Pro-Palestinian Students Occupy Stanford President's Office: Demands, Arrests, and University Response

Stanford, California, California, USA United States of America
Building 10 renamed 'Dr. Adnan Office' in honor of Palestinian surgeon Adnan al-Bursh.
Pro-Palestinian students occupied Stanford President's office on June 5, 2024.
Protesters described themselves as autonomous group unaffiliated with any VSO.
Thirteen individuals arrested during clearance operation.
Three demands were issued: add divestment bill to next Board of Trustees meeting, disclose finances from previous fiscal year, and drop charges against pro-Palestinian students.
Pro-Palestinian Students Occupy Stanford President's Office: Demands, Arrests, and University Response

Protests Erupt at Stanford University: Pro-Palestinian Students Occupy President's Office

Stanford, CA - In a bold move to demand change and bring attention to the ongoing conflict between Palestine and Israel, a group of pro-Palestinian students occupied Building 10, the president's office at Stanford University on June 5, 2024. The students barricaded themselves inside while around fifty others surrounded it with linked arms.

The group issued three demands to the University: add the divestment bill submitted by Stanford Against Apartheid in Palestine (SAAP) to the next Board of Trustees meeting, disclose finances from the previous fiscal year including endowment investments, and drop all disciplinary and criminal charges against pro-Palestinian students at Stanford.

Building 10 was renamed 'Dr. Adnan Office' in honor of Palestinian General Surgeon Adnan al-Bursh who was murdered. The building has a significant history as it houses the offices of the president and provost, making this occupation a powerful statement against Israel's ongoing military campaign.

The protesters barricaded doors with bike locks, chains, ladders and chairs and covered security cameras with tin foil. Approximately ten students were barricaded inside while around fifty others surrounded the building.

Stanford University spokesperson Dee Mostofi confirmed that law enforcement had arrested thirteen individuals in connection to the occupation. There were reports of extensive damage both inside and outside the building, and a public safety officer was injured during the clearance operation.

The protesters described themselves as an autonomous group of Stanford students unaffiliated with any Voluntary Student Organization (VSO). They demanded that Stanford Administration and the Board of Trustees meet their demands to address their role in enabling and profiting from the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

This occupation follows a 120-day Sit-in to Stop Genocide removed in February and an encampment established in White Plaza in April. The group disavowed acts of vandalism carried out by some protesters, which include spray-painted messages and what appears to be fake blood spilled on the desk of the president.

The intentions of this movement are not to create unnecessary labor for service workers, and they refuse to have their uprising hijacked by unknown agitators. The group entered and barricaded themselves in Saller's office at about 6 a.m. local time, accusing Stanford of being unwilling to engage with protestors and their demands.

The university urged people to stay away from the Main Quad and said no other campus operations were affected.

This is not the first instance of campus protests demanding divestment from Israel in response to its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza. Columbia University agreed to take additional steps to make students feel secure on campus under a settlement reached with a Jewish student Tuesday.

The Associated Press has recorded at least 86 incidents since April 18 where arrests were made at campus protests across the U.S., and more than 3,130 people have been arrested on the campuses of 65 colleges and universities. The figures are based on AP reporting and statements from universities and law enforcement agencies.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Did any other campus operations besides staying away from Main Quad were affected?
  • Were all thirteen individuals arrested directly involved in the occupation?
  • What was the extent of damage reported inside and outside Building 10?

Sources

82%

  • Unique Points
    • Approximately ten students are barricaded in Building 10 while around fifty others surrounded it with linked arms.
    • Three demands were issued to the University: add divestment bill to next Board of Trustees meeting, disclose finances from previous fiscal year and drop charges against pro-Palestinian students.
    • Building 10 was renamed ‘Dr. Adnan Office’ in honor of Palestinian General Surgeon Adnan al-Bursh who was murdered.
  • Accuracy
    • Thirteen people were arrested inside the building, and any students among the group will be immediately suspended. Seniors among the group will not be allowed to graduate.
    • Thirteen people were arrested and there was extensive damage to the interior and exterior of the building.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article reports on the arrest and suspension of pro-Palestinian protesters at Stanford University who took over the president's office. The author does not make any editorializing or pontification statements, but there are instances of selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The article focuses on the actions taken by the university against the students, implying that their demands for divestment from companies supporting Israel's military campaign are unjustified and violent. However, it fails to provide any context or explanation as to why these students are protesting or what their specific demands are beyond 'divestment.' This selective reporting creates a biased narrative that manipulates the reader's emotions against the protesters without providing enough information for an informed perspective. Additionally, the article mentions 'vile and hateful sentiments' in relation to graffiti on campus but does not provide any examples or quotes from the graffiti itself, further perpetuating emotional manipulation.
    • But within three hours, the building appeared to be back in university control after campus police and Santa Clara County Sheriff’s deputies took action, officials said.
    • The most prominent U.S. campus action against Israel was taken by Columbia University students who took over a key building, Hamilton Hall.
    • An encampment at Stanford University to protest Israeli attacks on Gaza on April 25.Tayfun Coskun / Anadolu via Getty Images
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The article reports on pro-Palestinian protests at Stanford University and the resulting arrests and suspensions of students involved. While the article does not contain any overtly biased language towards either side, it does convey a negative tone towards the protesters' actions by describing them as 'provocative', 'vile and hateful sentiments', 'damage was done inside the building along with extensive graffiti vandalism on the sandstone buildings and columns of the Main Quad', and 'this assault on our campus'. The article also mentions that students will be immediately suspended and not allowed to graduate, which could be perceived as disproportionately harsh punishment. However, it is important to note that this information comes from the university officials quoted in the article.
    • ]We are appalled and deeply saddened by the actions that occurred on our campus earlier today[.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    94%

    • Unique Points
      • Pro-Palestine protesters occupied and barricaded themselves inside Building 10, the president’s office at Stanford University on June 5, 2024.
      • Approximately ten students are barricaded in the building while around fifty others surrounded it with linked arms.
      • Three demands were issued to the University: add divestment bill to next Board of Trustees meeting, disclose finances from previous fiscal year and drop charges against pro-Palestinian students.
      • Building 10 was renamed ‘Dr. Adnan Office’ in honor of Palestinian General Surgeon Adnan al-Bursh who was murdered.
      • Protesters barricaded doors with bike locks, chains, ladders and chairs and covered security cameras with tin foil.
    • Accuracy
      • Protesters plan to remain until demands are met or they are forcibly removed.
    • Deception (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Fallacies (95%)
      The article contains some inflammatory rhetoric and an appeal to emotion with the use of the word 'genocidal campaign' in reference to Israel. However, no formal or blatant logical fallacies were found.
      • Protestors issued three demands to the University: add the divestment bill submitted by Stanford Against Apartheid in Palestine (SAAP) to the next Board of Trustees meeting, with a recommendation by President Richard Saller supporting the bill, disclose finances from the previous fiscal year (2022) including endowment investments and drop all disciplinary and criminal charges against pro-Palestinian students at Stanford.
      • The occupation follows a 120-day Sit-in to Stop Genocide removed in February and an encampment established in White Plaza in April.
    • Bias (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    82%

    • Unique Points
      • Protesters demanded divestment, transparency, and amnesty from Stanford Administration and Board of Trustees.
      • About ten students were barricaded inside the building while dozens linked arms outside on last day of spring classes.
    • Accuracy
      • Thirteen people were arrested and there was extensive damage to the interior and exterior of the building.
      • A campus police officer was injured during the clear-out.
    • Deception (50%)
      The article is deceptive in its portrayal of the protest as being violent and damaging, while omitting details about the reasons behind the protest and the university's response to those demands. The authors also use sensational language to describe events.
      • The public safety officer was injured after being shoved by protesters interfering with a transport vehicle,
      • Shortly after 8 a.m. local time, about two hours after the protesters said they entered, the building had been cleared and 13 people were arrested,
      • . . . there was “extensive damage to the interior and exterior of the building,” which has been shut down for the remainder of the day.
    • Fallacies (85%)
      The authors use inflammatory rhetoric by using the term 'genocide' to describe the situation in Gaza without providing any evidence or context. They also make an appeal to authority by stating that 'US colleges have been using law enforcement ... to quell student demonstrations since Hamas October attack on Israel.' This statement implies that the use of law enforcement is an inherently bad thing, but it does not provide any reasoning or evidence for this claim.
      • > about two hours after the protesters said they entered, the building had been cleared and 13 people were arrested, the university said. > We are appalled that our students chose to take this action and we will work with law enforcement to ensure that they face the full consequences allowed by law. > The intentions of this movement are not to create unnecessary labor for service workers, and we refuse to have our uprising hijacked by unknown agitators.
      • US colleges have been using law enforcement  – along with academic suspensions and expulsions – to quell student demonstrations since Hamas October attack on Israel.
    • Bias (95%)
      The authors use language that depicts the protesters as unlawful and violent, while also stating that the university is appalled by their actions. The authors do not provide any context or nuance to the situation beyond what has been reported by Stanford University.
      • > about two hours after the protesters said they entered, the building had been cleared and 13 people were arrested, the university said.
        • The intentions of this movement are not to create unnecessary labor for service workers, and we refuse to have our uprising hijacked by unknown agitators.
          • We are appalled that our students chose to take this action and we will work with law enforcement to ensure that they face the full consequences allowed by law.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          91%

          • Unique Points
            • Thirteen protesters were arrested at Stanford University after occupying the president and provost offices
            • Extensive damage was caused to the interior and exterior of the building
          • Accuracy
            • Thirteen people were arrested inside the building, and any students among the group will be immediately suspended. Seniors among the group will not be allowed to graduate.
            • A campus police officer was injured during the clear-out
          • Deception (75%)
            The article does not contain any direct assertions by the author. The author only reports on events that occurred and statements made by others. However, there are some elements of deception in the article.
            • `Stanford University said 13 people were arrested as law enforcement removed pro-Palestinian demonstrators who occupied a campus building early Wednesday`
            • `There has been extensive damage to the interior and exterior of the building,`
            • `A public safety officer was injured after being shoved by protesters who were interfering with a transport vehicle.`
          • Fallacies (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Bias (90%)
            The article reports on the arrest of pro-Palestinian demonstrators at Stanford University and mentions that there was extensive damage to the building where they had occupied offices. The author also states that 'Stanford is among colleges and universities around the country where campus protests have occurred to demand their schools separate themselves from companies advancing Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza and in some cases from Israel itself.' This statement implies a bias against Israel, as it frames the Israeli actions in a negative light by using the term 'war' and implying that separating from Israel is desirable. The article does not provide any counter-arguments or perspectives to balance this bias.
            • ]Stanford is among colleges and universities around the country where campus protests have occurred to demand their schools separate themselves from companies advancing Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza and in some cases from Israel itself.[
              • The Associated Press has recorded at least 86 incidents since April 18 where arrests were made at campus protests across the U.S. More than 3,130 people have been arrested on the campuses of 65 colleges and universities.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication