Former Justice Department Official Faces Disciplinary Hearing for Trump Election Efforts

Washington, DC, District of Columbia United States of America
Clark is facing a disciplinary hearing which could see him lose his license to practice law.
Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark attempted to enlist the US Justice Department in former President Donald Trump's efforts to undo his 2020 election loss.
Former Justice Department Official Faces Disciplinary Hearing for Trump Election Efforts

Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark attempted to enlist the US Justice Department in former President Donald Trump's efforts to undo his 2020 election loss. He is facing a disciplinary hearing which could see him lose his license to practice law.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

75%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if there was any evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

Sources

81%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

‘Assured failure’: Ex-White House lawyer provides new details of final days of Trump’s 2020 election gambit

Politico News Site Name: POLITICO Full Legal Name of News Site: Politico LLC Location of News Site: Washington D.C., USA Tuesday, 26 March 2024 00:00
  • Unique Points
    • Former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin shed new light on the frenzied effort by Donald Trump to remake the Justice Department into a tool of his bid to cling to power despite losing the election.
    • Clark seemed sincere in his beliefs and felt that there was a real crisis in the country and that he was being given an opportunity to do something about it.
    • If Trump had appointed Clark as acting attorney general, people at DOJ would have resigned en masse, according to Philbin.
  • Accuracy
    • Former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin tried to talk Clark out of it, but he was nervous about what would happen if they succeeded in their plan.
    • Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark violated legal ethics by attempting to use the authority of the Department of Justice to overturn President Donald Trump's 2020 election defeat.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it presents the former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin as a whistleblower who has provided new details about Donald Trump's final days of his presidency. However, this portrayal is misleading because Philbin was not an independent witness but rather someone with close ties to Trump and the administration. Secondly, the article quotes several sources including Richard Donoghue and Pat Cipollone without disclosing their identities or affiliations which undermines transparency. Thirdly, it presents Clark's claims of election fraud as a legitimate theory when in fact they have been debunked by multiple investigations.
    • The article portrays Philbin as an independent whistleblower who has provided new details about Trump's final days of his presidency. However, this is misleading because Philbin was someone with close ties to the administration and not an impartial witness.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the testimony of former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin and Richard Donoghue without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author relies on a dichotomous depiction when describing Clark's beliefs as being
    • The article contains several examples of informal fallacies.
    • The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the testimony of former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin and Richard Donoghue without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author relies on a dichotomous depiction when describing Clark's beliefs as being '100 percent sincere' in his misinformed views about election fraud.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that dehumanizes those who disagree with Trump's views on election fraud, referring to them as 'smart thermostats'. Additionally, the author quotes Pat Philbin describing Jeffrey Clark as wildly misinformed about claims of election fraud and not sufficiently cognizant of the havoc it would wreak if his plan succeeded. This suggests a lack of objectivity in reporting on this topic.
    • Pat Philbin describes Jeffrey Clark as wildly misinformed about claims of election fraud and not sufficiently cognizant of the havoc it would wreak if his plan succeeded.
      • The article uses language that dehumanizes those who disagree with Trump's views on election fraud, referring to them as 'smart thermostats'.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      81%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark could face disbarment for aiding Trump

      The Fixing Site: A Summary of the Article. Keith L. Tuesday, 26 March 2024 23:04
      • Unique Points
        • Former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark violated legal ethics by attempting to use the authority of the Department of Justice to overturn President Donald Trump's 2020 election defeat.
        • Clark repeatedly tried to help Trump undo Joe Biden's victory at the polls, despite having no evidence that there was fraud in Georgia or any other state.
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (90%)
        The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Clark violated legal ethics by attempting to overturn an election based on a lie and without evidence of fraud. However, it is not clear from the article whether there was any evidence of fraud or if this claim was made solely based on speculation or political bias.
        • The author claims that Clark violated legal ethics by attempting to overturn an election based on a lie and without evidence of fraud. However, it is not clear from the article whether there was any evidence of fraud or if this claim was made solely based on speculation or political bias.
        • The author quotes Hamilton P. Fox III as stating that Clark repeatedly violated department ethics when he tried to help Trump overturn Georgia's presidential election results and undo Joe Biden's victory at the polls. However, it is not clear from the article whether these actions constituted a violation of legal ethics or if they were simply part of his job as an assistant attorney general.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the actions taken by Jeffrey Clark and his attempts to overturn the election results in Georgia. Additionally, there are instances where the author appeals to authority by citing legal ethics violations without providing any evidence or context for these claims.
        • The article uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Jeffrey Clark's actions as a 'coup at the Department of Justice.'
        • The author repeatedly refers to Clark's attempts to overturn Georgia's presidential election results and undo Joe Biden's victory, without providing any evidence or context for these claims.
        • The article uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing Jeffrey Clark as a 'linchpin of plans to bypass the acting attorney general.'
      • Bias (85%)
        The author has a clear political bias and is attempting to use the Department of Justice's influence to help reverse President Donald Trump's election defeat. The author repeatedly violated department ethics when he tried to help Trump overturn Georgia's presidential election results and undo Joe Biden's victory at the polls.
        • The author drafted a letter that he wanted the Justice Department to send to Georgia officials, demanding that the state legislature call a special session to examine votes in the presidential election. In this letter, Clark falsely claimed that there were significant concerns about fraud affecting multiple states including Georgia.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        90%

        The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
        (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

        A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

        Trump ally Jeffrey Clark disciplinary hearing begins over role trying to overturn 2020 election

        The Associated Press News Tuesday, 26 March 2024 22:10
        • Unique Points
          • Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark's efforts to help then-President Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election were characterized as a coup attempt by Washington, D.C., Office of Disciplinary Counsel at a hearing to determine if Clark should be sanctioned.
          • Clark is accused of attempting to engage in dishonest conduct during his role in aftermath of the last presidential election.
          • The letter which Clark sent to his superiors at the time suggested that the Justice Department was investigating irregularities in Georgia's election and state lawmakers should void Biden's electoral win. The letter was essentially a coup attempt at the Department of Justice according to Hamilton Fox III, disciplinary counsel at the hearing.
          • Clark's attorney said punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a chilling effect on lawyers who are part of debates that normally occur between them and could discourage people from being as candid as they otherwise might be. Donoghue agreed with this point during cross examination.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (80%)
          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it misrepresents the nature of Jeffrey Clark's actions as a coup attempt at the Department of Justice when there was no evidence to support such claims. Secondly, it presents an incomplete picture by only focusing on one aspect of Clark's behavior and ignoring other instances where he attempted to intercede on Trump's behalf. Thirdly, it misrepresents the nature of a letter that Clark sent to his superiors at the time as being part of a conspiracy when there was no evidence to support such claims.
          • The letter sent by Jeffrey Clark to his superiors was misrepresented as being part of a conspiracy when there was no evidence presented in the article to support such claims.
          • The article states that Jeffrey Clark's actions were characterized as a coup attempt by Washington, D.C., Office of Disciplinary Counsel at a hearing to determine if Clark should be sanctioned. However, this is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and is likely an exaggeration.
        • Fallacies (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Bias (85%)
          The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
          • Clark is accused of attempting to engage in dishonest conduct during his role in aftermath of the last presidential election.
            • > Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark’s efforts to help then-President Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election were characterized Tuesday as a coup attempt by Washington, D.C., Office of Disciplinary Counsel at a hearing to determine if Clark should be sanctioned.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            70%

            The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
            (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

            A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

            Trump ally Clark attempted 'coup' at US Justice Dept, ethics counsel says

            Entertainment Variety Tv Site: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tv-site/ Andrew Goudsward Wednesday, 27 March 2024 00:58
            • Unique Points
              • Jeffrey Clark attempted to enlist the US Justice Department in former President Donald Trump's efforts to undo his 2020 election loss.
              • Clark is facing a disciplinary hearing which could see him lose his license to practice law.
              • Trump tried to put Clark in charge of the Justice Department as he sought to pursue false claims of widespread voter fraud.
            • Accuracy
              • Former deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin tried to talk Jeffrey Clark out of attempting a coup at the US Justice Dept, but he was nervous about what would happen if they succeeded in their plan.
            • Deception (50%)
              The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Jeffrey Clark attempted a coup at the US Justice Department when he made false claims as he tried to enlist the agency in former President Donald Trump's efforts to undo his 2020 election loss. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that Clark was attempting to overthrow the government and take control of the Justice Department. In reality, Clark was simply trying to pursue false claims of widespread voter fraud made by Trump and others in an attempt to challenge the results of the 2020 election.
              • Clark was simply trying to pursue false claims of widespread voter fraud made by Trump and others in an attempt to challenge the results of the 2020 election.
              • The author's statement that Jeffrey Clark attempted a coup at the US Justice Department is misleading.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an inflammatory phrase 'coup' to describe Jeffrey Clark's actions which is a form of appeal to emotion and not based on facts. Additionally, the author quotes Hamilton Fox stating that what Clark was attempting to do was essentially a coup at the Department of Justice without providing any evidence or context for this claim. This statement is also an inflammatory phrase and lacks objectivity. The article also contains several examples of informal fallacies such as false analogies, where the author compares Trump's efforts to overturn his election loss with a coup at the Department of Justice without providing any evidence or context for this comparison. Additionally, there are multiple instances where the author uses loaded language and inflammatory rhetoric which can be seen in phrases like 'false claims', 'attempted to enlist', and 'would seriously interfere'. The article also contains several examples of dichotomous depictions such as when it describes Clark's actions as a coup or not. Overall, the author uses inflammatory language and loaded rhetoric which can be seen in multiple instances throughout the article.
              • The author uses an inflammatory phrase 'coup' to describe Jeffrey Clark's actions without providing any evidence or context for this claim.
            • Bias (85%)
              The article shows that Jeffrey Clark attempted to overturn the election results by making false claims and trying to enlist the Justice Department in Trump's efforts. This is a clear example of bias as he was acting against the interests of democracy and the rule of law. He also violated ethics rules by dishonestly interfering with justice. The article does not present any counterarguments or evidence that contradict his actions, but rather quotes from other sources who condemn them.
              • `Jeffrey Clark, a former senior official in the U.S. Justice Department, made false claims as he attempted to enlist the agency in former President Donald Trump's efforts to undo his 2020 election loss`
                • `What Mr. Clark was attempting to do was essentially a coup at the Department of Justice`, Hamilton `Phil` Fox, the District of Columbia Bar disciplinary counsel said in his opening argument.`
                • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication
                • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                  None Found At Time Of Publication