On April 20, 2023, a young woman named Kaylin Gillis was killed by Kevin Monahan in his driveway. The group of friends that she was with mistakenly turned up to the wrong property and accidentally drove onto Monahan's long winding driveway at around 9:45 p.m. As they were trying to leave, Monahan fired two shots from a shotgun, killing Gillis in the passenger seat of an SUV with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
Tragic Accident: Young Woman Killed by Friend in Hebron Driveway
Hebron, New York United States of AmericaAs they were trying to leave, Monahan fired two shots from a shotgun, killing Gillis in the passenger seat of an SUV with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
On April 20, 2023, a young woman named Kaylin Gillis was killed by Kevin Monahan in his driveway. The group of friends that she was with mistakenly turned up to the wrong property and accidentally drove onto Monahan's long winding driveway at around 9:45 p.m.
Confidence
80%
Doubts
- It is not clear if there was any prior history between Kaylin Gillis and Kevin Monahan that could have led to this tragic accident.
Sources
88%
'Coward' Kevin Monahan gets decades in prison for Gillis' death
Times Union Robert Gavin Friday, 01 March 2024 11:49Unique Points
- Kevin Monahan was sentenced to 26 years to life in prison for the murder of Kaylin Gillis.
- Monahan fired two shots from a shotgun that killed Gillis as she sat in the passenger seat of a Ford Explorer with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
- Gillis was among seven friends traveling to find a party when they mistakenly turned up Monahan's driveway about 9:45 p.m.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
Deception (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Fallacies (95%)
The article contains an example of the appeal to authority fallacy. The judge's statement that Monahan is unremorseful and dishonest is presented as fact without any evidence or reasoning provided.Bias (85%)
The article is biased towards the victim and her family. The author uses language that demonizes the defendant as a 'coward' without providing any evidence to support this claim. Additionally, there are quotes from people who knew the victim but no one from Monahan's side of things.- ]Kaylin Gillis was killed by Kevin Monahan outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of hunting accidents as they are reporting on the death of Kaylin Gillis who was killed in a hunting accident. The article also mentions Blake Walsh and Jacob Haynes who were involved in another hunting accident that resulted in the death of Alexandra Whiting.- The author reports on the shooting death of Kaylin Gillis, stating that she died from a gunshot wound.
67%
Man convicted of killing Kaylin Gillis sentenced to 25 years to life for murder
WNYT NewsChannel 13 Michael Goot Friday, 01 March 2024 11:00Unique Points
- Kaylin Gillis was killed by Kevin Monahan in his driveway.
- Monahan shot and killed Kaylin Gillis as she sat in the passenger seat of a Ford Explorer with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
Accuracy
- Kevin Monahan was convicted of second-degree murder.
- Monahan shot and killed Kaylin Gillis in his driveway last April.
- The sentence for the murder charge is 25 years to life plus a smaller consecutive sentence for tampering with evidence. The total prison time is 26 1/3 to 29 years to life.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions that Kevin Monahan was convicted of killing Kaylin Gillis and sentenced to 25 years to life for murder. However, this sentence does not accurately reflect the content of the article as it states that he has been found guilty on second-degree murder charges but not first-degree. Secondly, in the body of the article, there are several instances where Monahan's attorneys make statements that contradict each other and their own previous statements. For example, Arthur Frost claims early on his 27-year career as a defense attorney he said to himself 'if you can't find something to love in your client, you should not represent him.' However later in the article, he states that what he loves about Monahan is how much he loves his wife. This contradicts Frost's earlier statement and shows deceptive behavior on his part. Lastly, there are several instances where the author of the article uses sensationalist language to make it seem like Kaylin Gillis was a sweet and loving soul who did not deserve to die. However, this is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.- The title mentions that Monahan was convicted of killing Kaylin Gillis but he has been found guilty on second-degree murder charges which does not accurately reflect the content of the article.
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains an example of a false dilemma fallacy. The author presents the idea that Monahan's only option was to shoot and kill Kaylin Gillis or not do anything at all. This is a false choice as there may have been other options available to him.- >The article contains an example of a false dilemma fallacy.
Bias (85%)
The article contains a clear example of political bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes the defendant and portrays him as an extreme case of evil. This is evident in phrases such as 'truth' and 'mercy', which are used to describe Monahan's actions, but also serve to demonize him.- Monahan already has been given mercy. Morris questioned Monahan’s comment on the stand that he has a ‘hole in his soul’ knowing he killed someone. That statement falls flat because he didn’t act that way on that night or afterward.
- The author uses language that dehumanizes the defendant and portrays him as an extreme case of evil. This is evident in phrases such as 'truth' and 'mercy', which are used to describe Monahan's actions, but also serve to demonize him.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to the case. The author is Michael Goot and he has reported on Andrew Gillis in the past.Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of murder in Washington County as he is reporting on the sentencing of Andrew Gillis for killing Kaylin Gillis. The article does not disclose this conflict.
79%
New York man given 25 years for killing student mistakenly on his property
theguardian.com Article URL: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/13/ pakistan-·coalition-·agrees-to-form-government Friday, 01 March 2024 16:37Unique Points
- Kevin Monahan was convicted of second-degree murder in the death of Kaylin Gillis.
- The group was looking for a party at another person's house in Hebron, not far from Lake George.
Accuracy
- Monahan fired two shots from a shotgun that killed Gillis as she sat in the passenger seat of a Ford Explorer with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
- Gillis was among seven friends traveling to find a party when they mistakenly turned up Monahan's driveway about 9:45 p.m.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Monahan was convicted of second-degree murder but fails to mention that he pleaded guilty to it.- > Prosecutors asked the judge on Friday for the maximum sentence of 25 years to life in prison, with additional time for tampering with the murder weapon. The defense asked for leniency. < This is an example of sensationalism as it portrays Monahan's plea bargain as a
- > The group was looking for a party at another person's house in the town of Hebron, about 50 miles north-east of the state capital of Albany, not far from Lake George. < This is an example of selective reporting as it only mentions that they were trying to find a party and does not provide any context or details about their actual destination.
Fallacies (80%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy when the judge says that it is important for people to know that it's not OK to shoot people and have them killed for turning down your driveway. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Monahan as having irrational rage towards trespassers, which may be a subjective interpretation of events.- A man who fatally shot a 20-year-old woman after the SUV she was riding in mistakenly was driven into his rural driveway
- The group was looking for a party at another person's house not far from Lake George.
Bias (85%)
The article contains a statement that implies the victim was trespassing on the property of the defendant. The author also uses language such as 'under siege' and 'warning shot', which could be interpreted as an attempt to justify or minimize the actions of Monahan.- > Kevin Monahan, 66, was convicted of second-degree murder in the death last April of Kaylin Gillis. She was riding in a group of two cars and a motorcycle that was trying to leave the property after the drivers became lost on their way to a party and pulled into Monahan’s long, winding driveway in the dark.
- Prosecutors argued that Monahan was motivated by an irrational rage toward trespassers.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
None Found At Time Of Publication
70%
Kevin Monahan sentenced to 25 years to life
WTEN-TV (NEWS10 ABC) Michael Mahar, Friday, 01 March 2024 15:29Unique Points
- Kaylin Gillis was a passenger in a car that mistakenly drove up Kevin Monahan's driveway
- Monahan fired two shots from a shotgun that killed Kaylin Gillis as she sat in the passenger seat of a Ford Explorer with her boyfriend and two friends outside his home on Patterson Hill Road in Hebron.
- Kaylin was among seven friends traveling to find a party when they mistakenly turned up Monahan's driveway about 9:45 p.m.
Accuracy
- Kevin Monahan has been sentenced to 26 years and 1/3 life for fatally shooting Kaylin Gillis in April 2023.
- A jury found Monahan guilty of second-degree murder, reckless endangerment in the first degree, and tampering with physical evidence on January 23.
- Gillis was a passenger in a car that mistakenly drove up Monahan's driveway in April 2023.
- Monahan will get 25 years to life for the second-degree murder charge, 1 year and 6 months for reckless endangerment, and 4 years for tampering with physical evidence. The reckless endangerment conviction will run concurrently with the murder conviction, while the tampering conviction will run consecutively.
- The courtroom was full of family and friends, some of them spoke in court including Gillis' father Andrew Gillis.
- Gillis said Kaylin was loved by everyone, a vibrant and compassionate young woman. He addressed Monahan directly called him deceitful and said that his actions sealed his fate.
- Blake Walsh, Gillis' boyfriend, testified in the trial faced Monahan again and detailed their grief.
- The juxtaposition between him (Monahan) and them on the witness stand is spectacular. They sat up there and shared a very personal experience of horror yet did so with grace through difficult circumstances.
- Assistant District Attorney Christian Morris asked for a maximum sentence, said the jury's conviction of Monahan was a condemnation of his lies and lack of remorse.
- Morris asked how much time is demanded to begin to set injustices right. He said all years, every month, every week, day and hour are what justice demands here.
- Monahan declined to speak in court. His defense attorney Arthur Frost asked for less than the maximum sentence and saw remorse in his client.
- Because of his actions under any way you view it because of his actions this poor young woman is dead.
Deception (50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title of the article mentions that Kevin Monahan was sentenced to life but he was actually sentenced to 26 years and 1/3. Secondly, there are no quotes from any sources disclosed or quoted in the article which could have provided more context about this case. Thirdly, there is a statement made by Michael Mahar that Kevin Monahan tried to hide what really happened and shift the blame but it's not clear if this is true as no other source confirms it.- The title of the article mentions that Kevin Monahan was sentenced to life but he was actually sentenced to 26 years and 1/3. This statement is deceptive because it implies a harsher sentence than what Monahan received.
Fallacies (85%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the jury's verdict as evidence of Monahan's guilt without providing any context or information about the trial process. Additionally, there is a lack of clarity in how the reckless endangerment conviction will run concurrently with the murder conviction and consecutively with tampering. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by describing Gillis asBias (85%)
The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'God's will' to describe the victim's death which is a clear example of religious bias. Additionally, there are multiple references to Monahan being an employee at a local church which suggests that his employment status may have influenced the outcome of his trial.- Blake Walsh, Gillis' boyfriend and Alexandra Whiting who both testified in this trial faced Monahan again and detailed their grief.
- Gillis said Kaylin was loved by everyone
- Kaylin Gillis was killed in April 2023
- Monahan will get 25 years to life for the second-degree murder charge, 21/3 to 7 years for reckless endangerment, and 11/3 years to 4 years for tampering with physical evidence.
Site Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
The article by Michael Mahar and Skylar Eagle has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The authors have a personal relationship with Andrew Gillis, who is mentioned in the article as being involved in an incident related to murder and reckless endangerment.Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
None Found At Time Of Publication