Supreme Court Overturns Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Settlement, Impact on Future Toxic Product Cases Unclear

Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts, USA United States of America
Decision invalidated non-bankrupt entities from benefiting from bankruptcy process
Impact on future toxic product cases uncertain
Purdue Pharma deal would have provided billions for opioid crisis compensation
Supreme Court overturns Purdue Pharma bankruptcy settlement
Supreme Court Overturns Purdue Pharma Bankruptcy Settlement, Impact on Future Toxic Product Cases Unclear

The U.S. Supreme Court has dealt a significant blow to the controversial bankruptcy deal involving Purdue Pharma, the maker of Oxycontin, and members of the Sackler family who owned and ran the company. In a 5-4 decision, the justices invalidated the bankruptcy settlement on May 30, 2024. This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for future bankruptcy cases involving toxic products, compensation for survivors of sexual abuse, and deals to shield executives of companies driven to bankruptcy.

The Purdue Pharma settlement would have ranked among the largest reached in epidemic-related lawsuits filed by state, local and Native American tribal governments. The deal was expected to provide billions of dollars for the opioid crisis, which has seen overdose deaths continue to climb, reaching 80,000 in recent years.

The Sackler family members no longer sit on the company's board and have not received payouts from it since before Purdue Pharma entered bankruptcy. However, they were paid more than $10 billion in the decade leading up to that point.

In March 2022, Kathleen Scarpone of Kingston, NH, and Cheryl Juaire of Marlborough, MA addressed three Sackler family members during a virtual U.S. Bankruptcy Court hearing. Both women lost their sons to OxyContin addiction.

The Supreme Court's decision was met with disappointment from the Biden administration and the Department of Justice, who had supported the settlement.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, stated that U.S. bankruptcy law doesn't allow for such a release and injunction in this case. The ruling is expected to slow down 'parasitic bankruptcies,' where non-bankrupt entities try to benefit from the bankruptcy process.

Sources:

  1. NPR: Supreme Court rejects controversial Purdue Pharma bankruptcy deal
  2. Bloomberg: Supreme Court Purdue Pharma Ruling Upends Bankruptcy Settlements
  3. AP News: The Supreme Court rejects a nationwide opioid settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma


Confidence

91%

Doubts
  • It's not explicitly stated if the Sackler family members will face any legal consequences as a result of the ruling
  • The impact on future toxic product cases is unclear

Sources

98%

  • Unique Points
    • The US Supreme Court has upended how lawsuits over toxic products, compensation for survivors of sexual abuse, and deals to shield executives of companies driven to bankruptcy may play out.
  • Accuracy
    • ,The US Supreme Court has upended how lawsuits over toxic products, compensation for survivors of sexual abuse, and deals to shield executives of companies driven to bankruptcy may play out.
    • ,The Supreme Court rejected a nationwide settlement between OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma and members of the Sackler family who own the company.
    • The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a bankruptcy deal involving Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • The Supreme Court rejected a nationwide settlement between OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma and members of the Sackler family who own the company.
    • ,members of the Sackler family branches who own Purdue suggested they’ll return to negotiations.
    • ,overdose deaths have continued to climb, hitting 80,000 in recent years.
    • ,the Purdue Pharma settlement would have ranked among the largest reached by drug companies in epidemic-related lawsuits filed by state, local and Native American tribal governments and others.
    • ,Sackler family members no longer are on the company’s board, and they have not received payouts from it since before Purdue Pharma entered bankruptcy. In the decade before that, though, they were paid more than $10 billion.
  • Accuracy
    • ,members of the Sackler family branches who own Purdue suggested they'll return to negotiations.
    • Justice Neil Gorsuch stated that U.S. bankruptcy law doesn’t allow for such a release and injunction in this case.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a bankruptcy deal involving Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family.
    • ,Justice Neil Gorsuch stated that U.S. bankruptcy law doesn’t allow for such a release and injunction in this case.
    • The decision is expected to have far-reaching implications for the opioid crisis in the U.S., potentially slowing down ‘parasitic bankruptcies’ where non-bankrupt entities try to benefit from a bankruptcy process.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication