Red and White Plaid Blanket Connected to Missing Teen Elijah Vue Found Weeks After Disappearance in Two Rivers, Wisconsin

Blanket discovered on Goodwin Rd east of County Road B in Manitowoc County, which is about 3.7 miles from where Elijah was last seen.
Red and white plaid blanket found weeks after Elijah Vue's disappearance is connected to him.
Red and White Plaid Blanket Connected to Missing Teen Elijah Vue Found Weeks After Disappearance in Two Rivers, Wisconsin

On March 19, the Two Rivers Police Department announced that a red and white plaid blanket found weeks after Elijah Vue's disappearance is connected to him. The blanket was discovered on Goodwin Rd east of County Road B in Manitowoc County, which is about 3.7 miles from where Elijah was last seen on February 20th.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if the blanket was intentionally left behind or if it accidentally got caught up in Elijah's disappearance.

Sources

72%

  • Unique Points
    • Missing toddler Elijah Vue's blanket found weeks after disappearance
    • Elijah Vue was reported missing from a home in northeastern Wisconsin on February 20th.
    • Jesse Vang, who is in a relationship with Elijah's mother Katrina Baur, allegedly saw Elijah asleep as he got his own son ready for school and later found him to be missing. He reportedly locked the door including using the doorknob lock, deadbolt and security chain.
    • Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Vang to learn how to 'be a man' and described him as an enforcer of rules in their relationship.
    • Two Rivers Police Chief Ben Meinnert stated that they had found a red and white plaid blanket about 3.7 miles from Vang's home earlier in the investigation which belonged to Elijah.
  • Accuracy
    • Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Jesse Vang to learn how to 'be a man'
    • Elijah's aunt Linda posted about more volunteer search efforts on Facebook.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Elijah Vue's blanket was found weeks after his disappearance when it was actually found earlier in the investigation. Secondly, Kerry Breen states that a red and white plaid blanket found earlier in this investigation was confirmed to belong to Elijah Vue but does not provide any evidence or sources for this claim. Thirdly, the article quotes local authorities stating that Baur handed Elijah over to Vang for 'discipline' without providing any context or clarification on what discipline means. Lastly, the article mentions a reward of up to $40,000 but does not provide any information on how this can be claimed.
    • The article quotes local authorities stating that Baur handed Elijah over to Vang for 'discipline' without providing any context or clarification on what discipline means.
    • The title of the article implies that Elijah Vue's blanket was found weeks after his disappearance when it was actually found earlier in the investigation.
    • Kerry Breen states that a red and white plaid blanket found earlier in this investigation was confirmed to belong to Elijah Vue but does not provide any evidence or sources for this claim.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the blanket found belongs to Elijah Vue without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Additionally, the author quotes a statement from Manitowoc County District Attorney Jacalyn LaBre about Baur's intentional actions towards Elijah, but does not provide any context or clarification on what exactly these actions were. This could be seen as an example of inflammatory rhetoric. The article also contains several examples of dichotomous depictions, such as the contrast between the initial description of Elijah and his actual clothing when he was last seen.
    • The blanket found belongs to Elijah Vue
    • Baur intentionally sent that child for disciplinary reasons for than a week to (Vang's) residence.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains a statement that Elijah Vue's blanket was found weeks after his disappearance. This is an example of monetary bias as the discovery of the blanket could potentially lead to financial rewards for those who find it.
    • > The Two Rivers Police Department said that a red and white plaid blanket found earlier in this investigation was confirmed to belong to Elijah Vue, a Wisconsin 3-year-old who went missing on February 20. <br> > An initial description of Elijah said he was last seen wearing gray pants, a long-sleeved dark shirt, and red and green dinosaur shoes.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The author of the article has multiple conflicts of interest related to the topics provided. The author reports on a missing child case and mentions several individuals involved in the investigation including local authorities, district attorneys, and family members. Additionally, the author references previous reporting by WDJT which may have influenced their coverage of this story.
      • The article mentions that Baur handed Elijah over to Vang who served six years in prison for methamphetamine distribution. This suggests a personal relationship between Baur and Vang, which could compromise her ability to report objectively on the case.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article reports that Elijah Vue was handed over to Jesse Vang by Katrina Baur and Orson Vue's intentionally sent him for disciplinary reasons. This suggests a personal relationship between the individuals involved, which could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on this topic.
        • The article reports that Elijah Vue was handed over to Jesse Vang by Katrina Baur and Orson Vue's intentionally sent him for disciplinary reasons. This suggests a personal relationship between the individuals involved, which could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially on this topic.

        70%

        • Unique Points
          • Elijah Vue was reported missing from a home in northeastern Wisconsin on February 20th.
          • Jesse Vang allegedly saw Elijah asleep as he got his own son ready for school and later found him to be missing. He reportedly locked the door including using the doorknob lock, deadbolt and security chain.
          • Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Vang to learn how to 'be a man' and described him as an enforcer of rules in their relationship.
          • Both Katrina Baur and Jesse Vang were charged with neglecting Elijah. Photographic evidence showed bruising on his jaw, neck, side and arm.
          • Two Rivers Police Chief Ben Meinnert stated that they had found a red and white plaid blanket about 3.7 miles from Vang's home earlier in the investigation which belonged to Elijah.
        • Accuracy
          • Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Jesse Vang to learn how to 'be a man' and described him as an enforcer of rules in their relationship.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Elijah Vue was last seen by Jesse Vang inside his residence. However, the article does not mention anything about any evidence linking Jesse Vang to Elijah's disappearance or why he would have taken him away from home. Secondly, the article mentions a blanket belonging to Elijah that was found near Jesse Vang's house but it does not provide any information on how this item could help in finding Elijah. Thirdly, the article states that Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Jesse Vang because he is an enforcer of rules and would teach him how to be a man. However, it does not provide any evidence or information on whether this statement is true or false.
          • The article states that Elijah was last seen by Jesse Vang inside his residence but no evidence linking Jesse Vang to Elijah's disappearance is provided.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the police's findings and statements from witnesses without providing any evidence or context for their credibility. Additionally, the author quotes a criminal complaint obtained by Nexstar WFRV last month as if it were factual information, which is not necessarily accurate or reliable. This creates a false sense of authority and trustworthiness in the article's claims.
          • The police claim that Vang had locked the door, including using the doorknob lock, a deadbolt and a security chain.
        • Bias (85%)
          The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Elijah Vue by referring to him as a 'bad behavior' child who needed correction. This is an example of religious bias because it implies that the boy was being punished for his actions, which could be seen as a form of divine retribution or punishment from God. Additionally, the author mentions that Baur and Vang were charged with neglecting Elijah and cites photographic evidence to support this claim. This is an example of monetary bias because it implies that money was being used to punish Elijah for his behavior, which could be seen as a form of punishment from God or the devil. The author also mentions that Baur and Vang were charged with neglecting Elijah and cites photographic evidence to support this claim. This is an example of monetary bias because it implies that money was being used to punish Elijah for his behavior, which could be seen as a form of punishment from God or the devil.
          • The author mentions that Baur and Vang were charged with neglecting Elijah and cites photographic evidence to support this claim. This is an example of monetary bias because it implies that money was being used to punish Elijah for his behavior, which could be seen as a form of punishment from God or the devil.
            • The author uses language that dehumanizes Elijah Vue by referring to him as a 'bad behavior' child who needed correction. This is an example of religious bias because it implies that the boy was being punished for his actions, which could be seen as a form of divine retribution or punishment from God.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            73%

            • Unique Points
              • Missing toddler Elijah Vue's blanket found weeks after disappearance
              • Elijah Vue was reported missing from a home in northeastern Wisconsin on February 20th.
              • Katrina Baur and Jesse Vang have been arrested and charged with child neglect for Elijah's disappearance.
            • Accuracy
              • Katrina Baur told authorities that she sent Elijah to stay with Jesse Vang to learn how to 'be a man'
            • Deception (50%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that a red and white plaid blanket found on Goodwin Rd east of County Road B is connected to missing child Elijah Vue without providing any evidence or context for this claim. This statement could be interpreted as factual when it may not be entirely accurate.
              • The article claims that a red and white plaid blanket found on Goodwin Rd east of County Road B is connected to missing child Elijah Vue without providing any evidence or context for this claim. This statement could be interpreted as factual when it may not be entirely accurate.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Bias (75%)
              The article contains a statement that the plaid blanket found is connected to missing child Elijah Vue. This implies a bias towards finding evidence of foul play or wrongdoing in his disappearance.
              • > Two Rivers Police announced in an update on Monday that a red and white plaid blanket that was previously found in Manitowoc County is connected to missing child Elijah Vue.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of missing child as they are reporting on Elijah Vue's case. The article mentions that police found a plaid blanket connected to the missing child which could be seen as an example of bias towards law enforcement and their efforts in finding Elijah.
                • The article mentions that police found a plaid blanket connected to the missing child which could be seen as an example of bias towards law enforcement and their efforts in finding Elijah.
                  • The article states 'Two Rivers Police have been searching for 13-year-old Elijah Vue since he went missing on Mishicot Road last week.'

                  78%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Missing toddler Elijah Vue's blanket found weeks after disappearance
                    • Elijah Vue's mother Katrina Baur and another man, Jesse Vang, were arrested and charged with child neglect on Feb. 21.
                    • Multiple agencies have been searching for Elijah since he was reported missing. Officials have searched storm sewers, landfills, rivers and more.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Elijah Vue's blanket was found nearly 4 miles from where the toddler disappeared. However, this statement is misleading because the location of the blanket does not necessarily mean anything about Elijah's current location or safety. Secondly, while it is true that Katrina Baur and Jesse Vang have been arrested and charged with child neglect, there are no details provided in the article regarding their involvement in Elijah's disappearance beyond this charge. This creates a false sense of closure for readers who may be looking for more information about what happened to Elijah. Finally, while it is true that Baur had sent Elijah to Vang for disciplinary concerns, there are no details provided in the article regarding any specific tactics or lack of care that were involved. This creates a false sense of understanding and closure without providing any actual evidence.
                    • The statement 'Elijah Vue's blanket was found nearly 4 miles from where the toddler disappeared' is misleading because it does not necessarily mean anything about Elijah's current location or safety.
                  • Fallacies (70%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article contains a statement that Katrina Baur intentionally sent Elijah for disciplinary reasons. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that the mother's actions were motivated by her beliefs and not based on objective evidence or facts.
                    • > She intentionally sent that child for disciplinary reasons.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    84%

                    • Unique Points
                      • Missing toddler Elijah Vue's blanket found weeks after disappearance
                      • Elijah Vue's mother Katrina Baur and another man, Jesse Vang, were arrested and charged with child neglect on Feb. 21.
                      • Multiple agencies have been searching for Elijah since he was reported missing. Officials have searched storm sewers, landfills, rivers and more.
                    • Accuracy
                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                    • Deception (50%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article suggests that a blanket found during the search for Elijah Vue belongs to him when it has not been confirmed yet by authorities. Secondly, there are no quotes from any sources other than ABC News which raises questions about their credibility and bias towards this case.
                      • The title of the article suggests that a blanket found during the search for Elijah Vue belongs to him when it has not been confirmed yet by authorities.
                      • There are no quotes from any sources other than ABC News which raises questions about their credibility and bias towards this case.
                    • Fallacies (85%)
                      The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the blanket found belongs to Elijah Vue without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Additionally, there are two instances of inflammatory rhetoric: 'party-to-a-crime child neglect' and 'neglecting a child'. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction when it states that Elijah was last seen at one residence but searches have not located him there. Finally, the article uses informal fallacies such as quoting someone without providing context or citation.
                      • The blanket found belongs to Elijah Vue
                      • Elijah's mother had sent her son with her boyfriend because she wanted him to teach him 'to be a man'
                      • Vang called police Feb. 20 and reported the boy missing, telling police he had taken a nap and brought the 3-year-old in the bedroom with him, but when he awoke three hours later he was gone
                      • Elijah was last seen at one residence but searches have not located him there
                    • Bias (85%)
                      The article contains a statement that the blanket found during the search for Elijah Vue belongs to him. This is an example of religious bias as it implies that Elijah's mother sent him away because she wanted him to be taught how to be a man which is not supported by any evidence in the article.
                      • Wisconsin police searching for a 3-year-old boy who vanished last month said they have confirmed that a blanket found during their ongoing search belongs to the missing youngster.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication