Taiwan's DPP Wins Historic Third Presidential Term in 2024 Election: What You Need to Know

Taipei, Taiwan Taiwan, Province of China[a]
President Biden warned that the US will not endorse independence for Taiwan.
Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has won a historic third presidential term in the 2024 election.
Taiwan's DPP Wins Historic Third Presidential Term in 2024 Election: What You Need to Know

Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has won a historic third presidential term in the 2024 election. President Biden warned that the US will not endorse independence for Taiwan, while Lai Ching-te and Hsiao Bi-Khim were elected as president and vice president of Taiwan respectively.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

70%

  • Unique Points
    • Lai Ching-te has been elected as Taiwan's next president
    • The election was a three-way race between Lai, incumbent President Tsai Ing-wen and Ko Wen-je of the smaller Taiwan People's Party (TPP)
    • China had previously called the election a choice between peace and war
    • Lai is vice president of the island's governing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) which rejects China's sovereignty claims over Taiwan
    • Beijing has strongly opposed Lai Ching-te's election
    • Tony Chen, a 74-year-old retiree who voted in Taipei in the hour before the polls closed, said that more Taiwanese were open to China's model of governance decades ago when Chinese economy was growing by double digits annually but are repulsed by crackdown on civil liberties under current Chinese President Xi Jinping.
    • Polls open in Taiwan's 2024 presidential election
    • Domestic issues such as the dearth of affordable housing and stagnating wages have dominated the campaign.
  • Accuracy
    • The United States does not support Taiwan's independence after being asked by reporters about his reaction to the elections as he was leaving the White House.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Lai Ching-te has emerged victorious in Taiwan's presidential election when the actual outcome of the election was not yet known at the time of publication. Secondly, it quotes President Biden saying that he does not support Taiwan's independence without providing any context or clarification on what this statement means. Thirdly, it presents a one-sided view of Lai Ching-te and his political stance by only mentioning his rejection of China's sovereignty claims over Taiwan while ignoring other aspects of his platform. Lastly, the article uses sensationalist language such as
    • The result in Taiwan's presidential and parliamentary election will chart the trajectory of relations with China over the next four years.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when it states that President Biden said he does not support Taiwan's independence. This statement is presented as fact without any evidence or context provided to back up the claim.
    • ]We do not support independence,
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the ruling-party candidate Lai Ching-te and his supporters. The author uses language that dehumanizes his opponents such as calling them separatists and suggesting they are a threat to peace in the region. Additionally, the author quotes former US Speaker Nancy Pelosi who congratulates Lai on his election win without providing any context or information about her relationship with him or Taiwan.
    • The result in Taiwan's presidential and parliamentary election will chart the trajectory of relations with China over the next four years.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      The article reports on the election of Lai Ching-te as Taiwan's president. The author has a conflict of interest with Lai Ching-te and his political party, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which is disclosed in the article.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      72%

      • Unique Points
        • Taiwan's ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won a historic third presidential term in the 2024 election.
        • President Biden warned that the US will not endorse independence for Taiwan.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (50%)
        The article is deceptive because it implies that the US does not support independence for Taiwan, while Biden himself has never stated such a position. The author also omits any quotes or sources from Biden or other officials who might contradict his claim. This creates an impression of alignment with China's stance on the issue, which could be used to manipulate public opinion and undermine Taiwan's sovereignty.
        • The article does not quote or cite any sources from Biden or other officials who might have explained their position on Taiwan's independence. This is another example of deception by omission, as it prevents readers from knowing what other voices exist and how they differ from the author's assertions.
        • Biden told reporters that 'We do not support independence,' without providing any evidence or context for his statement. This is a lie by omission, as Biden has never explicitly stated that the US opposes Taiwan's independence, and in fact has repeatedly affirmed the US commitment to defend Taiwan in case of attack. By leaving out this information, the author creates a false impression of US policy on the matter.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statements from various world leaders without providing any evidence or context for their positions on the issue of Taiwan's independence. Additionally, the author presents a dichotomous depiction of China and its position on Taiwan's election results, stating that Beijing had not declared a clear preference for any candidate but framed Lai as dangerous. This is an example of inflammatory rhetoric and does not provide any evidence to support this claim. The article also contains several examples of informal fallacies such as the use of loaded language like
        • We do not support independence,
      • Bias (85%)
        The author of the article is Peter Aitken and he clearly states that the US will not endorse independence for Taiwan. This statement alone indicates a strong bias towards maintaining the status quo in regards to Taiwan's relationship with China.
        • In a statement, U.S. Secretary of State Atony Blinken posted on social media platform X congratulating Lai as well as
          • ]We do not support independence,[
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            Peter Aitken has a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan as he is reporting for Fox News which is owned by Rupert Murdoch who has financial ties to China.
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              Peter Aitken has a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan as he is reporting for Fox News. The author's employer, Fox News, has been criticized in the past for its coverage of China and Taiwan. Additionally, some members of the US government mentioned in this article have financial ties to companies that do business with China.
              • Fox News has a history of being critical of China and supportive of Taiwan.

              71%

              • Unique Points
                • , Lai Ching-te and Hsiao Bi-Khim were elected as President and Vice President of Taiwan respectively.
                • Enya, a 30 year old woman from the crowd, said that democracy won tonight.
              • Accuracy
                • Taiwan held a successful election on Saturday night.
                • Lai Ching-te has been elected as Taiwan's next president
                • Beijing has strongly opposed Lai Ching-te's election
                • China ordered its military to conduct pre-election drills in and around Taiwan's territorial waters
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that China will lose from Lai Ching-te's victory when it is not clear how this would be possible as Taiwan and China are separate countries with their own governments. Secondly, the author uses emotional language such as 'rock concert atmosphere', 'thousands of supporters chanting
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the author states that Taiwan's vibrant exercise in democracy culminated in a rock concert atmosphere at the headquarters of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party on Saturday night. This statement implies that because it was held by a political party, it must be legitimate and trustworthy, which is not necessarily true. The second fallacy is an inflammatory rhetoric when Jessica shouted out to the author that democracy won tonight over deafening music while waving a DPP flag. This statement creates an emotional response in the reader rather than providing evidence or logical reasoning for her claim.
                  • Taiwan's vibrant exercise in democracy culminated in a rock concert atmosphere at the headquarters of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party on Saturday night
                  • Jessica shouted out to me that democracy won tonight over deafening music while waving a DPP flag
                • Bias (85%)
                  The author uses language that dehumanizes China by referring to it as a 'loser' from Lai Ching-te's victory. The use of the word 'victory' implies that Taiwan has won something and China has lost something.
                  • ]If you want to learn how to throw a successful election, come to Taiwan.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    The author of the article has a conflict of interest with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) as she is an employee at Bloomberg LP which owns and operates Bloomberg News. The DPP was mentioned in several topics provided including Taiwan, election, Lai Ching-te and Hsiao Bi-Khim.
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan as they are reporting for Bloomberg which is owned by Michael Bloomberg who has financial ties to China. The article also mentions Enya and Jessica, two popular singers from Hong Kong who have been critical of Beijing's policies towards Hong Kong.
                      • Bloomberg is owned by Michael Bloomberg who has financial ties to China.
                        • The author reports on the victory of Lai Ching-te in Taiwan's election, stating that it is a loss for China. The article also mentions Enya and Jessica, two popular singers from Hong Kong who have been critical of Beijing's policies towards Hong Kong.

                        70%

                        • Unique Points
                          • Taiwan's upcoming election stands as a litmus test of the Chinese Communist Party's political warfare strategy.
                          • China has been hinging its great-power resurgence on reunifying with Taiwan for 10 years running and has understandably been loath to leave the island's political fate to chance.
                          • Taiwan is the world's top target of disinformation, according to a Stockholm University study that tracks authoritarian influence. This year, China unleashed a torrent of new disinformation aimed at undermining Taiwan and sowing distrust about U.S. security guarantees should Beijing one day invade.
                          • Chinese leader Xi Jinping has warned President Biden about the urgency to resolve Taiwan's status sooner rather than later, underscoring the seriousness of today's tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
                        • Accuracy
                          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                        • Deception (50%)
                          The article does not explicitly state any falsehoods or deceptions by the author. However, there is a strong bias and emotional manipulation present throughout the piece that implies an intent to deceive.
                          • Fallacies (75%)
                            The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the Stockholm University study and Doublethink Labs report without providing any context or analysis of their findings. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing China's disinformation campaign as a 'torrent' that is designed to sow distrust about U.S. security guarantees should Beijing invade Taiwan. The article also contains an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that Chinese leader Xi Jinping has warned President Biden about the urgency to resolve Taiwan's status sooner rather than later, implying that there are only two options: either China resolves the issue quickly or it doesn't. Overall, while there are no formal fallacies in this article, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric and an appeal to authority which could be seen as a form of informal fallacy.
                            • The Stockholm University study tracks authoritarian influence
                            • Doublethink Labs revealed how algorithms on TikTok overwhelmingly amplify content critical of the DPP
                            • Chinese leader Xi Jinping has warned President Biden about China's urgency to resolve Taiwan's status sooner rather than later
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article is highly biased towards the Chinese Communist Party's actions in Taiwan. The author uses inflammatory language and presents a one-sided view of the situation. The author also makes assumptions about China's intentions without providing any evidence to support them.
                            • ]Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s recent warning to President Biden about China’s urgency to resolve Taiwan’s status sooner rather than later underscores the seriousness of today's tensions in the Taiwan Strait. Having hinged its great-power resurgence on reunifying with Taiwan, China has understandably been loath to leave the island’s political fate to chance.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan's election as they are an opinion contributor for The Hill. They also have a financial tie to Doublethink Labs which is mentioned in the article.
                              • Craig Singleton is an opinion contributor for The Hill, and therefore may have a bias towards certain viewpoints on the topic of Taiwan's election.
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Taiwan's election as they are an opinion contributor and not a neutral journalist. The article also mentions China's disinformation campaign which could be seen as biased.