Steve Bannon's Prison Sentence Upheld: Denied Stay Amid Contempt of Congress Conviction

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States United States of America
Bannon faces New York state criminal charges and will not be sent to minimal-security prison camps known as 'Club Fed'.
Bannon had been ordered to report to prison on July 1 after being convicted of contempt of Congress charges related to his refusal to comply with a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee.
Bannon has been vocal in his criticisms of the Biden administration and its policies ahead of the 2024 election.
Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison after being convicted in 2022. He has previously expressed his intention to seek relief from the Supreme Court if the appeals court panel rules against him.
Judges Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia disagreed with Bannon's proposal, stating that arguments about his state of mind do not present a substantial question that could reverse his conviction.
Steve Bannon, a former advisor to Donald Trump, was denied stay of prison sentence on June 16, 2023.
Steve Bannon's Prison Sentence Upheld: Denied Stay Amid Contempt of Congress Conviction

Steve Bannon, a former advisor to Donald Trump, was denied his bid to stay out of prison on June 16, 2023. The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled against him in a 2-1 decision.

Bannon had been ordered to report to prison on July 1 after being convicted of contempt of Congress charges related to his refusal to comply with a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee. He argued that he should be allowed to stay out of prison while appealing the conviction, citing potential legal questions about his state of mind when he refused to comply.

However, Judges Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia disagreed, stating that Bannon's proposal cannot be reconciled with Supreme Court precedent. They noted that arguments about Bannon's state of mind do not present a substantial question that could reverse his conviction.

Judge Justin Walker dissented, writing that the close question of whether Bannon had the required intent to commit contempt should be decided by the Supreme Court.

Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison after being convicted in 2022. He has previously expressed his intention to seek relief from the Supreme Court if the appeals court panel rules against him.

The House Jan. 6 committee issued a subpoena for documents related to the Capitol attack on January 6, 2021. Bannon had initially received a delayed sentence to allow his appeal to play out, but this was lifted by Judge Carl Nichols at the request of the Justice Department in May.

Bannon's lawyers argued that he should be allowed to stay out of prison as he continued to appeal the conviction, pointing to his ability to have the full DC Circuit review the case and then potentially a Supreme Court appeal. However, prosecutors countered that Bannon's role in political discourse is not a relevant factor under federal law.

Bannon faces New York state criminal charges and will not be sent to minimal-security prison camps known as 'Club Fed'. He has been vocal in his criticisms of the Biden administration and its policies ahead of the 2024 election.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Could Bannon's state of mind at the time of refusal be a significant factor in overturning his conviction?
  • Was there sufficient evidence to prove that Bannon intentionally refused to comply with the subpoena?

Sources

98%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Appeals court panel refuses to delay Trump ally Steve Bannon’s prison sentence

National Public Radio (NPR) Friday, 21 June 2024 00:00
  • Unique Points
    • Steve Bannon was found guilty of contempt for not complying with a House January 6 Committee subpoena for his testimony nearly two years ago but had initially received a delayed sentence to allow his appeal to play out.
    • Bannon faces New York state criminal charges and will not be sent to minimal-security prison camps known as 'Club Fed.'
    • Bannon argued that he should be allowed to stay out of prison while appealing the conviction, citing the potential for a full DC Circuit review and Supreme Court appeal.
    • Prosecutors countered that Bannon's role in political discourse is not a relevant factor under federal law.
  • Accuracy
    • ]Steve Bannon was convicted for defying a subpoena from the House committee that investigated the U.S. Capitol attack.[
    • Bannon faces New York state criminal charges and will not be sent to minimal-security prison camps known as ‘Club Fed.’[
    • Mr. Bannon’s appeal is unlikely to succeed as it would require judges to substantially bend the law as written.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (95%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when the prosecutors argue that 'Bannon cannot reconcile his claim for special treatment with the bedrock principle of equal justice under the law.' This statement implies that following the principle of equal justice under the law is an absolute good and not open to interpretation or debate, which is not true. Additionally, there are instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as 'giving an appearance that the government is trying to prevent Mr. Bannon from fully assisting with the campaign and speaking out on important issues,' but these do not rise to the level of a formal fallacy.
    • ]Prosecutors said in court papers that Bannon[u2019s] role in political discourse[ is irrelevant]. [/] [
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Appeals court won’t delay July 1 start of Steve Bannon’s prison sentence

CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Tierney Sneed Friday, 21 June 2024 01:52
  • Unique Points
    • Steve Bannon was found guilty of contempt for not complying with a House January 6 Committee subpoena for his testimony nearly two years ago but had initially received a delayed sentence to allow his appeal to play out.
    • Judge Cornelia Pillard and Judge Bradley Garcia, both Obama and Biden nominees respectively, were in the majority in the unsigned opinion.
    • Judge Justin Walker, a Trump appointee, dissented from the panel’s decision.
  • Accuracy
    • ][Steve Bannon was convicted for defying a subpoena from the House committee that investigated the U.S. Capitol attack.][] The appeals court rejected Bannon's bid to stay out of prison while he fights his conviction.[
    • ][Bannon argued that he should be allowed to remain free in the run-up to the 2024 election because Bannon is a top adviser to Trump’s campaign.][] Prosecutors said Bannon’s ‘role in political discourse’ is irrelevant and cannot reconcile his claim for special treatment with the bedrock principle of equal justice under the law.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy in the section where it states that 'Judge Cornelia Pillard, a Barack Obama nominee, and Judge Bradley Garcia, a Joe Biden nominee, were in the majority.' This statement implies that their positions should carry more weight due to their political affiliations. Additionally, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric in the section where it says 'Bannon has amped his rhetoric against the Justice Department... telling a conservative gathering in Detroit this month that they would “purge” the department and “take apart” the FBI if Trump won the election.' This statement is inflammatory and not a factual reporting of Bannon's actions, but rather an emotional appeal.
    • Judge Cornelia Pillard, a Barack Obama nominee, and Judge Bradley Garcia, a Joe Biden nominee...
    • Bannon has amped his rhetoric against the Justice Department... telling a conservative gathering in Detroit this month that they would “purge” the department and “take apart” the FBI if Trump won the election.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

88%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Judge Dissenting Over Steve Bannon Prison Sentence Gives MAGA Hope

Newsweek LLC Ewan Palmer Friday, 21 June 2024 08:13
  • Unique Points
    • Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months in jail in October 2021 after being found guilty of two counts of contempt of Congress for failing to respond to a subpoena issued by the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 attack.
    • Bannon's appeal is based on the suggestion that he did not
  • Accuracy
    • Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months in jail
    • Bannon is expected to ask the Supreme Court to stave off his prison sentence.
    • Judge Justin Walker argued that Bannon should be allowed to take his case to the Supreme Court before serving his sentence.
  • Deception (70%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support Bannon's position and ignores the judges' reasoning for denying his appeal. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying hope for Bannon based on one judge's dissent. Additionally, there is a lie by omission as the article fails to mention that Navarro's appeal was also rejected by the Supreme Court.
    • Grace Chong, the chief operating officer for War Room, was one of those who expressed hope for Bannon’s attempt to stay out of jail because of Walker’s dissent.
    • A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 on Thursday that Bannon ‘cannot delay surrendering by July 1 to begin his four-month sentence as Bannon has ‘no basis’ to conclude that a higher court will overturn his conviction.
    • Instead, Bannon claims that he was relying on the advice of his former lawyer, Robert Costello...
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses hope for Bannon's attempt to stay out of jail based on a dissenting judge's opinion. This demonstrates a clear bias towards Bannon and his case.
    • Steve Bannon's appeal is likely to be rejected by the nation’s highest court.
      • They got one judge to dissent, which is great.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      99%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Appeals court denies Steve Bannon's bid to stay out of prison

      NBC News Digital Friday, 21 June 2024 09:40
      • Unique Points
        • An appeals court denied Steve Bannon’s request to remain out of prison on June 16, 2023.
        • Steve Bannon was ordered to report to prison on July 1, 2023.
      • Accuracy
        • Steve Bannon was convicted on two counts of contempt of Congress in May 2023.
        • Steve Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison for defying a subpoena for documents related to the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      93%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Appeals Court Denies Bannon’s Emergency Motion to Remain Free

      The Name Of The NZ Prefix. I PWA NZI.P.Was Dropped. Zach Montague Friday, 21 June 2024 04:09
      • Unique Points
        • At trial, Mr. Bannon’s lawyers argued that he was acting on the advice of lawyers who counseled him to disregard the subpoena.
      • Accuracy
        • ][The federal appeals court rejected Stephen K. Bannon's bid to remain free while he exhausts his legal options to overturn his conviction.][
        • Bannon is expected to ask the Supreme Court to stave off his prison sentence.
        • Judge Justin Walker dissented and argued that Mr. Bannon should remain free until the Supreme Court decides whether to hear his appeal.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains an appeal to authority and a potential dichotomous depiction. The author cites the appeals court's decision as evidence without providing counter-arguments or perspectives, which is an appeal to authority. Additionally, the article presents Mr. Bannon's legal arguments but does not acknowledge potential counter-arguments or alternative interpretations of the case, which could create a dichotomous depiction.
        • . . . leaving little chance that he can further delay a four-month prison sentence that is set to start next month.
        • Judge Walker noted that Mr. Bannon was petitioning the Supreme Court to consider his case and wrote that he should remain free until it decides whether to hear his appeal.
        • In the order, the court wrote that Mr. Bannon’s appeal was unlikely to succeed, as judges would have to substantially bend the law as written to conclude that he had not intentionally dismissed Congress’s attempts to get his testimony.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication