Trump Faces Felony Charges: Prosecutors Seek Gag Order Over False Claims of Danger to Agents

Palm Beach, Florida United States of America
Former President Donald Trump faces 37 felony charges for mishandling classified documents.
Prosecutors have asked a federal judge for a gag order to limit Trump's ability to make statements that could endanger law enforcement agents.
Trump falsely claimed on Truth Social that the Biden administration authorized the FBI to use deadly force during its search of Mar-a-Lago.
Trump Faces Felony Charges: Prosecutors Seek Gag Order Over False Claims of Danger to Agents

Prosecutors in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump have asked a federal judge to block Trump from making public statements that could pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents investigating and prosecuting the case. The request comes after Trump falsely claimed on Truth Social that the Biden administration authorized the FBI to use deadly force during its search of Mar-a-Lago for classified documents in 2022. Prosecutors argue that Trump's claims could endanger law enforcement agents and undermine the integrity of the proceedings.

Trump is facing 37 felony charges related to the mishandling of classified documents according to an indictment unsealed on June 9, 2023. The search at Mar-a-Lago was conducted pursuant to a warrant issued by a federal judge.

Retired Judge George Grasso has responded to the special counsel's office requesting a gag order on Trump in the case. The special counsel's office is seeking to limit Trump's ability to comment about law enforcement regarding the search at his resort.

Senator Tim Scott, a potential vice president pick and former GOP primary opponent of Trump, has deflected questions about whether he thinks Trump's language is dangerous. Scott noted that he has not seen the same video of FBI agents raiding President Joe Biden's garage as he has of the search at Mar-a-Lago.

Special Counsel Jack Smith requested a federal judge to bar Trump from making statements that could pose a significant risk to law enforcement in light of Trump's false and inflammatory claims about an assassination plot against him during the search. Smith argues that these statements irresponsibly put a target on the backs of FBI agents involved in the case.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if Trump's statements have actually put law enforcement agents in danger.
  • The article does not specify which federal judge issued the warrant for the search at Mar-a-Lago.

Sources

93%

  • Unique Points
    • Sen. Tim Scott has not agreed with Attorney General Merrick Garland on any issue
    • FBI followed a standard use-of-force policy during the raid on Mar-a-Lago, prohibiting the use of deadly force unless there is a threat of death or physical injury
  • Accuracy
    • Trump falsely claimed that FBI agents were ‘locked and loaded’ during the raid on Mar-a-Lago
    • Federal prosecutors are seeking a gag order in Trump’s case due to his false and inflammatory statements posing a threat to law enforcement
    • Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 criminal counts related to his handling of classified materials after leaving the White House
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains an informal fallacy - a false analogy. The author compares the situation of Trump's rhetoric to the lack of action from the Democratic Party on antisemitism on college campuses, which are unrelated issues. Additionally, there is an example of inflammatory rhetoric with the use of the phrase 'locked and loaded'.
    • Sen. Tim Scott deflected questions about former President Donald Trump’s ‘Locked and loaded’ comment Sunday morning...
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

96%

  • Unique Points
    • Retired Judge George Grasso responded to the special counsel’s office requesting a gag order on Donald Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents case.
    • The special counsel’s office is seeking to limit Trump’s ability to comment about law enforcement regarding the search at his resort.
  • Accuracy
    • Federal prosecutors are seeking a gag order in Trump’s case due to his false and inflammatory statements posing a threat to law enforcement.
    • Trump falsely claimed that FBI agents were ‘locked and loaded’ during the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

78%

  • Unique Points
    • Special Counsel Jack Smith requested a federal judge to bar former President Donald Trump from making statements that could pose a significant risk to law enforcement.
    • Trump’s claims about President Biden planning an assassination attempt during the search of his Mar-a-Lago club have been deemed false and inflammatory by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
    • Smith highlights that Trump’s deceptive and inflammatory assertions irresponsibly put a target on the backs of FBI agents involved in the case.
  • Accuracy
    • Trump's claims about President Biden planning an assassination attempt during the search of his Mar-a-Lago club have been deemed false and inflammatory by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
    • FBI followed a standard use-of-force policy during the raid on Mar-a-Lago, prohibiting the use of deadly force unless there is a threat of death or physical injury.
    • Trump falsely claimed that FBI agents were ‘locked and loaded’ during the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
  • Deception (0%)
    The article from ABC News exhibits deception through selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author chooses to focus on Trump's statements without providing the full context of the situation. By doing so, they create a misleading impression about Trump's intentions and distort the facts. Furthermore, the author uses emotionally charged language such as 'grossly misleading impression,' 'expose those agents,' and 'put a target on the backs of FBI agents.' These phrases are intended to manipulate readers' emotions and sway their perception of Trump.
    • Those statements create a grossly misleading impression about the intentions and conduct of federal law enforcement agents falsely suggesting that they were complicit in a plot to assassinate him.
    • Trump... has grossly distorted... standard practices by mischaracterizing them as a plan to kill him, his family, and U.S. Secret Service agents.
    • The Government moves to modify defendant Donald J. Trump’s conditions of release, to make clear that he may not make statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents participating in the investigation and prosecution of this case.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author, ABC News, demonstrates a clear bias towards portraying Trump's statements as inflammatory and distorted. They use language that depicts Trump as putting targets on the backs of FBI agents and causing threats to their safety. The author also uses language that implies Trump's statements are false without providing any evidence to support this claim.
    • The Government moves to modify defendant Donald J. Trump’s conditions of release, to make clear that he may not make statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents participating in the investigation and prosecution of this case.
      • Those deceptive and inflammatory assertions irresponsibly put a target on the backs of the FBI agents involved in this case, as Trump well knows.
        • Trump... has grossly distorted... standard practices by mischaracterizing them as a plan to kill him, his family, and U.S. Secret Service agents.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        98%

        • Unique Points
          • Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s classified documents case asked a federal judge to block the former president from making public statements that pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents investigating and prosecuting the case.
          • Trump falsely claimed on Truth Social that the Biden administration authorized the FBI to use deadly (lethal) force in its 2022 search of Mar-a-Lago for classified documents.
          • Prosecutors argued that Trump’s claims posed a threat to law enforcement agents and could endanger the integrity of the proceedings.
          • Trump is facing 37 felony charges related to the mishandling of classified documents according to an indictment unsealed on June 9, 2023.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (95%)
          The authors make an appeal to authority by quoting Attorney General Merrick Garland and the FBI denying Trump's claims about the use of deadly force during the search. They also quote prosecutors stating that agents acted 'in an appropriate and professional manner' and followed department policies.
          • Prosecutors in special counsel Jack Smith’s office said in their court filing that agents acted ‘in an appropriate and professional manner, subject to the Department of Justice’s standard use-of-force policy’,
          • Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday rejected Trump’s claim about the authorized use of deadly force during the search, calling the allegation ‘false’ and ‘extremely dangerous’,
          • The FBI also said that it had ‘followed standard protocol in this search as we do for all search warrants’ and that no additional steps had been ordered for Mar-a-Lago.
        • Bias (95%)
          The authors use language that depicts Trump's statements as a 'significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents'. They also state that Trump's claims have 'endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings'. These statements suggest a bias against Trump.
          • Prosecutors in Donald Trump’s classified documents case in Florida asked a federal judge on Friday to block the former president from making public statements that pose ‘a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents’ investigating and prosecuting the case.
            • Trump’s repeated mischaracterization of these facts in widely distributed messages as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication

            80%

            • Unique Points
              • Special counsel's office prosecutors asked a federal judge in Florida to place a gag order on Donald Trump
              • Prosecutors wrote that Trump's inflammatory statements could cause his supporters to retaliate against federal authorities
              • FBI agents wore unmarked, business casual attire during the search at Mar-a-Lago and used standard protocol for FBI searches limiting how agents may use force in search operations
              • Attorney General Merrick Garland addressed Trump's claims about the FBI search at Mar-a-Lago, stating that it is false and extremely dangerous
            • Accuracy
              No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
            • Deception (30%)
              The article contains selective reporting and emotional manipulation. The author only reports details that support the argument for a gag order on Trump, while omitting information that contradicts it. For example, the author mentions that 'Prosecutors say Trump’s lawyers told them they are against a restriction on his ability to comment about law enforcement who worked on the investigation,' but does not mention that this is in contrast to previous cases where such restrictions were not sought. The author also uses emotional language to describe Trump's statements as 'inflammatory' and 'dangerous,' implying that they have caused harm, without providing evidence for this claim.
              • Prosecutors wrote that the former president’s inflammatory statements could cause his supporters to retaliate against federal authorities, some of whom may be witnesses in the case.
              • The same standard FBI policy was used in the searches of President Joe Biden’s homes and offices in a separate classified documents investigation.
              • Trump’s recent comments invite the sort of threats and harassment that have occurred when other participants in legal proceedings against Trump have been targeted by his invective.
            • Fallacies (85%)
              The author makes an appeal to authority by quoting Attorney General Merrick Garland and the FBI stating that the use of deadly force policy is standard protocol for FBI searches. However, this does not negate the fact that Trump's inflammatory statements could still incite his supporters to retaliate against law enforcement officers involved in the investigation.
              • ]The document that is being referred to in the allegation is the Justice Department's standard policy, limiting the use of force.[/
              • As the FBI advises, it is part of the standard operations plan for searches.
              • And in fact, it was even used in the consensual search of President Biden's home.
            • Bias (90%)
              The author, Katelyn Polantz, repeatedly mentions Trump's 'mischaracterization' and 'inflammatory statements', implying bias against Trump. She also states that Trump's comments could cause his supporters to retaliate against federal authorities and threaten the integrity of the proceedings. This suggests a potential monetary bias towards maintaining law and order, as well as a political bias against Trump.
              • His recent comments invite the sort of threats and harassment that have occurred when other participants in legal proceedings against Trump have been targeted by his invective.
                • The same standard FBI policy was used in the searches of President Joe Biden's homes and offices in a separate classified documents investigation.
                  • Trump's repeated mischaracterization as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings.
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication