Snap Inc. Settles $15 Million Lawsuit Over Discrimination, Harassment Allegations Against Female Employees

Santa Monica, California United States of America
Company disagreed with claims but decided to settle due to lengthy litigation and other settlements
Investigation by California Civil Rights Department revealed women were discouraged from promotions and faced harassment
Snap Inc. settles $15 million lawsuit over discrimination, harassment allegations against female employees
Snap Inc. will pay $15 million in direct relief to affected workers, cover litigation costs, hire independent consultant for pay and promotion policies, conduct third-party audit on sexual harassment, retaliation, and discrimination compliance
Snap Inc. Settles $15 Million Lawsuit Over Discrimination, Harassment Allegations Against Female Employees

In a significant development, Snapchat's parent company, Snap Inc., has agreed to pay $15 million to settle allegations of discrimination, retaliation, and sexual harassment against female employees. The investigation into these claims was conducted by the California Civil Rights Department over a three-year period.

The probe revealed that women at the Santa Monica-based company were actively discouraged from applying for promotions or lost promotions to less-qualified male colleagues. Furthermore, they faced unwelcome sexual advances and other forms of harassment. When these employees spoke up about their experiences, they faced retaliation in the form of negative performance reviews, denial of professional opportunities, and even termination.

California Civil Rights Department Director Kevin Kish expressed his pride in the state's innovators while emphasizing the importance of ensuring equal opportunities for all workers. He stated that women are entitled to equality in every job and industry.

Snap Inc. disagreed with the claims but decided to settle, citing lengthy litigation and the scope of other settlements as reasons for their decision. The company does not believe it has any ongoing systemic pay equity, discrimination, harassment, or retaliation issues against women.

Under the terms of the settlement, Snap Inc. will pay $15 million in direct relief to affected workers and cover litigation costs. Some $14.5 million of this amount will compensate female employees who were employed at the company between 2014 and 2024.

The company has also agreed to hire an independent consultant to advise on pay and promotion policies, as well as conduct a third-party audit on its sexual harassment, retaliation, and discrimination compliance. This settlement marks one of several recent actions taken by California officials to hold tech giants accountable for their treatment of employees.

The investigation into Snapchat's parent company follows similar allegations against video game company Activision Blizzard in December 2023, which resulted in a $54 million settlement agreement. Attorney General Rob Bonta has also pursued actions against other tech industries, including Google and DoorDash.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Is Snap Inc. truly free of ongoing systemic pay equity, discrimination, harassment, or retaliation issues against women?
  • Was the investigation by California Civil Rights Department thorough enough?
  • Were all affected female employees identified and compensated?

Sources

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Snapchat’s parent company, Snap Inc., agreed to a $15 million settlement following a three-year investigation into allegations of discrimination, retaliation and sexual harassment by its female employees.
    • Women at the Santa Monica-based company were actively discouraged from applying for promotions or lost promotions to less-qualified male colleagues.
    • Women also faced unwelcome sexual advances and other harassment, according to state officials.
    • When the employees spoke up, they faced retaliation with negative performance reviews, denial of professional opportunities and termination.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Snap Inc. disagreed with the claims but decided to resolve the issue to avoid lengthy litigation and focus on the future.
    • Those who spoke out allegedly faced retaliation including negative performance reviews, denial of work opportunities or even termination.
    • Women who worked for the company between 2014 and 2024 may be eligible for compensation.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Snapchat Inc. will pay $15 million to settle a discrimination and harassment lawsuit brought by California’s civil rights agency
    • Investigation found Snapchat Inc. discriminated against female employees regarding pay and promotions
    • Women faced sexual harassment, retaliation when reporting incidents
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article reports facts about a settlement between Snapchat Inc. and California's civil rights agency over allegations of discrimination against female employees and workplace sexual harassment. The author does not make any fallacious statements or appeals to authority in the text provided. However, there are some instances of inflammatory rhetoric used by the California Civil Rights Department in their statement which is quoted in the article.
    • “Women were told, both implicitly and explicitly, that they were second-class citizens at Snap.”
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication