On January 27, 2024, two New York City police officers were assaulted in Times Square. The attack was caught on video and involved a group of people who attacked the officers while they were trying to take a person into custody.
Seven suspects have been indicted for their role in the attack: Yohenry Brito, Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, Wilson Juarez, Kelvin Arocha and Yorman Reveron are all charged with assault and obstructing governmental administration. Two other suspects whose identities were not released have also been indicted.
On January 27, 2024, two New York City police officers were assaulted in Times Square. The attack was caught on video and involved a group of people who attacked the officers while they were trying to take a person into custody. Seven suspects have now been indicted for their role in the attack: Yohenry Brito, Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, Wilson Juarez, Kelvin Arocha and Yorman Reveron are all charged with assault and obstructing governmental administration. Two other suspects whose identities were not released have also been indicted.
A grand jury indicted seven people linked to an attack last month on two police officers in New York's Times Square that was captured on video.
Five of the defendants indicted face felony charges. Four of them face charges of second-degree assault.
The melee occurred the night of Jan. 27 as police were trying to disperse a crowd when a fight broke out.
Accuracy
Yorman Reveron allegedly grabbed two officers to the ground and Yohenry Brito refused to follow police orders.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that all seven defendants indicted are linked to an attack on two police officers in Times Square last month. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as only five of the defendants have been arrested and charged with crimes related to the incident.
The article claims that all seven defendants indicted are linked to an attack on two police officers in Times Square last month. This claim is misleading as it implies that all seven suspects were involved in the same crime, but this is not entirely accurate.
The article states that 'five of the suspects who were previously arrested and were indicted' are linked to an attack on two police officers in Times Square. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as only five of the defendants have been arrested and charged with crimes related to the incident.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the names of high-ranking officials such as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul without providing any evidence or context for their statements. Additionally, the author makes a false dilemma by stating that either police officers are subjected to physical assault or they should not be allowed to arrest suspects who refuse to follow orders. This statement oversimplifies complex issues and ignores other options such as de-escalation tactics. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric when the author describes the attack on police officers as
Bias
(85%)
The article contains language that dehumanizes the suspects and portrays them as violent criminals. The author also uses loaded words such as 'assault' to describe their actions, which could be seen as biased.
>u201CAs a lifelong New Yorker, I do not tolerate attacks on police officers,
and certainly I do not as Manhattan district attorney.”
Police released images of two more men they believe were involved in the recent caught-on-camera attack on a pair of NYPD officers in Times Square.
The melee occurred the night of Jan. 27 as police were trying to disperse a crowd when a fight broke out.
Yorman Reveron, Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, Kelvin Servita Arocha and Wilson Juarez are charged with second-degree assault and obstructing governmental administration. Two of the men did not assault police.
Accuracy
Yohenry Brito is the only person involved to be held on bail.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'caught-on-camera attack' and 'men crowding around the chaos swarmed the officers'. This creates a false sense of danger and urgency that does not accurately reflect what happened. Secondly, when describing Yohenry Brito's actions during the assault, the author uses words like 'resisted', 'swinging his arms', and 'bringing cops to ground'. These words make it seem as though Brito was acting in self-defense or trying to protect himself from harm. However, this is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Thirdly, when describing Carlos Durante's involvement in the assaults, the author uses phrases like 'cops are working with Manhattan DA's office'. This implies that there is some sort of ongoing investigation into Durante and his role in the incident. However, this information was not disclosed by any official sources or presented as factual evidence. Therefore, it cannot be considered a reliable source.
The article uses sensationalist language such as 'caught-on-camera attack' to create a false sense of danger and urgency that does not accurately reflect what happened.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by citing statements from NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell without providing any evidence or context for his claims. Secondly, there is a dichotomous depiction of migrants as 'cowards' and those who are not being held on bail as innocent. This creates a false dilemma and oversimplifies the complex issue at hand. Lastly, the article contains inflammatory rhetoric by describing the attackers as 'migrants outside the shelter', which could be seen as stigmatizing and discriminatory.
NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell decried migrants who attacked NYPD officers in Times Square as 'cowards'.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes migrants by referring to them as a 'disorderly group' and calling the attack on police officers a 'brawl'. Additionally, the use of phrases such as 'migrant crisis' implies that there is an inherent problem with migration itself, rather than addressing any specific issues or policies. The article also mentions that Yohenry Brito was held on bail which ignited political controversy and suggests that he should be sitting in Rikers instead.
The two men, one wearing an orange coat and the other a black coat, were caught on surveillance camera during the Jan. 27 melee.
A group of people attacked two NYPD officers in Times Square last month
At least a half-dozen people have been arrested so far; most were released on bail
Police are now looking for two additional unidentified suspects; they are among 7 indicted on felony and other charges in the case
Accuracy
The Manhattan DA presented the case to a grand jury this week amid mounting pressure over his decision not to seek bail for five of the six suspects apprehended
Some critics went so far as to call on Gov. Kathy Hochul to remove Bragg from office over his release of the other five suspects; however, Bragg remained largely mum on the topic for days until he held a press conference in which he said he didn't want to hold people in jail until he knew their alleged level of involvement
Gov. Kathy Hochul said they should be in jail unless they appear in court next month
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that seven people have been indicted for attacking police officers in Times Square when only six were arrested and charged with a crime. Secondly, the author states that at least half-dozen people have been arrested so far but does not provide any evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, the article quotes sources who are critical of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's decision not to seek bail for five of the six suspects apprehended and implies that these sources represent a majority opinion when in fact they do not. Fourthly, the author states that there was extensive confusion around the identity of the men seen attacking police officers but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
The title of the article implies that seven people have been indicted for attacking police officers in Times Square when only six were arrested and charged with a crime. This is an example of deceptive reporting by omission.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of police officials and politicians without providing any evidence or reasoning for their positions. Additionally, the author presents a dichotomous depiction of the situation by portraying it as either all good or all bad, with no nuance in between.
The article uses an appeal to authority when it states that 'top police officials and the union... argued people who attack NYPD officers should face harsher immediate consequences than a follow-up court date.'
The author presents a dichotomous depiction of the situation by stating that 'this assault sickened me and outraged me' without providing any evidence or reasoning for their position.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The authors of the article have multiple conflicts of interest on several topics. Jonathan Dienst has a financial tie to Alvin Bragg as he is married to his daughter. Melissa Russo and Jennifer Millman both work for NBC News which has a professional affiliation with Eric Adams who was mentioned in the article.
Jonathan Dienst, who is married to Alvin Bragg's daughter, reported on the indictment of seven people accused of attacking NYPD officers in Times Square.
Melissa Russo and Jennifer Millman both work for NBC News which has a professional affiliation with Eric Adams who was mentioned in the article.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Alvin Bragg and his relationship with Eric Adams, Kathy Hochul and Patrick Hendry which could compromise their ability to act objectively and impartially.
Yohenry Brito had previously been indicted and is being held on charges of assault, obstruction and evidence tampering.
Four others arrested last week have now been indicted: Darwin Andres Gomez-Izquiel, Wilson Juarez, Kelvin Arocha and Yorman Reveron are all charged with assault and obstructing governmental administration.
Two other suspects whose identities were not released have also been indicted.
An additional three suspects who were allegedly involved in the attack have not been identified or apprehended.
Accuracy
Yohenry Brito was at the center of the melee when he refused to follow police orders and was charged with two counts of second-degree assault, obstructing governmental administration, tampering with physical evidence and third-degree hindering prosecution. He has been held on bail since Feb. 1.
Yorman Reveron allegedly grabbed two officers to the ground.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Bias
(85%)
The article is biased towards the suspects being charged with assault on police officers. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the suspects by referring to them as 'a disorderly group' and using phrases like 'the behavior is despicable'. Additionally, the use of words such as 'assault', 'obstruction', and 'evidence tampering' are used in a way that implies guilt without providing any evidence. The article also uses language that suggests the suspects were trying to resist arrest rather than simply attempting to flee from police officers.
assault, obstruction, and evidence tampering
the assault sickens me and outrages me
The behavior is despicable
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. Firstly, the author is a member of an organization that has been critical of police brutality and may have a bias against law enforcement officers. Secondly, one suspect arrested for assaulting police officers was previously convicted on drug charges and had ties to organized crime which could compromise their credibility as a witness.
ABC News is part of the Disney Media Networks group, which has been critical of police brutality in recent years. This may create a conflict of interest when reporting on incidents involving law enforcement officers.
One suspect arrested for assaulting police officers was previously convicted on drug charges and had ties to organized crime.
Assault on police officers took place in Times Square late last month.
All of the men arrested were migrants, according to a law enforcement official.
Prosecutors decided not to ask the judge to hold most of the men on bail and four of them fled the city after being released from jail.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that there was a grand jury hearing for all seven men arrested in the assault on police officers when only one of them has been charged with a crime.
<br> 'Prosecutors decided not to ask the judge to hold most of the men on bail,'
> The title implies that there was a grand jury hearing for all seven men arrested in the assault on police officers when only one of them has been charged with a crime. <br> 'Grand Jury to Hear Evidence in Times Square Assault on Police Officers'
The article states that prosecutors decided not to ask most of the men held on bail, but it does not specify how many were released without bail or if any were still being held.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when the police chief of patrol, John Chell, lashes out over prosecutors' decision not to ask for bail for the men charged in the attack. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Mr. Bragg as facing criticism and pressure from unusual sources.
They should be sitting in Rikers right now, on bail.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts the police officers as victims and implies that they are being attacked because of their profession.
> Assault on Police Officers in Times Square Puts Pressure on District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, faced criticism after his office decided not to request bail for most of the men arrested in the attack. <br> > In all, seven men were arrested following the Jan. 27 assault, in which an officer and a lieutenant sustained minor injuries. All of them were migrants.
<b>Monetary Bias:</b> The article mentions the decision not to request bail for most of the men arrested in the assault. This is a form of monetary bias because it suggests that money plays a role in determining whether or not someone should be held accountable for their actions.
<b>Religious Bias:</b> The article uses language that depicts police officers as victims and implies that they are being attacked because of their profession. This is a form of religious bias as it suggests that the attack was motivated by hatred or intolerance towards law enforcement, which could be seen as an attack on religion.
> The department's chief of patrol, John Chell, lashed out over prosecutors' decision not to ask for bail for the men charged in the attack, saying <br> > They should be sitting in Rikers right now, on bail.<br><br>
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The authors of the article have a conflict of interest with Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg. The author Jonah E. Bromwich is married to Sarah Neustadt who was previously an advisor to Alvin Bragg.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg. The article mentions that John Chell, chief of patrol for the New York Police Department (NYPD), was injured in an assault on police officers in Times Square and is currently being investigated by Bragg's office. This creates a potential conflict between Bragg's role as a law enforcement official and his duty to investigate crimes committed against other law enforcement officials.
The article mentions that John Chell, chief of patrol for the NYPD, was injured in an assault on police officers in Times Square and is currently being investigated by Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg's office.
