Hundreds of thousands were left homeless by the earthquakes that struck southern Turkey and northern Syria, with almost half of Antakya's population displaced. The city was one of the cities affected by these earthquakes.
The Karapirli family was injured in a deadly earthquake in southern Turkey and lost their two sons when the apartment building they lived in collapsed. They are working hard to recover and find a new home for themselves and their twin toddlers.
The war in Gaza has been ongoing for years now, sparked by Hamas' October 7 attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of about 1,160 people. Efforts are being made to help displaced Palestinians find new homes in Cairo.
The year has been difficult for the Karapirli family, who were injured in a deadly earthquake in southern Turkey. Ibrahim and Pinar lost their two sons when the apartment building they lived in collapsed before dawn last February. The couple was still mourning their loss when they were rushed to the hospital with injuries from the quake. Despite this tragedy, they have been working hard to recover and find a new home for themselves and their twin toddlers.
The earthquakes that struck southern Turkey and northern Syria in 2023 caused widespread devastation, leaving hundreds of thousands homeless. The city of Antakya was one of the cities affected by these earthquakes, with almost half its population displaced and a large share of the death toll. Despite this tragedy, people are working hard to rebuild their lives and find new homes.
The war in Gaza has been ongoing for years now, sparked by Hamas's unprecedented October 7 attack on Israel that resulted in the deaths of about 1,160 people. The Israeli government's failure to secure hostages release has led to harsh criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. Despite this ongoing conflict, efforts are being made by various organizations such as UN humanitarian agency and others to help displaced Palestinians find new homes in Cairo.
Ibrahim Karapirli and his wife, Pinar, were injured in a deadly earthquake in southern Turkey in 2023.
The couple was still mourning the loss of their two sons who were killed when the earthquake pancaked their six-story apartment building before dawn last February.
Ibrahim Karapirli hobbled back from physical therapy on crutches to protect his aching leg and Pinar wrangled their twin toddlers, unsure how she would care for them with her one remaining arm.
The couple was cleared to leave the hospital 106 days after being rushed there by ambulances.
Ibrahim Karapirli drove despite having a hulking plastic brace on his right leg and Pinar said 'God, please don't let us end up here again'.
As he pulled into traffic, a Turkish pop song mourning a lost love came on the stereo.
The Great Read article was about the Karapirli family's struggle to heal, find a home and cope with loss after being injured in the earthquake.
Ibrahim and Pinar piled about a dozen plastic bags holding their possessions atop a wheelchair before going to their car.
Accuracy
The earthquakes struck southern Turkey and northern Syria last February.
Hundreds of thousands lost their homes in the earthquakes.
Antakya is one of the cities affected by earthquakes where almost half its population was displaced and had largest share of death toll.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by describing the earthquake as a 'deadly' disaster that killed two sons of the family. However, there is no evidence to support this claim and it may be misleading for readers who do not have access to more information about the incident.
The article describes the earthquake as a 'deadly' disaster that killed two sons of the family. However, there is no evidence to support this claim.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the presence of Ben Hubbard and Safak Timur as evidence that they were present when four members of the Karapirli family were pulled from their collapsed apartment building in Gaziantep, Turkey. This is not a logical fallacy, but it does suggest that the author may be relying on their authority to lend credibility to the story. Additionally, there are several instances where dichotomous depictions of loss and grief are used throughout the article. For example, when describing Ibrahim Karapirli's leg injury as
]Ibrahim Karapirli hobbled back from physical therapy on crutches to protect his aching leg.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The article discusses the recovery of a Turkish family after an earthquake. The authors have financial ties to Turkey as they are employed by The New York Times which has business interests in the country.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of earthquake recovery in Turkey as they are reporting on Ibrahim Karapirli and Pinar Karapirli who were killed during an earthquake. The article also mentions their daughter Pinar's struggle with loss after her parents died.
The author reports that the couple was known for their love of Turkish pop songs, including one mourning a lost love.
The earthquakes struck southern Turkey and northern Syria last February.
Hundreds of thousands lost their homes in the earthquakes.
Antakya is one of the cities affected by earthquakes where almost half its population was displaced and had largest share of death toll.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(30%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that no one can bring back what was lost and then proceeds to quote a resident who has indeed lost family members but still believes they will be able to rebuild their lives. This contradicts the initial statement and creates an emotional response in readers without providing any evidence or context for this belief. Secondly, the author uses selective reporting by focusing on the negative aspects of the earthquake such as death tolls and displacement while ignoring positive stories of resilience and recovery. Lastly, there is no clear indication that sources are being disclosed or quoted in the article.
The final resting place for the city's dead will soon be overshadowed by tower blocks for those who survived.
Fallacies
(75%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Turkish president's promise for a swift cleanup and fast reconstruction without providing any evidence that it will be fulfilled. Additionally, the author quotes people who lost their homes in the earthquake as if they are experts on rebuilding efforts, which is not accurate.
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies.
Bias
(75%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'martyrs' to describe those who died in the earthquake which is a term that has strong religious connotations. Additionally, there are references to government housing for people who lost their homes which implies an emphasis on financial aid rather than addressing the root cause of homelessness.
Rows of bright white marble gravestones dot a hillside on the outskirts of Antakya, some bearing the words
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
Ruth Michaelson has a conflict of interest on the topics of Antakya and earthquakes as she is reporting for The Guardian which has financial ties to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's government through its parent company KKR. Additionally, Ruth Michaelson may have personal relationships with individuals or groups in Turkey that could compromise her objectivity.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Antakya and earthquakes as they are directly related to Turkey's recent earthquake that caused $148.8bn in damage.
The war in Gaza was sparked by Hamas's unprecedented October 7 attack on Israel, which resulted in the deaths of about 1,160 people, mostly civilians.
Hamas needs more time to announce its position based on its desire to put an end as quickly as possible to the aggression that its people suffer.
The Israeli government's inability to secure hostages release has led to harsh criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(80%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Hamas still maintains some control over Gaza despite the Israeli ground operation. However, this statement contradicts other information provided in the article which shows that Israel has been gradually advancing south and pushing civilians up against the border with Egypt to avoid areas exposed to bombardment and fighting. Secondly, it states that Hamas needs more time to consider a ceasefire proposal but does not provide any details about what is holding them back or why they need more time. This statement also contradicts other information provided in the article which shows that international mediators are making a full-court press to seal a proposed truce deal thrashed out last week in Paris. Finally, it states that Hamas' Qatar-based leader Ismail Haniyeh has said any ceasefire must lead to 'a full withdrawal' of Israeli troops from Gaza. However, this statement is not supported by any information provided in the article and may be misleading.
The sentence
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the situation in Gaza as a 'worst disaster' and mentions that Hamas still maintains some control despite being overrun by troops and tanks. This is an example of hyperbole, which is not supported by evidence or facts. Additionally, the article contains several examples of appeal to authority fallacies when citing statistics such as the number of people killed in Gaza during the war between Palestinian militants and Israel without providing any context or explanation for these numbers.
The author uses hyperbole when describing the situation in Gaza as a 'worst disaster'
The article contains several examples of appeal to authority fallacies when citing statistics such as the number of people killed in Gaza during the war between Palestinian militants and Israel without providing any context or explanation for these numbers.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that is highly biased. The author states that the children were just sleeping and suddenly the bombardment happened which implies that Israel was responsible for the attack on a kindergarten in Rafah where displaced people were sheltering. This statement is not supported by any evidence provided in the article, making it an example of propaganda.
The children were just sleeping and suddenly the bombardment happened
This statement implies that Israel was responsible for attacking a kindergarten in Rafah where displaced people were sheltering.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The article by Dmitry ZAKS | AFP has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The author is affiliated with a site that has financial ties to Hamas and OCHA, which could compromise their ability to report objectively on these topics.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The author is affiliated with AFP and OCHA which have a vested interest in reporting on humanitarian issues related to Palestine and Israel.
