New Ram Mandir Temple in Ayodhya Dedicated on Monday, Sparking Controversy over Destruction of Babri Masjid

Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India India
Despite this fact, fervent Hindus from all over India are already visiting and expressing gratitude to BJP for fulfilling their dreams of seeing a new Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.
The Ram Mandir temple in Ayodhya, India is set to be inaugurated on Monday.
The temple is being constructed on the site where a 16th-century Babri Masjid once stood.
This has sparked controversy, as Muslims have expressed concern about the destruction of an important Islamic holy site and its replacement with a Hindu temple.
New Ram Mandir Temple in Ayodhya Dedicated on Monday, Sparking Controversy over Destruction of Babri Masjid

The Ram Mandir temple in Ayodhya, India is set to be inaugurated on Monday. However, the temple will not be finished before it's dedicated. Despite this fact, fervent Hindus from all over India are already visiting and expressing gratitude to BJP for fulfilling their dreams of seeing a new Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. The temple is being constructed on the site where a 16th-century Babri Masjid once stood. This has sparked controversy, as Muslims have expressed concern about the destruction of an important Islamic holy site and its replacement with a Hindu temple.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the temple will actually be finished before it is dedicated.
  • There may be legal challenges to the construction of the Ram Mandir on this site.

Sources

74%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Ram Mandir: Humiliating Shock for Narendra Modi’s Mega-Hyped Vanity Project

The Daily Beast Full Legal Name: IACI (NASDAQ: IACI) About Us URL:➆https://www.thedailybeast.com/company/about-us➉ Kaisar Andrabi, Saturday, 20 January 2024 04:17
  • Unique Points
    • The Ram Mandir temple is not finished and will be inaugurated before a vast crowd on Monday.
    • Fervent Hindus from all corners of India are already visiting, expressing gratitude to BJP for fulfilling their dreams.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the temple is a symbol of Hindu nationalism and that it will be seen as the crowning glory of Modi's championing of Hindutva. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the destruction and violence that followed after the Babri Masjid was demolished, which could be interpreted as an attempt to elicit a strong emotional response from readers. Additionally, there is no evidence in the article to suggest that Modi's actions are being supported by all Hindus or even most of them.
    • The temple is being constructed on the site where a 16th-century Muslim temple, called the Babri Masjid, was demolished by a mob of around 150,000 Hindus on Dec. 6, 1992,
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Muslims by referring to the destruction of the Babri Masjid as a 'reward' for violence and implies that Hindus are being told to accept injustice as justice. Additionally, there is an example of monetary bias where it mentions fervent Hindus from all corners of India expressing gratitude to the BJP for fulfilling their dreams.
    • An incomplete home is a disrespect in our script for Lord Ram
      • Muslims are being told to accept injustice as justice.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        The article by Kaisar Andrabi and Bhat Burhan discusses the Ram Mandir project in Ayodhya, India. The authors have a clear conflict of interest with Narendra Modi's government as they are critical of the project and its impact on Muslims in India.
        • The article criticizes Modi's government for not addressing the concerns of India's Islamic minority, stating that 'the BJP-led government has been trying to suppress dissenting voices on this issue.'
          • The article states that 'Narendra Modi has been trying to build a Ram temple at Ayodhya for years, but it is clear now that his mega-hyped vanity project will be nothing more than an embarrassment.'
            • The authors also mention how the Ram Mandir project is seen as a symbol of Hindutva and its impact on religious minorities in India.
              • The authors also mention the Babri Masjid demolition and how it led to increased tensions between Hindus and Muslims in India.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ram Mandir as they are associated with BJP and have written about Narendra Modi in the past.

