In 2020, then-president Trump attempted to ban TikTok with an executive order but the effort was stalled in court.
Members of Congress have raised concerns about potential data harvesting and propaganda channels.
Reports have surfaced that U.S. users' data was accessible to ByteDance employees in China and perhaps Beijing itself.
The Chinese government has signaled that it would block any forced sale of TikTok by ByteDance.
TikTok reportedly brought in between $16 billion and $20 billion in revenue in 2023.
Title: Perils of TikTok: The Battle for Control Continues
The popular social media platform TikTok has been at the center of a contentious debate between the U.S. government and its Chinese-owned parent company, ByteDance, over data privacy concerns and potential propaganda channels.
Background: In April 2024, the House of Representatives passed a bill that could effectively ban TikTok in the U.S. if ByteDance does not sell the app to a buyer not controlled by a foreign adversary within 9 months.
Facts:
TikTok reportedly brought in between $16 billion and $20 billion in revenue in 2023.
The Chinese government has signaled that it would block any forced sale of TikTok by ByteDance.
Members of Congress have raised concerns about the potential for American user data to be harvested by Chinese authorities and used as propaganda channels.
In 2020, then-president Trump attempted to ban TikTok with an executive order but the effort was stalled in court.
Reports have surfaced that U.S. users' data was accessible to ByteDance employees in China and perhaps Beijing itself, despite TikTok's claims that Chinese authorities have no access to its U.S. user data.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S.'s (CFIUS) investigation into TikTok has been ongoing but is yet to reach a conclusion.
Impact: If the bill becomes law, ByteDance would have up to a year to find a buyer for TikTok or face a ban. However, it is unlikely that either party will agree to the terms of the sale due to constitutional questions and potential precedents set by such legislation.
Conclusion: The fight between TikTok and the U.S. government over control of the app is far from over, with both sides digging in their heels for what could be a lengthy legal battle.
TikTok reportedly brought in between $16 billion and $20 billion in revenue in 2023
TikTok has promised to protect the privacy of its U.S. users by storing all its data with Oracle in Texas
Accuracy
Congress is expected to approve a law that would give ByteDance up to a year to find a U.S. buyer for TikTok or face a ban.
The Chinese government has signaled that it would block any forced sale of TikTok by ByteDance.
It is unlikely that TikTok or the Chinese government will agree to the terms of the sale.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(90%)
The article contains several informational fallacies due to the author's use of loaded language and framing of certain information. However, no formal or blatant logical fallacies were found in the text.
][Congress] likely passage of a law forcing TikTok’s Chinese owner to sell its U.S. operations will close one lengthy chapter of the ‘Washington vs. TikTok’ epic and open a new one that could be equally drawn-out.[/]
[Members of Congress have already raised constitutional questions about legislation that targets a specific company by name, and ByteDance is nearly certain to take up that argument in challenging the law.][
Supporters of free trade fear that the law could set a precedent for other nations to force U.S. tech companies to sell off their local operations.[
The House approved a bill that could effectively ban TikTok in the US if its China-based parent company, ByteDance, does not sell the app within 270 days or face a ban.
It is unlikely that TikTok or the Chinese government will agree to the terms of the sale.
TikTok has spent $5 million on ads against the legislation since mid-March according to AdImpact.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of a potential ban on TikTok and does not mention any counterarguments or alternative perspectives. The author also uses emotional manipulation by implying the danger of China and foreign adversaries accessing Americans' data through TikTok.
Trump opposed the previous version of the TikTok bill passed last month...
China and other foreign adversaries could still purchase Americans’ sensitive data from data brokers on the open market...
The legislation, approved by the House in a 360-58 vote, would force China-based TikTok owner, ByteDance, to sell the app to a buyer that is not controlled by a foreign adversary...
The House voted to ban TikTok or force its sale in the US.
Comedian and actor Zach Sage Fox earns income from TikTok and recognizes the dangers it poses.
TikTok has been accused of promoting hate and misinformation, particularly regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Accuracy
The bill to ban or force sale passed overwhelmingly in the House with a vote of 360 to 58.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains selective reporting as it only mentions the negative aspects of TikTok without providing any context or balance. The authors also use emotional manipulation by quoting Zach Sage Fox's fear and terror regarding the app, which may influence readers to share that emotion. Additionally, there is a lie by omission as the article fails to mention that there have been no credible reports of TikTok promoting Hamas propaganda or turning younger Americans towards Islamic extremism.
The bill, which would force the app owner, ByteDance, to divest within nine months, passed overwhelmingly,
The House on Saturday voted to ban TikTok – and even some Americans who make bank on the Chinese-owned app believe its end can’t come soon enough, saying it’s become a cesspool of hate and misinformation.
Comedian and actor Zach Sage Fox, who earns his living in part by posting clips of his standup to over 1.1 million followers on TikTok, was sweating what the ban on the app could mean for his income in the hours after the Congressional vote to block the platform in the US or force its sale.
But as the company has faced accusations of promoting Hamas propaganda and turning younger Americans toward Islamic extremism following the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel,
Fallacies
(85%)
The authors use inflammatory rhetoric by describing TikTok as a 'cesspool of hate and misinformation' and 'massively popular video sharing platform poses'. They also make an appeal to authority by quoting experts who suggest that if TikTok is banned, another app will take its place. However, they do not provide any specific examples or evidence to support these claims.
]The House on Saturday voted to ban TikTok - and even some Americans who make bank on the Chinese-owned app believe its end can’t come soon enough, saying it’s become a cesspool of hate and misinformation.[
Comedian and actor Zach Sage Fox recognized the dangers of the massively popular video sharing platform poses.
Experts said even if TikTok fails to find a buyer and get blocked from the United States, a new app is guaranteed to take its place.
Bias
(95%)
The authors express their concern about the dangers of TikTok and its promotion of misinformation, specifically in relation to the Israel-Palestine conflict. They quote a TikTok user named Zach Sage Fox who shares similar concerns and provides examples of misinformation on the platform. The authors do not demonstrate any bias towards or against any particular political or ideological position, but rather express concern about the potential harm caused by misinformation on TikTok.
In the last few months, in regard to the Israel-Palestine conflict, for all the biggest sources of misinformation, TikTok is just a gold mine.
It seems like there is something happening in the algorithm that is very much trying to soil the West.
The House passed legislation that would ban TikTok in the United States if the popular social media platform’s China-based owner doesn’t sell its stake within a year.
TikTok has lobbied against the legislation, pushing its users to call Congress and voice opposition.
Members of both parties, along with intelligence officials, have worried that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over American user data or direct the company to suppress or boost TikTok content favorable to its interests.
TikTok has denied assertions that it could be used as a tool of the Chinese government and has said it has not shared U.S. user data with Chinese authorities.
The U.S. government has not publicly provided evidence that shows TikTok shared U.S. user data with the Chinese government or tampered with the company’s popular algorithm, which influences what Americans see.
Accuracy
Congress is expected to approve a law that would give ByteDance up to a year to find a U.S. buyer for TikTok or face a ban.
The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a larger foreign aid package fast-tracked the ban after an earlier version had stalled in the Senate.
Deception
(30%)
The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of the possible TikTok ban in the US. The author does not provide any counterarguments or mention any potential negative consequences of the ban for TikTok users or businesses. Additionally, there is emotional manipulation through phrases like 'millions of users', 'amazing platform', and 'positive impacts on their lives' which are used to evoke an emotional response from readers.
The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a larger foreign aid package, a priority for President Joe Biden with broad congressional support for Ukraine and Israel, fast-tracked the ban after an earlier version had stalled in the Senate.
Since mid-March, TikTok has spent $5 million on TV ads opposing the legislation.
The company has also encouraged its users to contact Congress, and some lawmakers have received profanity-laced calls.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several informal fallacies and an appeal to authority. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the potential impact of the bill on TikTok users and businesses, implying that it would 'devastate' them. This is an example of exaggeration or overstatement, which is a type of informal fallacy. Additionally, the author quotes a lawyer from the American Civil Liberties Union stating that 'Congress cannot take away the rights of over 170 million Americans who use TikTok to express themselves.' This statement can be considered an appeal to authority as it implies that the ACLU's opinion on this matter is definitive and infallible. However, it is important to note that while the ACLU may have a strong stance on this issue, their opinion does not necessarily make it true or correct.
It's a sign of the Beltway being out of touch with where voters are.
This is going to have real repercussions.
Bias
(95%)
The article expresses a clear bias against TikTok and its Chinese owner ByteDance Ltd. The author mentions the national security concerns about the app's owner multiple times and quotes lawmakers voicing these concerns. The author also mentions that TikTok has lobbied against the legislation, which is presented in a negative light, and includes quotes from TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew that are intended to anger readers. The article also implies that the pushback from TikTok and its users is ferocious and unwarranted. Additionally, the author mentions legal challenges to the legislation but does not mention any potential legal challenges to national security concerns.
But the ferocity of the pushback angered lawmakers on Capitol Hill, where there is broad concern about Chinese threats to the U.S. and where few members use the platform themselves.
It is unfortunate that the House of Representatives is using the cover of important foreign and humanitarian assistance to once again jam through a ban bill that would trample the free speech rights of 170 million Americans
Members of both parties, along with intelligence officials, have worried that Chinese authorities could force ByteDance to hand over American user data or direct the company to suppress or boost TikTok content favorable to its interests.
The decision by House Republicans to include TikTok as part of a larger foreign aid package...fast-tracked the ban after an earlier version had stalled in the Senate.
The ferocity of the pushback angered lawmakers on Capitol Hill...
We will not stop fighting and advocating for you...We will continue to do all we can, including exercising our legal rights, to protect this amazing platform that we have built with you.
/2024/04/19/1713553647273.gif?w=1920)
