Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with Basel Cell Carcinoma, which is the most common type of cancer and typically treated successfully with surgical excision.
Simmons saw a specialist who burned his face again in an attempt to remove all of the margins from the cancer cells. However, this procedure was not successful and he had to go back for another round of treatment which burned his face once more and was deeper than before.
Richard Simmons, a 75-year-old fitness guru and media personality, has been diagnosed with skin cancer. The diagnosis was Basel Cell Carcinoma, which is the most common type of cancer and typically treated successfully with surgical excision. According to his Facebook post on Tuesday, March 20th, Simmons saw a specialist who burned his face again in an attempt to remove all of the margins from the cancer cells. However, this procedure was not successful and he had to go back for another round of treatment which burned his face once more and was deeper than before. He wrote that after two attempts at burning his skin with a small instrument, it finally worked.
Simmons has skin cancer and was told he had basal cell carcinoma.
The doctor explained the treatment process to him, which involved burning his skin with a small instrument for about 30 minutes. He went through this procedure twice before it was successful in removing all of the cancer cells.
Accuracy
Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer.
The diagnosis was Basel Cell Carcinoma.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it quotes Richard Simmons' doctor as saying that he has skin cancer. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the burning of his face and legs as 'painful'. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of the treatment process being both painful and successful.
The article quotes Richard Simmons' doctor as saying that he has skin cancer. This is an appeal to authority fallacy because it assumes that the doctor's statement must be true without any evidence or context provided.
The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the burning of his face and legs as 'painful'.
The article describes the treatment process as both painful and successful, creating a dichotomous depiction.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from the author that implies they are biased towards Richard Simmons. The author states that he is getting cancer and then goes on to describe his experience with skin cancer in detail. This suggests that the author has a personal connection to this topic and may be more likely to present information in an emotionally charged manner.
According to Simmons the doctor told him to come back in "an hour and a half' to find out if the procedure removed all of the cancer.
On Tuesday, the 75-year-old fitness trailblazer got candid about the moment he learned he had skin cancer
Simmons said he was told he had basal cell carcinoma, and advised to see a "cancer doctor" as soon as possible.
Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer.
The diagnosis was Basel Cell Carcinoma.
Simmons saw a specialist to remove the cancer cells from his face but the first attempt did not clear all the margins. He had to go back for another round of treatment which burned his face again and was deeper than before.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer without providing any context or background information on his health status before this diagnosis. This creates a false sense of urgency and concern for readers who may not have known about his condition prior to reading the article.
The author uses sensationalism by stating that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer without providing any context or background information on his health status before this diagnosis. This creates a false sense of urgency and concern for readers who may not have known about his condition prior to reading the article.
The author quotes Richard Simmons as saying 'I told him to stop calling me dirty names.' However, it is unclear what context this statement was made in or if it relates to the skin cancer diagnosis. This creates a false sense of deception and manipulation.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that basal cell carcinoma is typically treated successfully with surgical excision. This statement assumes that all cases of basal cell carcinoma will be cured by surgery and ignores other treatment options or the potential for complications.
CNN reports that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer, stating that he was told to return after a first attempt did not clear all the margins. This implies an appeal to authority fallacy as it assumes that his doctor's decision is correct and ignores other treatment options or potential complications.
Bias
(85%)
The author uses the phrase 'the C word' to refer to cancer which is a loaded term that can be seen as demeaning and offensive. The use of this language creates an emotional response in readers and may lead them to believe that Richard Simmons is being treated unfairly or with disrespect.
He comes back about 20 minutes later and says the C word. You have cancer.
Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer.
The reclusive fitness guru revealed the news in a lengthy Facebook post on Tuesday, two days after he posted a concerning message about dying.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer and will be undergoing treatment for it. However, this information was not disclosed until later in the article after a concerning message about dying was posted on Facebook by Simmons two days prior to his diagnosis being made public.
Simmons added that as soon as he got home, he contacted Santa Monica, California-based Dr. Ralph A. Massey and scheduled an appointment. This statement is deceptive because it implies that Simmons has a positive attitude towards seeking medical treatment for his condition, but in reality, the diagnosis of skin cancer can be very serious and may require extensive treatment.
Simmons went on to give several diet tips and exercise ideas after posting an apology message about dying. This statement is deceptive because it implies that Simmons has a positive attitude towards living life to the fullest every day, but in reality, his diagnosis of skin cancer can be very serious and may require extensive treatment.
The article does not disclose any sources for its information or quotes from experts in the field. This lack of transparency is deceptive as it makes it difficult for readers to verify the accuracy of the information presented.
The title of the article implies that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer and will be undergoing treatment for it. However, this information was not disclosed until later in the article after a concerning message about dying was posted on Facebook by Simmons two days prior to his diagnosis being made public.
Simmons attempted to lighten the mood by telling fans he told his doctor to “stop calling me dirty names” when he was told he had basal cell carcinoma. This statement is deceptive as it implies that Simmons has a positive attitude towards cancer and its treatment, but in reality, the diagnosis of skin cancer can be very serious.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an example of a false dilemma fallacy. The author presents the reader with two options: either Richard Simmons is dying or he has skin cancer. However, these are not mutually exclusive and it is possible for someone to have both conditions at the same time.
The article states that Richard Simmons had a choice between “stop calling me dirty names” when he was told he had basal cell carcinoma or not. This presents a false dilemma as there may have been other options available to him.
The author uses the phrase “it's either this or that.” which is an example of a false dilemma fallacy.
Bias
(85%)
The author of the article is Jack Hobbs and he has a history of promoting conspiracy theories such as QAnon. He also uses language that dehumanizes white supremacists who are celebrating the reference to racist and antisemitic conspiracy in his statement.
> Denise Truscello/WireImage
> Rodrigo Vaz/FilmMagic<br><br>
> There was this strange looking bump under my right eye. I had a tube of Neosporin which I would put on in the morning and the evening . . . it was still there. It was time to call my dermatologist.<br> > Now I am getting a little bit nervous. He comes back about 20 minutes later and says the C-word.<br><br>
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of skin cancer and basal cell carcinoma as they are discussing Richard Simmons's diagnosis. The article also mentions Dr. Ralph A. Massey who may have financial ties to treatments for these conditions.
Richard Simmons, 75, reveals skin cancer diagnosis after posting alarming message about dying
The doctor’s appointment was scheduled for Monday at the University of California San Francisco Medical Center.
Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer.
The diagnosis was Basel Cell Carcinoma.
Simmons underwent a procedure in which the doctor had to burn his skin with a small instrument to remove the cancer cells.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title and body of the article suggest that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer when he hasn't. The author claims that she spoke to him about his diagnosis but does not provide any evidence or quotes from Simmons himself confirming this information. Secondly, the article contains sensationalism by using words like 'dying', which are used in a way that is intended to grab attention and create fear in readers without providing accurate information. Thirdly, the author uses emotional manipulation by encouraging readers to enjoy their lives every day despite not knowing if they will die or not.
The title of the article suggests that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer when he hasn't.
Fallacies
(80%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that Richard Simmons attends the Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade and is a successful fitness coach. The author does not provide any evidence or sources for these claims.
]Richard Simmons attends An Evening with Richard Simmons at the Mount Airy Casino Resort on Jan. 8, 2010, in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from the author that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer. The language used in this statement is not neutral and implies that there may be negative consequences for Simmons' health as a result of his diagnosis.
]I sat in his chair and he looked at it through a magnifying mirror. He told me he would have to scrape it and put it under the microscope. Now I am getting a little bit nervous.[/]
Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer.
The dermatologist told him he had Basal Cell Carcinoma and suggested Botox injections for his forehead lines and smile lines.
After three treatments, Simmons' cancerous cells were successfully removed and he is now healthy.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer when there is no evidence to support this claim. The only information provided in the article comes from a Facebook post by Simmons himself which does not mention any diagnosis or treatment plan for his supposed cancer.
The article states that Richard Simmons has been diagnosed with skin cancer, but there is no evidence to support this claim.
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(80%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'God bless you' to express sympathy for Richard Simmons, which is a clear example of religious bias. Additionally, the author mentions that Simmons has been working with a dermatologist who specializes in skin cancer treatment, implying that he may be charging more than other doctors due to his expertise and reputation. This suggests monetary bias.
God bless you
Simmons has been working with a dermatologist who specializes in skin cancer treatment
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(781x375:783x377)/richard-simmons-032024-1-267e6c20b2344e7597f893c4e98b89d9.jpg)