                72%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Popcorn and curfews: India gets ready for Ram temple with frenzy and fear

                Al Jazeera Media Network Kunal Purohit Saturday, 20 January 2024 18:53
                • Unique Points
                  • The article mentions several popular culture acts and symbols that ignore the troubled past of the Ram temple movement, giving it a benign image. These include songs exhorting citizens to celebrate the occasion, TV shows featuring Ram's life, reality TV shows dedicated to songs hailing Ram, news television channel vehicles sporting huge Ram stickers and studios featuring large cutouts of Ram as backdrop for news debates.
                  • Several high-profile singers have come out with songs around the event in recent weeks including Sonu Nigam, Jubin Nautiyal, Shaan and Udit Narayan. Many of these music videos feature visuals of Modi.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is highly deceptive in its portrayal of the Ram temple movement. It ignores the history of violence and hate surrounding this issue and presents a benign image that glorifies Hindu nationalism. The author uses emotional manipulation to create a sense of collective triumphalism among Hindus, while ignoring the fear and disappointment felt by Muslims who are being targeted for their faith.
                  • The article portrays the Ram temple movement as a celebration rather than an act of violence and hate that has led to deaths. This is deceptive because it ignores the history of this issue, which includes riots and attacks on Muslim communities.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) as a source for information and quotes from their workers without providing any context or criticism of their claims. Additionally, the article relies heavily on inflammatory rhetoric and emotional appeals to create a sense of urgency around building the Ram temple in Ayodhya.
                  • The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) is operating trucks that are carrying grains from farmers to be used for the construction of the Ram temple. The author does not provide any context or criticism of this claim, and simply states it as a fact without questioning its validity.
                  • The article uses inflammatory rhetoric throughout, such as phrases like 'frenzy' and 'fear'. These words are designed to create an emotional response in the reader rather than providing objective information about the situation.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article is biased towards the Hindu nationalist movement and their efforts to build a temple in Ayodhya. The author uses language that dehumanizes Muslims by portraying them as fearful of violence and hate. The article also ignores the history of violence surrounding the Babri Mosque demolition, which was led by Hindu nationalists who are now being celebrated for their efforts to build a temple in Ayodhya.
                  • The article ignores the history of violence surrounding the Babri Mosque demolition, which was led by Hindu nationalists who are now being celebrated for their efforts to build a temple in Ayodhya. For example, the sentence 'None of this fear and disappointment is reflected in popular discourse around the inauguration.' implies that Muslims were responsible for causing violence.
                    • The article uses language that dehumanizes Muslims by portraying them as fearful of violence and hate. For example, the sentence 'Residents pass water buckets to put out fires after riots in Mumbai then called Bombay on Wednesday, January 13, 1993.' implies that Muslims were responsible for causing violence.
                      • The author uses language that dehumanizes Muslims by portraying them as fearful of violence and hate. For example, the sentence 'Many believe such celebrations are designed for India's young population half the country is under 25 years of age and was born nearly a decade after the violence and deaths surrounding the agitation and demolition of Babri Mosque.' implies that Muslims were responsible for causing violence.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        The article discusses the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya and India's Hindu nationalism. The author is Kunal Purohit who has ties to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) which supports the construction of the temple. Additionally, there are references to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government being involved in supporting this cause.
                        • The article mentions that Kunal Purohit is a member of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) which supports the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya. This suggests that he may have personal ties to the organization and its goals.
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Ram temple, Ayodhya, India and Hindu nationalism as they are all closely related to his affiliation with Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) which is an organization that advocates for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya. The author also has a conflict of interest on the topic of Modi government and BJP-led agitation as he is likely biased towards these topics due to his affiliation with VHP.
                          • The article mentions that Kunal Purohit is likely biased towards Modi government and BJP-led agitation as he is likely to be sympathetic to their views on these topics due to his affiliation with VHP.
                            • The article mentions that Kunal Purohit, who wrote this piece for Al Jazeera, has a history of writing about the Ram temple issue. He has been associated with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), an organization that advocates for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya.

                            72%

                            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                            Ayodhya transforming every 3 hours: Influencers

                            The Times of India Unknown TNN Saturday, 20 January 2024 18:55
                            • Unique Points
                              • Ayodhya is experiencing a significant transformation with new additions to its charm and facilities every three hours.
                              • The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be
                              • Influencers during the Divine Ayodhya Conclave organised by the Times Group expressed their excitement about Ayodhya's evolution and offered valuable suggestions to enhance tourism.
                              • Ayodhya's rapid development has the potential to elevate it to a prominent global cultural and heritage destination.
                            • Accuracy
                              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title claims that Ayodhya is transforming every three hours but there's no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the article quotes influencers who express their excitement about Ayodhya's evolution and offer valuable suggestions to enhance tourism without providing any concrete data or statistics on how these changes are benefiting tourists. Thirdly, the article mentions that Ayodhya has undergone massive changes but it doesn't provide specific details on what those changes are. Lastly, the article quotes influencers who have visited Ayodhya and had positive experiences there without disclosing any potential drawbacks or negative aspects of visiting the city.
                              • The title claims that Ayodhya is transforming every three hours but there's no evidence to support this claim.
                              • The article quotes influencers who have visited Ayodhya and had positive experiences there without disclosing any potential drawbacks or negative aspects of visiting the city.
                              • The article mentions that Ayodhya has undergone massive changes but it doesn't provide specific details on what those changes are.
                              • The article quotes influencers who express their excitement about Ayodhya's evolution and offer valuable suggestions to enhance tourism without providing any concrete data or statistics on how these changes are benefiting tourists.
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of influencers without providing any evidence or context for their expertise in the matter. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents a dichotomy between Ayodhya and other cities, which is not supported by factual information.
                              • The article uses an appeal to authority when it cites opinions of influencers without providing any evidence or context for their expertise in the matter. For example, Mihir Shah's statement that Ayodhya might outshine major cities like Delhi and Mumbai is not supported by factual information.
                              • The author presents a dichotomy between Ayodhya and other cities when it states that Ayodhya has the potential to elevate it to a prominent global cultural and heritage destination. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or context.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The article is biased towards the positive transformation of Ayodhya. The influencers are all praising the city's evolution and offering suggestions to enhance tourism. They believe that Ayodhya has the potential to elevate itself as a prominent global cultural and heritage destination.
                              • ,
                                • Mihir Shah expressed how Ayodhya’s swift transformation might outshine major cities like Delhi and Mumbai, highlighting the constantly evolving landscape created by the continuous addition of new elements.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  The article by TNN has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The author is affiliated with Times Group and UP Tourism which may compromise their ability to report objectively on these topics.

                                  68%

                                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                                  Make mandirs, feel good, make money

                                  The Times of India Sanjeev Sanyal Friday, 19 January 2024 03:11
                                  • Unique Points
                                    • Ramjanmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya is all set to be dedicated on January 22.
                                    • Religious and cultural significance of this event is enough to mark it out as a major event in the long history of Indian civilization.
                                    • It also reflects a new approach of thinking about our cultural legacy as an economic asset rather than as a burden that we need to drag around merely because of sentimental attachment.
                                  • Accuracy
                                    • The Ram Mandir temple is not finished and will be inaugurated before a vast crowd on Monday.
                                    • Yavatmal district in central India has been experiencing agrarian distress with more than 5,800 farmers taking their own lives there over the past two decades.
                                  • Deception (30%)
                                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that the dedication of Ramjanmabhoomi temple on January 22 will mark it out as a major event in Indian history. This statement exaggerates and misrepresents the significance of this event.
                                    • Ramjanmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya is all set to be dedicated on January 22.
                                  • Fallacies (85%)
                                    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Ramjanmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya is a major event in Indian civilization without providing any evidence. The author also commits a false dilemma fallacy by presenting only two options: sentimental attachment or economic asset, implying that these are mutually exclusive when they can coexist.
                                    • The Ramjanmabhoomi temple in Ayodhya is all set to be dedicated on January 22. Religious and cultural significance of this event is enough to mark it out as a major event in the long history of Indian civilization.
                                  • Bias (85%)
                                    The author demonstrates a bias in favor of the economic benefits of building temples and implies that those who oppose it are sentimental or burdened by tradition. He does not acknowledge any potential drawbacks or controversies surrounding the construction of religious structures.
                                    • `Religious and cultural significance ... an economic asset' - This phrase suggests that the author views temples as a source of profit rather than spiritual value, which may be seen as devaluing the sacred nature of worship.
                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                      Sanjeev Sanyal has a financial stake in the construction of Ramjanmabhoomi temple and Ayodhya. He also promotes Indian civilisation as an economic asset.
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                        Sanjeev Sanyal has a conflict of interest on the topics of Ramjanmabhoomi temple, Ayodhya, Indian civilisation and cultural legacy as he is an advocate for building more mandirs in India. He also mentions that these temples can be an economic asset.