Former President Trump's Classified Documents Trial: Delayed Indefinitely by Judge Cannon's Controversial Rulings

Miami, Florida United States of America
Former President Donald Trump faces multiple criminal trials, including one in Florida over allegations of improperly holding onto classified documents after leaving the White House.
Judge Aileen Cannon has shown little urgency in resolving these issues and has faced criticism from legal experts and calls for her recusal from the case.
The trial, originally scheduled for May 20, 2024, has been delayed indefinitely due to Judge Aileen Cannon's handling of pretrial issues and the complexity of the case.
Trump is facing 40 federal charges in this trial over claims he obstructed attempts to get the classified documents returned to relevant authorities after leaving office.
Former President Trump's Classified Documents Trial: Delayed Indefinitely by Judge Cannon's Controversial Rulings

Former President Donald Trump is currently facing multiple criminal trials, including one in Florida over allegations of improperly holding onto classified documents after leaving the White House. The trial, which was originally scheduled to begin on May 20, 2024, has been delayed indefinitely due to the complexity of the case and Judge Aileen Cannon's handling of pretrial issues. Cannon has shown little urgency in resolving these issues, leading to criticism from legal experts and calls for her recusal from the case.

Trump is facing 40 federal charges in this trial over claims he obstructed attempts to get the classified documents returned to the relevant authorities after leaving office. The delay in the trial has raised concerns about whether it will get underway before the November 2024 presidential election.

Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, has been criticized for her slow work and deference to Trump's requests for delays in the case. She has also shown a new propensity for micromanaging and required clearances for clerks to handle classified material in her chambers. This, combined with a higher than normal turnover in her chambers, has added complexity to the case.

The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) is a 1980 law that governs the use of classified documents in criminal trials and adds complexity to the case. Judge Cannon has ruled on several motions related to the case since March, including redaction and sealing requests. She obliged Trump's request for a special master to slow down the Justice Department's examination of seized material.

The trial had originally been scheduled to begin on May 20 but was delayed due to the complexity of the case and Trump's ongoing criminal trial in New York. The other prosecution, which is generally seen as the weakest case against Trump, has provided salacious and embarrassing moments for the former president but is ongoing in a different jurisdiction.

Critics argue that Judge Cannon's handling of the case and her decisions play into Trump's strategy of delaying court appearances. They also question her impartiality given her appointment by Trump and limited experience overseeing trials, especially those involving highly classified state secrets.

It is unclear whether the case will get underway before the November 2024 presidential election due to Judge Cannon's handling of the case and calls for her recusal. Special Counsel Jack Smith may request a writ of mandamus from the 11th Circuit of Appeals to review Cannon's legal rulings and actions, potentially leading to her removal from the case.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

75%

Doubts
  • Are there any potential conflicts of interest in Judge Cannon overseeing the case given her appointment by Trump?
  • Can the trial be resolved before the November 2024 presidential election, considering Judge Cannon's slow work and complexities of the case?
  • How will Judge Cannon's handling of the case impact Trump's image and chances in the upcoming presidential election?

Sources

84%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Aileen Cannon's Recusal From Donald Trump's Trial Could Look Like This

Newsweek LLC Tom Norton Wednesday, 08 May 2024 15:49
  • Unique Points
    • Judge Aileen Cannon postponed Donald Trump’s classified documents trial indefinitely on Tuesday, May 20, 2024.
    • Trump is facing 40 federal charges over claims he improperly held onto classified documents after leaving the White House in January 2021 and then obstructed attempts to get them returned to the relevant authorities.
    • Cannon requested lawyers to file proposed jury instructions in March 2024, which was criticized by legal analysts and led to more calls for her removal.
    • Jack Smith may request a writ of mandamus from the 11th Circuit of Appeals to review Cannon’s legal rulings and actions, potentially leading to her removal.
    • It is unclear whether the case will get underway before the November 2024 presidential election due to Cannon’s handling of the case and calls for her recusal.
  • Accuracy
    • The potential success of efforts to remove Cannon is disputed.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article contains selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position of calling for Judge Aileen Cannon's recusal from Donald Trump's trial. The author does not disclose any sources and makes no attempt to present a balanced perspective. The article also includes emotional manipulation through phrases like 'stunning betrayal of the American justice system', 'partisan MAGA operative', and 'furthering calls for her to recuse herself from the case'.
    • The most significant maneuver toward recusal came in March after Cannon requested lawyers to file proposed jury instructions.
    • Activist group Occupy Democrats also wrote 'This is a stunning betrayal of the American justice system. Judge Cannon should be removed from the bench immediately.'
    • Cannon's handling of the case, including the delay on Tuesday, has led to calls for her recusal.
    • Professor Todd Landman told Newsweek that many of the indictments in the case were not even based on PRA but under section 793(e) of the Espionage Act 1917.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

79%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Wait. Why are 3 of Trump’s 4 criminal trials delayed indefinitely?

CNN News Site: In-Depth Reporting and Analysis with Some Financial Conflicts and Sensational Language Zachary B. Wednesday, 08 May 2024 21:21
  • Unique Points
    • Judge Aileen Cannon has been criticized for her slow work and deference to Trump’s requests to delay the trial in the Florida case.
    • The trial regarding Trump's alleged affair with Stormy Daniels and falsifying business records is ongoing in a different jurisdiction.
  • Accuracy
    • Three out of the four trials have been delayed indefinitely.
    • The trial in which special counsel Jack Smith alleges Trump mishandled classified data is doubted to occur before November.
    • Judge Aileen Cannon has been criticized for her slow work and deference to Trump’s requests to delay the trial.
  • Deception (30%)
    The author makes editorializing statements and uses emotional manipulation by implying that the delays in Trump's trials are a 'good week for him'. He also engages in selective reporting by focusing on the delays and not providing context about the reasons for them. The article does not disclose any sources.
    • There may have been a good reason federal prosecutors passed on this case and decided not to pursue it.
    • This has been a good week for him.
    • The point here is that for all of Trump’s controversial actions as president and his clear attempt to change election results, a conviction for falsifying business records, if it even comes, may not be what sways those few voters in swing states who will decide this election.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The author makes an appeal to authority when stating that 'legal experts are now doubting the trial in which special counsel Jack Smith alleges Trump mishandled classified data he refused to turn over to the National Archives will occur before November.' This is a fallacy because while legal experts may have doubts, it does not necessarily mean that the trial will not occur before November. Additionally, there are multiple instances of inflammatory rhetoric used throughout the article such as 'salacious and embarrassing moments', 'weakest case against Trump', and 'slow-working justice system'. These statements do not add any value to the analysis of the situation and are intended to elicit an emotional response from the reader.
    • ][legal experts] are now doubting the trial in which special counsel Jack Smith alleges Trump mishandled classified data he refused to turn over to the National Archives will occur before November.[/]
    • [the Georgia Court of Appeals] said Wednesday it would consider Trump’s appeal of Judge Scott McAfee’s decision to allow Willis to remain on the case.[
  • Bias (90%)
    The author expresses a clear bias towards former President Trump by repeatedly referring to him as 'former President' and using derogatory language such as 'manufacture a conspiracy theory' and 'weakest case'. The author also quotes critics of Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over one of the cases against Trump, implying that she is biased towards Trump due to her appointment by him. However, the author does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
    • Conservative justices, three of whom were appointed by Trump, seemed to not necessarily buy into the more outlandish extremes of his argument during a hearing last month
      • disproving Trump’s allegation is the likelihood, which seems to be growing this week, that three of the four criminal prosecutions might not reach the courtroom before Election Day.
        • Indictment: August 1, 2023. Trial date: Delayed indefinitely.
          • Indictment: June 8, 2023, with a superseding indictment filed July 27, 2023. Trial date: Delayed indefinitely.
            • On Tuesday, Cannon scratched the planned May trial date and did not pencil in a new one.
              • The Georgia Court of Appeals said Wednesday it would consider Trump’s appeal of Judge Scott McAfee’s decision to allow Willis to remain on the case.
                • Trump has pleaded not guilty in all of the cases.
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                96%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Where Trump's classified documents case stands after judge indefinitely postponed start

