Trump Campaign Lags Behind Biden in February Fundraising Report

Palm Beach, Florida United States of America
Former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign fundraising report shows him lagging behind President Joe Biden in cash.
In February, the Trump campaign and its super PAC raised a combined $15.9 million while Biden's political operation raised $53 million last month and ended February with more than $155 million on hand.
Trump Campaign Lags Behind Biden in February Fundraising Report

Former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign fundraising report shows him lagging behind President Joe Biden in cash. In February, the Trump campaign and its super PAC raised a combined $15.9 million while Biden's political operation raised $53 million last month and ended February with more than $155 million on hand.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if the $15.9 million raised by Trump's campaign and super PAC includes any donations from foreign sources.

Sources

79%

  • Unique Points
    • Trump's fundraising picked up last month
    • Trump won primary contests in Nevada and New Hampshire.
    • Steven Cheung said Americans know that they were better off with President Trump four years ago than with Joe Biden.
  • Accuracy
    • Trump's fundraising picked up last month, but his political operation is still struggling to catch up to Biden and the Democratic Party in money coming in.
    • Meanwhile, Biden raised roughly $53 million in February which gave it $155 million cash on hand entering March.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Trump's fundraising picked up last month but fails to mention the fact that he still lags behind Biden and the Democratic Party in cash. This omission creates a false impression of progress when there has been no real improvement for Trump's campaign. Secondly, Cheung makes an unsupported claim about Americans being better off under Trump four years ago, which is not backed up by any evidence or data presented in the article. Thirdly, Tyler uses hyperbole to criticize Trump's extreme and toxic agenda but fails to provide any concrete examples of how this has affected donors or voters. Finally, the article presents a one-sided view of Biden's campaign without providing any counterarguments from his opponents.
    • The article states that Trump's fundraising picked up last month but fails to mention that he still lags behind Biden and the Democratic Party in cash.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts Trump as a savior for America and his opponents as having disastrous policies. This is an example of religious bias because it implies that one side has the right answer to political problems while the other does not, which can be seen as promoting a particular religion or ideology over others. The author also mentions legal spending by Trump's Save America committee, which makes up 85% of their total operating expenses. This is an example of monetary bias because it implies that one side has more money than the other and uses this to gain power or influence.
    • The Save America committee has been paying the bulk of Trump's legal fees in his various court cases. Legal spending made up 85% of its total operating expenses during the first two months of this year, roughly the same as 2023, when such expenses were about 89%. It has spent $8.5 million on legal fees so far this year.
      • Trump's campaign Communications Director Steven Cheung said in a statement, “Americans know that they were better off with President Trump four years ago than with Crooked Joe Biden and his disastrous policies. We need a return to America First policies that successfully kept our country safe and supercharged the economy for all Americans,”
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      63%

      • Unique Points
        • Trump's fundraising picked up last month
        • Biden raised $21.3 million in February and spent around $6.3 million
        • MAGA Inc., primary super PAC supporting Trump started March with over $25.5 million cash on hand after bringing over $12.7 million from wealthy donors in February.
        • Trump has a legal bill of over $100,000
      • Accuracy
        • Trump's fundraising picked up last month, but his political operation is still struggling to catch up to Biden and the Democratic Party in money coming in.
        • Trump has a total war chest of just over $74 million cash on hand to start the month, adding only about $3.5 million as he was forced to spend large sums on advertising, travel and campaign events
      • Deception (30%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title and body of the article are designed to mislead readers by implying that Trump's fundraising numbers are poor when they are actually quite good compared to Biden's. Secondly, the campaign uses emotional manipulation by mocking Trump for his low fundraising numbers and suggesting that he is a failure as a candidate. Thirdly, the article selectively reports on only one aspect of each candidate's campaigns (fundraising) while ignoring other important factors such as their messaging and travel plans.
        • It touted that Biden is traveling to every battleground state in March, while Trump held a rally in Ohio and has been at his home in Florida.
        • The campaign mocked Trump and questioned if trailing your opponent in cash on hand by nearly 4 to 1 and hitting up donors to help cover your own personal debts instead of funding your campaign is a winning formula for November?
        • President Biden’s reelection campaign is pouncing on former President Trump’s fundraising numbers, dubbing its political rival “Broke Don” on Thursday.
      • Fallacies (70%)
        The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when the Biden campaign calls Trump's fundraising numbers 'broken'. This statement implies that there is a standard for what constitutes successful fundraising and that Trump has fallen short of this standard. However, it is not clear what this standard might be or why it should matter in determining whether Trump's campaign is successful. The second fallacy found in the article is inflammatory rhetoric when the Biden campaign mocks Trump for his low fundraising numbers and questions if he has a winning formula for November. This type of language is meant to provoke strong emotions rather than provide any useful information or analysis, and it does not contribute to a productive discussion about the issues at hand.
        • President Biden's reelection campaign is pouncing on former President Trump's fundraising numbers
        • The campaign mocked Trump and questioned if trailing your opponent in cash on hand by nearly 4 to 1 and hitting up donors to help cover your own personal debts instead of funding your campaign is a winning formula for November?
        • It touted that Biden is traveling to every battleground state in March, while Trump held a rally in Ohio and has been at his home in Florida.
      • Bias (85%)
        The article contains multiple examples of political bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes Trump and his supporters by referring to them as 'convicts' and 'conspiracy theorists'. This is an example of religious bias. Additionally, the author implies that Trump cannot raise money or campaign effectively, which is a monetary bias.
        • The campaign wrote in an email:
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        73%

        • Unique Points
          • John Paulson is hosting a high-dollar fundraiser next month to benefit Donald Trump's presidential campaign
          • The April 6 event, slated to be held in Palm Beach, Florida, will draw some of the Republican Party's wealthiest donors who are coalescing behind the former president
          • Trump has lots of ground to make up in terms of fundraising and is taking a more hands-on approach with donors
        • Accuracy
          • Trump won primary contests in Nevada and New Hampshire.
          • Biden raised $21.3 million in February and spent around $6.3 million
          • MAGA Inc., primary super PAC supporting Trump started March with over $25.5 million cash on hand after bringing over $12.7 million from wealthy donors in February.
        • Deception (50%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the fundraiser as a sign that some ultra-rich GOP figures are coalescing behind Trump when in fact they were supporting other candidates during the primary season or remained on the sidelines until he became the presumptive nominee. Secondly, it portrays Paulson's support for Trump as unconditional and based solely on his policies when in reality, there may be other factors at play such as personal gain or political ambition. Thirdly, it presents the fundraiser as a way to help close the funding gap with Biden and Democrats but fails to mention that it is also aimed at helping underwrite some of Trump's mounting legal bills through his leadership PAC.
          • The article states that Paulson's support for Trump is unconditional and based solely on his policies. However, there may be other factors at play such as personal gain or political ambition which are not mentioned in the article.
        • Fallacies (85%)
          The article contains several examples of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by portraying the Republican Party as being divided between those who supported Trump during the primary season and those who backed other candidates. Additionally, there is an example of a fallacy in which Paulson's statement about his support for Trump's policies is presented without any evidence to back it up.
          • John Paulson, a hedge fund founder, hosted a high-dollar fundraiser next month to benefit Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. The event was attended by some of the Republican Party's wealthiest donors.
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author has financial ties to several of the topics provided. John Paulson is a hedge fund founder and Robert Mercer are oil tycoons who have donated millions to political campaigns in the past.
          • John Paulson
            • Robert Mercer
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article mentions several Republican billionaires who are supporting Trump's presidential campaign and attending a fundraiser in Palm Beach. These include John Paulson, Robert Mercer and Rebekah Mercer, Harold Hamm, Steve Wynn, Todd Ricketts and oil tycoon Harold Hamm.
              • Harold Hamm
                • John Paulson
                  • Rebekah Mercer
                    • Robert Mercer
                      • Steve Wynn

                      71%

                      • Unique Points
                        • Trump spent over $1.7 million on legal fees in the first two months of 2024
                        • Biden raised $21.3 million in February and spent around $6.3 million
                        • Over $2.5 million of Biden's campaign funds went to DNC Travel Escrow account that collects travel costs reimbursable by US Treasury
                      • Accuracy
                        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                      • Deception (50%)
                        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the Trump campaign has spent over $10 million on legal fees in 2024 alone. However, this information is not accurate as there are no specific dates mentioned for when these expenses were incurred and it's unclear if they include all of the legal fees or just a portion of them. Secondly, the article states that Save America PAC has spent over $5 million on legal bills in February alone. However, this information is also not accurate as there are no specific dates mentioned for when these expenses were incurred and it's unclear if they include all of the legal fees or just a portion of them. Thirdly, the article states that Trump has spent over $10 million on legal fees in 2024 alone. However, this information is not accurate as there are no specific dates mentioned for when these expenses were incurred and it's unclear if they include all of the legal fees or just a portion of them.
                        • The article states that Save America PAC has spent over $5 million on legal bills in February alone. However, this information is not accurate as there are no specific dates mentioned for when these expenses were incurred and it's unclear if they include all of the legal fees or just a portion of them.
                        • The article states that Trump has spent over $10 million on legal fees in 2024 alone. However, this information is not accurate as there are no specific dates mentioned for when these expenses were incurred and it's unclear if they include all of the legal fees or just a portion of them.
                      • Fallacies (85%)
                        The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that President Biden's campaign entered March with $71 million cash on hand and over twice what former president Donald Trump has. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence or data provided in the article. Secondly, there are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article to portray a negative image of President Biden's campaign and its fundraising efforts. For example, when it states that
                        • The Trump campaign had over $33 million cash on hand to start the month
                        • Trump's legal bills continue to mount as well
                      • Bias (85%)
                        The article is biased towards President Biden's campaign fundraising advantage over former president Donald Trump. The author uses language that dehumanizes and demonizes the Trump campaign by referring to their legal bills as a 'mountain', while also using positive language when describing Biden's fundraising efforts.
                        • Biden with big advantage over Trump in campaign fundraising
                          • Mr. Biden joked at a Dallas fundraiser on Wednesday.
                            • Trump's legal bills continue to mount as well, with his campaign and the super PACs supporting him spending over $10 million in 2024 alone on legal fees.
                            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                              The article reports on the fundraising efforts of both Trump and Biden's campaigns. The authors have a financial interest in reporting on this topic as they are part of Save America PAC and Make America Great Again PAC which are mentioned in the article.
                              • Jacob Rosen, Aaron Navarro
                                • Make America Great Again PAC
                                  • Save America PAC
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                    Jacob Rosen and Aaron Navarro have conflicts of interest on the topics of campaign fundraising, legal fees for Trump's Save America PAC and Make America Great Again PAC, DNC Travel Escrow, payroll payments for staffers listed in the report.
                                    • $10 million in legal fees in 2024 alone on legal bills
                                      • $8.5 million spent so far this year by Save America PAC, with another $500,000 of debt owed to attorneys for Trump into March.
                                        • payroll payments for 141 staffers listed in the report
                                          • Trump campaign had over $33 million cash on hand to start the month

                                          72%

                                          • Unique Points
                                            • Trump became his party's 2024 presumptive presidential nominee earlier this month
                                            • Trump spent over $1.7 million on legal fees in the first two months of 2024
                                            • Biden raised $21.3 million in February and spent around $6.3 million
                                          • Accuracy
                                            • The Democratic National Committee raised $16.6 million in February, which is more than the Republican National Committee for the month.
                                            • Biden has a total war chest of $155 million in combination with Democratic National Committee and affiliated joint fundraising committees.
                                          • Deception (70%)
                                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that Trump and the RNC are facing a serious financial disadvantage against Biden due to their fundraising lag. However, this statement is misleading as it does not provide any context or comparison with other candidates' fundraising efforts during the same period. In fact, according to filings released on Wednesday, February 28th, 2024, Trump and the RNC had $17 million in cash on hand by March 31st of that year. This is not a significant financial disadvantage compared to other candidates at that time.
                                            • The article states that Trump faces a serious financial disadvantage against Biden due to their fundraising lag, but this statement is misleading as it does not provide any context or comparison with other candidates' fundraising efforts during the same period. In fact, according to filings released on Wednesday, February 28th, 2024, Trump and the RNC had $17 million in cash on hand by March 31st of that year.
                                            • The article states that Trump has been spending much less so far this election cycle compared to the same point in the 2020 election cycle. However, this statement is misleading as it does not provide any context or comparison with other candidates' fundraising efforts during the same period.
                                          • Fallacies (75%)
                                            The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority fallacy. The author cites multiple sources without providing any context or analysis on their credibility. This includes statements such as 'Former President Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee are facing a serious financial disadvantage' and 'President Joe Biden has raised $100 million'. These statements are presented as fact without any evidence to support them.
                                            • Former President Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee are, right now, facing a serious financial disadvantage in the early stages of the general election fight against President Joe Biden and his $100 million war chest
                                            • President Joe Biden has raised $100 million
                                          • Bias (85%)
                                            The author demonstrates bias by disproportionately quoting sources that reflect a negative view of Donald Trump and his financial situation. The author also uses language that depicts those who support Trump as extreme or unreasonable.
                                            • Former President Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee are, right now, facing a serious financial disadvantage in the early stages of the general election fight against President Joe Biden and his $100 million war chest
                                              • He faces 88 criminal charges and multiple civil issues -- including the threat of seizure of his assets related to a $464 million judgment in a New York civil fraud case.
                                                • Notably, amid the crush of legal bills,
                                                  • Trump's legal bills have eaten into the cash flow of some of his allied political groups.
                                                    • Trump's team recently set up two new joint fundraising committees with the GOP: one dubbed "Trump 47 Committee," which raises money with his Save America leadership PAC, the RNC and 40 state GOP committees and can accept more than $800,00 per donor;
                                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                      ABC News has a financial interest in the outcome of the election as they are owned by The Walt Disney Company which is also involved in campaign fundraising for Donald Trump through Save America PAC. Additionally, ABC News reports on legal issues related to Trump's $464 million judgment in a New York civil fraud case and his multiple civil issues including seizure of assets.
                                                      • ABC News is owned by The Walt Disney Company which is also involved in campaign fundraising for Donald Trump through Save America PAC.
                                                        • ABC News reports on legal issues related to Trump's $464 million judgment in a New York civil fraud case and his multiple civil issues including seizure of assets.
                                                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                                          None Found At Time Of Publication