with injured veterans through the Invictus Games.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a clear bias against Prince Harry being given the Pat Tillman Award by quoting Mary Tillman's statements about being shocked and confused as to why he was chosen. The author also quotes Pat McAfee's criticism of ESPN for selecting Harry. No other biases were found.
    • Mary Tillman said she was shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award.
      • Pat McAfee accused his own network of ‘trying to piss people off’ for picking Prince Harry.
        • The mother of US hero and former NFL player Pat Tillman slammed ESPN’s decision to honor Prince Harry with the award named after her son.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        52%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        Prince Harry's ESPYs Award Labeled 'Embarrassing,' Gets Called Into Question By ESPN's Pat McAfee

        Entertainment Variety Tv Site: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv-site/ Favour Adegoke Sunday, 30 June 2024 19:26
        • Unique Points
          • Prince Harry is set to receive the Pat Tillman Award at the 2024 ESPYs for his service in the British Armed Forces and his work with the Invictus Games Foundation.
        • Accuracy
          • ESPN’s Pat McAfee has criticized the decision to award Prince Harry, stating that they are trying to
          • Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPY awards for his work with injured veterans through the Invictus Games.
        • Deception (30%)
          The author, Favour Adegoke, uses emotional manipulation and sensationalism in this article. The title itself is sensational and designed to grab the reader's attention with phrases like 'Prince Harry’s ESPYs Award Labeled “Embarrassing,” Gets Called Into Question By ESPN’s Pat McAfee'. The author then quotes Pat McAfee making derogatory statements about Prince Harry being awarded the Pat Tillman Award, implying that it's an embarrassment and a mistake. The author also uses emotional language like 'probably the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen in my entire life' and 'trying to p-ss people off'. These are all examples of emotional manipulation.
          • Pat McAfee criticized the ESPYs for shortlisting Prince Harry amongst the nominees to be honored with the Pat Tillman awards, claiming that they didn’t do their due diligence in the selection process.
          • McAfee’s castmate Boston Connor described Harry’s nomination as probably the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen in my entire life.
          • He then wondered why the ESPYs do this sh-t.
          • How about it's like ESPY for a royal family member who doesn’t want to be called royal family member who loves sports.
          • When you do something like this, you know the immediate reaction from humans and sports fans and like people with common sense and brains is going to be like ‘Hey, don’t be putting our f---ing guy with that guy.’
          • Prince Harry is set to receive the prestigious Pat Tillman Award at the 2024 ESPYs for his service in the British Armed Forces and his work with the Invictus Games Foundation. Despite his achievements, the Duke of Sussex has already been met with criticism for being shortlisted for the award.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The author, Favour Adegoke, uses inflammatory rhetoric by quoting Pat McAfee and Boston Connor's derogatory comments about Prince Harry receiving the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPYs. They also appeal to authority by quoting McAfee's criticism of the ESPYs selection process without providing any evidence or context.
          • "probably the most embarrassing thing I've seen in my entire life,"
          • 'Hey, don't be putting our f---ing guy with that guy.'
        • Bias (10%)
          The author expresses a clear bias against Prince Harry receiving the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPYs. The author quotes Pat McAfee and Boston Connor making derogatory statements about Prince Harry's nomination and questioning why he was chosen over American veterans. The author also shares their own opinion that the decision to award Prince Harry is an attempt to 'p-ss people off'.
          • Boston Connor described Harry's nomination as 'probably the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen in my entire life.'
            • Pat McAfee claimed that the ESPYs weren't thrilled about Harry's nomination for the award.
              • The author questions why American veterans were not considered for the award instead of Prince Harry.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              69%

              The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
              (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

              A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

              Backlash grows after Prince Harry wins award set up to honour war hero

              Daily Mail Caroline Graham Saturday, 29 June 2024 23:58
              • Unique Points
                • Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPY Awards in Hollywood next month.
                • Pat Tillman served in Iraq and Afghanistan where he was killed by friendly fire in 2004.
                • ESPN stated that Prince Harry is being honoured for his 'tireless work in making a positive impact for the veteran community through the power of sport' with his Invictus Games.
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (25%)
                The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of Prince Harry being unsuitable for the award. The author also uses emotional manipulation by quoting the mother of a war hero expressing her disappointment and using sensational language such as 'backlash grows' and 'controversial and divisive individual'. The article also implies facts without linking to peer-reviewed studies or retracted sources.
                • He publicly disrespected his family, ran away from service to his country as a royal… He is unworthy of this award.
                • It says: ‘Awarding this honour to someone who does not reflect the award’s intent diminishes its value and disrespects Tillman’s memory.’
                • The decision to honour him has led to a backlash.
              • Fallacies (75%)
                The author commits an appeal to emotion fallacy by using the emotional reaction of Pat Tillman's mother and others to criticize Prince Harry's receipt of the award. They also commit a hasty generalization fallacy by assuming that because Harry is divisive, he is not deserving of the award.
                • But the decision to honour him has led to a backlash.
                • It says: ‘Awarding this honour to someone who does not reflect the award’s intent diminishes its value and disrespects Tillman’s memory.’
                • He publicly disrespected his family, ran away from service to his country as a royal… He is unworthy of this award.
              • Bias (50%)
                The author expresses a clear bias against Prince Harry by quoting individuals who criticize his receipt of the Pat Tillman Award and stating that he is 'divisive' and 'unworthy' of the award. The author does not provide any counter-arguments or context to balance out these quotes.
                • But the decision to honour him has led to a backlash.
                  • He publicly disrespected his family, ran away from service to his country as a royal… He is unworthy of this award.
                    • It says: ‘Awarding this honour to someone who does not reflect the award’s intent diminishes its value and disrespects Tillman’s memory.’
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    88%

                    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                    Prince Harry award challenged by family of war hero

                    The Daily Telegraph Telegraph Reporters Sunday, 30 June 2024 00:00
                    • Unique Points
                      • Prince Harry will receive the Pat Tillman Award at the ESPY awards for his work with injured veterans through the Invictus Games.
                      • ESPN announced that Prince Harry is one of the ‘incredible individuals’ being honored at the 2024 ESPYs for his work with marginalized and suffering communities.
                    • Accuracy
                      • ,
                    • Deception (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Fallacies (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Bias (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication