Total Solar Eclipse in New Hampshire's Great North Woods on April 8, 2024

United States of America
The Great North American Solar Eclipse will occur on Monday, April 8, 2024.
The mid-afternoon sun over New Hampshire's Great North Woods will be totally obscured by the moon for about three and a half minutes.
Total Solar Eclipse in New Hampshire's Great North Woods on April 8, 2024

The Great North American Solar Eclipse will occur on Monday, April 8, 2024. The mid-afternoon sun over New Hampshire's Great North Woods will be totally obscured by the moon for about three and a half minutes.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

85%

  • Unique Points
    • The Great North American Solar Eclipse will occur on Monday, April 8, 2024
    • Five weeks from now, the mid-afternoon sun over New Hampshire's Great North Woods will be totally obscured by the moon for about three and a half minutes.
    • Visitors are expected to experience the celestial event firsthand in New Hampshire.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that all of New Hampshire will experience a partial eclipse when in fact only those who go north to Lancaster will see a full eclipse. Secondly, the article suggests that visitors should plan ahead and avoid limited routes during the day of the event but does not provide any information on how many people are expected or what kind of traffic is likely. Thirdly, while it mentions several events in New Hampshire for viewing the eclipse, it fails to disclose whether these events will be held by private organizations or if they have been organized with government support.
    • The article claims that all of New Hampshire will experience a partial eclipse when in fact only those who go north to Lancaster will see a full eclipse. This is deceptive because it implies that the entire state will be able to view the event, which is not true.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the New Hampshire Travel and Tourism Director Lori Harnois as a source of information about the eclipse's potential impact on tourism in New Hampshire. Additionally, the author quotes Globe correspondent Dave Epstein as a source for information about how total solar eclipses differ from annular ones. The article also contains an example of inflammatory rhetoric when it describes the crowds that are expected to gather during the event and suggests that visitors should plan ahead in order to avoid them. Finally, there is an example of dichotomous depiction when it contrasts between experiencing a full eclipse at Coleman State Park and attending a special concert featuring Cynthia MacLeod and Gordon Belsher from Prince Edward Island.
    • The highly anticipated Great North American Solar Eclipse which will send a lunar shadow sweeping across the country from central Texas, through the Midwest, and across northern New England on Monday, April 8 is expected to bring a wave of visitors to the Granite State eager to experience the celestial event firsthand.
    • We expect a significant influx of people
    • The state launched a Joint Information Center and a dedicated website NHSolarEclipse.com, to coordinate information-sharing.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

60%

  • Unique Points
    • The April total solar eclipse will occur on April 8, 2024.
    • Millions of Americans are expected to view the eclipse from across thousands of miles.
    • Roads in states where sky gazers will travel to see the centerline of totality may experience traffic jams and congestion.
    • The last total solar eclipse in 2017 caused dangerous and busy traffic conditions as people packed into narrow areas to view it, with some areas experiencing congestion for up to 13 hours after the totality.
    • Drivers should be aware of distracted pedestrians looking to the sky during the eclipse.
    • AAA recommends drivers put their sun visors down to block their view of the sun and watch closely for pedestrian traffic.
    • The path of totality in 2024 will begin in Texas, with cities on its centerline including Dallas, Cleveland, Ohio and Buffalo, New York.
    • Drivers should plan ahead before traveling during the eclipse and avoid pulling over on roads or highways to view it.
  • Accuracy
    • County officials in Lorain County, Ohio are warning residents about increased visitors, traffic and jammed roads during the eclipse.
    • The Wyoming Department of Transportation reported that more than 536,000 cars filled its streets after the eclipse in 2017 and experienced heavy congestion on its highway system.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the excitement of the solar eclipse could create dangerous and busy traffic conditions as people pack into cities to view it. However, this statement implies that there will be a significant increase in visitors during the event which may not necessarily be true or accurate.
    • The article states that an analysis of traffic patterns from 2017 suggests that the worst of the traffic both on big interstates and rural backroads will kick off after the eclipse ends and everyone tries to exit all at once. However, this statement implies that there will be a significant increase in visitors during the event which may not necessarily be true or accurate.
    • The article mentions that roads could be especially packed at the center of the eclipse's path as Americans who want the best view crowd into cities, towns and remote areas. However, this statement implies that there will be a significant increase in visitors during the event which may not necessarily be true or accurate.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing experts and officials without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by suggesting that traffic congestion is the only potential issue with viewing the solar eclipse.
    • The article contains several fallacies.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the negative impact of traffic congestion during the solar eclipse. The author uses fear tactics to warn readers about potential dangers and inconveniences caused by increased traffic. They also use quotes from experts to support their claims without providing any counter-arguments or alternative viewpoints.
    • Pack your patience, whether traveling a great distance or locally, people will be out and about to catch a glimpse of the eclipse,
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
      The article discusses the potential impact of a total solar eclipse on traffic across thousands of miles. The author is Aixa Diaz who works for the American Automobile Association (AAA) and Lorain County Emergency Management. She has a professional affiliation with NASA through her work at Transportation Research News.
      • The article mentions that Aixa Diaz, an expert in transportation research from Transportation Research News, was consulted for the story.
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      82%

      • Unique Points
        • The Great North American Solar Eclipse marks a significant astronomical event.
        • Even if you’re not directly inside the path of totality, you should still be able to experience the eclipse in some form.
      • Accuracy
        • <date>February 26, 1979</date>
        • Is it too late to invest in Nvidia?
        • The state launched a Joint Information Center and dedicated website NHSolarEclipse.com to coordinate information-sharing.
        • Visitors are expected to experience the celestial event firsthand in New Hampshire.
      • Deception (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by referencing the total solar eclipse of February 26, 1979 and stating that it was a significant astronomical event. However, this is not supported with any evidence or data. Additionally, the author makes a false dichotomy between different types of solar eclipses (total vs annular/partial) by stating that the next big eclipse will be in 2045 for North Americans and Canadians respectively, when in fact there are other types of solar eclipses. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing the path of totality as
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          George Dvorsky / Gizmodo has conflicts of interest on the topics of solar eclipses and Canada provinces since 1979.
          • The article also mentions the Great North American Solar Eclipse of 2045 and Canada provinces since 1979, both topics that could be considered conflicts of interest if George Dvorsky has a personal stake in these areas.
            • The article mentions that George Dvorsky is a science writer for Gizmodo, which may have financial ties to companies or industries related to space exploration.

            80%

            • Unique Points
              • The Great North American Solar Eclipse will occur on Monday, April 8, 2024
              • Visitors are expected to experience the celestial event firsthand in New Hampshire.
              • Roads in states where sky gazers will travel to see the centerline of totality may experience traffic jams and congestion.
              • Drivers should be aware of distracted pedestrians looking to the sky during the eclipse.
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (30%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Nashville will only have a small portion of West Tennessee included in the path of totality when in fact it is not mentioned anywhere else what part of West Tennessee will be included. Secondly, the article mentions two cities inside Kentucky and Indiana as being able to witness a total solar eclipse but does not mention any other states or cities that are also on the path. Thirdly, the article uses sensationalism by stating that over 100,000 tourists are expected to visit Russellville in Arkansas which is six hours away from Nashville and implies it will be an extremely large event when there is no information provided about how many people usually visit these cities during a solar eclipse. Lastly, the article uses selective reporting by only mentioning two cities inside Kentucky that can witness totality while not mentioning any other states or cities on the path.
              • The article mentions Nashville will have a small portion of West Tennessee included in the path of totality but does not specify which part.
              • The article mentions only two cities in Kentucky and Indiana that can witness totality while not mentioning any other states or cities on the path.
              • The article uses sensationalism by stating over 100,000 tourists are expected to visit Russellville when there is no information provided about how many people usually visit these cities during a solar eclipse.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing NASA as a source for information about the solar eclipse. However, this does not necessarily mean that NASA's information is accurate or reliable. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing how close Nashville is to totality and how many tourists are expected in Arkansas. This creates an emotional response rather than providing objective facts.
              • The article cites NASA as a source for information about the solar eclipse, which could be seen as an appeal to authority fallacy.
            • Bias (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            70%

            • Unique Points
              • The Great North American Solar Eclipse will occur on Monday, April 8, 2024
              • Visitors are expected to experience the celestial event firsthand in New Hampshire.
              • Roads in states where sky gazers will travel to see the centerline of totality may experience traffic jams and congestion.
              • Drivers should be aware of distracted pedestrians looking to the sky during the eclipse.
              • <date>April 8, 2024</dateǩ
              • Ὢ5 The path of totality in 217 will begin in Texas, with cities on its centerline including Dallas, Cleveland, Ohio and Buffalo, New York.
              • Drivers should plan ahead before traveling during the eclipse and avoid pulling over on roads or highways to view it.
            • Accuracy
              • The solar eclipse is happening on April 8, 2024.
              • Looking directly at the sun during a solar eclipse can cause permanent retinal damage.
              • Solar filters made of black polymer lenses are imperative for safe viewing and protect your eyes from harmful UV rays.
              • ISO 12312-2 certified glasses have been verified compliant with modern standards for beholding eclipses.
              • It is important to purchase solar eclipse glasses before the event as they may sell out quickly.
              • Solar filters are not expensive and can be found for around $10 per pair.
              • DIY workarounds such as pinhole viewing or using a colander can also allow you to view the solar eclipse indirectly without hurting your eyes.
              • The American Academy of Ophthalmology confirms that approved solar eclipse glasses from 2017 will still work for the upcoming event.
            • Deception (50%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the only way to safely view a solar eclipse is by using special viewing glasses fitted with solar filters. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as there are other methods of indirect viewing available such as pinhole projection and colander projection which can also be used to observe the eclipse without causing permanent damage to your eyes.
              • The article states that looking through conventional binoculars or telescopes does not mitigate the risk of eye damage during a solar eclipse. However, this is false as these devices are designed with special filters that can protect your eyes from harmful UV radiation and direct sunlight.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) has certified solar eclipse glasses as safe for viewing. However, this statement is not enough on its own and should be accompanied by information about what ISO 12312-2 actually entails and why it's important. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the consequences of looking directly at the sun during a solar eclipse as
              • Bias (85%)
                The author is promoting the use of solar eclipse glasses and encouraging readers to buy them. The article mentions that these glasses are necessary for safe viewing during a solar eclipse as looking directly at the sun can cause permanent retinal damage. However, it also implies that not all sunglasses or binoculars will provide adequate protection.
                • The article mentions that looking directly at the sun during a solar eclipse can cause permanent retinal damage and recommends using specialized glasses for safe viewing.
                  • The author states 'It's imperative to procure special viewing glasses fitted with solar filters.'
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    Elana Spivack has a financial interest in TotalEclipseGlasses.com as she is promoting their solar eclipse glasses and the article mentions that they are sold out.
                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      The author has a financial interest in the topic of solar eclipse glasses as they are promoting TotalEclipseGlasses.com and selling $10 for 5 solar eclipse glasses.