Thousands of Days Since Girls in Afghanistan Were Banned from Secondary Schools: UNICEF Urges Taliban to Allow Education for All

Kabul, Afghanistan Afghanistan
Taliban have imposed harsh measures including barring women from higher education, public spaces and most jobs.
The Taliban's refusal to allow girls beyond sixth grade education is a violation of their human rights and hinders progress in Afghanistan.
Thousands of days have passed since girls in Afghanistan were banned from attending secondary schools according to UNICEF.
UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell urged Taliban authorities to allow all children, particularly girls, to resume learning.
UNICEF works with partners to run community-based education classes for over 600,000 children, two-thirds of them girls.
Thousands of Days Since Girls in Afghanistan Were Banned from Secondary Schools: UNICEF Urges Taliban to Allow Education for All

ISLAMABAD - A thousand days have passed since girls in Afghanistan were banned from attending secondary schools, according to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). The Taliban's refusal to allow girls beyond sixth grade to continue their education remains a significant obstacle for the group in gaining international recognition as legitimate rulers of Afghanistan. UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell urged Taliban authorities to immediately allow all children, particularly girls, to resume learning and called on the international community for support.

The U.N. has warned that the ban on girls' education is a violation of their human rights and hinders progress in Afghanistan. The Taliban have stated that their strict interpretation of Islamic law prohibits girls from continuing their education beyond sixth grade.

Despite initially promising a more moderate rule, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, including barring women from higher education, public spaces like parks, and most jobs. When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s, they also banned girls' education.

The Taliban's educational policies have been criticized for their negative impact on both boys and girls. Human Rights Watch reported that deep harm has been inflicted on boys' education as qualified teachers, including women, were left. The group noted an increase in corporal punishment.

UNICEF works with partners to run community-based education classes for over 600,000 children, two-thirds of them girls. However, the Taliban's restrictions on girls' education have forced many families to make difficult choices and prioritize their sons' education.

The U.N. Human Rights Office reported that female civil servants barred from working were told their salaries would be cut to the lowest level regardless of their experience or qualifications, further deepening the erosion of human rights in Afghanistan.

The Taliban's treatment of women and girls has been widely condemned by international organizations and human rights groups. The U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights called on authorities to rescind all laws, instructions, edicts, and other measures that discriminate against women and girls in violation of the country's human rights obligations.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there any recent developments regarding the Taliban's stance on girls' education?
  • Is the number of 600,000 children accurate?

Sources

75%

  • Unique Points
    • Zakia lost her job after the Taliban takeover and joined a protest in December 2022
    • Parwana Ibrahimkhail Nijrabi was arrested after attending a protest against Taliban rules in December 2022
    • Mariam, a widow and sole breadwinner for her children, attended a protest out of fear she wouldn’t be able to provide for her family
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of women being oppressed by the Taliban. It also uses emotional manipulation by describing the experiences of three women in a way that elicits sympathy and anger from readers. The article does not disclose any sources.
    • Parwana too decided to protest against the Taliban, along with a group of fellow students, organising several marches. But their action was also met with swift reprisal.
    • When Zakia (who is using a pseudonym) joined a protest more than a year later in December 2022, it was her first chance to express her anger at losing the right to work and to education.
    • Despite protests against Taliban rules, participation of Afghan women in employment has fallen drastically since the takeover
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (50%)
    The author demonstrates a clear bias towards the women who protested against the Taliban and against the Taliban itself. The author's language is emotionally charged and paints a picture of innocent women being brutally oppressed by the Taliban. The author also implies that the Taliban is intolerant towards protests, violent, and dehumanizing towards women.
    • But soon, those who gathered in the capital Kabul and other major cities to demand ‘food, work, freedom’ felt the full force of the Taliban.
      • I could hear several people, one would kick me and ask who paid me to organise [the] protest
        • I was being pulled by the Taliban who were trying to load me into their vehicle and other fellow protesters who were trying to release me.
          • My face was numb as they slapped me so many times. I was so scared, my entire body was trembling.
            • One of them pointed his gun right into my mouth and threatened to kill me right there if I didn’t shut up.
              • They made their families pay for these protests
                • They started torturing me from the moment they arrested me
                  • They were twisting my arms
                    • When I refused to sit there, they moved me to the front, put a blanket over my head and pointed the gun and told me not to move.
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                      None Found At Time Of Publication

                    78%

                    • Unique Points
                      • It has been 1000 days since the Taliban banned schooling for girls beyond sixth grade.
                      • The Taliban’s cruelty has evolved with modern technology and they enforce their policies with relentless efficiency.
                    • Accuracy
                      No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                    • Deception (30%)
                      The author uses emotional manipulation by describing the plight of Afghan women and girls and their inability to attend school due to Taliban restrictions. She also uses selective reporting by focusing on the lack of education for women under Taliban rule while ignoring any potential progress or efforts made towards improving their situation. The author's statements are not factually incorrect, but her emphasis on empty promises and superficial actions from the international community without providing evidence creates a deceptive narrative.
                      • It's been 1000 days since the Taliban banned schooling for girls beyond sixth grade.
                      • Despite knowing the dire situation, the world has mustered neither collective will nor coordinated efforts needed to make a real difference.
                      • Such efforts lack transparency and will likely be subject to limited rollouts.
                    • Fallacies (80%)
                      The author uses emotional appeals and hyperbole to make her argument, which can be considered a form of informal fallacy. She also makes several statements about the international community's response to the situation in Afghanistan being 'hollow proclamations' and 'empty promises,' implying that they are not doing enough. This is an appeal to emotion and a dichotomous depiction, as it presents two extreme options (either the international community is doing nothing or they are making empty promises) without acknowledging any nuance or complexity. The author also mentions specific examples of inadequate responses, such as Secretary of State Anthony Blinken's announcement about American companies providing job training to Afghan women. She criticizes this initiative for lacking transparency and being insubstantial, but does not provide any evidence or reasoning beyond her emotional reaction. This can be considered a fallacy of insufficient evidence.
                      • ]Afghan women's rights activists and their supporters often speak empty words, merely to feel good about themselves.[/
                      • The suggestion that these efforts constitute substantial support is an insult to the dignity of Afghan women.
                    • Bias (80%)
                      The author expresses a strong opinion against empty platitudes and superficial actions taken by the international community in regards to Afghan women's rights. She criticizes the lack of substantial support and coordinated efforts to help Afghan women receive education under Taliban rule. The author also mentions specific examples of empty promises made by Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, such as job training programs on Microsoft, LinkedIn and Coursera.
                      • Secretary of State Anthony Blinken announced in February that American companies like Microsoft, LinkedIn and Coursera will provide job training, certifications and employer connections to Afghan women. Such efforts lack transparency and will likely be subject to limited rollouts.
                        • The suggestion that these efforts constitute substantial support is an insult to the dignity of Afghan women.
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        100%

                        • Unique Points
                          • A thousand days have passed since girls in Afghanistan were banned from attending secondary schools.
                          • UNICEF estimates that more than 1 million girls are affected by the ban.
                          • Girls’ education is the Taliban’s biggest obstacle to gaining recognition as legitimate rulers of Afghanistan.
                          • Taliban authorities have said girls continuing their education goes against their strict interpretation of Islamic law.
                          • UNICEF works with partners to run community-based education classes for over 600,000 children, two-thirds of them girls.
                        • Accuracy
                          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                        • Deception (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Fallacies (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Bias (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        80%

                        • Unique Points
                          • U.N. Special Rapporteur Richard Bennett published a report on the institutionalized system of discrimination against women and girls in Afghanistan.
                          • Approximately 52 edicts restricting women's rights have been issued since June 2023.
                        • Accuracy
                          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                        • Deception (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Fallacies (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Bias (0%)
                          The author expresses a clear position against the Taliban's treatment of women and girls in Afghanistan, using strong language such as 'institutionalized system of discrimination,' 'severe deprivation of fundamental rights,' and 'architecture of oppression.' She also quotes extensively from a UN report that supports her position. While it is important to note that the author's position is not inherently biased, the use of such strong language and extensive quoting from a single source could be seen as disproportionately reflecting her position.
                          • The report emphasized that In addition to strengthening the normative framework of international law, recognition of the crime against humanity of gender apartheid would more profoundly underscore the duty of States to take effective action to prevent and punish the practice.
                            • The report found that Women and girls are being maneuvred into increasingly narrow roles where the deep-rooted patriarchy, bolstered and legitimized by Taliban ideology, deems them to belong: as bearers and rearers of children, and as objects available for exploitation, including debt bondage, domestic servitude, sexual exploitation and other forms of unremunerated or poorly remunerated labor.
                              • The U.N. Special Rapporteur Richard Bennett warned that Left unchecked, the Taliban’s institutionalized system of gender oppression will become more robust, as those resisting it suffer increasing violence, as memories of female role models and notions of female independence fade, and as new generations are raised and radicalized in a society unquestioning of its dehumanization and exploitation of women and girls.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication

                              100%

                              • Unique Points
                                • Girls' education is the Taliban’s biggest obstacle to gaining recognition as legitimate rulers of Afghanistan.
                                • Taliban authorities have said girls continuing their education goes against their strict interpretation of Islamic law.
                                • UNICEF works with partners to run community-based education classes for over 600,000 children, two-thirds of them girls.
                              • Accuracy
                                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                              • Deception (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Fallacies (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Bias (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication