Russian missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity plant near Kyiv on April 11, 2024.
The attack hit power facilities in several regions including the Trypilska coal-powered thermal power plant near the capital two years ago. This was the third and last facility owned by state-owned energy company Centrenergo that has been destroyed by Russian attacks since Russia renewed its long-range aerial assaults on Ukraine's energy system in March 2024.
The attack used 82 missiles and drones, with Ukrainian air defenses taking down 18 of the incoming missiles and 39 drones.
On April 11, Russian missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity plant near Kyiv. The attack hit power facilities in several regions on Thursday, including the Trypilska coal-powered thermal power plant near the capital two years ago. This was the third and last facility owned by state-owned energy company Centrenergo that has been destroyed by Russian attacks since Russia renewed its long-range aerial assaults on Ukraine's energy system in March 2024. The attack used 82 missiles and drones, with Ukrainian air defenses taking down 18 of the incoming missiles and 39 drones. The destroyed power plant outside Kyiv is the third and last facility owned by state-owned energy company Centrenergo.
Russian shelling caused a large-scale fire at the Trypilska Thermal Power Plant (TPP), with the company still working to localize the fire in the plant's turbine workshop.
Over more than two years of war, Russia has systematically targeted Ukraine's energy infrastructure in an attempt to break the country's power grid and deprive it of essential services.
Accuracy
The largest power-generating plant in Ukraine's Kyiv region was destroyed in a Russian missile attack on Thursday.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Russia has systematically targeted Ukraine's energy infrastructure in an attempt to break the country's power grid and deprive its people of essential services. This statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article, making it a fallacy.
Russia has systematically targeted Ukraine’s energy infrastructure
The biggest loss of power in Ukraine came shortly after the invasion
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Peter Wilkinson has a conflict of interest on the topic of energy infrastructure in Ukraine as he is reporting for CNN which is owned by AT&T. AT&T has financial ties with Centrenergo, one of the companies involved in the Trypilska Thermal Power Plant.
Peter Wilkinson reports for CNN which is owned by AT&T.
Russia carried out a massive drone and missile attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russia's oil and gas industry
Zelenskyy signed another security agreement with Latvia that committed to spend at least 0.25% of its GDP over 10 years for cyber defense, demining and unmanned technologies
Accuracy
The largest power-generating plant in Ukraine was destroyed by Russian shelling caused by the company still working to localize the fire in the plant's turbine workshop.
Russian troops occupied Centrenergo’s third plant, Vuhlehirska TPP, which previously accounted for about 20% of Ukraine's power generation.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the author claims that Russia has foiled a British-led sabotage plot without providing any evidence to support this claim. This is an example of sensationalism and selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position while ignoring other perspectives or facts. Secondly, the article uses emotional manipulation by stating that 200,000 people are left without power after a massive attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence and could be seen as an exaggeration to elicit sympathy from readers. Lastly, the author quotes Zelenskyy saying that Russia's attacks were in response to Ukrainian assaults on its oil and gas industry without providing any context or alternative perspectives.
200,000 people are left without power after a massive attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure
Russia claims it foiled a British-led sabotage plot
Fallacies
(70%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(75%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes Russia by referring to their actions as a 'massive attack' and calling it an act of terror. Secondly, there is no evidence provided for any sabotage plot involving Britain or its involvement in Ukraine. Thirdly, the article quotes Russian officials without providing context on why they are being quoted or what their motivations may be.
Russia said it had carried out a 'massive' drone and missile attack on Ukraine's energy infrastructure
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy inspects bunkers, firing ranges, armored personnel carrier trenches and anti-tank trench
Russian missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity plant near Kyiv
Hit power facilities in several regions on Thursday
Completely destroyed the Trypilska coal-powered thermal power plant near the capital two years ago
Attacks hammered thermal and hydroelectric power plants, sparking fears about resilience of energy system hobbled by Russian air campaign in war's first winter
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Russian missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity plant near Kyiv and hit power facilities in several regions on Thursday. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. The only direct quote from an official source states that Russia completely destroyed the Trypilska coal-powered thermal power plant near the capital two years ago, which does not support the claim made about a recent attack. Secondly, there are several instances of sensationalism and emotional manipulation used throughout the article to create fear and urgency in readers. For example, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is quoted as saying that Russia's attacks on Ukraine's energy system are terrorism, which is a highly charged word that could be seen as inflammatory by some readers. Thirdly, there are several instances of selective reporting and omission in the article. For example, while it mentions damage to power facilities in several regions, it does not provide any specific details about how many people were affected or what impact this had on their daily lives. Additionally, the article only provides a brief mention of Ukraine's largest private electricity company DTEK losing 80% of its generating capacity during Russia's March attacks but fails to provide any further information about the extent of this damage.
The author claims that Russian missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity plant near Kyiv and hit power facilities in several regions on Thursday. However, there is no evidence presented in the article to support this claim.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the statements of officials without providing any evidence or context for their claims. This is a form of informal fallacy as it relies on the reader's trust in these sources rather than presenting objective information. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article, such as when President Zelenskyy calls the attacks 'terror'. The author also uses dichotomous depiction by describing Russia's actions as a full-scale invasion and an air campaign that hobbled Ukraine's energy system. This oversimplifies complex issues and ignores other factors that may have contributed to the situation. Finally, there are examples of appeals to emotion used throughout the article, such as when President Zelenskyy condemns the attacks as 'terror'. These appeals can be effective in swaying public opinion but they do not provide any evidence or logical reasoning for their claims.
The major attack more than two years since Russia's full-scale invasion completely destroyed the Trypilska coal-powered thermal power plant near the capital, a senior official at the company that runs the facility told Reuters.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses loaded language such as 'terror' to describe the Russian attacks on Ukraine's energy system. Additionally, the use of quotes from President Zelenskyy and other officials is used to support a particular narrative without providing any context or counter-arguments.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the attacks as “terror”
The article describes Russia’s full-scale invasion as 'completely destroyed'
'We need air defense and other defense support, not eye-closing and long discussions,' President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on the Telegram messaging app
The largest power-generating plant in Ukraine's Kyiv region was destroyed in a Russian missile attack on Thursday.
Russian shelling caused a large-scale fire at the Trypilska Thermal Power Plant (TPP), with the company still working to localize the fire in the plant's turbine workshop.
Accuracy
The strike set ablaze the turbine hall of the coal-fired Trypilska plant some 45 kilometers (28 miles) south of the capital.
`Russian shelling caused a large-scale fire at the Trypilska Thermal Power Plant (TPP), with the company still working to localize the fire in the plant's turbine workshop.a
Ukraine's largest private electricity company DTEK lost 80% of its generating capacity during Russia's March attacks
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Russia destroyed the power plant when it was actually hit by missiles. Secondly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'sweeping Russian missile attack' and 'renewed offensive' to create a sense of urgency and danger without providing any context or evidence for these claims. Thirdly, the article quotes an anonymous source which is not reliable.
The title implies that Russia destroyed the power plant when it was actually hit by missiles.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the statement of Andriy Hota without providing any evidence or context. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Russian missile attack as a 'renewed offensive' and stating that it exploits gaps in Ukraine's air defense.
Andriy Hota, the supervisory board chairman of state-owned power producer Centrenergo stated that the facility was hit by six missiles early Thursday.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains a statement that implies the Russian missile attack was successful in destroying the Trypilska power plant. The author does not provide any evidence to support this claim and only quotes an anonymous source who claims six missiles hit the facility. This is an example of biased reporting as it presents one-sided information without providing context or counterarguments.
A sweeping Russian missile attack on Ukraine destroyed the largest power generating plant in the Kyiv region
The strike set ablaze the turbine hall of the coal-fired Trypilska plant some 45 kilometers (28 miles) south of the capital
