Senate Panel Hears From Mothers of Children Affected by Social Media Child Exploitation

Washington D.C., District of Columbia United States of America
Cyberbullying and harassment on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Discord and X have tragic consequences
Mariam Fawzi developed severe anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on Facebook and TikTok.
Riley Basford died by suicide after being cyberbullied online while Grace McComas also died by suicide due to social media abuse.
Social media child exploitation is a growing concern for parents and lawmakers
Senate Panel Hears From Mothers of Children Affected by Social Media Child Exploitation

The harrowing reality of social media child exploitation is a growing concern for parents and lawmakers alike. In recent years, we have seen the tragic consequences of cyberbullying and harassment on platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, Discord and X. The mothers of three children whose lives were severely impacted due to social media attended an emotional Senate panel hearing on Wednesday to demand action from tech companies. Riley Basford and Grace McComas both died by suicide after being cyberbullied online while Mariam Fawzi developed severe anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on Facebook and TikTok. The parents have channeled their pain into pushing for legislation aimed at putting an end to the abuse.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if the legislation proposed by the parents will be effective in putting an end to social media abuse.

Sources

88%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Inside the harrowing reality of social media child exploitation: 'They scared him to death'

New York Post Alex Oliveira, Sunday, 04 February 2024 22:28
  • Unique Points
    • The mothers of three children whose lives were severely impacted due to the negligent effects of social media attended an emotional Senate panel hearing on Wednesday. Riley Basford and Grace McComas, both 15, died by suicide after being cyberbullied online.
    • Neveen Radwan's daughter Mariam developed severed anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on Facebook and TikTok. The parents have channeled their anguish into pushing for legislation aimed at putting an end to the abuse.
  • Accuracy
    • Neveen Radwan's daughter Mariam developed severed anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on Facebook and TikTok.
  • Deception (90%)
    The article is highly deceptive in its portrayal of social media as a harmless platform for children. The authors use emotional language and personal stories to manipulate the reader into believing that social media companies are not doing enough to protect their users from online bullying and harassment. However, the article fails to provide any evidence or statistics supporting this claim.
    • The title of the article is misleading as it implies that all children who use social media will be harmed by it.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the mothers are making a statement on behalf of all parents who have lost children due to social media exploitation. This is not true and it creates a false sense of legitimacy for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when they describe Riley Basford's death as 'scared him to death'. This statement is exaggerated and does not accurately reflect the circumstances surrounding his suicide. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction when it describes Mariam Fawzi as being both a high school athlete before being airlifted to hospital due to severe anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on TikTok and Facebook. This creates the impression that she was either completely healthy or completely sick, which is not accurate. Finally, there are several examples of appeals to emotion throughout the article.
    • The mothers of three children whose lives were severely impacted due to social media attended an emotional Senate panel hearing on Wednesday.
    • Riley Basford and Grace McComas both took their own lives after being targeted online. Mariam Fawzi was airlifted to hospital with severe anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on TikTok and Facebook.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article highlights the tragic experiences of three teenagers who took their own lives after being bullied and harassed online. The mothers of these children attended a Senate hearing to demand action from social media companies to protect kids on their platforms. The CEOs of Meta (Facebook), TikTok, X, Snap Inc., and Discord were present at the hearing but received an icy reception from parents in the audience who held up photographs of their deceased children. The article also discusses how these social media companies utilize algorithms that adapt to a person's interests and push videos or content that will keep them hooked on products, which can lead to addiction and mental health issues such as eating disorders. Mariam Fawzi developed severe anorexia after watching pro-eating disorder content on TikTok and Facebook. Christine McComas' daughter Grace took her own life in 2012 after a horrific cyberbullying campaign, which included messages like 'snitches should have their fingers cut off one by one while they watch their families burn'. The mothers of these children are pushing for legislation aimed at putting an end to the abuse. Overall, this article demonstrates a clear bias towards the negative effects of social media on young people and highlights examples of how it can lead to tragic outcomes.
    • The mothers of three children whose lives were severely impacted due to the negligent effects of social media stared down billionaire CEOs at an emotional Senate panel hearing.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    85%

    The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
    (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

    A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

    Does Mark Zuckerberg have a mullet? An investigation.

    Business Insider Katie Notopoulos Monday, 05 February 2024 04:25
    • Unique Points
      • Mark Zuckerberg has grown a mullet.
      • The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on child exploitation on social media.
    • Accuracy
      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
    • Deception (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Fallacies (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Bias (80%)
      The author uses language that dehumanizes Mark Zuckerberg by referring to him as a 'business/party chimera' and saying the photos of his haircut were taken during a moment where he turned around and spoke to parents holding up photos of their children who died from suicide after exploitation through social media. This is an example of emotional appeal, which can be used to manipulate readers into forming strong opinions without providing evidence or logical reasoning.
      • The duality of the business/party chimera.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        Katie Notopoulos has a financial tie to Facebook as she is an employee of Insider Media Group which is owned by Axel Springer AG. She also has personal relationships with Linda Yaccarino and Sen. Tom Cotton who are both involved in the political sphere.
        • Katie Notopoulos works for Insider Media Group, which is owned by Axel Springer AG.
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Katie Notopoulos has conflicts of interest on the topics of Mark Zuckerberg and Linda Yaccarino. She is a reporter for Business Insider which is owned by Axel Springer AG, a German media company that also owns Politico Europe.

          73%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          All you need to know to keep your children safe on social media

          The Associated Press News BARBARA ORTUTAY Sunday, 04 February 2024 11:00
          • Unique Points
            • Social media CEOs were grilled by Senate lawmakers about the dangers of their platforms to children.
            • The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act prohibits kids under 13 from using platforms that advertise to them without parental consent, but it does not regulate online privacy for older kids or teenagers.
            • Online privacy is no longer the only concern when it comes to kids being online. There are bullying, harassment, and other risks associated with social media use.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (30%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that there are laws to protect children from online harms but fails to mention the law prohibiting kids under 13 from using platforms that advertise to them without parental consent has been widely documented as being ignored by social media companies. Secondly, the article suggests waiting until a child is older before giving them access to social media and presents this as an option for parents when in fact it's not clear if there are any laws or regulations preventing children from using these platforms at younger ages. Thirdly, the article quotes experts who suggest that 13 may not be the best age for kids to get on social media but fails to mention that some of these experts also recommend waiting until a child is older before giving them access to social media.
            • Waiting until a child is older before giving them access to social media and presenting this as an option for parents when in fact it's not clear if there are any laws or regulations preventing children from using these platforms at younger ages.
            • The law prohibiting kids under 13 from using platforms that advertise to them without parental consent has been widely documented as being ignored by social media companies.
            • The article quotes experts who suggest that 13 may not be the best age for kids to get on social media but fails to mention that some of these experts also recommend waiting until a child is older before giving them access to social media.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the opinions of experts without providing any evidence or reasoning for their claims. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when describing the dangers posed by social media platforms and how they can harm children, which is not supported by factual evidence.
            • Christine Elgersma, a social media expert at the nonprofit Common Sense Media.
          • Bias (85%)
            The author Barbara Ortutay does not demonstrate any political, religious or monetary bias in this article. However she demonstrates ideological bias by promoting the idea that parents should wait until their children are older before allowing them to use social media and phones.
            • `13 is probably not the best age for kids to get on social media`
              • `Some wait even later, like 16 or 17. But neither social media companies nor the government have done anything concrete to increase the age limit.`
                • `There has been a push among parents, educators and tech experts to wait to give children phones — and access to social media — until they are older, such as the ‘Wait Until 8th’ pledge that has parents sign a pledge not to give their kids a smartphone until the 8th grade`
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  Barbara Ortutay has conflicts of interest on the topics of social media and CEOs. She is a journalist who covers technology and social media for The Associated Press.

                  70%

                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                  Mark Zuckerberg apologizes to victims' families as senators demand tech platforms do better by kids

                  NBC News Digital Monday, 05 February 2024 04:31
                  • Unique Points
                    • Mark Zuckerberg apologized to parents who say Instagram contributed to their children's suicides or exploitation.
                    • Sen. Richard Blumenthal referred to a series of emails Zuckerberg allegedly received from Meta's global affairs director in which Clegg wrote about Meta's ability to ensure safety on its platforms being hampered by a lack of investment in the efforts.
                  • Accuracy
                    • Some parents audibly hissed when Zuckerberg entered the hearing room.
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Mark Zuckerberg has apologized to victims' families when he only apologized to parents who were present at the hearing and not necessarily victims or their families. Secondly, the author of the article is not disclosed which makes it difficult to determine if they have any bias towards Meta or its CEOs. Thirdly, some of the statements made by Zuckerberg are taken out of context and misrepresented in order to make him appear more deceptive than he actually is.
                    • Zuckerberg faced perhaps the toughest line of questioning at the hearing, with senators pressing him about nonconsensual sexually explicit images of children on Instagram, drug deaths linked to his social media platforms and an array of other issues.
                    • Sen. Richard Blumenthal referred to a series of emails Zuckerberg allegedly received from Meta's global affairs director Nick Clegg which were taken out of context.
                    • Mark Zuckerberg apologized Wednesday to parents who say Instagram contributed to their children's suicides or exploitation.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Kids Online Safety Act and referring to Meta's global affairs director as a source for information about their efforts towards online child safety. Additionally, there are instances where the author presents only one side of an argument without providing any counter-evidence or alternative perspectives, which can be seen in statements such as 'No one should have to go through the things that your families have suffered.' This is a form of confirmation bias. The article also contains examples of inflammatory rhetoric, with phrases like 'terrible' and 'psychologically manipulative' being used to describe Meta's platforms.
                    • Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologized Wednesday to parents in the audience of a Senate online child safety hearing who say Instagram contributed to their children’s suicides or exploitation.
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold a different belief system than the one promoted by Facebook (Meta). Additionally, there is an example of disproportionate number of quotes from politicians that reflect a specific position.
                    • I'm sorry for everything you've all gone through
                      • It's terrible. No one should have to go through the things that your families have suffered.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        There are multiple examples of conflicts of interest in this article. The author is Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO and founder of Facebook which owns Instagram. This creates a conflict when reporting on topics related to these platforms such as suicides or exploitation of children.
                        • Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for not doing enough to protect kids online.
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication