Android Authority published article claiming Rabbit R1 interface can be installed on Google Pixel 6a using APK file
Importance of transparency and honesty in tech marketing highlighted by controversy
Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu denies claims, stating rabbit OS and LAM run on cloud with customized AOSP and firmware modifications
Rabbit R1 virtual assistant under scrutiny for being an Android app in disguise
Some tech experts remain skeptical about Rabbit R1's capabilities due to fast-draining battery issue and potential lack of unique features as an app
Rabbit, a tech company known for its AI-powered devices, has been under scrutiny lately due to claims that its latest product, the Rabbit R1 virtual assistant, is just a glorified Android app. The controversy began when Android Authority published an article stating that they were able to install and run the Rabbit R1 interface on a Google Pixel 6a using an APK file. This revelation raised questions about the unique value proposition of the Rabbit R1 and whether it was worth its $199 price tag.
In response to these allegations, Rabbit CEO Jesse Lyu issued a statement denying that the R1 was an Android app. According to Lyu, rabbit OS and LAM (the operating system and language model powering the R1) run on the cloud with customized AOSP (Android Open Source Project) and firmware modifications. He also warned against using unofficial APKs or websites, as they carry significant risks of data theft.
Despite Lyu's denial, some tech experts remain skeptical about the R1's capabilities. They argue that if the interface can be run on a smartphone, then it may not offer enough unique features to justify its existence as a standalone device. Others point out that the fast-draining battery issue, which has been addressed in a recent software update, could have been avoided if the R1 was simply an app.
The controversy surrounding the Rabbit R1 highlights the importance of transparency and honesty in tech marketing. As consumers become increasingly aware of deceptive practices, companies must be upfront about their products' capabilities and limitations to maintain trust and credibility.
Rabbit CEO, Jesse Lyu, defended the device's bespoke code that requires Rabbit’s own hardware.
Connecting to apps like Spotify is an intense hassle with Rabbit R1’s voice and single button controls.
Accuracy
Rabbit R1 is not an Android app.
Rabbit R1 is an AI-powered handheld gadget that runs Android under the hood.
Rabbit R1 was discovered to be running as an Android app on a Google Pixel 6A by Mishaal Rahman.
Deception
(30%)
The author makes selective statements about the Rabbit R1's capabilities and downplays its ability to function as an app. He also uses emotional manipulation by implying that those who have managed to run the Rabbit OS on other devices are 'passionate' individuals who are trying to 'get a taste of [Rabbit's] AI and LAM'.
But let’s ignore the Rabbit on Android debate. That’s not really the point. As Rahman himself said, tons of startups get their projects off the ground by relying on good ol’ AOSP with hardware that already supports the Android ecosystem.
To clear any misunderstanding and set the record straight, rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with very bespoke AOSP and lower level firmware modifications, therefore a local bootleg APK without the proper OS and Cloud endpoints won’t be able to access our service. Rabbit OS is customized for r1 and we do not support third-party clients.
The Rabbit R1 doesn’t have a lot of capabilities that your phone already has. It doesn’t send emails for you. It can’t set calendar reminders or alarms.
Fallacies
(85%)
The author makes an appeal to authority when quoting Rabbit's CEO Jesse Lyu defending the Rabbit R1 as not being an Android app and requiring Rabbit's own hardware. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the device as 'terrible', 'very, very limited', and a 'hassle'.
“Rabbit r1 is not an Android app.”
“To clear any misunderstanding and set the record straight, rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with very bespoke AOSP and lower level firmware modifications, therefore a local bootleg APK without the proper OS and Cloud endpoints won’t be able to access our service. Rabbit OS is customized for r1 and we do not support third-party clients.”
“It can answer basic questions and offer a bit more nuance on some queries than Siri.”
“My colleague Dua Rashid will have her full thoughts on the Rabbit R1 this week, but after using it for a brief time, I can say that if it was an app, I wouldn’t even bother downloading it.”
Bias
(95%)
The author expresses a negative opinion towards the Rabbit R1 device and its capabilities, implying that it is not worth the asking price. The author also quotes other tech bloggers who have managed to run Rabbit's OS on Android devices and questions the legitimacy of Rabbit's claims about its bespoke code requiring specific hardware. This can be seen as an attempt to discredit the company and their product, which could be considered monetary bias.
But let’s ignore the Rabbit on Android debate. That’s not really the point. As Rahman himself said, tons of startups get their projects off the ground by relying on good ol’ AOSP with hardware that already supports the Android ecosystem. The Rabbit runs on the Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, a five-year-old ARM-based mobile CPU that can support LGE radio with up to 300 Mbps download speeds. Is that bad? No, not necessarily.
I’d be very concerned about asking it for any important information like where the nearest hospital is.
The issue isn’t that the Rabbit is somehow scamming people with a fake phone, it’s more that it seems Rabbit should have waited before putting out its first product.
The Rabbit R1 is an AI-powered handheld gadget that runs Android under the hood.
The entire interface of the Rabbit R1 is handled by a single Android app.
Rabbit’s founder and CEO, Jesse Lyu, stated that rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with bespoke AOSP and firmware modifications.
Accuracy
Rabbit R1 is not an Android app.
Rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with bespoke AOSP and firmware modifications.
Rabbit OS and LAM run on the cloud with customized AOSP and lower level firmware modifications.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(95%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states 'Rabbit has reached out to Android Authority with a statement from its founder and CEO, Jesse Lyu.' This statement is used as evidence that the Rabbit R1's interface is not an app. However, this does not negate the fact that the article provides evidence that the interface appears to be handled by an Android app. Additionally, there are no other fallacies found in the article.
Rabbit has reached out to Android Authority with a statement from its founder and CEO, Jesse Lyu.
Rabbit R1 was discovered to be running as an Android app on a Google Pixel 6A by Mishaal Rahman.
Rabbit founder and CEO Jesse Lyu denies that Rabbit R1 is an Android app, stating it runs on customized cloud-based software with firmware modifications.
Rabbit R1 has faced criticism for its fast-draining battery issue, which has been addressed in a recent software update.
The existence of Rabbit R1 being just an app raises questions about its usefulness when phones already exist.
Accuracy
Rabbit R1 is not an Android app.
The Rabbit R1 is an AI-powered handheld gadget that runs Android under the hood.
Rabbit R1 runs Android under the hood and is powered by a single app.
Deception
(80%)
The author makes editorializing comments throughout the article, such as 'Oh boy.' and 'But the bigger problem is that the R1 just doesn't do enough useful things to justify its existence when, you know, phones exist.' These comments are not factual statements and are intended to manipulate the reader's emotions. The author also selectively reports information by focusing on the negative aspects of the Rabbit R1 and ignoring its potential benefits.
Oh boy.
But the bigger problem is that the R1 just doesn’t do enough useful things to justify its existence when, you know, phones exist.
Fallacies
(95%)
The author makes a comparison of Rabbit R1 to an Android app (dichotomous depiction), but the author does not state that Rabbit R1 is an Android app. The author also quotes Rahman stating that some functions may fail without proper permissions, which is a valid observation. The author's statement about the R1 not doing enough useful things to justify its existence is an opinion and not a fallacy.
]Turns out the Rabbit R1 was just an Android app all along[
:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25415491/DSC08587.JPG)
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25415491/DSC08587.JPG)
