Ramadan in Gaza: Struggling to Find Peace Amidst Ongoing Conflict and Humanitarian Crisis

Gaza, Palestine Iraq
Despite Israeli-led war on Gaza causing widespread destruction and displacement throughout the region since 2014 when Hamas attacked Israel that killed more than 1,200 people. There have been ongoing clashes between Israel and Palestine leading to an increase in violence and instability in the area.
In Gaza City's Old Town Square, a group of men gathered for prayers on Friday outside Al Aqsa Mosque due to Israeli restrictions that prevent many Palestinians from entering the compound where the mosque is located.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has led to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where many people are struggling with hunger. As Ramadan begins, Muslims around the world will be fasting during this time of year as they seek closer connection to God.
Ramadan in Gaza: Struggling to Find Peace Amidst Ongoing Conflict and Humanitarian Crisis

The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has led to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where many people are struggling with hunger. As Ramadan begins, Muslims around the world will be fasting during this time of year as they seek closer connection to God. However, for those living in Gaza, their daily struggles make it difficult to fully participate in the holiday.

The Israeli-led war on Gaza has caused widespread destruction and displacement throughout the region. The conflict began with a Hamas attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200 people. Since then, there have been ongoing clashes between Israel and Palestine, leading to an increase in violence and instability in the area.

Despite this turmoil, Muslims continue to observe Ramadan as best they can. In Gaza City's Old Town Square, a group of men gathered for prayers on Friday. They prayed outside Al Aqsa Mosque due to Israeli restrictions that prevent many Palestinians from entering the compound where the mosque is located.

The situation in Gaza has been dire for years, with more than 80% of the population displaced and pushed hundreds of thousands to brink famine. The conflict has also led to a shortage of basic necessities such as food, water, and medical supplies. Despite this, many Palestinians continue to hold onto hope that one day they will be able to live in peace without fear or violence.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if there are any specific concerns about the accuracy of information provided.

Sources

86%

  • Unique Points
    • The Israel-Hamas war has affected Muslims around the world
    • More than 31,000 Gazans have been killed according to health officials there following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200.
    • Muslims are preparing for Ramadan and fasting during this time is meant to bring them closer to God.
    • The suffering in Gaza has changed Tarifi's usually joyful mood toward Ramadan as she is mindful of how her hunger during daytime fasting will be different from hunger in Gaza where food is difficult to come by.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (80%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author does not disclose their sources or provide any quotes from them to support their claims. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'heartbreaking' and 'overwhelmed with somber moods' which are exaggerations of the situation in Gaza. Thirdly, the article presents a one-sided view of Muslims being unable to celebrate Ramadan due to the Israel-Hamas war without providing any counterarguments or perspectives from other Muslim communities who may not be affected by this conflict.
    • The author does not disclose their sources or provide any quotes from them to support their claims. This is a deceptive practice as it makes it difficult for readers to verify the accuracy of the information presented in the article.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites statistics and quotes from experts without providing any context or analysis. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the situation in Gaza as a 'war' and using words like 'heartbreaking' and 'devastating'. This creates a strong emotional response in readers rather than presenting an objective view of the issue.
    • The Israel-Hamas war has affected Muslims around the world, leaving many feeling unable to truly celebrate Ramadan. More than 31,000 Gazans have been killed according to health officials there
    • A map that includes Gaza and describes the region as Palestine sits in Hedab Tarifi's living room.
    • The suffering is especially changing Tarifi's usually joyful mood toward Ramadan.
    • In Southern California, the Pakistan American Chamber of Commerce is planning its second annual Grand L.A. Interfaith Iftar for people of many faiths to come together and celebrate the breaking of the fast (which is known as the Iftar meal).
    • Upholding the pillar of charity is difficult this year In addition to fasting, Muslims also give to charity during Ramadan.
    • Rania Sbaita wears a black sweatshirt that has the phrase 'Gaza: Soul of My Soul' printed on it in white.
    • Marwan knows their hunger this Ramadan is fundamentally different from the hunger he feels during daytime fasting.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians and portrays them as victims rather than individuals with agency. Additionally, the author quotes a Muslim woman who is deeply affected by the Israel-Hamas war and her inability to fully celebrate Ramadan due to the suffering of those in Gaza.
    • It was heartbreaking for me to see parents were fasting for their children to have food,
      • The word Palestine is on it
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      61%

      • Unique Points
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Accuracy
        • Palestinians in Gaza began fasting for the holy month of Ramadan on Monday as hunger worsens across the strip and pressure grows on Israel over the growing humanitarian crisis.
        • — The war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking around 250 hostage. Hamas is still believed to be holding around 100 captives.
        • — The war has driven around 80% of Gaza㲗s population of 2.3 million people from their homes and pushed hundreds of thousands to the brink of famine.
        • — At least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began. The ministry doesn¶t differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says that women and children make up two-thirds of the dead.
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7 and killed some civilians and took around 250 hostages. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that only civilians were killed during the attack while in reality many soldiers also died. Secondly, the article states that at least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began but does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count. This is deceptive as it implies that all those who were killed during the war were innocent civilians when in reality many of them may have been soldiers or militants. Thirdly, the article states that Hamas is still believed to be holding around 100 captives but does not provide any evidence for this claim. This is deceptive as it implies that there are still people being held by Hamas without providing any concrete information about their whereabouts or condition.
        • The article states that at least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began but does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count. This is deceptive as it implies that all those who were killed during the war were innocent civilians when in reality many of them may have been soldiers or militants.
        • The article states that the war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7 and killed some civilians and took around 250 hostage. However, this statement is misleading as it implies that only civilians were killed during the attack while in reality many soldiers also died.
        • The article states that Hamas is still believed to be holding around 100 captives but does not provide any evidence for this claim. This is deceptive as it implies that there are still people being held by Hamas without providing any concrete information about their whereabouts or condition.
      • Fallacies (70%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the United States, Qatar and Egypt had hoped to broker a cease-fire ahead of Ramadan. This statement implies that these countries have some sort of authoritative power over Israel and Hamas, which they do not necessarily possess. Additionally, there are several instances where the article uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation in Gaza as a
        • The war began when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7
        • Hamas is still believed to be holding around 100 captives.
        • Gaza's Health Ministry said that at least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began.
      • Bias (85%)
        The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Israelis by referring to them as 'Hamas-led militants' and saying they took around 250 hostage. This is a clear example of religious bias as Hamas is an Islamic extremist group and this implies that all Jews are responsible for their actions. Secondly, the author uses language that demonizes Israel by stating that it has driven around 80% of Gaza's population from their homes and pushed hundreds of thousands to the brink of famine. This is a clear example of ideological bias as it implies that Israel is solely responsible for this humanitarian crisis without mentioning any other factors such as Hamas' actions or international support. Thirdly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by stating that at least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began and women and children make up two-thirds of the dead. This is a clear example of religious bias as it implies that all Muslims are innocent victims in this conflict without mentioning any other factors such as Hamas' actions or international support. Finally, the author uses language that demonizes Israel by stating that tensions have soared in recent years as Israel has allowed increasing numbers of Jews to visit the Al-Aqsa mosque compound and stoked Palestinian fears that Israel intends to take over or partition it. This is a clear example of religious bias as it implies that all Jews are responsible for this tension without mentioning any other factors such as Hamas' actions or international support.
        • The author uses language that dehumanizes Israelis by referring to them as 'Hamas-led militants'
          • The author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by stating that at least 31,112 Palestinians have been killed since the war began and women and children make up two-thirds of the dead
            • The author uses language that demonizes Israel by stating that it has driven around 80% of Gaza's population from their homes and pushed hundreds of thousands to the brink of famine
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest found in this article. The author is biased towards Israel and against Palestinians as evidenced by the use of terms such as 'Hamas-led militants' and 'Israel hostages Palestinian prisoners'. Additionally, the article frequently mentions Hamas without disclosing any potential financial ties or personal relationships they may have with ABC News. The author also uses language that is sympathetic towards Israel and critical of Palestinians, which could be seen as a conflict of interest.
              • Hamas-led militants
                • Israel hostages Palestinian prisoners
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinians in Gaza, which is a highly sensitive and controversial topic. Additionally, the article mentions Hamas-led militants and Israeli hostages Palestinian prisoners humanitarian aid entry Gaza strip., which are also politically charged issues.
                  • Additionally, the article mentions Hamas-led militants and Israeli hostages Palestinian prisoners humanitarian aid entry Gaza strip., which are also politically charged issues.
                    • The author discusses the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinians in Gaza, which is a highly sensitive and controversial topic.

                    62%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Muslims who were prevented from entering Al Aqsa Mosque on Friday prayed instead on a sidewalk outside the Old City of Jerusalem.
                      • Israeli police forces guard many gates in the Old City and prevent some people from entering Al Aqsa Mosque, including Yousef al-Sideeq who visits every Friday to pray.
                    • Accuracy
                      • Muslims have long been a point of contention as Israel has exerted tighter control over the compound.
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses a quote from Yousef al-Sideeq to suggest that Israeli police have been preventing him from entering Al Aqsa Mosque on Fridays for no reason. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there was no justification for the restrictions imposed by Israel. In reality, Israel has exerted tighter control over the compound in recent years due to security concerns and Hamas-led attacks on Gaza. Secondly, the article uses a quote from an Israeli police spokesperson to suggest that people were being
                      • The article uses a quote from an Israeli police spokesperson to suggest that people were being
                      • The author uses a quote from Yousef al-Sideeq to suggest that Israeli police have been preventing him from entering Al Aqsa Mosque on Fridays for no reason. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that there was no justification for the restrictions imposed by Israel.
                    • Fallacies (70%)
                      The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that 'Israel has exerted tighter control over the compound in recent years' without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Israel and Palestinians as the article portrays Israeli police forces as heavily armed and preventing Muslim access to Al Aqsa Mosque while not mentioning any actions taken by Palestinian groups that may have contributed to tensions in the region.
                      • Israel has exerted tighter control over the compound in recent years
                      • The Israeli police said that people were 'centering after enhanced security checks'
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by referring to them as 'Muslims' rather than people with their own culture and beliefs. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'the Temple Mount', which is a Jewish site sacred to Jews, further perpetuates this religious bias.
                      • The article uses language that dehumanizes Palestinians by referring to them as 'Muslims'
                        • The author uses the phrase 'the Temple Mount' which is a Jewish site sacred to Jews
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        75%

                        • Unique Points
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Accuracy
                          • Israel is attacking Gaza with a surge in attacks targeting residential areas.
                          • UNRWA reports that hunger is everywhere in Gaza as Ramadan begins and calls for an immediate ceasefire during the holy month.
                        • Deception (50%)
                          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Israel's war on Gaza has been ongoing for a long time and that it is still happening. However, this information is not accurate as Ramadan began with no end to Israel's siege of Gaza yet.
                          • The article states 'Israel attacks across Gaza have surged', implying that the situation has improved when in fact it has worsened.
                        • Fallacies (80%)
                          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing UNRWA's statement that hunger is everywhere in Gaza during Ramadan. This statement is not supported by any evidence and should be treated with skepticism.
                          • > Israeli forces targetting residential areas, our correspondents on the ground report.
                        • Bias (85%)
                          The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by saying 'Palestinians in Gaza observe Ramadan in ruined mosques'. This is an example of religious bias because it implies that the Palestinians are suffering due to their faith, rather than Israel's actions. Additionally, the author uses language such as 'Israel forces targetting residential areas', which suggests a clear ideological bias against Israel and its military operations.
                          • Israel forces targetting residential areas
                            • Palestinians in Gaza observe Ramadan in ruined mosques
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication