Samsung Ditches Galaxy A55 in US, Encourages Buyers to Consider Mid-Range Devices

Not specified, Not specified United States of America
Samsung has announced that it will not be launching the Galaxy A55 in the US.
The company wants to direct potential buyers of the Galaxy A55 to other mid-range devices such as Samsung S23 and S23 FE, which are available at a lower price point.
Samsung Ditches Galaxy A55 in US, Encourages Buyers to Consider Mid-Range Devices

Samsung has announced that it will not be launching the Galaxy A55 in the US. The company wants to direct potential buyers of the Galaxy A55 to other mid-range devices such as the Samsung S23 and S23 FE, which are available at a lower price point. While some may see this as disappointing news for those looking forward to purchasing a new phone, it is important to note that there are many other options available in the market. It's also worth considering that mid-range devices can still offer excellent performance and features without breaking the bank.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there are any specific reasons for Samsung to discontinue the Galaxy A55 in the US.

Sources

83%

  • Unique Points
    • The Samsung Galaxy A55 uses Gorilla Glass Victus Plus for its display while the Samsung Galaxy A54 used Gorilla Glass 5. This should make the newer phone more durable.
    • Both phones have similar camera setup with a 32MP selfie cam and same cameras found on the Galaxy A54, including a 12MP ultrawide lens.
  • Accuracy
    • The Samsung Galaxy A54 used Gorilla Glass 5 while the Samsung Galaxy A55 uses Gorilla Glass Victus Plus for its display.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article is a comparison between Samsung Galaxy A55 and Galaxy A54. The two phones have some similarities in terms of design, display size and refresh rate, camera setup and battery life. However there are also significant differences such as the chipset upgrade from Exynos 1380 to Exynos 1480 for Samsung Galaxy A55 which should make switching between apps smoother. The new phone also features a larger display at 6.6-inches compared to the previous model's smaller display of 6.4 inches, and uses Gorilla Glass Victus Plus instead of Gorilla Glass 5 for better durability.
    • The Galaxy A55 has a chipset upgrade from Exynos 1380 to Exynos 1480 which should make switching between apps smoother. (Image credit: Samsung / Tom޲s Guide)
    • The new phone features a larger display at 6.6-inches compared to the previous model's smaller display of 6.4 inches, and uses Gorilla Glass Victus Plus instead of Gorilla Glass 5 for better durability.
    • Samsung Galaxy A54 took a big leap forward last year by adapting the 50MP main camera from the Galaxy S23 flagship as its own primary shooter.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
    Philip Michaels has a conflict of interest with Samsung as he is reporting on the Galaxy A54 and A55. He also mentions Exynos 1380 and Exynos 1480 which are processors used by Samsung in their phones.
    • Philip Michaels reports that the Galaxy A54 has a larger display size than its predecessor, the Galaxy A53. He also mentions that it uses an Exynos processor.
      • The article compares the camera setup and quality of both devices, with Philip Michaels stating that he prefers Samsung's cameras over those of other manufacturers.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      86%

      • Unique Points
        • The Samsung Galaxy A55 won't be available to buy in the US.
        • Samsung wants to direct potential Galaxy A55 buyers to the Galaxy S23 and S23 FE.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Galaxy A35 will be coming to the US market and look forward to sharing more details in the coming weeks. However, this statement contradicts Samsung's official confirmation that they won't be carrying the Galaxy A55 5G at all. Secondly, while there is no clear evidence of bias or fallacies present in this article, it does not disclose any sources and only quotes a representative from Samsung without providing their name or title. Lastly, the article presents information about two different phones (the Galaxy A35 and the Galaxy A55) as if they are one product when discussing its US availability.
        • Samsung quotes a representative from their company without providing any additional context or information about them. This makes it difficult to determine if they are an unbiased source.
        • The statement that 'Galaxy A35 5G will be coming to the US market' is deceptive because it implies that both the Galaxy A35 and Galaxy A55 will be released in the US, but only the former has been confirmed for a release.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Samsung has confirmed the Galaxy A35 will be coming to the US market and look forward to sharing more details in the coming weeks. However, it also states that they will not be carrying the Galaxy A55 5G at this time.
        • We can confirm that Galaxy A35 5G will be coming to the US market and look forward to sharing more details in the coming weeks.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      84%

      • Unique Points
        • , The out-of-the-box performance of mid-range Galaxy smartphones has been problematic despite advances in Snapdragon and Exynos chips.
        • , The worst part is that the phones that have suffered the most from poor out-of-the box optimization are those in the Galaxy A5x lineup, which includes the A52, A52 5G, and A52s.
        • The Galaxy A34 was equipped with a MediaTek chip and had more performance issues out of the box than it did despite being powered by Samsung's in-house chips.
        • , The Galaxy A34 was equipped with a MediaTek chip and had more performance issues out of the box than it did despite being powered by Samsung's in-house chips.
        • The Galaxy A53 stuttered a bit too much in the early days and needed updates before performing optimally, while the A54 suffered from even more performance issues out of the box.
        • , The Galaxy A54 was launched alongside and had more performance issues than it did despite being powered by Samsung's in-house chips.
      • Accuracy
        • The worst part is that the phones that have suffered the most from poor out-of-the-box optimization are those in the Galaxy A5x lineup, which includes the A52, A52 5G, and A52s.
        • The Samsung Galaxy S10 was launched alongside and had more performance issues than it did despite being powered by Samsung's in-house chips.
        • The base model of Samsung Galaxy S4 included 3GB of RAM while the LTE version had 4GB. This should make switching between apps smoother in the newer phone.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Samsung has never minced its words when calling out how the performance of mid-range smartphones hasn't kept up with the times. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by saying that the Galaxy A5x lineup is currently Samsung's most premium mid-range lineup, and it stuttered in early days.
        • Samsung has never minced its words when calling out how the performance of mid-range smartphones hasn't kept up with the times.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      85%

      • Unique Points
        • The Samsung Galaxy A55 has a more enhanced processor than the Galaxy A35 which is Exynos 1480 chip compared to Exynos 1380 found in the A35 model. This promises up to 32% better graphics processing unit (GPU) performance and up to 15% better central processing unit (CPU) performance.
        • The Samsung Galaxy A5x lineup is Samsung's most premium mid-range lineup.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when comparing the Galaxy A55 and Galaxy A35 by stating that they are 'comfortably on par with their 6.6-inch Super AMOLED displays' but then goes on to say that the 'Awesome Ice Blue, Awesome Lemon, Awesome Lilac, and Awesome Navy colors of the new phones are quirky'. This is an example of a slippery slope fallacy as it implies that because something is comfortable or good in one aspect it must be bad in another. Additionally, the author uses an appeal to authority when stating that 'Samsung has kindly packaged in 25W fast charging into both devices' but does not provide any evidence for this claim.
        • The A55 and A35 are comfortably on par with their 6.6-inch Super AMOLED displays
        • Awesome Ice Blue, Awesome Lemon, Awesome Lilac, and Awesome Navy colors of the new phones are quirky
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication