Rams Sign Jimmy Garoppolo to One-Year Deal, Suspended for Two Games at Start of 2024 Season

Los Angeles, California United States of America
Garoppolo is suspended for two games at the start of the 2024 season due to a violation of the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances.
The Los Angeles Rams have signed quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo to a one-year deal worth $4.5 million with the possibility of earning an additional $12 million in incentives.
Rams Sign Jimmy Garoppolo to One-Year Deal, Suspended for Two Games at Start of 2024 Season

The Los Angeles Rams have signed quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo to a one-year deal worth $4.5 million with the possibility of earning an additional $12 million in incentives, according to NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport. The contract was announced on Tuesday after Garoppolo agreed to terms and filed his paperwork with the league.

Garoppolo is suspended for two games at the start of the 2024 season due to a violation of the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances. He messed up his Therapeutic Use Exemption, which led to his suspension. The Rams signed Garoppolo as their backup quarterback this offseason and he will participate in the team's offseason program before going on the suspended list for two weeks at the start of the season.

Garoppolo views playing under Sean McVay as a chance to revamp his credibility around the NFL. He originally entered the league as a second-round pick out of Eastern Illinois in 2014 and has played for three different teams throughout his career, including San Francisco from 2015 to 2018 and Las Vegas last season.

The Rams hope that Stafford will be able to play through injuries again. He missed one game in 2023 due to injury and sat out the regular season finale with a playoff ticket already punched. In 2022, he missed eight games as the Rams seasons sputtered.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

72%

  • Unique Points
    • Jimmy Garoppolo is suspended for the first two games of the 2024 season for violating the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances.
    • Garoppolo messed up his Therapeutic Use Exemption, which led to his suspension.
    • The Rams signed Garoppolo as their backup quarterback this offseason and he will participate in the team's offseason program before going on the suspended list for two weeks at the start of the season.
    • Garoppolo views playing under Sean McVay as a chance to revamp his credibility around the NFL.
    • Stafford missed one game in 2023 due to injury and sat out the regular season finale with a playoff ticket already punched. In 2022, he missed eight games as the Rams seasons sputtered.
    • The Rams hope that Stafford will be able to play through injuries again.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Garoppolo's suspension was due to a mistake with his Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE), but this contradicts previous reports stating that he had been using performance-enhancing substances for years. Secondly, the article quotes Garoppolo as saying 'I hate to joke about it', which implies that what he said was not meant to be taken seriously, despite being reported on by a reputable news outlet. Thirdly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'bad timing' and 'one of those situations', implying that Garoppolo is somehow responsible for his suspension when it is clear that this is not the case.
    • Garoppolo quotes 'I hate to joke about it', which implies that what he said was not meant to be taken seriously, despite being reported on by a reputable news outlet. This is therefore deceptive.
    • The article claims that Garoppolo's suspension was due to a mistake with his Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE), but previous reports state that he had been using performance-enhancing substances for years. This contradicts the author's claim and is therefore deceptive.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances is a valid reason for Garoppolo's suspension. The author does not provide any evidence or context about the specific substance that Garoppolo tested positive for, making this statement vague and unsupported.
    • The article states that 'I mean, just messed up the TUE,' which implies a mistake was made. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Garoppolo intentionally violated any rules or regulations.
  • Bias (85%)
    The author uses the phrase 'just messed up' to describe Garoppolo's mistake in failing to properly manage his Therapeutic Use Exemption. This is an example of language that dehumanizes and trivializes a serious issue by portraying it as something minor and unimportant.
    • I mean, just messed up the TUE,
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      Kevin Patra has a conflict of interest on the topic of performance-enhancing substances and Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) as he is reporting on Jimmy Garoppolo's suspension for using PEDs. He also reports that Garoppolo was granted a TUE, which could be seen as an endorsement or support for the use of performance-enhancing substances in sports.
      • Kevin Patra writes:
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      69%

      • Unique Points
        • Jimmy Garoppolo is suspended for two games due to violating the NFL's performance-enhancing substances policy.
        • Garoppolo signed with the Rams as a backup quarterback after being released by the Las Vegas Raiders and completing 65.1% of his passes in 2023 for 1,205 yards with seven touchdowns and nine interceptions in seven games.
      • Accuracy
        • Garoppolo messed up his Therapeutic Use Exemption, which led to his suspension.
        • NFL Media reports that Garoppolo's base pay on a one-year deal with the Rams is $4.5 million and incentives push the maximum value to $12 million.
        • Garoppolo originally entered the NFL as a second-round pick (62nd overall) out of Eastern Illinois in the 2014 NFL Draft by the Patriots.
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Garoppolo's suspension was because he 'messed up' his therapeutic use exemption when he first got to Las Vegas. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and it implies that Garoppolo intentionally violated the policy which may not be true.
        • The author claims that Garoppolo's suspension was because he 'messed up' his therapeutic use exemption when he first got to Las Vegas. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and it implies that Garoppolo intentionally violated the policy which may not be true.
        • The author states that Garoppolo had a couple of different options in free agency but talking to Rams coach Sean McVay 'really sealed the deal' on his decision to sign with Los Angeles. This statement is misleading as it implies that McVay was the only factor in Garoppolo's decision when there may have been other factors at play.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it quotes Sarah Barshop as saying that Garoppolo's two-game suspension was because he 'messed up the therapeutic use exemption'. This implies that there is some sort of objective standard for what constitutes a valid therapeutic use exemption, which may not be true. Additionally, the article contains an informal fallacy when it quotes Garoppolo saying that his suspension was because he 'messed up' the TUE without providing any context or explanation for what this means. This could potentially mislead readers into thinking that Garoppolo intentionally violated the policy, which may not be true.
        • The article quotes Sarah Barshop as saying that Garoppolo's two-game suspension was because he 'messed up the therapeutic use exemption'. This implies that there is some sort of objective standard for what constitutes a valid TUE, which may not be true.
        • The article quotes Garoppolo saying that his suspension was because he 'messed up' the TUE without providing any context or explanation for what this means. This could potentially mislead readers into thinking that Garoppolo intentionally violated the policy, which may not be true.
      • Bias (80%)
        The author uses the phrase 'messed up' to describe Garoppolo's violation of the NFL performance-enhancing substances policy. This is a biased use of language that implies that Garoppolo intentionally violated the rules and acted irresponsibly. The author also mentions that this was related to medication without a valid therapeutic use exemption, which could be seen as an attack on Garoppolo's character rather than simply reporting facts.
        • Garoppolo said he's never DŽ been in this situation before,
          • Jimmy G 'trying to stay positive' after PED suspension (0:37)
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The author of the article has a conflict of interest with respect to two topics: NFL's performance-enhancing substances policy and therapeutic use exemption. The author is an ESPN Staff Writer which may have financial ties or professional affiliations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on these topics.
            • The article also mentions therapeutic use exemption, but again provides no specific information about it. The author is an ESPN Staff Writer which may have financial ties or professional affiliations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on this topic.
              • The article mentions the NFL's performance-enhancing substances policy, but does not provide any specific information about it. The author is an ESPN Staff Writer which may have financial ties or professional affiliations that could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on this topic.
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of performance-enhancing substances policy in the NFL as they are an ESPN Staff Writer and ESPN is a media company that covers the NFL. The article also mentions therapeutic use exemption which could be related to this topic.
                • The author's affiliation with ESPN, a media company that covers the NFL, creates a conflict of interest on the topic of performance-enhancing substances policy in the league.

                63%

                • Unique Points
                  • Jimmy Garoppolo is suspended for the first two games of the 2024 season for violating the NFL's policy on performance-enhancing substances.
                  • Garoppolo messed up his Therapeutic Use Exemption, which led to his suspension.
                  • The Rams signed Garoppolo as their backup quarterback this offseason and he will participate in the team's offseason program before going on the suspended list for two weeks at the start of the season.
                  • Garoppolo views playing under Sean McVay as a chance to revamp his credibility around the NFL.
                  • Stafford missed one game in 2023 due to injury and sat out the regular season finale with a playoff ticket already punched. In 2022, he missed eight games as the Rams seasons sputtered.
                  • The Rams hope that Stafford will be able to play through injuries again.
                • Accuracy
                  • Jimmy Garoppolo had a guaranteed compensation package of $11.25 million for 2024, with another $11.25 million in non-guaranteed wages.
                  • Garoppolo might not come close to the $11.25 million guarantee that was wiped out by his PED suspension.
                  • NFL Media reports that Garoppolo's base pay on a one-year deal with the Rams is $4.5 million and incentives push the maximum value to $12 million.
                • Deception (30%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Garoppolo had a guaranteed compensation package of $11.25 million for 2024 when he actually did not have one and the numbers are finally out after five days from signing the contract with Rams.
                  • The article claims that Garoppolo had a guaranteed compensation package of $11.25 million for 2024, but this is false as there was no such guarantee.
                • Fallacies (70%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that NFL Media reports Garoppolo's base pay on a one-year deal with the Rams is $4.5 million without providing any evidence or citation for this information.
                  • NFL Media reports that Garoppolo's base pay on a one-year deal with the Rams is $4.5 million.
                • Bias (85%)
                  The author uses language that dehumanizes Garoppolo by referring to him as a 'guaranteed compensation package' and saying he won't come close to $22.5 million in 2024. The author also implies that the numbers are not worth bragging about, which is an example of disproportionate language used for one side.
                  • He won't come close to $22.5 million in 2024.
                    • Quarterback Jimmy Garoppolo had a guaranteed compensation package of $11.25 million for 2024
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author is Mike Florio who works for NBC Sports and the NFL Network which have a financial stake in the league that Jimmy Garoppolo plays for, the San Francisco 49ers.
                      • The article mentions that 'the Rams are reportedly interested in trading Matthew Stafford to make room on their roster for Jimmy Garoppolo.' This suggests that NBC Sports and/or the NFL Network may have a financial stake in the Rams, which could influence their coverage of this topic.
                        • The article states that 'Garoppolo is expected to sign a one-year deal with San Francisco worth $4.5 million, according to sources.'
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        64%

                        • Unique Points
                          • Garoppolo played for the Raiders last season and completed 67.4% of his career pass attempts with 94 touchdowns against 51 interceptions across one season in Las Vegas.
                          • He originally entered the NFL as a second-round pick (62nd overall) out of Eastern Illinois in the 2014 NFL Draft by the Patriots.
                        • Accuracy
                          • Garoppolo messed up his Therapeutic Use Exemption, which led to his suspension.
                        • Deception (0%)
                          The article is deceptive in that it presents Jimmy Garoppolo as a veteran quarterback who has played for multiple teams and had success. However, the information provided only shows his statistics from one season with the Raiders which does not accurately represent his career as a whole.
                          • The article states 'Garoppolo most recently played for the Raiders' but fails to mention that he was released by them after just 7 games. This is an example of selective reporting and omission.
                        • Fallacies (85%)
                          The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Garoppolo is a 10-year NFL veteran without providing any evidence or context for his accomplishments. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Garoppolo's performance with the Raiders as 'completing 7 touchdowns against 9 interceptions in seven games (six starts) last season'. This is an example of a dichotomous depiction fallacy where two opposing viewpoints are presented without any evidence to support either one. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Garoppolo's performance with the Raiders as 'completing 67.4 percent of his career pass attempts for 15,494 yards with 94 touchdowns against 51 interceptions across one season in Las Vegas'. This is an example of a fallacy where the author uses inflammatory language to make Garoppolo's performance seem worse than it actually was. The article also contains several examples of informal fallacies such as using vague and ambiguous language, making assumptions without evidence, and presenting information out of context.
                          • Garoppolo is a 10-year NFL veteran
                          • completing 7 touchdowns against 9 interceptions in seven games (six starts) last season
                          • 67.4 percent of his career pass attempts for 15,494 yards with 94 touchdowns against 51 interceptions across one season in Las Vegas
                        • Bias (75%)
                          The author uses language that dehumanizes Garoppolo by referring to him as a '10-year NFL veteran' and then immediately following up with his statistics from last season. This is an example of using language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                          • A 10-year NFL veteran, Garoppolo most recently played for the Raiders,
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication