Former President Trump Allowed to Discuss Witnesses and Jurors in Hush Money Case, but Personal Information Remains Off-Limits

New York, New York United States of America
Former President Donald Trump convicted of 34 felony counts in New York criminal trial
Gag order revised days before Trump-Biden debate on June 27
Hush money trial centered around payments to Stormy Daniels and Michael Cohen to cover up alleged affair with Trump prior to 2016 election
Trump allowed to speak about witnesses and jurors but cannot disclose personally identifying information
Former President Trump Allowed to Discuss Witnesses and Jurors in Hush Money Case, but Personal Information Remains Off-Limits

Former President Donald Trump, who was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a New York criminal trial, will now be able to publicly comment about witnesses and jurors involved in the case. The revised gag order issued by Judge Juan Merchan on June 25 allows Trump to speak about the key figures in the trial but prohibits him from disclosing any personally identifying information of jurors or discussing court staffers and their families until his sentencing on July 11.

Trump, who was fined $10,000 for violating the initial gag order during the trial, had been barred from making statements about potential witnesses and jurors throughout the proceedings. The loosened restrictions come just days before Trump is set to face President Joe Biden in a presidential debate on June 27.

The hush money trial centered around payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels and former lawyer Michael Cohen to cover up an alleged affair between Trump and Daniels prior to the 2016 election. The conviction marked the first time a U.S. president has been convicted of a crime while in office.

The initial gag order was put in place due to Trump's history of inflammatory rhetoric towards people involved in his legal cases and potential threats against them, as well as concerns for the integrity of the judicial proceedings. However, Merchan acknowledged that circumstances have changed since the jury handed down its verdict last month.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg had requested that the gag order remain in place due to an uptick in threats against him and his office. Trump's legal team had filed a motion to remove the order as they await sentencing.

Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen commented on the loosened gag order, stating that Trump's failed strategy of discrediting him would not work now. Cohen has been a frequent target of Trump's attacks on social media.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • Are there any potential conflicts of interest or biases among the jurors in the hush money trial?
  • Is it confirmed that Trump will indeed face Biden in a presidential debate on June 27?

Sources

99%

  • Unique Points
    • A Manhattan judge modified Donald Trump’s gag order, allowing him to comment publicly about witnesses and jurors in the hush money criminal trial that led to his felony conviction.
    • Trump was convicted in New York on May 30 of falsifying records to cover up a potential sex scandal, making him the first ex-president convicted of a crime.
    • Judge Juan M. Merchan’s decision clears Trump to again go on the attack against his lawyer-turned-foe Michael Cohen, porn actor Stormy Daniels and other trial witnesses.
  • Accuracy
    • ]A Manhattan judge modified Donald Trump’s gag order, allowing him to comment publicly about witnesses and jurors[
    • Trump was convicted in New York on May 30 of falsifying records to cover up a potential sex scandal
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Juan Merchan partially lifted the gag order imposed on former President Trump after he was found guilty on all counts.
    • Trump was fined $10,000 for violating the gag order during the trial.
  • Accuracy
    • Trump is still barred from commenting on court staffers and employees in the Manhattan district attorney’s office and their families until he is sentenced.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The article contains an appeal to authority and a slight exaggeration in describing the gag order as a 'witch hunt'. No other formal or informal fallacies were found.
    • The former president and presumptive Republican nominee's legal team had argued the gag order should be lifted before the June 27 presidential debate.
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

100%

  • Unique Points
    • Donald Trump constantly tested the boundaries of the gag order imposed on him during his hush-money trial and incurred $10,000 in fines for violating it.
    • Judge Juan Merchan loosened the gag order’s conditions, allowing Trump to publicly comment on witnesses that testified in the trial and members of the jury.
    • Trump is still barred from commenting on court staffers and employees in the Manhattan district attorney’s office and their families under the revised order.
    • Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and is set to be sentenced on July 11.
    • The initial gag order was put in place due to Trump’s history of ‘threatening, inflammatory, denigrating’ rhetoric aimed at people involved in his legal cases.
    • Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg requested that the gag order remain in place, citing an uptick in threats against him and others in his office.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

98%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Juan Merchan partially lifted the gag order in Donald Trump’s New York criminal trial on Tuesday.
    • Trump was prohibited from making statements about potential witnesses, jurors or court staff and their families during the trial.
    • Trump became the first president to be convicted of a felony in May for falsified business records.
    • The jury found him guilty of 34 felony counts.
  • Accuracy
    • Donald Trump was prohibited from making statements about potential witnesses, jurors or court staff and their families during the trial.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

  • Unique Points
    • Judge Juan Merchan lifted portions of the gag order in Donald Trump’s hush money trial.
    • Trump cannot discuss any prosecutor, court staffer or their family members until his sentencing.
    • The new order also lifts the bar on public statements about jurors but prohibits the disclosure of personally identifying information of any juror.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The authors use language that depicts Trump as being unable to respond to attacks from witnesses due to the gag order, implying that he is at a disadvantage. They also quote Cohen stating 'For the past six years, Donald and acolytes have been making constant negative statements about me. Donald’s failed strategy of discrediting me so that he can avoid accountability didn’t work then and won’t work now.', which could be seen as an attempt to discredit Trump by quoting a negative statement about him. The authors do not provide any counter-argument or context to balance out these statements.
    • Donald’s failed strategy of discrediting me so that he can avoid accountability didn’t work then and won’t work now.
      • The former president will now be able to discuss the witnesses who testified against him
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication