Russian Presidential Election: Protests and Violence Mar the Vote, Putin Expected to Win Again

Moscow, Russia Russian Federation
Russia is holding its presidential election this weekend.
There have been protests against the election in several regions of Russia.
Vladimir Putin is expected to win another term.
Russian Presidential Election: Protests and Violence Mar the Vote, Putin Expected to Win Again

Russia is holding its presidential election this weekend, with Vladimir Putin expected to win another term. However, there have been protests against the election in several regions of Russia. In Moscow, a woman threw a Molotov cocktail at a polling station signboard and was arrested for obstructing the vote. Elsewhere in Russia, protesters poured dye into ballot boxes to spoil votes cast for Putin's opponents. The Russian government has denied any involvement in these incidents.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there have been any other incidents of violence or sabotage during the election.
  • The extent of the protests against the election in different regions of Russia may vary.

Sources

66%

  • Unique Points
    • Several Russians poured dye into ballot boxes in protest against presidential election
    • Dissent has effectively been outlawed in Russia since it launched its invasion of Ukraine more than two years ago
    • Protesters pouring what authorities described as dye into ballot boxes to spoil the votes cast were immediately detained and face criminal charges for obstructing the election, according to Russian state media RIA Novosti
    • Polls opened Friday across Russia's 11 time zones. With most opposition candidates either dead, jailed, exiled, barred from running or simply token figures, Putin is expected to coast to victory extending his rule until at least 2030.
    • Voters have staged similar protests in the Voronezh, Rostov and Karachay-Cherkessia regions
    • A woman was arrested after setting fire to a voting booth at a polling station. Officials told RIA that the ballots were not damaged and voting has continued.
    • In St. Petersburg, Putin's hometown, a woman threw a Molotov cocktail at the signboard of a polling station in the Moskovsky district
    • Ella Pamfilova, chair of Russia's Central Election Committee called protesters 'scum'
    • Green dye has been used in attacks on Russian journalists and opposition figures, most notably on Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny
    • Navalny died in an Arctic prison a month ago. Russia's prison service said he felt unwell after a walk and lost consciousness later attributing his death to natural causes.
    • The Kremlin denied any involvement in Navalny's death
  • Accuracy
    • Vladimir V. Putin has been in power for roughly two decades and promises future achievements after securing another six-year term in rubber-stamp elections this weekend.
    • Many Russians have adopted cognitive dissonance, celebrating their country while accepting government triumphal narrative even as Mr. Putin has become a pariah in much of Western world and Russian army suffers staggering number of casualties in Ukraine.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the actions of protesters as a form of dissent when in reality they are simply attempting to disrupt the election process and have no legitimate claim to political power. Secondly, it portrays Putin's expected victory as inevitable despite evidence suggesting otherwise. Thirdly, it attempts to discredit opposition candidates by implying that their presence is merely tokenistic.
    • The article presents the actions of protesters as a form of dissent when in reality they are simply attempting to disrupt the election process and have no legitimate claim to political power.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Russian government's claims without providing any evidence or counterarguments. Additionally, the use of inflammatory rhetoric is evident in phrases such as 'scum' and 'fake'. There are also instances where the author presents a dichotomous depiction of events, stating that Putin is expected to coast to victory while simultaneously mentioning protests against him. The article contains examples of direct quotations from sources without providing any context or analysis, which could be seen as an example of inflammatory rhetoric.
    • Ella Pamfilova, chair of Russia's Central Election Committee called the protesters 'scum'
    • The Russian government often alleges that acts of political dissent are paid-for 'provocations' rather than genuine acts of protest
    • Green dye has been used in attacks on Russian journalists and opposition figures, most notably on Alexey Navalny
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable by referring to the protesters as 'scum' without providing any evidence for this claim.
    • Dissent has effectively been outlawed in Russia since it launched its invasion of Ukraine more than two years ago.
      • Green dye has been used in attacks on Russian journalists and opposition figures, most notably on the late Kremlin critic Alexey Navalny.
        • The Russian government often alleges that acts of political dissent are paid-for 'provocations' rather than genuine acts of protest.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The article by Christian Edwards, Katharina Krebs and Anna Chernova reports on the green dye attack that occurred during the Russian presidential election. The authors have a conflict of interest as they are reporting for CNN which has its own political leanings and may be biased towards certain candidates or issues.
          • The article mentions that Russia is facing dissent, but does not provide any context or analysis on why this is happening.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          60%

          • Unique Points
            • The Russian election is being held
            • Morgan Ortagus believes the Russian election is a joke
          • Accuracy
            • Several Russians poured dye into ballot boxes in protest against presidential election
            • Dissent has effectively been outlawed in Russia since it launched its invasion of Ukraine more than two years ago
          • Deception (50%)
            The title of the article is misleading and exaggerated. The author uses hyperbole to make it seem like the Russian election was a complete joke when in reality there were legitimate concerns about voter fraud and irregularities.
            • This Russian 'election' is a joke
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy. The author claims that the Russian election is a joke without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
            • > This video is playing in picture-in-picture. Live Now All times eastern NOW - 4:30 PM 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 5:30 PM <br> The Russian election is a joke.
          • Bias (85%)
            The author uses inflammatory language and makes a statement that is not supported by evidence. The use of the word 'joke' to describe an election implies that it is illegitimate or invalid.
            • The author uses inflammatory language and makes a statement that is not supported by evidence.
              • ]This Russian 'election' is a joke[
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              68%

              • Unique Points
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Accuracy
                • Vladimir V. Putin is casting himself as the only leader able to end the war in Ukraine.
                • The centerpiece of the exhibition is a grand hall housing pavilions featuring all Russian regions, including five illegally annexed from Ukraine. Visitors are greeted by LED screens displaying tulip fields that portray these regions as calm and peaceful despite regular air raid sirens and deadly Ukrainian missile and drone strikes on the cities.
                • Several Russians poured dye into ballot boxes in protest against presidential election
                • The Kremlin denied any involvement in Navalny's death
              • Deception (80%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents Putin's vision of Russia as successful and innovative without any mention of the ongoing war in Ukraine which has caused significant damage to the country. Secondly, it portrays a peaceful image of Belgorod despite regular air raid sirens and deadly Ukrainian missile and drone strikes on the city. Thirdly, it presents Putin's triumphal narrative even though he has become a pariah in much of the Western world due to his actions in Ukraine. Lastly, it fails to mention any criticism or dissent against Putin's policies.
                • The article presents Putin's triumphal narrative even though he has become a pariah in much of the Western world due to his actions in Ukraine.
                • The article portrays Russia 2024 as a showcase of Russia's achievements and promises for the future after Putin secures another term in rubber-stamp elections. However, it does not provide any information on how these achievements were made or what they are.
                • Visitors to Belgorod pavilion are greeted by two LED screens displaying tulip fields that portray the region as calm and peaceful despite regular air raid sirens and deadly Ukrainian missile and drone strikes on the city. This is a cognitive dissonance many Russians have adopted.
              • Fallacies (70%)
                The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Putin is the only leader able to end the war in Ukraine without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim. Additionally, there are examples of dichotomous depictions throughout the article such as portraying Belgorod as calm and peaceful despite regular air raid sirens and deadly Ukrainian missile and drone strikes on the city. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Putin has become a pariah in much of the Western world without providing any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
                • Putin is the only leader able to end the war in Ukraine
                • Belgorod portrayed as calm and peaceful despite regular air raid sirens and deadly Ukrainian missile and drone strikes on the city
                • Putin has become a pariah in much of the Western world
              • Bias (80%)
                The article is biased towards Putin and his vision for Russia. The author portrays him as the only leader capable of ending the war in Ukraine, which is not accurate or fair. Additionally, the exhibition center promotes a triumphal narrative that ignores reality on the ground in Ukraine.
                • At the Crimea pavilion, throngs of visitors pose with men dressed as Roman legionnaires next to a video boasting about the bridge connecting the peninsula, which was illegally annexed in 2014, to the Russian mainland. There is no mention of the Ukrainian attack in 2022 that blew a hole in the bridge or frequent threats that lead to its closing.
                  • The centerpiece is a grand hall housing pavilions featuring all the Russian regions, including five illegally annexed from Ukraine. Visitors to one pavilion are greeted by two LED screens displaying tulip fields that portray the region of Belgorod as calm and peaceful.
                    • The exhibition promotes what the Kremlin portrays as Russia’s achievements in the past two decades, roughly the period Mr. Putin has been in power.
                      • Vladimir V. Putin’s vision of Russia — successful, innovative and borderless — is on display at one of Moscow’s biggest tourist attractions
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        Valerie Hopkins has conflicts of interest on the topics of Putin and Russia. She reports on a Russian exhibition center that celebrates Putin's achievements in the past two decades and promises for the future after he secures another six-year term in rubber-stamp elections this weekend.
                        • Putin started more than two years ago
                          • Russia 2024 Expo
                            • Vladimir V. Putin
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              Valerie Hopkins has conflicts of interest on the topics of Putin and Russia's achievements in the past two decades. She also reports on a recent attack by Ukraine that blew a hole in the bridge connecting Crimea to mainland Russia.
                              • >Putin started more than two years ago
                                • Russia 2024 Expo