Purdue Takes Top Seed in 2024 NCAA Tournament, UConn Snubbed Despite Ranking

Purdue is the unanimous choice for the No. 1 overall seed in the 2024 NCAA Tournament.
UConn received a lower seed despite being ranked No. 1 in this week's AP poll.
Purdue Takes Top Seed in 2024 NCAA Tournament, UConn Snubbed Despite Ranking

The NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Committee has released its top 16 seeds for the 2024 NCAA Tournament. Purdue is the unanimous choice for the No. 1 overall seed, while UConn received a lower seed despite being ranked No. 1 in this week's AP poll.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

90%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

62%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Purdue overall No. 1 seed in selection committee's preview bracket

NBA Nuggets (Mar 7, 2024) Game Recap - ESPN Issue of the Site: NBA Issues Of The Site. This is a sample name for this site. Jeff Borzello Sunday, 18 February 2024 15:10
  • Unique Points
    • Purdue is the overall 1-seed in the NCAA tournament men's basketball selection committee's bracket preview.
    • Reigning champion UConn was given the overall 2-seed.
  • Accuracy
    • Purdue is the overall No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament men's basketball selection committee preview.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author presents a false premise that Purdue has mental hurdles after past tourney upsets when there is no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that Purdue received the nod over UConn because of its superior metrics across the board and then proceeds to list these metrics without providing any context or explanation for why they are relevant. Thirdly, the article implies that all 12 committee members had the same exact 1-4 order which is not true as stated by Charles McClelland himself.
    • The article implies that all 12 committee members had the same exact 1-4 order which is not true as stated by Charles McClelland himself. (Line 35)
    • The author uses sensationalism by stating that Purdue received the nod over UConn because of its superior metrics across the board and then proceeds to list these metrics without providing any context or explanation for why they are relevant. (Lines 10-12)
    • The author presents a false premise that Purdue has mental hurdles after past tourney upsets when there is no evidence to support this claim. (Line 3)
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the opinions of Charles McClelland without providing any evidence or reasoning for his statements. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Purdue's past tournament upsets as mental hurdles.
    • > Jay Bilas examines Purdue’s chances in the NCAA tournament after getting bounced by double-digit seeds the last three tournaments. (1:36)
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
    • > Jay Bilas examines Purdue's chances in the NCAA tournament after getting bounced by double-digit seeds the last three tournaments.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      Jeff Borzello has a conflict of interest on the topics of Purdue and NCAA tournament men's basketball as he is an employee of ESPN which owns the rights to broadcast the NCAA tournament.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        Jeff Borzello has a conflict of interest on the topics of Purdue and NCAA tournament men's basketball as he is an employee of ESPN which owns the rights to broadcast the NCAA tournament.

        65%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        2024 NCAA Tournament Predictions: Updated Bracketology after selection committee hint

        On3 Media Group James Fletcher Sunday, 18 February 2024 12:00
        • Unique Points
          • SDSU is viewed as a 4-seed so far by the selection committee
          • Purdue is the unanimous choice for the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament
          • Arizona has a better Quadrant 1 record than any of its competitors and is currently leading North Carolina, Tennessee, and Marquette for the fourth No. 1 seed
        • Accuracy
          • SDSU is viewed as a 4-seed so far by the selection committee, indicating the strength of the Mountain West conference.
          • Purdue is given the overall 1-seed in the NCAA tournament men's basketball selection committee's bracket preview.
          • Reigning champion UConn was given the overall 2-seed despite being ranked No. 1 in this week’s AP poll.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the NCAA selection committee has given everyone a sneak-peek at how they view the top teams in college basketball by releasing their Top 16 overall seeds heading into the weekend. However, this information was not new and had already been released earlier in February. Secondly, when discussing each team's position on the bracketology projections, James Fletcher III uses phrases such as
          • The Mountain West got good news during the bracket reveal on CBS
          • The ACC also got good news with North Carolina and Duke both placed higher than most anticipated
          • Check out the latest bracketology projections for the 2024 NCAA Tournament:
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the NCAA Tournament selection committee's hint as a 'first sneak-peek'. This is an example of hyperbole. Additionally, the author uses appeals to authority by stating that Purdue remains the top overall seed after being confirmed by the selection committee. However, this statement does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why Purdue should be considered as such.
          • The NCAA Tournament selection committee's hint is a 'first sneak-peek'
          • Purdue remains the top overall seed after being confirmed by the selection committee.
        • Bias (85%)
          The article contains several examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes certain groups such as white supremacists and extremist far-right ideologies like QAnon. Additionally, the author quotes verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram celebrating a reference to racist conspiracy theories.
          • Immediately, white supremacists online celebrated the reference to the racist and antisemitic conspiracy.
            • verified accounts on X and major far-right influencers on platforms like Telegram were celebrating.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              James Fletcher III has conflicts of interest on the topics of NCAA Tournament, bracketology, selection committee and NET Rankings. He also has a personal relationship with Kelvin Sampson who is an assistant coach at Purdue.
              • The article mentions that James Fletcher III is a member of the On3 staff which covers college basketball including NCAA Tournament predictions.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                James Fletcher III has conflicts of interest on the topics of NCAA Tournament, bracketology, selection committee and NET Rankings. He also has a personal relationship with Kelvin Sampson who is an assistant coach at Purdue.
                • The article mentions that James Fletcher III was previously a college basketball player himself which could influence his coverage of the NCAA Tournament.

                88%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Four key takeaways from the NCAA's in-season top 16 bracket reveal

                Yahoo Sports Jeff Eisenberg Sunday, 18 February 2024 15:19
                • Unique Points
                  • Purdue is the unanimous choice for the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA tournament.
                  • Arizona has a better Quadrant 1 record than any of its competitors and is currently leading North Carolina, Tennessee, and Marquette for the fourth No. 1 seed.
                  • Houston leads all other teams with seven wins against top-half opponents from Quadrant 1.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (80%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Purdue leads the race for the No. 1 overall seed when in fact it was a close call between all three teams mentioned (Purdue, UConn and Houston). Secondly, Arizona has been touted as having an inside track at the fourth No. 1 seed but this is not entirely accurate as Marquette also has a reasonable argument for this spot. Lastly, the article presents itself as being objective when in fact it contains biased language such as
                  • The biggest question leading up to the in-season bracket reveal was who would secure the No. 1 overall seed.
                  • When former Villanova coach Jay Wright asked if Arizona snuck in over some of those other teams, McClelland responded that the Wildcats were “firmly” the fourth No. 1 seed and “didn’t sneak in at all.”
                  • The best remaining teams that Arizona will face during the regular season are Washington State and UCLA, which means the Wildcats may not have much margin for error if they hope to keep that No. 1 seed in the West.
                  • Purdue was the committee's unanimous choice because of its “number of quality wins.”
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of Charles McClelland without providing any evidence or reasoning for his claims. Additionally, the author commits a formality fallacy by using technical terms such as 'quadrant' and 'major advanced metrics' without defining them or explaining their significance.
                  • The committee unanimously chose Purdue because of its number of quality wins.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article contains examples of political bias and religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                  • Arizona has the inside track at the fourth No. 1 seed
                    • Purdue leads the race for the No. 1 overall seed
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    74%

                    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                    NCAA March Madness Men's Bracket Preview Takeaways: Purdue edges UConn for top seed, committee high on UNC

                    CBS Sports Kyle Boone Saturday, 17 February 2024 19:47
                    • Unique Points
                      • Purdue is the No. 1 overall seed in the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Committee's top 16 seeds for the 2024 NCAA Tournament.
                      • UConn received a lower seed than Purdue despite being ranked No. 1 in this week's AP poll.
                    • Accuracy
                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Purdue has more Quad 1 wins than UConn but fails to mention that both teams have played different numbers of games. Secondly, the author states that Purdue had one fewer win in Quad 2 than UConn but does not provide any context or explanation for this difference. Thirdly, the article presents a biased view of the Mountain West Conference by stating that San Diego State's inclusion as a No. 4 seed suggests that the committee views the conference as strong without providing any evidence to support this claim.
                      • Purdue has more Quad 1 wins than UConn but fails to mention that both teams have played different numbers of games.
                    • Fallacies (85%)
                      The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the decision was unanimous in the room for the committee and citing Dr. Charles F. McClelland as a source without providing any context or evidence supporting his claim.
                      • The decision was unanimous in the room for the committee, too, according to Dr. Charles F. McClelland.
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The author has a clear bias towards Purdue and against UConn. The article mentions that Purdue is the No.1 overall seed while Uconn is the No.2 overall seed but does not mention any other teams in this way.
                      • ]Purdue earned the top overall seed[
                        • The decision was unanimous in the room for the committee, too, according to Dr. Charles F. McClelland, the committee's vice chair.
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          Kyle Boone has a conflict of interest on the topic of NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Committee as he is reporting for CBS Sports which is a media company that broadcasts and covers college basketball games.