Student Activism and University-Defense Industry Ties: The Complex Issue of Divesting from Israel and Defense Contractors at UC Berkeley and Beyond

Berkeley, California United States of America
Historically close ties between US universities and defense industries have raised concerns, with California having over $158bn a year from the defense industry alone.
Student activism in California has been prevalent, with collaborations between universities and defense companies often present in STEM departments.
Student protests at UC Berkeley and other universities have led to calls for divestment from Israel and defense contractors due to the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict.
Universities are reluctant to divest due to potential lower returns on endowment funds which could negatively impact future students.
Student Activism and University-Defense Industry Ties: The Complex Issue of Divesting from Israel and Defense Contractors at UC Berkeley and Beyond

Student protests against the Israel-Hamas conflict have led to calls for college endowment funds to divest from Israel and companies doing business there. The ongoing unrest has brought about demands for universities to review their investments in tech giants like Google and Amazon, as well as defense contractors such as Boeing and Lockheed. However, implementing these divestments is a complex process.

At the University of California, Berkeley, student activists agreed with the president to support a cease-fire in Gaza. Meanwhile, Rutgers University promised scholarships for ten Palestinian students displaced by the war. Brown University's board of trustees pledged to vote on divesting from Israel.

Universities are reluctant to divest due to potential lower returns on their endowment funds, which could impact future students negatively. For instance, The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania emphasizes that introducing greater risk or lower returns in the endowment would limit resources available for tuition assistance and university operations.

Historically close ties between US universities and defense industries have raised concerns for decades. In 1961, former President Dwight Eisenhower warned of the 'military-industrial complex' entering the academic sphere. California, known for its defense and aerospace sectors, has over $158bn a year from the defense industry alone as of fiscal year 2021.

Student activism in California has been prevalent, drawing inspiration from past protests against wars such as Vietnam and apartheid South Africa. Collaborations between universities and defense companies can come in various forms, often prevalent in STEM departments through research projects, recruitment, job fairs, and school donations.

Weapons companies like Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin are listed on the University of California's corporate affiliates program. Graduate students in California are increasingly unionizing to demand their schools distance themselves from weapons manufacturers and government defense operations.

Universities have faced calls to sever ties with companies that donate over $1m cumulatively, such as Raytheon. However, the process of divesting is not straightforward and requires careful consideration of potential consequences.



Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • Are there any specific instances of financial harm caused by previous university divestments?
  • What percentage of UC Berkeley's endowment is invested in defense contractors?

Sources

78%

  • Unique Points
    • University of California, Berkeley: Student activists agreed with the president to support a cease-fire in Gaza.
    • Rutgers University: Protesters won a promise of scholarships for 10 Palestinian students displaced by the war.
    • Brown University: The board of trustees pledged to vote on divesting from Israel.
    • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee: UWM Foundation leadership agreed to meet with students about disclosure and divestment. University administrators will attend and ensure that students are given the opportunity to express their requests.
    • University of Minnesota: The university committed to fund two visiting Palestinian faculty members per year for two years, provide full cost of attendance for five Palestinian undergraduates, and fundraise to sustain this program beyond the current commitment.
    • Evergreen State College: The college will make a statement defending speech rights of students and others, including those doing Palestinian solidarity work. The statement will include an acknowledgment of the ICJ’s genocide investigation and comments about US weaponry.
  • Accuracy
    • ]University of California, Berkeley: Student activists agreed with the president to support a cease-fire in Gaza.[
    • University of California, Berkeley is one of the universities that has agreed to review its investments in response to these calls.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article reports on agreements made between universities and protesters during campus protests over Israel's military campaign in Gaza. While the author does not make any editorializing or pontificating statements, there are instances of selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The article focuses on the concessions made by universities to protesters, implying that these agreements are problematic and under criticism from various groups. However, it fails to mention that many of these agreements also include provisions for dialogue and disclosure regarding university investments in companies supporting Israel's occupation. By omitting this information, the article creates a biased narrative that only highlights the negative aspects of these agreements without providing a complete picture.
    • Several universities have struck agreements with protesters over the past few weeks that effectively conceded to some of their demands.
    • One university president, Mike Lee, of Sonoma State University, even found himself in trouble with his bosses after he promised protesters an academic boycott of Israel.
    • But already, the agreements have come under criticism both from other student activists, who say that not enough concessions were extracted, and from conservatives and Jewish advocacy groups, who complain that they are rewarding students who disrupted campuses and violated university policies.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (90%)
    The author uses language that depicts the protesters in a positive light and those opposing them in a negative light. For example, he describes the agreements as 'conceded to some of their demands' and 'effective', while criticizing those who oppose these agreements as 'complaining' and setting 'a dangerous precedent'. The author also quotes student activists making demands without providing any counterargument or criticism.
    • But already, the agreements have come under criticism both from other student activists, who say that not enough concessions were extracted, and from conservatives and Jewish advocacy groups, who complain that they are rewarding students who disrupted campuses and violated university policies.
      • Disclosure and Divestment The UWM Foundation leadership has agreed to meet with up to four students identified by UWM Popular University for Palestine Coalition after the encampment comes down on Tuesday, May 14, to discuss your concerns and requests.
        • Make a Statement The college will make a statement defending speech rights of students and others, including those doing Palestinian solidarity work. The FULL statement be reviewed by negotiators and a faculty representative before it is released.
          • Several universities have struck agreements with protesters over the past few weeks that effectively conceded to some of their demands.
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          96%

          • Unique Points
            • Student protests against the Israel-Hamas conflict have led to calls for college endowment funds to divest from Israel and companies doing business there.
            • Many universities have ignored the calls to divest from Israel or companies doing business there.
          • Accuracy
            • Tech companies such as Google and Amazon, and defense contractors like Boeing and Lockheed are among the businesses named in these demands.
            • Universities are reluctant to divest due to potential lower returns on their endowment which could affect their ability to cover tuition assistance and running costs.
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Bias (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          90%

          • Unique Points
            • Students in Edinburgh are on hunger strike
            • They are demanding the university to divest over Gaza’s alleged complicity
          • Accuracy
            • ]Students in Edinburgh are on hunger strike[
          • Deception (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Fallacies (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Bias (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          76%

          • Unique Points
            • The war in Gaza has killed nearly 35,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children.
            • , The US has supplied Israel with about $3.8bn each year in military aid.
            • , Historically close ties between US universities and defence industries have raised concerns for decades.
            • , In 1961, former President Dwight Eisenhower warned of the 'military-industrial complex' entering the academic sphere.
            • , California is known for its defence and aerospace sectors, with over $158bn a year from the defence industry alone as of fiscal year 2021.
            • , Student activism has been prevalent in California, drawing inspiration from past protests against the war in Vietnam, US support for apartheid South Africa, and the Iraq War.
            • , Collaborations between universities and defence companies can come in various forms, often prevalent in STEM departments through research projects, recruitment, job fairs, and school donations.
            • , Weapons companies such as Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin are listed on the University of California’s corporate affiliates programme.
            • , Graduate students in California are increasingly unionizing to exert demands for their schools to distance themselves from weapons manufacturers and government defence operations.
            • , Universities have faced calls to sever ties with companies that donate over $1m cumulatively, such as Raytheon.
          • Accuracy
            • Universities have faced calls to sever ties with companies that donate over $1m cumulatively, such as Raytheon.
          • Deception (30%)
            The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position against US universities' ties to weapons contractors and Israel's military campaign in Gaza. The author also uses emotional manipulation by describing the war in Gaza as 'one of the most destructive in modern history', which kills 'nearly 35,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children'. Furthermore, there is a lie by omission as the article fails to mention that many Palestinian deaths were caused by Hamas' indiscriminate rocket attacks on Israeli civilians. Lastly, the author quotes student protesters making opinionated statements without disclosing their names or providing any evidence to support their claims.
            • Eventually we will look back on this and see that we were on the right side of history.
            • Many student demonstrators have zeroed in on their schools’ multimillion-dollar endowment funds as a target for their activism.
            • The death toll, as well as the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza, has many progressive and pro-Palestinian activists in the United States critical of their country’s role in the war.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting former President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex entering the academic sphere. However, this quote does not directly relate to the current situation and is used as a historical context. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Israel's military campaign in Gaza as 'one of the most destructive in modern history' and 'a genocide.'
            • ]These are supposedly social justice-oriented institutions, but their actions say entirely differently[.
            • Eventually we will look back on this and see that we were on the right side of history.
            • And the administration will have blood on their hands for waiting 209 days and counting into a genocide to respond to student, faculty and staff demands for divestment.
          • Bias (80%)
            The author expresses a clear bias towards the pro-Palestinian activists and their cause, using language that depicts the US role in Israel's military campaign as 'aiding and abetting genocide'. The author also quotes student activists who use similar language, further emphasizing this bias. Additionally, there is a disproportionate number of quotations reflecting the perspective of the pro-Palestinian activists.
            • Eventually we will look back on this and see that we were on the right side of history.
              • The only reason that students are protesting is because our institutions are aiding and abetting genocide in Gaza, in the same way that in the past they were funding apartheid in South Africa.
                • These are supposedly social justice-oriented institutions, but their actions say entirely differently.
                  • We are following the courageous students before us who dared to challenge their school’s investments in war.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication