Russian President Vladimir Putin is running for re-election on March 18,
The Russian region of Belgorod has closed all schools and colleges in parts of the region following an increase in Ukrainian attacks.
Ukraine's security service (SBU) also reportedly carried out drone strikes on three oil refineries in the Samara region.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is running for re-election on March 18, and the Russian region of Belgorod has closed all schools and colleges in parts of the region following an increase in Ukrainian attacks. The Russian Defense Ministry said that it had repelled attempts by Ukrainian fighters to infiltrate Russia from several locations, saying it had carried out a complex fire attack on concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment. Ukraine's security service (SBU) also reportedly carried out drone strikes on three oil refineries in the Samara region.
The Russian region of Belgorod has closed all schools and colleges in parts of the region on Monday and Tuesday following an increase in Ukrainian attacks.
<https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/16/europe/>
Russia's Defense Ministry said in a post on its own Telegram channel Saturday that Russian forces had repelled attempts by Ukrainian fighters to infiltrate Russia in several locations, saying it had carried out <a href=
Russian soldiers who are fighting for Ukraine gather in a farmhouse on Thursday near the Russian border as they prepare for an assault.
<https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/16/world/europe>
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it does not provide any evidence or sources for the claims that Ukrainian attacks have increased and caused casualties in Belgorod. The author relies on vague statements from the governor of Belgorod and unverified reports from local residents without citing any official data, statistics, or witnesses. The article also implies that the war in Ukraine has directly affected Russians who are isolated from the conflict by using emotional language such as 'difficult', 'worried', and 'scared'. This is a form of editorializing and bias that manipulates the reader's emotions without presenting any facts or context. The article does not mention any counter-claims, alternative perspectives, or possible motives for the Ukrainian attacks. It also does not disclose whether the malls and schools closures are precautionary measures or actual consequences of the strikes. By providing a biased and incomplete picture of the situation in Belgorod, the article is trying to influence public opinion and support Putin's re-election.
The author does not mention any sources for the claims that Ukrainian attacks have increased and caused casualties in Belgorod. The only evidence provided are vague statements from Gladkov and unverified videos posted by local residents on social media platforms. This is an example of lying by omission, as it conceals the lack of credible information to support the author's assertions.
The author quotes Gladkov as saying that 'two people were killed in early morning attacks' on Saturday. This is an example of lying by omission, as it does not specify who was killed, how they died, where and when the attacks occurred, or whether there were any casualties among Ukrainian forces. The author also does not mention if Gladkov has confirmed these deaths with official sources or if he is relying on unverified reports from local residents.
The author says that 'a Ukrainian source told CNN that Ukraine's security service (SBU) carried out drone strikes on three oil refineries in Russia's Samara region'. This is an example of sensationalism, as it implies that the SBU was directly responsible for the attacks without providing any evidence or sources. The author also does not explain why the refineries were targeted, how they caused damage and casualties, or what kind of response Russia had. Additionally, by citing a 'Ukrainian source' without specifying who it is or how credible they are, the author creates an impression that Ukraine has some inside information on Russian operations.
The author claims that 'Ukraine has been attacking the Belgorod region off and on since the first half of 2023 but scaled up shelling and strikes most about a week ago'. This is an example of selective reporting, as it omits any information about when exactly these attacks started, how frequent they are, what methods or targets they use, and what kind of response Russia has given. The author also does not provide any context for why Ukraine would attack Belgorod or what the consequences have been for both sides.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the governor's statement without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation as 'quite difficult' and 'worried'. There are also instances where statements made by anyone other than www.cnn.com are used to support an argument, which violates one of the analysis rules.
The frequent attacks have brought the war in Ukraine to Russians largely isolated from the conflict.
. The surprise attacks are meant to undermine the sense of stability in Russia and divert the country's military resources from Ukraine.
. Russian soldiers who are fighting for Ukraine gather in a farmhouse on Thursday near the Russian border as they prepare for an assault.
. Their goal has been to break through a first line of Russian defenses, hoping to open a path for another unit to drive deeper into Russia with tanks and armored personnel carriers.
Accuracy
. U.S.WorldBusinessArtsLifestyleOpinionAudioGamesCookingWirecutterThe Athletic Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access.
. The surprise attacks, timed to Russia’s election, are meant to undermine the sense of stability in Russia and divert the country’s military resources from Ukraine.
. The soldiers are Russians who have turned against the government of their country’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, and are now fighting for the Ukrainian side by making incursions back into Russia.
. By both Ukrainian and Russian accounts, fierce fighting has raged along Russia’s southern border for five days in the most sweeping ground attacks into Russia since its military invaded Ukraine two years ago.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive because it does not provide any evidence or sources for the claims that anti-Putin Russians are staging attacks from Ukraine on Russian soil. The author relies on anonymous quotes and vague descriptions of events without disclosing their reliability or credibility. The author also uses emotional language such as 'surprise', 'daring' and 'sweeping' to create a sense of urgency and drama that may not be accurate or verified. Additionally, the article does not mention any counter-claims or alternative perspectives from the Russian government or military, which could provide a more balanced view of the situation.
The author quotes an unnamed 'Russian soldier' who says 'We will jump in their trench and hold it. Either we take them out, or they take us out'. However, there is no way to know if this quote is accurate or reliable. The reader cannot verify the identity of the speaker or his motives.
The author states that 'fierce fighting has raged along Russia's southern border for five days in the most sweeping ground attacks into Russia since its military invaded Ukraine two years ago'. However, there is no data or source given to back up this claim. The reader cannot verify if these attacks were really happening or how severe they were.
The author claims that 'Russian soldiers who are fighting for Ukraine gather in a farmhouse on Thursday near the Russian border as they prepare for an assault'. However, there is no evidence or source provided to support this claim. The reader cannot verify if these soldiers actually exist or if they were really preparing for an attack.
The author does not mention any counter-claims or alternative perspectives from the Russian government or military on these alleged attacks. This could provide a more balanced view of the situation and show different sides of the conflict.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the Russian exile groups are all but openly backed by Ukraine's military intelligence agency. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of Russia as stable and Putin's quest for a fifth term being undermined, while also portraying the Ukrainian soldiers fighting against Russia in an heroic light.
Russian exile groups are all but openly backed by Ukraine's military intelligence agency
The surprise attacks, timed to Russia’s election, are meant to undermine the sense of stability in Russia and divert the country’s military resources from Ukraine.
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the Russian government and its actions in Ukraine. The author uses language that dehumanizes Russians who are fighting for Ukraine by describing them as 'Russians who have turned against their country's president'. This implies that they are traitors rather than individuals with legitimate grievances against their government. Additionally, the article portrays these attacks as a threat to Russia's stability and security, which may be seen as an attempt to delegitimize Putin's rule.
Russians who have turned against their country's president
Their goal has been to break through a first line of Russian defenses
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article by Andrew E. Kramer and Oleksandr Chubko reports on anti-Putin Russians staging attacks from Ukraine on Russian soil. The authors have a conflict of interest with Russia as they are reporting for the New York Times which has been critical of Putin's government.
The article mentions that the attacks were carried out by 'anti-Putin rebels', indicating that there is an ideological bias towards opposing Putin and his government.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has conflicts of interest on the topics of Russia and Ukraine. The article mentions that Russian soldiers were involved in attacks from Ukrainian soil, which could be seen as a violation of sovereignty by Russia. Additionally, the article discusses exile groups who are opposed to Putin's government, which could create a conflict of interest if the author has ties to these groups.
The article mentions that some of the rebels involved in the attacks had previously been exiled by Putin's government, but does not provide any further information on their ties to these groups.
The Russian soldiers involved in attacks from Ukrainian soil were not identified or disclosed
, Belgorod faces near-daily attacks from Ukrainian missiles and explosive drones.
The Russian army battles anti-Kremlin militias in areas east and south of Belgorod.
<Yanna Mikhichuk said that the rocket explosion near her apartment building did not scare her and she will still vote for Putin.
Residents of Grayvoron started evacuating due to attacks from Ukrainian missiles.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the attacks on Belgorod as a minor inconvenience for most Russian voters when in reality they are experiencing near-daily attacks and many residents have been injured or killed. Secondly, the article portrays Putin's war in Ukraine as largely unseen by most Russian voters when there is evidence to suggest that it has had a significant impact on their lives. Thirdly, the article presents Putin as a victim of Ukrainian aggression and not responsible for his actions which contradicts other sources of information. Lastly, the author uses emotional manipulation by portraying Yanna's response to the attack as an example of Russian resilience and support for Putin.
The article portrays Putin's war in Ukraine as largely unseen by most Russian voters when there is evidence to suggest that it has had a significant impact on their lives.
The article presents attacks on Belgorod as a minor inconvenience when in reality they are experiencing near-daily attacks
The author uses emotional manipulation by portraying Yanna's response to the attack as an example of Russian resilience and support for Putin.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the author states that Putin's two-year-old war in Ukraine remains largely unseen except on state-controlled television or social media. This implies that the information presented by these sources should be trusted without question, which is not necessarily true.
Putin’s two-year old war in Ukraine remains largely unseen except on state controlled television or social media.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts the Russian people as victims in the war rather than perpetrators, which is a false narrative promoted by the Kremlin. Additionally, there are quotes from residents who express their support for Putin despite being affected by attacks on Belgorod.
Belgorod feels the war firsthand as it faces near-daily attacks.
, regional Gov. Vyacheslav Gladkov said on the Telegram messaging app.
The Russian region of Belgorod has closed all schools and colleges in parts of the region on Monday and Tuesday following an increase in Ukrainian attacks.
Russia's Defense Ministry said in a post on its own Telegram channel Saturday that Russian forces had repelled attempts by Ukrainian fighters to infiltrate Russia
Ukraine's security service (SBU) carried out drone strikes on three oil refineries in Russia's Samara region.
At least five people have been reported killed and several dozen wounded as a result of the attacks.
Accuracy
, The city of Belgorod is also subject to the closures.
Russia's Defense Ministry said in a post on its own Telegram channel Saturday that Russian forces had repelled attempts by Ukrainian fighters to infiltrate Russia in several locations, saying it had carried out 'a complex fire attack on concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment.'
A Ukrainian source told CNN that Ukraine's security service (SBU) carried out drone strikes on three oil refineries in Russia's Samara region.
Local residents in Belgorod have been posting videos to regional social media platforms showing explosions in the city and fires burning outside residential buildings where Ukrainian strikes have taken place.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Ukrainian shelling killed two people in Belgorod while Russia claims to have thwarted an incursion. However, there is no evidence presented to support these claims and the sources are not disclosed.
The article does not provide any direct quotations from official Russian or Ukrainian sources that would verify the deaths of two people due to Ukrainian shelling in Belgorod.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that Russia's Defense Ministry claimed that Moscow's military and security forces killed 30 fighters while thwarting the latest incursion. This statement assumes the accuracy of a claim made by a government agency without providing any evidence or context for its veracity.
Russia’s Defense Ministry also said Saturday that it had thwarted attempts by Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance groups to enter the country from Ukraine's Sumy region. That followed an armed incursion claimed by Ukraine-based Russian opponents of the Kremlin on Tuesday in the Belgorod and Kursk regions, Russia’s Defense Ministry said that Moscow’s military and security forces killed 30 fighters while thwarting the latest incursion.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy promised a ‘just response’ to the attack in a video address Friday evening.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains multiple examples of bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Ukrainians by referring to them as 'saboteurs' and 'opponents of the Kremlin'. This is an example of ideological bias. Additionally, the author quotes a Russian official who claims Russia thwarted attempts by sabotage groups to enter from Ukraine, without providing any evidence or context for these claims. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that Russia has resources and capabilities to prevent such incursions which may not be true.
Russian official claims Russia thwarted attempts by sabotage groups without providing any evidence or context for these claims
The author uses language that dehumanizes Ukrainians by referring to them as 'saboteurs' and 'opponents of the Kremlin'
Ukrainian shelling killed two people in Belgorod while Russian Defense Ministry claimed it had thwarted an attempt to cross border
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article reports on an incident in which Russian forces claim that Ukrainian shelling killed two people in the city of Belgorod. The article also mentions a thwarted incursion into Russia by Ukrainian troops and discusses the involvement of various military groups such as the Freedom of Russia Legion, Rosneft, and Odesa.
Russia says Ukrainian shelling killed 2 in a border city while it thwarted an incursion
The article mentions a thwarted incursion into Russia by Ukrainian troops
