A six-year-old boy was fatally attacked by two Great Dane-Mastiff mixes in Northeast Portland.
The caretaker of the boy, who owned the dogs, was also injured in the attack.
The dogs are now in the custody of Multnomah County Animal Services.
The incident is being investigated by the Portland Police Bureau Child Abuse Team and Homicide Unit.
A tragic incident unfolded in Northeast Portland when a six-year-old boy was fatally attacked by two dogs. The dogs, identified as Great Dane-Mastiff mixes, belonged to the woman who was taking care of the boy. The incident occurred when the boy opened the garage door where the dogs were kept.
The caretaker, who was also injured in the attack, made desperate attempts to save the boy, including grabbing a gun. Despite her efforts, the boy succumbed to his injuries. The woman was subsequently taken to the hospital for treatment.
The boy's grandmother would drop him off at the caretaker's house each morning. On the day of the incident, the dogs attacked the boy when he opened the garage door. The dogs are now in the custody of Multnomah County Animal Services.
The Portland Police Bureau Child Abuse Team and Homicide Unit are investigating the incident. It remains unclear if the dog owner will face criminal charges. This incident is one of several deadly dog attacks that have occurred in the U.S. this year.
100%
No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
This is one of several deadly dog attacks that have occurred in the U.S. this year.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
95%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
80%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
The owner of the dogs did everything she could to save the boy's life, including grabbing a gun.
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
94%
What's This
The overall score is a weighted
number that takes
into
account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine
the
credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest +
Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 +
ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 +
UniquePointsScore * 0.05 +
DeceptionScore * 0.20 +
ReadabilityScore * 0.05 +
FallacyScore * 0.20
Readability
85%
A score that takes into
consideration the content
for
flow,
interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that
makes
the
content hard to understand
Unique
Points
Accuracy Deception
(100%)
Fallacies
(100%)
Bias
(100%)
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (100%)