Former President Donald Trump is currently facing a classified documents case, with prosecutors accusing him of illegally hoarding and obstructing the return of sensitive materials taken from the White House to Mar-a-Lago. The latest developments in this case include arguments over evidence suppression and gag orders.
On Tuesday, Trump's lawyers will ask Judge Aileen Cannon to prevent prosecutors from using evidence seized during an FBI search of his Florida estate and recordings made by one of his former attorneys. The defense team argues that the warrant used to justify the search was misleading and that attorney-client privilege should apply in this case.
Meanwhile, prosecutors are seeking a gag order to prevent Trump from making comments that could pose a risk to law enforcement officials involved in the investigation. However, Judge Cannon appeared skeptical of this request during Monday's hearing.
The classified documents case is just one of many legal battles facing Trump as he prepares for the upcoming presidential election. The former president has pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently facing dozens of felony counts.
In a recent court filing, special counsel Jack Smith released new images showing how top secret materials and government secrets were stored in cardboard boxes alongside personal items at Mar-a-Lago. The boxes containing classified documents traveled from one readily accessible location to another at the property: a public ballroom, an office space, a bathroom, and a basement storage room.
FBI agents who searched Mar-a-Lago after Trump allegedly evaded attempts to collect missing documents did so professionally and thoroughly. However, the defense team has argued that investigators failed to preserve evidence in the order in which they were found.
The handling of this case by Judge Cannon has drawn intense scrutiny, with her willingness to entertain various Trump team motions and her plodding pace in issuing rulings contributing to a delay that makes a trial before the November presidential election a virtual impossibility.
Michael van der Veen, an ex-attorney to former President Trump, criticized Judge Cannon for taking a long time to make pretrial decisions. He argued that she is “playing right into the defense’s hands” by slow-walking decisions.
The two sides discussed the legality of special counsel Jack Smith during Monday's hearing, with Trump's lawyers arguing that his appointment was illegal. The hearing is expected to wrap up Tuesday.