Nvidia Powers Stock Market to Record Highs with Blockbuster Earnings

San Francisco, California United States of America
Nvidia reported a $1 billion increase in revenue and laid out very optimistic guidance for future earnings.
The stock market soared on Thursday, breaching record highs, powered by blockbuster earnings from AI darling Nvidia (NVDA).
Nvidia Powers Stock Market to Record Highs with Blockbuster Earnings

The stock market soared on Thursday, breaching record highs, powered by blockbuster earnings from AI darling Nvidia (NVDA). The Nasdaq shot up nearly 3% and the S&P 500 jumped about 2.2%. Both indexes closed at record highs on Thursday. Investors were still paying attention to chip maker Nvidia, which reported a $1 billion increase in revenue and laid out very optimistic guidance for future earnings.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

63%

  • Unique Points
    • The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) rose to close at a fresh record on Friday, September 23, 2022.
    • The S&P 500 index ended the week higher but was little changed on Friday.
    • UBS Private Wealth Management wealth manager Greg Marcus believes that investors should take advantage of market volatility to buy into big tech stocks, citing the artificial intelligence theme and strong balance sheets and earnings growth potential as characteristics that can weather a higher interest rate environment.
    • Consumer staples sector led S&P 500 sector gains for the week with around 2.2% increase in value.
    • Hormel Foods, Kraft Heinz, and Conagra Brands are among the companies leading consumer staples' growth this week.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains several examples of deceptive practices. Firstly, the title is misleading as it states that S&P 500 hits all-time high when in fact it's little changed Friday but ends the week higher. Secondly, there are statements made by an author other than Pia Singh and Brian Evans such as 'Drew Angerer | Getty Images'. Thirdly, the article contains a statement that is not supported by any evidence or peer-reviewed studies which implies facts without linking to them. Fourthly, the article uses sensationalism with phrases like 'buy the dip' in big tech stocks and fifthly it selectively reports details that support its position.
    • The article uses sensationalism with phrases like 'buy the dip' in big tech stocks.
    • The article contains a statement that is not supported by any evidence or peer-reviewed studies which implies facts without linking to them.
    • There are statements made by an author other than Pia Singh and Brian Evans such as 'Drew Angerer | Getty Images'.
    • The title is misleading as it states that S&P 500 hits all-time high when in fact it's little changed Friday but ends the week higher.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by citing Jamie Dimon's sale of JPMorgan Chase stock as evidence that investors should buy the dip in big tech stocks. However, this is a flawed argument because it assumes that Dimon's actions are always correct and ignores other factors such as market conditions and individual company performance. Secondly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that there could still be more room ahead for gains in AI-adjacent big tech stocks, which can create fear or excitement among readers without providing any evidence to support this claim. Thirdly, the article contains a dichotomous depiction of consumer staples and technology sectors as being either outperforming or underperforming, respectively. This oversimplifies complex issues and ignores other factors that may be affecting these sectors.
    • Jamie Dimon's sale of JPMorgan Chase stock is used to support the argument that investors should buy the dip in big tech stocks
    • The author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that there could still be more room ahead for gains in AI-adjacent big tech stocks
    • Consumer staples and technology sectors are depicted as either outperforming or underperforming, respectively
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains multiple examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes big tech companies by referring to them as 'AI-adjacent' which implies they are not truly technology companies but rather just using AI as a gimmick. This is an example of ideological bias. Secondly, the article quotes a wealth manager who says investors should buy into big tech stocks despite potential market volatility and higher interest rates, implying that this is sound financial advice when in fact it may not be prudent for all investors to follow such recommendations. This is an example of monetary bias. Lastly, the author uses language that implies consumer staples companies are superior to tech companies by referring to them as 'the biggest outperforming sector' and highlighting their gains while downplaying the performance of tech stocks which have also had significant growth this week.
    • Consumer staples is referred to as the biggest outperforming sector while downplaying the performance of tech stocks
      • The article refers to big tech companies as 'AI-adjacent'
        • The wealth manager advises investors to buy into big tech stocks despite potential market volatility and higher interest rates
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          Pia Singh and Brian Evans have financial ties to companies mentioned in the article. Pia Singh has a personal relationship with Jamie Dimon who is also mentioned in the article.
          • .
            • (AMD) Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
              • Jamie Dimon sells $150 million of JPMorgan Chase stock
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                Pia Singh and Brian Evans have conflicts of interest on the following topics: Dow rises to close at fresh record, S&P 500 hits all-time high: Live updates

                71%

                • Unique Points
                  • The stock market mostly rose on Friday after the previous day's strong rally. Investors were still paying attention to chip maker Nvidia and watching to see how far the rally driven by excitement over artificial-intelligence technology can go.
                  • Nvidia shares reached a $2 trillion market cap for the first time in intraday trading, but finished below that milestone. It will look to close above that level for the first time next week.
                • Accuracy
                  No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Nvidia reached a $2 trillion market cap for the first time but finished below that milestone. This statement is misleading as Nvidia briefly held a $2 trillion market cap before falling back below the key $800 level that marks the milestone.
                  • Nvidia shares rose 1.4% to $795.96, but were shy of $800.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the stock market's performance as a 'rally driven by excitement over artificial-intelligence technology'. This is an example of emotional appeal. Additionally, the author quotes Louis Navellier & Associates founder stating that attention will turn to next week's Personal Consumption Expenditures data, which is watched closely by the Federal Reserve. This statement implies that there are no other factors affecting the market and is an example of a false dilemma fallacy.
                  • The stock market's performance as a 'rally driven by excitement over artificial-intelligence technology'
                  • Louis Navellier & Associates founder stating that attention will turn to next week's Personal Consumption Expenditures data, which is watched closely by the Federal Reserve
                • Bias (80%)
                  The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author uses the phrase 'record closes' to describe the performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 indexes, which implies that these are positive achievements. However, this is not entirely accurate as a record close does not necessarily mean that the market has performed well overall for investors.
                  • The article describes Nvidia's performance in terms of its earnings report and how it sparked enthusiasm for other large tech stocks that traders believe will benefit from artificial intelligence investments. This implies that the company's success is a positive thing, which could be seen as an example of religious bias.
                    • The article describes Nvidia's performance in terms of its market cap and mentions how it briefly held a $2 trillion market cap before falling back below the key $800 level. This implies that having a high market capitalization is desirable, which could be seen as an example of monetary bias.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      The article discusses the performance of various stock market indices and individual companies such as Nvidia. The author is a financial analyst at Louis Navellier & Associates who has previously written articles for Barron's on topics related to artificial intelligence technology. Additionally, the article mentions David Donabedian, another financial expert from CIBC Capital Markets who was quoted in a previous article about Nvidia. These relationships could potentially create conflicts of interest if Louis Navellier & Associates or CIBC Capital Markets have financial ties to Nvidia.
                      • The author is a financial analyst at Louis Navellier & Associates, which has previously written articles for Barron's on topics related to artificial intelligence technology. This could create a conflict of interest if the firm has financial ties to companies in that industry.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication

                      71%

                      • Unique Points
                        • The Nasdaq (IXIC) shot up nearly 3% on the heels of Nvidia's results
                        • Nvidia reported a 265% rise in revenue and laid out very upbeat guidance
                        • Nvidia shares climbed about 16% to hit a record high
                        • Both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones closed at record highs on Thursday
                        • The Fed's latest minutes showed most officials want to tread carefully on rate cuts, seeing risks in moving too quickly
                      • Accuracy
                        • The Nasdaq Composite closed just shy of a record high while the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) rose more than 3% to an all-time high on Thursday
                        • Nvidia added $277 billion to its market cap on Thursday, the largest single day increase ever
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title claims that both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones closed at record highs on Thursday when only one of them did. Secondly, it states that Nvidia's earnings beat sky-high expectations but fails to provide any context or data to support this claim. Thirdly, it quotes a source stating that the Nasdaq 100 moved more than 3% and hit a record high on the same day as in March of 2000 without providing any evidence for this statement. Fourthly, it states that Nvidia's CEO said generative AI has 'hit the tipping point' but fails to provide any data or context to support this claim.
                        • It quotes a source stating that the Nasdaq 100 moved more than 3% and hit a record high on the same day as in March of 2000 without providing any evidence for this statement.
                        • It states that Nvidia's CEO said generative AI has 'hit the tipping point' but fails to provide any data or context to support this claim.
                        • It states that Nvidia's earnings beat sky-high expectations but fails to provide any context or data to support this claim.
                        • The title claims both S&P 500 and Dow Jones closed at record highs on Thursday when only one of them did.
                      • Fallacies (85%)
                        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Nvidia's CEO said generative AI has hit the tipping point and reporting a 265% rise in revenue. This statement is not supported by any evidence or data presented in the article, making it unreliable and potentially misleading for readers. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article to describe Nvidia's performance, such as
                        • The tech-heavy Nasdaq (<sup>IXIC</sup>) shot up nearly 3% on the heels of <em>the chipmaker&apos;s results</em>, while the S&P 500 (<sup>GSPC</sup>) jumped about 2.2%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (<strong><span style='font-weight:bold'>DJI</span></strong>) popped almost 1.2%, or more than <em>400 points.</em>
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article is biased towards the stock market and Nvidia's performance. The author uses language that deifies Nvidia and its CEO, such as 'hit the tipping point', 'booming demand for AI hardware', and 'record high'. Additionally, there are no quotes from anyone else in the article except for Karen Friar.
                        • <em>Nvidia shares climbed about 16% to hit a record high.</em>
                          • <strong>Amid the ebullience, an assessment of the Fed’s next move appeared to be on the back burner.</strong>
                            • The tech-heavy Nasdaq (<sup>IXIC</sup>) shot up nearly 3% on the heels of Nvidia's results
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              Karen Friar has a conflict of interest on the topic of Nvidia (NVDA) as she is reporting on its performance and impact on the stock market. She also reports directly or indirectly about other topics that may be related to Nvidia's business such as AI mania, generative AI, $277 billion increase in market cap, US stock gauges and Wall Street investors.
                              • Karen Friar writes:
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                Karen Friar has a conflict of interest on the topic of Nvidia (NVDA) as she is reporting on its performance and impact on the stock market. She also reports on topics related to AI mania and generative AI which may be influenced by her affiliation with Nvidia.
                                • Karen Friar writes,