                PBS NewsHour Wednesday, 08 May 2024 22:25
                • Unique Points
                  • Judge Aileen Cannon has indefinitely delayed the start of the classified documents case against former President Trump.
                  • Trump is facing 40 federal charges over claims he improperly held onto classified documents after leaving the White House in January 2021 and then obstructed attempts to get them returned to the relevant authorities.
                • Accuracy
                  • The trial, which was supposed to begin in two weeks, will likely not start before the election.
                  • Legal observers considered this case against Trump to be the strongest and clearest-cut.
                • Deception (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Fallacies (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Bias (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication

                79%

                The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                Opinion | Judge Aileen Cannon set herself up for failure

                MSNBC News Thursday, 09 May 2024 00:31
                • Unique Points
                  • U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon is presiding over a case involving former President Donald Trump and the seizure of classified documents from Mar-a-Lago.
                  • Judge Cannon has shown little urgency in resolving pretrial issues, leading to delays in the trial.
                  • The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) is a 1980 law that governs the use of classified documents in criminal trials and adds complexity to the case.
                  • Judge Cannon has ruled on several motions related to the case since March, including redaction and sealing requests.
                  • Judge Cannon's name became widely known after she obliged Trump's request for a special master to slow down the Justice Department's examination of seized material.
                  • The trial had originally been scheduled to begin on May 20 but was delayed due to the complexity of the case and Trump's ongoing criminal trial in New York.
                • Accuracy
                  • The trial had originally been scheduled to begin on May 20 but was delayed due to the complexity of the case and Trump’s ongoing criminal trial in New York.
                  • It is unclear whether the case will get underway before the November 2024 presidential election due to Cannon’s handling of the case and calls for her recusal.
                • Deception (30%)
                  The article contains editorializing and pontification by the author. The author expresses their opinion that Judge Aileen Cannon has made what should have been a straightforward case into a quagmire. The author also implies that Cannon is intentionally slow-rolling the case and making decisions based on her past mistakes, which are not facts but opinions.
                  • This led to her grossly overthinking the matter and issuing an opinion that was too clever by half – and just plain wrong.
                  • It's impossible at this juncture to definitively apportion the blame for this cascading failure on inexperience, partisan malice and simply being dealt a bum hand. What is clear though is that Cannon has made what should have been one of the most straightforward cases against Trump into a quagmire of her own creation.
                  • Unfortunately for everyone who isn’t a co-defendant in this case, Cannon’s careful treading fits perfectly with Trump’s preferred strategy of delaying his court appearances for as long as possible.
                  • The primary speed bump preventing a swift resolution of the issues she cites in explaining her delay is none other than Cannon herself.
                • Fallacies (100%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Bias (80%)
                  The author expresses a clear bias against Judge Aileen Cannon by repeatedly criticizing her handling of the case and implying that she is incompetent and slow-moving. The author also implies that Cannon's decisions are motivated by partisan malice due to her appointment by Trump.
                  • Cannon's name first became widely known soon after the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August 2022 and seized boxes of documents that Trump had refused to return to the federal government, which were found to include hundreds of pages of classified documents. When Trump’s lawyers demanded a ‘special master’ to slow down the Justice Department’s examination of the seized material, citing ‘executive privilege’, Cannon obliged.
                    • It's entirely possible that a more experienced judge would be facing similar problems. But that Cannon is even in a position to make these decisions is due to an almost literary twist of fate. There are more than two dozen federal district judges in the southern district of Florida. Cases are assigned at random among them. It is only through the luck of the draw that Trump would see his classified documents case fall before Cannon.
                      • It's impossible at this juncture to definitively apportion the blame for this cascading failure on inexperience, partisan malice and simply being dealt a bum hand. What is clear though is that Cannon has made what should have been one of the most straightforward cases against Trump into a quagmire of her own creation.
                        • Lawyer and legal commentator David Lat wrote last month that in the special master case, ‘Judge Cannon thought like a pointy-headed appellate judge, not a commonsensical trial judge’, seizing on the novel legal issues at play rather than the matter directly at hand. This led to her ‘grossly overthinking the matter’ and issuing an opinion that ‘was too clever by half – and just plain wrong – which is why the Eleventh Circuit made short work of it.’
                          • The author's repeated criticisms and insinuations against Judge Cannon demonstrate a clear bias.
                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication

                          87%

                          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                          In Trump’s Classified Documents Case, Judge’s Decisions Play Into Delay Strategy

                          The New York Times Alan Feuer Wednesday, 08 May 2024 20:18
                          • Unique Points
                            • Judge Aileen Cannon has been handling the case of former President Donald Trump’s classified documents.
                            • Judge Cannon was appointed by Trump and has limited experience overseeing trials, especially those involving highly classified state secrets.
                            • Critics argue that Judge Cannon is treating defense motions as if they all raise substantial and important issues, when in fact, not all do.
                          • Accuracy
                            • The path for the trial to take place before Election Day is exceedingly narrow, and the outcome largely depends on how Judge Cannon handles upcoming pretrial matters.
                          • Deception (70%)
                            The article contains editorializing and pontification by the author when they state 'It is not impossible that the trial could still take place before Election Day, but the path is exceedingly narrow.' and 'Judge Cannon has put herself outside the normal boundaries with her languid pace and her willingness to grant a sober audience to several of Mr. Trump’s ‘meshuggeneh motions.’' The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on Judge Cannon's decisions without providing context or acknowledging that she has granted some requests from the defense but denied others.
                            • Judge Cannon has put herself outside the normal boundaries with her languid pace and her willingness to grant a sober audience to several of Mr. Trump’s ‘meshuggeneh motions.’
                            • The path is exceedingly narrow.
                          • Fallacies (85%)
                            The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Nancy Gertner's opinion on Judge Cannon's handling of the case. However, the author also provides his own analysis and interpretation of Gertner's comments, which goes beyond reporting and could be considered editorializing.
                            • ][Nancy Gertner] said that rookie jurists handling prominent matters deserve some measure of leeway. But she added that Judge Cannon had put herself outside the normal boundaries with her languid pace and her willingness to grant a sober audience to several of Mr. Trump’s ‘meshuggeneh motions.’[[/1]
                            • [The author] Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe. Want all of The Times? Subscribe. Advertisement SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
                          • Bias (95%)
                            The author, Alan Feuer, demonstrates a subtle bias towards implying that Judge Cannon's decisions are taking too long and that she is granting undue consideration to Trump's motions. This bias is evident in statements such as 'rookie jurists handling prominent matters deserve some measure of leeway. But she added that Judge Cannon had put herself outside the normal boundaries with her languid pace and her willingness to grant a sober audience to several of Mr. Trump’s “meshuggeneh motions.”' The author also implies that these decisions are delaying the trial, which could potentially impact the upcoming election.
                            • For months now, she has stood in the glare of the spotlight with each of her most minute decisions scrutinized by an often critical gallery of legal scholars and reporters.
                              • She is treating everything the defense has done as if they all raise substantial and important issues, and that’s just not true.
                                • The decision by Judge Aileen M. Cannon to avoid picking a date yet for former President Donald J. Trump’s classified documents trial is the latest indication of how her handling of the case has played into Mr. Trump’s own strategy of delaying the proceeding.
                                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                  None Found At Time Of Publication