SpaceX's Starship Rocket Fails to Make it Around the Earth on Third Test Flight, Heads Towards Belly-Flop Splashdown in Indian Ocean

Boca Chica, Texas, USA Namibia
Despite this setback, SpaceX is continuing to develop its technology for future missions to Mars.
On March 14, SpaceX launched the third test flight of its Starship rocket. The launch was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth and instead started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
SpaceX's Starship Rocket Fails to Make it Around the Earth on Third Test Flight, Heads Towards Belly-Flop Splashdown in Indian Ocean

On March 14, SpaceX launched the third test flight of its Starship rocket. The launch was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth and instead started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean. Despite this setback, SpaceX is continuing to develop its technology for future missions to Mars.



Confidence

70%

Doubts
  • It's not clear if there were any issues with the rocket or its systems that caused it to fail.

Sources

80%

  • Unique Points
    • The third test flight of the Starship rocket was launched on Thursday.
    • This particular flight was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth. It started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
  • Accuracy
    • The rocket traveled almost halfway around the Earth before it was lost as it re-entered the atmosphere.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'mammoth Starship rocket' to describe SpaceX's rocket which implies that it is bigger than other rockets in a way that could be seen as exaggerated or biased towards SpaceX.
    • The third try turned out to be closer to the charm for Elon Musk and SpaceX, as his company’s mammoth Starship rocket launched on Thursday and traveled about halfway around the Earth before it was lost as it re-entered the atmosphere.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    65%

    • Unique Points
      • The rocket took off from its launchpad at about 9:25 a.m. ET and reached orbital velocity, but did not survive reentry.
      • This particular flight was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth. It started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
    • Accuracy
      • The rocket reached orbital velocity but did not survive reentry.
    • Deception (30%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article implies that SpaceX successfully launched its Starship rocket for a third time when in fact it did not survive reentry and exploded over the Gulf. Secondly, Elon Musk's statement on Twitter about reaching orbital velocity is misleading as he does not provide any context or clarification about what this means. Thirdly, the article states that Starship reached space following liftoff but fails to mention that communication was lost and it exploded over the Gulf just minutes into its test flight.
      • The article states that Starship reached space following liftoff but fails to mention that communication was lost and it exploded over the Gulf just minutes into its test flight.
      • Elon Musk's statement on Twitter about reaching orbital velocity is misleading as he does not provide any context or clarification about what this means.
      • The title of the article implies a successful launch when in fact SpaceX's Starship rocket did not survive reentry and exploded over the Gulf.
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing Elon Musk's tweet as evidence of the rocket reaching orbital velocity. However, this is not a reliable source and does not provide any concrete evidence for the claim made.
      • > SpaceX founder Elon Musk wrote on X at 9:40 a.m. ET.‒Congratulations @SpaceX team!!–
      • The rocket reached space following liftoff before communication suddenly was lost, SpaceX officials said.
    • Bias (85%)
      The author uses language that dehumanizes the rocket and its mission. The phrase 'Starship reached orbital velocity!' is an example of this as it implies that the rocket itself was capable of reaching a certain speed rather than just being propelled to reach it.
      • > Starship reached orbital velocity!
        • The SpaceX Starship spacecraft lifts off from its launch pad in Boca Chica, Texas, on Thursday.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        71%

        • Unique Points
          • The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will oversee a mishap investigation involving SpaceX's third test flight of Starship.
          • , The FAA is overseeing the SpaceX-led mishap investigation to ensure compliance with its approved plan and other regulatory requirements.
        • Accuracy
          • The rocket traveled almost halfway around the Earth before it was lost as it re-entered the atmosphere.
          • This particular flight was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth. It started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that there was a mishap involving SpaceX's third test flight of Starship without providing any details about what happened or how it affected public safety. Secondly, the author implies that SpaceX is solely responsible for the mishap when in fact both the Super Heavy booster and Starship vehicle were involved. Thirdly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning that no public injuries or property damage have been reported without providing any information about what caused these issues to occur. Lastly, there are no peer-reviewed studies linked to support any of the claims made in this article.
          • The author sensationalizes the mishap by stating it as a 'mishap' without providing details on what happened or how it affected public safety.
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (75%)
          The article is biased towards the FAA's involvement in the investigation of SpaceX's third test flight of Starship. The author uses language that portrays the FAA as a watchdog and protector of public safety, which could be seen as an attempt to create a positive image for the agency.
          • A mishap investigation is designed to further enhance public, safety, determine the root cause of the event and identify corrective actions to avoid it from happening.
            • “A return to flight is based on the FAA determining that any system, process or procedure related to the mishap does not affect public safety,”
              • No public injuries or public property damage have been reported
                • The FAA will be highly involved in every step in the investigation of the mishap and must approve SpaceX's final report, including any corrective actions.
                  • The mishap involved both the Super Heavy booster and the Starship vehicle
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  64%

                  • Unique Points
                    • SpaceX launched the Starship rocket on Thursday from Texas at 8:25 a.m. Chicago time.
                    • The third test launch of the largest and most powerful rocket in history, Starship, took place with assistance from an Evanston-based company called QuesTek Innovations.
                  • Accuracy
                    • The rocket traveled almost halfway around the Earth before it was lost as it re-entered the atmosphere.
                    • This particular flight was not intended to make it all the way around the Earth. It started re-entering the atmosphere about 45 minutes after launch and headed toward a belly-flop splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
                  • Deception (30%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by citing the success of SpaceX as a successful test flight for QuesTek. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the immense pressures of space travel and how advanced materials are needed to withstand it.
                    • The third test launch of the largest and most powerful rocket in history, Starship, took place from Texas at 8:25 a.m. Chicago time.
                  • Bias (75%)
                    The article contains a statement that suggests the author has a positive bias towards SpaceX and their collaboration with QuesTek. The sentence 'Success for SpaceX translates to success for QuesTek.
                    • ]I've been to the SpaceX headquarters, and I've seen that place where you see everybody cheering and such, and we're rooting for them,
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      Scott Schneider has a conflict of interest on the topics of SpaceX and Starship as he is reporting for Fox32 Chicago which is owned by Sinclair Broadcasting Group. Sinclair Broadcasting Group has financial ties with QuesTek Innovations, an Evanston company that provided components to SpaceX's Starship.
                      • Scott Schneider reports on the launch of SpaceX's Starship and mentions that it was made possible in part by components from an Evanston company called QuesTek Innovations. He does not disclose any financial ties between Sinclair Broadcasting Group, which owns Fox32 Chicago, and QuesTek Innovations.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication