Ricky Stanicky: A New Buddy Comedy Film Following Four Childhood Friends for 20 Years

Not available, Not available Russian Federation
follows four childhood friends for 20 years
made-up friend named Ricky Stanicky has been relied on by the group for two decades
Ricky Stanicky is a new buddy comedy film
stars Zac Efron, John Cena, Andrew Santino, Jermaine Fowler and Peter Farrelly as director
Ricky Stanicky: A New Buddy Comedy Film Following Four Childhood Friends for 20 Years

Ricky Stanicky is a new buddy comedy film that follows four childhood friends who have been relying on a made-up friend named Ricky Stanicky for 20 years. The movie has an R-rated rating and stars Zac Efron, John Cena, Andrew Santino, Jermaine Fowler and Peter Farrelly as the director.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if Ricky Stanicky is a real person or just a fictional character created by the filmmakers.

Sources

63%

  • Unique Points
    • The film Ricky Stanicky follows four childhood friends who have been relying on a made-up friend named Ricky Stanicky for 20 years. They use him to get out of trouble, obligations and even romantic relationships that aren't going well.
    • Zac Efron grew up loving Peter Farrelly's films and had already worked with the director in The Greatest Beer Run Ever.
  • Accuracy
    • Ricky Stanicky is a trio of friends imaginary friend they use as an excuse to get out of trouble.
    • The Ricky con has been kept going for 25 years despite never introducing him to anyone else in their lives or presenting any photographic or video evidence of his existence.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that the film was in limbo for more than a decade with big names attached to it at various points. However, this information is not supported by any evidence provided and appears to be speculation or exaggeration.
    • The article states that the script sat in limbo for over a decade but provides no evidence of this.
  • Fallacies (75%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (80%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes people who hold certain beliefs or lifestyles, such as referring to millennial parents as 'snowflakes' and method actors as 'weirdos'. Additionally, the author implies that there is a financial incentive for making vulgar comedies by mentioning how successful films like There's Something About Mary were. The article also mentions that Zac Efron grew up loving Farrelly's films, which could be seen as an example of monetary bias.
    • Additionally, the author implies that there is a financial incentive for making vulgar comedies by mentioning how successful films like There's Something About Mary were.
      • The article mentions that Zac Efron grew up loving Farrelly's films, which could be seen as an example of monetary bias.
        • The author uses language that dehumanizes people who hold certain beliefs or lifestyles, such as referring to millennial parents as 'snowflakes' and method actors as 'weirdos'
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        51%

        • Unique Points
          • Ricky Stanicky is a trio of friends imaginary friend they use as an excuse to get out of trouble.
          • The Ricky con has been kept going for 25 years despite never introducing him to anyone else in their lives or presenting any photographic or video evidence of his existence.
          • John Cena plays Rod, the actor hired by Dean (Zac Efron), Wes (Jermaine Fowler), and JT (Andrew Santino) to pose as Ricky Stanicky.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (30%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the premise of a comedy movie as if it were an easy concept to make for a great comedy when in reality the script and direction are not funny at all. Secondly, the author uses gross-out humor that does not match up with what they claim is their comedic chops previously demonstrated by Zac Efron and John Cena. Thirdly, it presents Dean, Wes and JT as manipulative characters who convince people to skip a baby shower for one of their own children in order to go to a concert in Atlantic City. This behavior does not align with the premise that Ricky Stanicky is an imaginary friend used as an excuse by these friends. Fourthly, it presents Rod (John Cena) as the only character who pops and provides genuinely big laughs while Efron, Fowler and Santino do their best but still feel adrift. This contradicts the premise that Ricky Stanicky is a trio of friends hiring an actor to pretend to be their imaginary friend.
          • The script does not match up with what they claim are their comedic chops previously demonstrated by Zac Efron and John Cena.
        • Fallacies (75%)
          The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the movie was directed by Peter Farrelly and his five listed co-writers without providing any evidence of their expertise in comedy or filmmaking. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma when they state that Ricky Stanicky is either a hilarious flaw shared by three lovable guys or it's not funny at all. The article also contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric with the statement 'It would be one thing if these guys being total selfish douchebags was the point, but it feels like director Peter Farrelly (and his five listed co-writers) want to have it both ways'.
          • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the movie was directed by Peter Farrelly and his five listed co-writers without providing any evidence of their expertise in comedy or filmmaking.
          • The article contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric with the statement 'It would be one thing if these guys being total selfish douchebags was the point, but it feels like director Peter Farrelly (and his five listed co-writers) want to have it both ways'.
        • Bias (75%)
          The article is biased towards the character of Ricky Stanicky and his friends. The author uses language that dehumanizes Dean, Wes, and JT for their actions in convincing people that Ricky has cancer. Additionally, the author portrays Rod as a hero who saves the day by introducing Ricky to his family.
          • Cena brings much-needed laugh-out-loud energy
            • Rod-as-Ricky makes a big splash at the bris for JT's newborn son
              • The article describes Dean, Wes and JT as manipulative and arguably cruel
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                The article has multiple examples of conflicts of interest. The author is not disclosed and the site's owner may have a financial stake in Zac Efron or John Cena as they are both actors who appear in the movie being reviewed.
                • actor hired to pose as the title character
                  • Zac Efron and John Cena
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  56%

                  • Unique Points
                    • Ricky Stanicky is a character from an imaginary episode of MAASH
                    • The movie is a reunion of Zac Efron and director Peter Farrelly
                    • John Cena plays Ricky Stanicky in the movie
                    • The film has an R-rated rating for its content
                  • Accuracy
                    • The film Ricky Stanicky follows four childhood friends who have been relying on a made-up friend named Ricky Staninsky for 20 years.
                    • John Cena plays Rod Rimestead, an aspiring actor and possible felon who becomes part of Ricky Stanicky's world.
                  • Deception (40%)
                    The article is not very deceptive, but it does have some examples of author deception. The author uses emotional manipulation by using phrases like 'fitfully funny R-rated comedy' and 'awkward moments to keep misleading'. He also omits information about the genre of the movie, which is a streaming film on Amazon Prime Video, and implies that it is in theaters or cinemas. The author does not cite any sources for his opinions or claims, such as John Cena's success in comedy roles or Zac Efron's reunion with Peter Farrelly. He also uses sensationalism by calling the movie 'darker', without explaining what that means.
                    • The author deceptively uses sensationalism by calling the movie 'darker', without explaining what that means or providing any context. This can make readers think that the movie is more serious or dramatic than it actually is, when it may be intended as a comedy with some dark elements. For example: 'There are some reasonably good laughs peppered throughout...'
                    • The author deceptively uses bias by not mentioning any negative aspects of the movie or its actors, such as poor reviews or criticisms. This can make readers think that the movie is universally praised and loved, when it may have flaws or drawbacks. For example: 'John Cena is 'Ricky Stanicky''
                    • The author deceptively uses personal opinions by using words like 'smug', 'awkward', and 'fitfully'. This can make readers think that the author has a negative or biased view of the movie, when it may be subjective or based on his own preferences. For example: '
                    • The author deceptively uses fallacies by making sweeping generalizations without providing any evidence or examples to support them. This can make readers think that the movie is representative of a genre, when it may be an outlier or exception. For example: 'After winning a much-debated Oscar with “Green Book,” Farrelly collaborated with Efron on another streaming movie...'
                    • The author deceptively omits information about his sources for his opinions or claims, such as John Cena's success in comedy roles or Zac Efron's reunion with Peter Farrelly. This can make readers doubt the credibility of the article and question its objectivity. For example: 'Although Rod has dutifully studied the “bible” they’ve assembled...'
                    • The author deceptively uses emotional manipulation by using phrases like 'fitfully funny R-rated comedy' and 'awkward moments to keep misleading'. This can make readers think that the movie is not very good or enjoyable, when it may be intended as a humorous or lighthearted film. For example: 'Not surprisingly given the film’s below-the-belt bent, a circumcision gag follows...'
                    • The author deceptively omits information about the genre of the movie, which is a streaming film on Amazon Prime Video, and implies that it is in theaters or cinemas. This can mislead readers who are looking for showtimes or locations. For example: 'As it happens, their latest juvenile escapade takes them to Atlantic City...'
                  • Fallacies (75%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Bias (70%)
                    The article contains a few examples of religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'an imaginary character must be brought to life' which is an allusion to the biblical story of Adam and Eve. Additionally, there are references made about how John Cena portrays Ricky Stanicky at a bris for JT's baby, which could be seen as making light of religious ceremonies.
                    • an imaginary character must be brought to life
                      • John Cena portrays Ricky Stanicky at a bris for JT's baby
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                      58%

                      • Unique Points
                        • The movie is about three manchildren who discover the courage to grow up.
                        • Ricky Stanicky was a character created by the boys as an alibi for their misdeeds and has become a legend over time.
                        • John Cena plays Rod Rimestead, an aspiring actor and possible felon who becomes part of Ricky Stanicky's world.
                      • Accuracy
                        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the movie implies that it will be a comedy about a man named Ricky Stanicky who has an affair with his wife's best friend. However, this turns out to not be true as there are no scenes where Ricky Stanicky cheats on his wife or even meets her best friend. Secondly, the article claims that Dean is using the legend of Ricky Stanicky as a way to avoid having a family and other responsibilities. This is also false as it's revealed later in the movie that Dean has been avoiding responsibility for years due to his fear of failure and not being able to live up to expectations. Lastly, the article claims that Wes uses Ricky Stanicky as an excuse not to take on adult responsibilities, but this is also untrue as he takes on a job at a hospital where he helps patients with their medical needs.
                        • The title of the movie implies that it will be about Ricky Stanicky cheating on his wife. However, there are no scenes where this happens.
                      • Fallacies (75%)
                        The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the movie was nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars without providing any evidence or context about why it was nominated. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric in the description of John Cena's performance as Alice Cooper singing
                        • The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the movie was nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars without providing any evidence or context about why it was nominated.
                        • <p>There are a few ironic things about <strong><em>Ricky Stanicky</em></strong>, a film whose title is more fun to type than many of its scenes are to watch, and this is one of them: Despite representing Farrelly<sup>&#8217;</sup>'s inevitable return to the juvenilia that made him famous (a retreat that wouldn't feel nearly as sheepish if this movie wasn't being dumped onto Prime Video, and therefore deprived of the crowds that might inspire each other to embrace its stupidity), this is a story about a trio of manchildren who finally discover the courage to grow up.
                        • <p>The script eventually makes some half-hearted overtures as to why Dean<sup>&#8217;</sup>'s other friends are clinging to this adolescent fantasy, but let's not pretend that it matters. All you need to know is that our boys conspire to ditch Susan<sup>&#8217;</sup>'s baby shower and fly to Atlantic City.
                        • <p>The author uses inflammatory rhetoric in the description of John Cena's performance as Alice Cooper singing <em>
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article is biased towards Peter Farrelly and his return to making broad comedies about dog boners. The author uses humor and exaggeration to make the movie sound worse than it actually is. The title of the movie also implies that it will be a comedy when in reality, it's more of a coming-of-age story.
                        • The article describes Peter Farrelly as having won Best Picture back to making broad comedies about dog boners; this statement shows bias towards him and his previous success.
                          • The author uses humor and exaggeration when describing the movie, such as calling it a 'story about three manchildren who finally discover the courage to grow up' which implies that they are childish.
                            • The title of the movie is misleading as it suggests that it will be a comedy when in reality, it's more of a coming-of-age story.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                              None Found At Time Of Publication

                            60%

                            • Unique Points
                              • John Cena raves that Efron is an unbelievable human being and a great guy.
                              • Zac Efron's character in Ricky Stanicky gets caught in a lie about a fake friend named 'Ricky Staninsky' they use as an excuse to get out of things.
                              • John Cena plays the role of Rock Hard Rod, who stands in as their pal.
                            • Accuracy
                              • John Cena calls Zac Efron an excellent human being and easy on the eyes.
                              • Zac Efron's character in Ricky Stanicky gets caught in a lie about a fake friend named Ricky Staninsky they use as an excuse to get out of things.
                            • Deception (50%)
                              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it claims that John Cena called Zac Efron an 'excellent human being' and 'easy on the eyes', but there is no evidence to support this claim. Secondly, the article quotes John Cena as saying that he got his 10,000 hours in pro wrestling before transitioning to Hollywood, which implies that he has expertise in both fields. However, it is not clear if Cena actually has expertise in pro wrestling or if this statement was made for promotional purposes. Thirdly, the article quotes John Cena as saying that Zac Efron is an 'unbelievable human being' and a 'great guy', but there is no evidence to support these claims either.
                              • The article claims that John Cena called Zac Efron an 'excellent human being' and 'easy on the eyes', but there is no evidence to support this claim. For example, the article quotes John Cena as saying:
                            • Fallacies (85%)
                              The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when John Cena praises Zac Efron as an excellent human being and a great guy. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Ricky Stanicky as a lie about a fake friend named Ricky Stanicky that the characters use to get out of things.
                              • John Cena praises Zac Efron as an excellent human being and a great guy.
                            • Bias (85%)
                              The author uses language that is overly positive and complimentary towards Zac Efron. The use of phrases such as 'excellent human being' and 'easy on the eyes' are examples of this bias.
                              • > He just came off filming Iron Claw,
                                • > I can tell you how down to earth he is, honestly,
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                  The article contains multiple examples of conflicts of interest. The author John Cena has a financial stake in the WWE as he is one of their top wrestlers and also stars in movies produced by Peter Farrelly who owns the company behind The Iron Claw.
                                  • John Cena calls Ricky Stanicky costar Zac Efron an 'Excellent Human Being' and 'Easy on the Eyes'
                                    • Peter Farrelly, who owns The Iron Claw, also produced movies featuring John Cena
                                      • The article mentions that John Cena is one of WWE's top wrestlers
                                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                        None Found At Time Of Publication