Santos and Woodside in Preliminary Merger Talks Amid Rising Global Gas Demand

Australia
Both companies have seen their shares decline in recent months, and they are currently trading below the values assigned to U.S. oil companies.
Santos and Woodside are in early discussions for a potential merger that could create a global energy giant worth around $52 billion.
The merger discussions have been partly prompted by pressure from investors urging the board to consider a break-up.
The potential merger is also being driven by the rising demand for natural gas due to the Ukraine war.
Santos and Woodside in Preliminary Merger Talks Amid Rising Global Gas Demand

Australian oil and gas companies, Santos and Woodside, are reportedly in early discussions for a potential merger. The talks, which are still in their preliminary stages, could result in the creation of a global energy giant worth around $52 billion. The merger discussions have been partly prompted by pressure from investors urging the board to consider a break-up. Santos CEO Kevin Gallagher has confirmed that the company is considering various options, including splitting off its LNG operations.

Woodside, which recently completed a merger with BHP's oil and gas business, is facing obstacles in obtaining final approvals for its Scarborough venture. The $11 billion Scarborough gas project of Woodside and the $4 billion Barossa gas project of Santos have faced protests and legal challenges from Aboriginal groups and environmentalists. These delays have raised concerns in Japan, a major buyer of Australian liquefied natural gas (LNG), about the reliability of LNG supply.

Both companies have seen their shares decline in recent months, and they are currently trading below the values assigned to U.S. oil companies. Analysts believe that the base case for Santos would be to keep the company whole but consider divestments unless a takeover proposal emerges. A merger could create value through cost savings and improved funding options for delayed projects. However, there is no certainty that a transaction will occur.

The potential merger is also being driven by the rising demand for natural gas due to the Ukraine war. Santos shares surged on news of the merger talks with Woodside, indicating the market's positive response to the potential deal.



Confidence

95%

Doubts
  • The merger discussions are still in their preliminary stages, and there is no certainty that a transaction will occur.

Sources

95%

reuters.com

Reuters Friday, 08 December 2023 08:10
  • Unique Points
    • Santos shares surge on news of $11.53 billion merger talks with Woodside
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Both companies have seen their shares decline in recent months
    • A possible combination of Woodside and Santos would create one of the world's biggest LNG producers
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

97%

  • Unique Points
    • The talks were partly prompted by pressure from investors urging the board to consider a break-up
    • Santos CEO Kevin Gallagher has confirmed that the company is considering various options, including splitting off its LNG operations
    • Woodside, which recently completed a merger with BHP's oil and gas business, is facing obstacles in obtaining final approvals for its Scarborough venture
    • Analysts believe that the base case for Santos would be to keep the company whole but consider divestments unless a takeover proposal emerges
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

95%

  • Unique Points
    • The merger is driven by the rising demand for natural gas due to the Ukraine war
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

97%

  • Unique Points
    • The $11 billion Scarborough gas project of Woodside and the $4 billion Barossa gas project of Santos have faced protests and legal challenges from Aboriginal groups and environmentalists
    • The delays have raised concerns in Japan, a major buyer of Australian liquefied natural gas (LNG), about the reliability of LNG supply
    • Pressure to simplify the Australian oil and gas sector has already led to major mergers, and market speculation suggests that a merger between Woodside and Santos could be on the horizon
    • Both companies are currently trading below the values assigned to U.S. oil companies, and a merger could create value through cost savings and improved funding options for delayed projects
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    • The article is straightforward and factual, with no apparent deception.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication