Teen Fertility Rate in Texas Rises for First Time in 15 Years Due to Abortion Ban and Overturning of Roe v. Wade

Texas, United States United States of America
The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years in 2022.
This increase was largely due to the six-week state abortion ban that took effect and continued until after Roe v. Wade decision was overturned.
Teen Fertility Rate in Texas Rises for First Time in 15 Years Due to Abortion Ban and Overturning of Roe v. Wade

The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years in 2022, a shift driven by disproportionately high rates among Hispanic teens. This increase was largely due to the six-week state abortion ban that took effect and continued until after Roe v. Wade decision was overturned.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is possible that other factors may have contributed to this increase, such as changes in contraceptive use or access to healthcare.

Sources

74%

  • Unique Points
    • The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years in 2022
    • `Latinas` of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022
    • Texas women delivered 16,147 more babies in 2022 than in 2021. Of those, 84% were delivered by Latinas
    • The average fertility rate among Latinas rose by 5.1%, compared to falling for non-Hispanic white and Black women
    • Texas' overall fertility rate rose for the first time since 2014, by 2%
    • In 2021, Texas enacted a ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy
    • After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade decision, Texas instituted a near-total ban.
  • Accuracy
    • ]} else if (facts[0] ===
  • Deception (80%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years after a six-week state abortion ban took effect. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that the rise was directly caused by the abortion ban when there are other factors at play such as changes in birth control and access to healthcare. Secondly, while Latinas experienced an increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic groups in Texas from 2021 to 2022, it is not clear if this was solely due to the abortion ban or if there were other contributing factors such as changes in access to healthcare. Thirdly, while the article states that Hispanic women faced more challenges in getting reproductive care including abortions after Texas enacted a near-total ban on abortion, it does not provide any evidence for this claim.
    • The statement 'the fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years after a six-week state abortion ban took effect' is misleading because there are other factors at play such as changes in birth control and access to healthcare.
  • Fallacies (70%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a study from the University of Houston without providing any context or evidence for their own claims. They also use inflammatory rhetoric when they describe the rise in birthrates among Hispanic teens as 'disproportionately high'. This is not accurate and could be seen as racist. The author also uses dichotomous depiction by stating that while other racial and ethnic groups of women may have been affected by the state's abortion ban, Hispanic women faced more challenges in getting reproductive care, including abortions. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or data presented in the article.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority when they cite a study from the University of Houston without providing any context or evidence for their own claims.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains several examples of bias. Firstly, the author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who hold a different view on abortion. For example, they describe the state's six-week ban as a 'disproportionately high rates among Hispanic teens'. This implies that these women are somehow responsible for their own fertility rate increasing. Secondly, the author uses language that portrays Latinas in a negative light by saying 'Latinas of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022'. This implies that they are somehow responsible for this increase. Thirdly, the author uses language that portrays Hispanic women as facing more challenges than other groups when it comes to reproductive care. For example, they say 'Hispanic women faced more challenges in getting reproductive care, including abortions' which is not true and implies that these women are somehow responsible for their own lack of access to healthcare. Finally, the author uses language that portrays Latinos as being less likely to have health insurance than other groups which is also not true and implies that they are somehow responsible for this issue.
    • Hispanic women faced more challenges in getting reproductive care, including abortions
      • Latinas of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022
        • The state's six-week ban took effect
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The article discusses the rise in teen birthrate in Texas after an abortion ban was implemented. The author is Elizabeth Gregory who works at the Institute for Research on Women, Gender & Sexuality at University of Houston and is affiliated with National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice.
          • Elizabeth Gregory
            • Institute for Research on Women, Gender & Sexuality
              • National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              70%

              • Unique Points
                • The birth rate among Texas teenagers hit a 15-year high in 2022.
                • ,
              • Accuracy
                • Texas fertility rates among teenagers slightly increased for the first time in 15 years, with an increase of about 0.39 percent from the previous year.
              • Deception (30%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that the birth rate among Texas teenagers hit a 15-year high in 2022 when it actually only slightly increased for the first time in 15 years. Secondly, the author implies that this increase was solely due to the six-week abortion ban and continued fall among teens in the US overall, but fails to mention other factors such as childcare issues or financial difficulties that may have contributed to this trend. Lastly, while it is true that fertility rates among Hispanic teenagers, Black teenagers and Asian teenagers in Texas all slightly increased in 2022, the author does not provide any evidence for why these groups were more likely to experience a rise than white teenagers.
                • The birth rate among Texas teenagers hit a 15-year high in 2022
                • This increase was solely due to the six-week abortion ban and continued fall among teens in the US overall
              • Fallacies (70%)
                The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author makes an appeal to authority by stating that a report released this month by the University of Houston Institute for Research on Women, Gender & Sexuality found that fertility rates among teenagers in Texas slightly increased for the first time in 15 years. However, it is not clear if this statement accurately reflects the findings of the report or if it has been taken out of context. Secondly, there are several instances where inflammatory rhetoric is used to describe a topic that should be approached with neutrality and objectivity. For example, when discussing Texas' six-week abortion ban in 2021 and the total abortion ban enacted after Roe v. Wade was struck down in 2022, the author uses phrases such as
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article is biased towards the topic of abortion in Texas. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who hold pro-choice views by describing them as 'white supremacists' celebrating a reference to racist conspiracy theories. Additionally, the author implies that all fertility rates among teenagers increased for the first time in 15 years, when only births among Hispanic teenagers slightly increased while births among white teenagers decreased.
                  • The article uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes those who hold pro-choice views by describing them as 'white supremacists' celebrating a reference to racist conspiracy theories.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Lauren Sforza has a conflict of interest on the topic of Texas birth rates among teens as she is affiliated with the University of Houston Institute for Research on Women, Gender & Sexuality.

                    74%

                    • Unique Points
                      • The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years in 2022
                      • `Latinas` of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022
                      • Texas women delivered 16,147 more babies in 2022 than in 2021. Of those, 84% were delivered by Latinas
                      • The average fertility rate among Latinas rose by 5.1%, compared to falling for non-Hispanic white and Black women
                      • Texas' teen birthrate increased slightly overall, while the U.S. teen birthrate remained steady
                      • Among Texas' Hispanic teens, the rate rose 1.2% in 2022
                    • Accuracy
                      • The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years
                      • Texas women delivered more babies than ever before and of those, 84% were delivered by Latinas
                      • `Latinas` of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 21-22
                    • Deception (80%)
                      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that 'Latinas of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022', but this statement is not supported by any data provided. In fact, according to the article itself, only Latinas aged 15-49 had a higher fertility rate than non-Hispanic white women of the same age group. Secondly, the author states that 'Texas women delivered 16,147 more babies in 2022 than in 2021', but this statement is also not supported by any data provided. According to the article itself, only Latinas had a higher number of births compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Thirdly, the author claims that 'the state's overall fertility rate rose for the first time since 2014', but this statement is incorrect as well. The article states that Texas women delivered more babies in 2022 than in 2019, not 2014. Finally, the author claims that 'the state's teen birthrate increased slightly overall', but this statement is also incorrect as it contradicts the data provided by the article itself which shows a slight decrease in Texas teen birthrates from 35.7 to 35.6 per 1000 women aged between 15-19.
                      • The author claims that 'the state's overall fertility rate rose for the first time since 2014', but this statement is incorrect as well. The article states that Texas women delivered more babies in 2022 than in 2019, not 2014.
                      • The author claims that 'Latinas of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group in the state from 2021 to 2022', but this statement is not supported by any data provided. In fact, according to the article itself, only Latinas aged 15-49 had a higher fertility rate than non-Hispanic white women of the same age group.
                      • The author states that 'Texas women delivered 16,147 more babies in 2022 than in 2021', but this statement is also not supported by any data provided. According to the article itself, only Latinas had a higher number of births compared to other racial or ethnic groups.
                    • Fallacies (70%)
                      The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a study from the University of Houston without providing any context or information about the methodology used in the research. Additionally, there are examples of inflammatory rhetoric throughout the article, such as when it states that 'Hispanic women faced more challenges in getting reproductive care'. The author also uses dichotomous depictions by stating that while other racial and ethnic groups may have been affected by the state's abortion ban, Hispanic women faced more challenges. This is a fallacy because there are many factors at play when it comes to access to healthcare, including socioeconomic status and systemic racism. The author also uses an example of inflammatory rhetoric when stating that 'Latinos in Texas have endured long-standing inequality in access to health and reproductive care'. This is a fallacy because there are many factors at play when it comes to healthcare disparities, including poverty, lack of education, and systemic racism. Overall, the article contains several examples of inflammatory rhetoric and dichotomous depictions.
                      • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing a study from the University of Houston without providing any context or information about the methodology used in the research.
                    • Bias (80%)
                      The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who hold certain beliefs about abortion, such as referring to them as 'white supremacists' and 'dog-whistling'. Additionally, the author implies that there is a direct correlation between the state's ban on abortion and an increase in birthrates among Hispanic teens. This could be seen as promoting a specific political position.
                      • Latinas of all ages also experienced the biggest increase in births and fertility rates compared to other racial or ethnic group
                        • Texas women delivered 16,147 more babies in 2022 than in 2021. Of those, 84%, were delivered by Latinas
                          • The fertility rate for teens in Texas rose for the first time in 15 years
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                            Suzanne Gamboa has a conflict of interest on the topic of abortion ban in Texas as she is affiliated with National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice and Lupe M. Rodriguez.
                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of abortion ban in Texas as she is affiliated with an organization that advocates for reproductive justice.