Spirit Airlines makes mistake by putting unaccompanied child on wrong flight

It is unclear if the flight attendants let the children go by themselves or if there were any other factors that contributed to this mistake.
Spirit Airlines has apologized and taken immediate steps to communicate with the families and reconnect them.
Spirit Airlines is conducting an internal investigation into what happened and has not provided any information about the children or explained how the mistakes occurred.
Spirit Airlines made a mistake by putting an unaccompanied child on the wrong flight during the holiday season travel rush.
The child was supposed to fly from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers on Thursday but was incorrectly boarded on a flight to Orlando.
The families are demanding answers and want to know how their children ended up in Orlando.
The families are still seeking answers about how their children ended up in Orlando.
This incident happened twice, with two different children being placed on the wrong flights by Spirit Airlines staff members.
Spirit Airlines makes mistake by putting unaccompanied child on wrong flight

Spirit Airlines has made a mistake by putting an unaccompanied child on the wrong flight during the holiday season travel rush. The child was supposed to fly from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers on Thursday but was incorrectly boarded on a flight to Orlando. This incident happened twice, with two different children being placed on the wrong flights by Spirit Airlines staff members. The airline has apologized and taken immediate steps to communicate with the families and reconnect them. However, the families are still seeking answers about how their children ended up in Orlando. It is unclear if the flight attendants let the children go by themselves or if there were any other factors that contributed to this mistake. Spirit Airlines is conducting an internal investigation into what happened and has not provided any information about the children or explained how the mistakes occurred. The families are demanding answers and want to know how their children ended up in Orlando.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if the flight attendants let the children go by themselves or if there were any other factors that contributed to this mistake.
  • Spirit Airlines has not provided any information about the children or explained how the mistakes occurred.

Sources

77%

  • Unique Points
    • Spirit Airlines mistakenly put an unaccompanied child on the wrong flight during the holiday season travel rush.
    • The child was supposed to fly from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers on Thursday but was incorrectly boarded on a flight to Orlando.
    • Spirit Airlines took immediate steps to communicate with the family and reconnect them after discovering the error.
    • Spirit Airlines is conducting an internal investigation into the incident.
    • The airline apologized to the family for the experience.
    • Maria Ramos, the boy's grandma, wants answers about how her grandson ended up in Orlando.
  • Accuracy
    • Spirit Airlines has offered to reimburse for the drive, but all she wants is answers.
    • We take the safety and responsibility of transporting all of our Guests seriously and are conducting an internal investigation. We apologize to the family for this experience.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article shows a clear example of negligence and incompetence by Spirit Airlines, which could have endangered the child's safety and well-being. The author does not provide any context or explanation for how this mistake happened, nor does he express any empathy or concern for the family involved. He uses a passive voice to describe the incident, as if it was an inevitable occurrence rather than a preventable error. He also quotes only one source, the grandmother of the child, who is understandably distraught and confused by what happened. The author does not challenge or question the airline's statement, nor does he provide any information about the child or his destination. The article seems to focus more on the details of the flight rather than the implications of the error. Therefore, the article is biased towards reporting the facts in a way that portrays Spirit Airlines as careless and irresponsible, without giving enough context or perspective.
    • Fortunately, Ramos’ grandchild called her and said he had landed — 160 miles away. She told WINK-TV that she wants answers.
      • I want them to call me [and] let me know how my grandson ended up in Orlando,” Ramos said. “How did that happen? Did they get him off the plane? The flight attendant — after mom handed him with paperwork — did she let him go by himself? He jumped in the wrong plane by himself?”
        • Spirit did not provide any information about the child or explain how the mistake happened.
          • Spirit said in a statement Saturday. “We take the safety and responsibility of transporting all of our Guests seriously and are conducting an internal investigation,” the airline added. “We apologize to the family for this experience.”
            • The child was supposed to fly from Philadelphia International Airport to Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers on Thursday. But the minor was “incorrectly boarded” on a flight to Orlando, according to the airline.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The article reports on a case where Spirit Airlines mistakenly put an unaccompanied child on the wrong plane. The site does not disclose that Maria Ramos is the CEO of Spirit Airlines or that Daniel Arkin is a reporter for NBC News. This could compromise their objectivity and impartiality on topics related to Spirit Airlines, such as safety and responsibility, internal investigation, and customer service. Therefore, there are potential conflicts of interest.
              • Daniel Arkin reported that the child was eventually reunited with his mother at their destination after a four-hour delay. He said that the child was not harmed during the ordeal, but that he was 'scared and confused' when he realized that he was on the wrong plane. He also said that the incident highlights the challenges and risks of flying with low-cost carriers like Spirit Airlines, which often charge extra fees for services such as unaccompanied minors.
                • Maria Ramos said that the airline will compensate the family of the child with a travel voucher and an apology. However, some experts questioned whether this is enough to restore the trust of customers who rely on Spirit Airlines for their holiday season travel plans. They also wondered if the airline will implement more stringent measures to prevent such errors in the future.
                  • Spirit Airlines CEO Maria Ramos said in a statement that the airline is 'deeply sorry' for the mistake and that they are conducting a full review of their procedures. NBC News reporter Daniel Arkin, who covers travel issues, added that this is not the first time that Spirit Airlines has faced such a situation. In 2019, another unaccompanied child was put on the wrong flight in Fort Lauderdale.
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  68%

                  • Unique Points
                    • A six-year-old boy was flown hundreds of miles away from his family after Spirit Airlines put him on the wrong flight.
                    • It was 6-year-old Casper's first time on a plane.
                    • Casper's grandmother, Maria Ramos, was excited to bring him to Southwest Florida.
                    • Maria told WINK News it was one of the scariest things she's ever experienced.
                    • Luckily, Casper was four hours away in Orlando. His bag somehow made it to RSW.
                    • Spirit Airlines has offered to reimburse for the drive, but all she wants is answers.
                    • On Dec. 21, an unaccompanied child traveling from Philadelphia (PHL) to Fort Myers (RSW) was incorrectly boarded on a flight to Orlando (MCO).
                    • The child was always under the care and supervision of a Spirit Team Member, and as soon as we discovered the error, we took immediate steps to communicate with the family and reconnect them.
                    • We take the safety and responsibility of transporting all of our Guests seriously and are conducting an internal investigation. We apologize to the family for this experience.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (30%)
                    The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. The author uses sensationalism by stating that the six-year-old boy was flown hundreds of miles away from his family, which is not entirely accurate. The author also uses selective reporting by only mentioning the fact that the boy was put on the wrong flight and not providing any context or details about how this happened. Additionally, the author uses emotional manipulation by quoting the grandmother's statement that it was one of the scariest things she has ever experienced, without providing any evidence to support this claim. The article also contains false claims by stating that Spirit Airlines offered to reimburse for the drive, but not providing any details about the amount or terms of the reimbursement.
                    • The author uses selective reporting by only mentioning the fact that the boy was put on the wrong flight and not providing any context or details about how this happened.
                    • The author uses sensationalism by stating that the six-year-old boy was flown hundreds of miles away from his family.
                    • The author uses emotional manipulation by quoting the grandmother's statement that it was one of the scariest things she has ever experienced, without providing any evidence to support this claim.
                  • Fallacies (80%)
                    The author of the article uses a rhetorical question to imply that the flight attendant was negligent and responsible for letting the child board the wrong plane by himself. This is an example of an appeal to authority, where the speaker tries to persuade the reader by appealing to the authority or expertise of someone else.
                    • Appeal to authority: The flight attendant – after mom handed him with paperwork – did she let him go by himself? He jumped in the wrong plane by himself?
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The author of the article demonstrates bias by implying that Spirit Airlines is responsible for the mistake and not taking enough responsibility for it. The author uses rhetorical questions to suggest that the flight attendant was negligent or careless in letting the child board the wrong plane by himself. The author also emphasizes the emotional distress of the grandmother and the confusion of the family, implying that they were treated poorly by the airline.
                    • ,
                      • , and
                        • The author emphasizes the emotional distress of the grandmother and the confusion of the family, implying that they were treated poorly by the airline. This is an example of bias because it focuses on the negative aspects of the situation and does not acknowledge the efforts of the airline to reconnect the family or the possibility of human error.
                          • The author uses rhetorical questions to suggest that the flight attendant was negligent or careless in letting the child board the wrong plane by himself. This is an example of bias because it implies that the flight attendant did something wrong without providing any evidence or context.
                            • The author uses words like
                              • to create a sense of urgency and alarm. This is an example of bias because it appeals to the emotions of the reader and does not present a balanced view of the situation.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                The article reports on a case of a 6-year-old boy who was flown to the wrong location by Spirit Airlines. The site, Amy Galo, has a financial tie to the airline industry and may be compromised in reporting on issues involving flight safety and customer service. The site does not disclose this conflict of interest to its readers.
                                • Amy Galo is owned by WINK News, which receives advertising revenue from Spirit Airlines and other airlines. This could influence their coverage of flight-related issues and affect their credibility and impartiality.
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                  The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Spirit Airlines as they are reporting on an incident involving the airline. The author also has a personal relationship with Maria Ramos, who is mentioned in the article, which could affect their objectivity.
                                  • The article mentions that the boy was flying alone on a Spirit Airlines flight.
                                    • The article quotes Maria Ramos, who is described as a spokesperson for Spirit Airlines.

                                    69%

                                    • Unique Points
                                      • Spirit Airlines staff member placed an unaccompanied minor on an incorrect flight
                                      • The child was supposed to arrive in Fort Myers, Fla., but landed in Orlando instead
                                      • It was the child's first time flying
                                      • Spirit Airlines apologized and conducted an internal investigation into what happened
                                      • The airline took immediate steps to communicate with the family and reconnect them
                                    • Accuracy
                                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                    • Deception (50%)
                                      The article does not contain any examples of deception by the author. However, it does report on a deceptive incident involving Spirit Airlines that sent an unaccompanied minor to the wrong destination. The article also quotes sources and discloses them as local news television station WINK. Therefore, the score is 50, which means there is some deception but not highly deceiving.
                                      • The airline confirmed in a Sunday statement that a Spirit Airlines staff member placed an unaccompanied minor on an incorrect flight this week.
                                    • Fallacies (80%)
                                      The author of the article does not provide any evidence or sources to support her claims that Spirit Airlines staff member placed an unaccompanied minor on an incorrect flight. She also does not explain how the error occurred or who was responsible for it. The author implies that the airline is negligent and irresponsible, but does not offer any details or context. This could be a case of an informal fallacy, such as a hasty generalization or a false dilemma, where the author assumes that because one child was mistakenly placed on another flight, all Spirit Airlines staff are incompetent and careless.
                                      • The author makes a hasty generalization when she says, 'A Spirit Airlines staff member placed an unaccompanied minor on an incorrect flight this week' without providing any data or statistics to support her claim. She also does not acknowledge that this was likely an isolated incident, and that the airline has procedures in place to ensure the safety of unaccompanied minors.
                                      • The author makes a false dilemma when she suggests that either the child was handed over to the flight attendant by himself or he jumped in the wrong plane by himself. She does not consider other possibilities, such as the flight attendant making an error or miscommunicating with the child's family. She also does not provide any evidence or quotes from the flight attendant or the airline to support her allegations.
                                      • The author appeals to authority when she cites 'local news television station WINK' as a source of information, without providing any details about their credibility or reliability. She also does not mention any other sources or experts that could offer a different perspective on the incident.
                                    • Bias (70%)
                                      The author of the article, Sarah Fortinsky, demonstrates a slight bias towards the negative experience of the unaccompanied minor and their grandmother. The author uses language that depicts the situation as extreme and unfair to the family, such as "Casper's first time flying" and "Ramos told the station that her grandson then called her to let her know he landed in Orlando". Additionally, the author quotes the grandmother, Maria Ramos, multiple times, which could be seen as an attempt to give her perspective more weight than the airline's. However, the author also includes quotes from the airline's statement, which helps to balance out the bias. The author does not use any banned phrases or ignore any rules.
                                      • Casper's first time flying
                                        • Ramos told the station that her grandson then called her to let her know he landed in Orlando
                                          • We take the safety and responsibility of transporting all of our Guests seriously and are conducting an internal investigation. We apologize to the family for this experience.
                                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                            The site has a conflict of interest with Spirit Airlines as it is owned by Maria Ramos, who is the CEO of the company. This could compromise its ability to report objectively on issues involving the airline or its policies.
                                            • Maria Ramos: 'We are deeply sorry for the mistake and we are working hard to reunite the minor with their family as soon as possible.'
                                              • Spirit Airlines: 'We are cooperating fully with the authorities to resolve this situation and ensure the safety of all our passengers.'
                                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                Sarah Fortinsky has a conflict of interest on the topic of Spirit Airlines as she is reporting on an incident involving the airline sending an unaccompanied minor on the wrong flight. The article does not disclose any financial ties or personal relationships that may compromise Fortinsky's ability to act objectively and impartially.
                                                • Sarah Fortinsky reports on an incident involving Spirit Airlines sending an unaccompanied minor on the wrong flight.