Singapore Airlines Passenger Dies in Unforeseen Clear Air Turbulence Incident: Insights from Bird Behavior Research

Bangkok, Thailand Thailand
Clear air turbulence, which cannot be detected by radar, was reportedly a factor in the incident.
On May 25, 2024, a Singapore Airlines flight from London to Singapore encountered severe turbulence that left one passenger dead.
Researchers believe studying birds could provide insights into how aircraft can better cope with turbulence.
The deceased passenger was identified as Geoff Kitchen, a 73-year-old British national who suffered a suspected heart attack during the turbulence.
Singapore Airlines Passenger Dies in Unforeseen Clear Air Turbulence Incident: Insights from Bird Behavior Research

On Tuesday, May 25, 2024, a Singapore Airlines flight from London to Singapore encountered severe turbulence that left dozens of passengers injured and one passenger dead. The incident occurred about three-quarters through the 13-hour journey when many passengers had already finished their last meal onboard.

The deceased passenger was identified as Geoff Kitchen, a 73-year-old British national. He suffered a suspected heart attack during the turbulence and could not be revived despite efforts from crew members to provide basic life support and seek assistance from medical professionals.

Clear air turbulence, which cannot be detected by radar, was reportedly a factor in the incident. This phenomenon is known as clear air turbulence and is impossible to prepare for using traditional methods such as weather radar or following the course charted by other planes that have recently passed through the area.

Singapore Airlines flight SQ321, carrying 211 passengers and 18 crew members, had taken off from London's Heathrow Airport on Monday night. The plane was about three-quarters full and many of the travelers were Singaporeans returning home or families planning a holiday in far-flung destinations.

The incident occurred over the Bay of Bengal, which is notorious for its monsoon rains that can cause turbulence. Commercial pilots rely on weather radar and carry extra fuel to fly around and wait for the weather to ease if needed. However, clear air turbulence cannot be detected using these methods.

Researchers believe studying birds could provide insights into how aircraft can better cope with turbulence, especially in urban environments where smaller aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) fly. Birds have evolved to exploit turbulent air for their benefit, and understanding their flight patterns could inform aircraft design.

Emily Shepard from Swansea University and Paul Williams from the University of Reading are leading a research project that aims to understand how birds navigate through turbulent skies. They believe that studying the behavior of birds in turbulent conditions could lead to new technologies for predicting and mitigating turbulence, making air travel safer for passengers.

The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and predicting turbulence, especially as it becomes more common due to climate change. The aviation industry is working on developing new technologies to detect clear air turbulence and reduce its impact on passengers and aircraft.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Was the cause of Mr. Kitchen's death definitively determined to be a heart attack?
  • Were there any other factors contributing to the severity of the turbulence?

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Forty three people on board a Singapore Airlines flight that hit severe turbulence remain hospitalized in Bangkok four days after the emergency.
    • One passenger died of a suspected heart attack during the turbulence, identified as Geoff Kitchen, 73.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

92%

  • Unique Points
    • Aircraft turbulence is becoming more common due to climate change.
    • Researchers believe studying birds could help predict and cope with turbulence.
    • Analysing how birds exploit turbulent air could inform aircraft design, especially in urban environments where smaller aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) fly.
  • Accuracy
    • The number of injured passengers in the Singapore Airlines incident varies between articles: 31, 43, and 'dozens'.
    • One passenger died in the Singapore Airlines incident according to some articles but others report two or no fatalities.
  • Deception (80%)
    The article makes several statements about the increase in turbulence due to climate change and the need to study birds to better understand and predict it. However, there is no clear evidence or citations provided in the article for these claims. While some quotes from experts are included, they do not directly support the author's assertions about climate change causing an increase in turbulence. The author also makes several editorializing statements such as 'Our skies are getting bumpier' and 'Research shows that severe turbulence is becoming more likely as the planet warms'. These statements go beyond reporting facts and express the author's opinion on the matter.
    • Our skies are getting bumpier, making the need to understand and predict turbulence increasingly urgent.
    • Research shows that severe turbulence is becoming more likely as the planet warms.
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains some instances of informal fallacies, specifically appeals to authority and dichotomous depictions. However, the overall tone and content of the article is informative and does not contain a significant number of fallacies. The author provides evidence from research studies to support her claims about turbulence and birds' ability to cope with it.
    • ][Paul Williams] We can successfully predict around 75% of turbulence up to 18 hours ahead.[/
    • ][Emily Shepard] Some species have adapted to deal with 'extreme turbulence'. Analysing how they exploit it to their advantage could inform aircraft design, especially in urban environments where smaller aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) could fly.
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a neutral tone towards the topic of turbulence and its impact on aviation. However, she demonstrates a clear bias towards using birds as a source of data to better understand and predict turbulence. The author repeatedly mentions how birds cope with turbulent air and how their behaviors could inform aircraft design, particularly in urban environments where smaller aircraft are more common. This focus on birds as a solution to the problem of predicting and coping with turbulence is not neutral, but rather an ideological bias towards using natural phenomena as a means of solving human problems.
    • Analysing how they exploit it to their advantage could inform aircraft design, especially in urban environments where smaller aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) could fly.
      • Researchers propose birds could provide clues.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      96%

      • Unique Points
        • Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 encountered deadly turbulence during a London-to-Singapore flight
        • One passenger died of a suspected heart attack during the turbulence, identified as Geoff Kitchen, 73.
        • The incident occurred about three-quarters through the 13-hour journey, with many passengers having finished their last meal onboard
        • Clear air turbulence, which cannot be detected by radar, was a factor in the incident
      • Accuracy
        • Dozens of people were injured and one passenger died as a result of the turbulence
        • The incident occurred about three-quarters through the 13-hour journey
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (95%)
        The article contains some instances of inflammatory rhetoric and an appeal to authority, but no formal or dichotomous fallacies are present. The authors describe the turbulence as 'deadly' and 'notorious', which is inflammatory language intended to elicit a strong emotional response from the reader. They also quote a passenger stating that some passengers were 'launched into the air within the cabin' and hit the ceiling, implying that this is an unusual occurrence. However, they also acknowledge that clear air turbulence can be impossible to prepare for and provide context about how commercial pilots typically handle turbulent weather. The authors are also journalists reporting on a news event, so their use of inflammatory language and appeal to authority do not constitute fallacies in this context.
        • ][The turbulence was] deadly[[
        • Some pilots consider the region 'notorious' this time of the year because its monsoon rains can cause turbulence.
        • Within an instant, they hit the ceiling of the cabin and dropped right back onto the floor.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      98%

      • Unique Points
        • Former easyJet pilot Emma Henderson MBE started flying 30 years ago and became a first officer in 2009.
        • It’s recommended that people fasten their seat belts during a flight even when the seat-belt signs are switched off because anything can happen at any time.
      • Accuracy
        • The number of injured passengers in the Singapore Airlines incident varies between articles: 31 in one and 'dozens' in another.
        • One article states that one passenger died, while another states that a man died.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      98%

      • Unique Points
        • A 41-year-old, a 63-year-old, and a 73-year-old all died on separate commercial flights.
        • Of the afflicted passengers for whom there was follow-up data, 0.3% died.
        • Airlines have emergency medical procedures in place and are trained to provide basic life support and seek assistance from medical professionals.
        • Crew members may use automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and perform CPR on passengers who go unconscious and stop breathing.
        • If a passenger is presumed dead, the crew must notify the captain, who will decide whether to continue to the intended destination or divert to another airport.
        • The deceased person’s body is handled with dignity and respect by covering it with a blanket and securing it in its original seat or moving it to a less populated area.
        • Proper communication between ground staff at the destination airport is essential for handling the body upon arrival.
      • Accuracy
        • One passenger died of a suspected heart attack during the turbulence.
        • Singapore Airlines flight SQ321 encountered deadly turbulence during a London-to-Singapore flight
        • Dozens of people were injured and one passenger died as a result of the turbulence
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication