Trump's Allies Rally Behind Him After New York Jury Finds Him Guilty on All 34 Felony Counts

New York, New York, USA United States of America
Former President Donald Trump was found guilty on all 34 felony counts in his criminal trial in New York on May 31, 2024.
Representative Byron Donalds wrote on social media that Trump is innocent and that this was a 'disaster.'
Representative Elise Stefanik claimed that the American justice system is rigged after Trump's conviction and urged supporters to rally behind Trump and look forward to an appeal.
Senator J.D. Vance called the verdict an 'absolute miscarriage of justice' and said measures would be necessary to appeal the decision.
Senators Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton criticized the verdict, with Rubio calling it a 'mockery of our system of justice' and Cotton claiming it was an attempt to weaponize the legal system.
Senator Tim Scott reaffirmed his loyalty to the former president in a video post, urging people to stand with Trump and await the outcome of any appeals.
Trump's Allies Rally Behind Him After New York Jury Finds Him Guilty on All 34 Felony Counts

Former President Donald Trump faced a significant setback on May 31, 2024, when a jury in New York found him guilty on all 34 felony counts in his criminal trial. The verdict came as a shock to many, including Trump's vice presidential hopefuls who rushed to defend him and express their support.

Senator J.D. Vance of Ohio, one of the potential running mates for Trump, called the verdict an 'absolute miscarriage of justice.' He also stated that measures would be necessary to appeal the decision.

Representative Elise Stefanik, another possible vice presidential pick and the third-ranking Republican in the House, claimed that the American justice system is rigged after Trump's conviction. She called on supporters to rally behind Trump and look forward to an appeal.

Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina, who was once a rival during the GOP primary but has since become one of Trump's most ardent supporters, reaffirmed his loyalty to the former president in a video post. He urged people to stand with Trump and await the outcome of any appeals.

Representative Byron Donalds, another potential vice presidential candidate who attended Trump's trial, wrote on social media that Trump is innocent and that this was a 'disaster.'

Senators Marco Rubio and Tom Cotton also weighed in on the situation, with Rubio calling the verdict a 'mockery of our system of justice,' and Cotton claiming it was an attempt to weaponize the legal system.

Despite these strong statements from Trump's allies, it remains to be seen how this conviction will impact his bid for a return to the White House in November. The Republican Party is expected to rally behind their nominee, but the outcome of any appeals could significantly alter the political landscape.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Could Trump's conviction affect his ability to run for office in the future?
  • How will public opinion be influenced by Trump's allies' reactions to the verdict?
  • Is there any possibility that new evidence could emerge during appeals that might change the outcome of the trial?

Sources

95%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

GOP senator aims to block floor action over Trump conviction

Axios News Site: https://www.axios.com/2024/01-30/prior-authorization-gap-insurer-drug-decisions Stef W. Friday, 31 May 2024 19:05
  • Unique Points
    • Sen. JD Vance, Sen. Mike Lee, Sen. Marco Rubio, Sen. Rick Scott, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, Sen. Eric Schmitt, and Sen. Marsha Blackburn are vowing to vote against any spending bills, judicial nominees or other Democratic legislation in protest of former President Trump’s conviction on 34 felony charges.
    • Sen. Mike Lee led the effort and was joined by six other senators in a pledge of non-cooperation.
  • Accuracy
    • Republicans are taking action to hit back at Democrats over the jury’s Thursday decision.
    • Nearly every Republican member of Congress has criticized the verdict.
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

80%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

'Mockery of the rule of law': GOP senators vow to stonewall Dems after Trump conviction

Raw Story Friday, 31 May 2024 18:44
  • Unique Points
    • A group of Republican Senators, including Mike Lee and J.D. Vance, have announced they will not allow increase in non-security related funding for the Biden administration, vote to confirm political and judicial appointees, or allow expedited consideration and passage of Democrat legislation under the Biden administration unless it is directly relevant to the safety of American people.
    • The senators’ letter accuses the White House of making a mockery of the rule of law and altering politics in un-American ways.
  • Accuracy
    • Republicans are taking action to hit back at Democrats over the jury’s Thursday decision.
    • Sen. Mike Lee led the effort and was joined by six other senators in a pledge of non-cooperation.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article contains editorializing and selective reporting. The author does not clearly distinguish between their own opinions and facts in the article. They also only report details that support their position against Democrats, implying deception by omission regarding the reasons for Trump's conviction and the actions of Republicans mentioned in the article.
    • We will not allow any increase to non-security related funding for this administration, or any appropriations bill which funds partisan lawfare
    • The White House has made a mockery of the rule of law and fundamentally altered our politics in un-American ways
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The authors of the article make an appeal to authority fallacy by quoting and attributing the statement 'We will not ...' to a group of Republican Senators without providing any context or evidence that these senators hold this position due to their expertise or credibility in the matter. The authors also use inflammatory rhetoric by describing the White House's actions as 'a mockery of the rule of law and fundamentally altered our politics in un-American ways.'
    • > A group of Republican Senators announced they plan to stop working with Democrats in Washington D.C. after 12 jurors convicted former President Donald Trump on criminal charges in New York City.
    • The White House has made a mockery of the rule of law and fundamentally altered our politics in un-American ways.
    • We will not 1) allow any increase to non-security related funding for this administration, or any appropriations bill which funds partisan lawfare; 2) vote to confirm this administration’s political and judicial appointees; and 3) allow expedited consideration and passage of Democrat legislation or authorities that are not directly relevant to the safety of the American people.
  • Bias (80%)
    The author does not directly express bias towards any specific political ideology or group in the article. However, they do quote users on social media who express criticism towards the Republican Senators and their actions. The language used by these users can be seen as biased against the Senators and their decision to stonewall funding increases, political appointments, and Democrat-backed legislation under President Biden's administration.
    • "Have some dignity for once, and stop backing Convicted Felon Trump."
      • "The anti law and order Tantrum."
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      72%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      Hill GOP blasts 'travesty' Trump verdict — and vows it will motivate party base in November

      Politico News Site Name: POLITICO Full Legal Name of News Site: Politico LLC Location of News Site: Washington D.C., USA Thursday, 30 May 2024 00:00
      • Unique Points
        • Republicans view the trial as an attempt to interfere with Trump's bid to return to the White House
        • Some Republicans, including Tom Emmer, Mike Johnson, Jim Jordan and Lindsey Graham have expressed confidence that the verdict will be overturned on appeal
      • Accuracy
        No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
      • Deception (0%)
        The article contains multiple examples of deceptive practices. The authors use emotional manipulation by labeling the verdict as a 'travesty' and a 'sham'. They also engage in selective reporting by only mentioning the conviction of Donald Trump and ignoring any potential wrongdoings on his part. Furthermore, they make editorializing statements such as 'this verdict says more about the system than the allegations' and 'justice arrived for Donald Trump all the same'. Lastly, they use sensationalism by implying that Democrats are engaging in a witch hunt against Trump.
        • The U.S. Capitol building is seen in Washington, on March 28, 2024. | Francis Chung/POLITICO
        • Despite his efforts to distract, delay, and deny justice arrived for Donald Trump all the same.
        • Congressional Republicans wasted no time in blasting former President Donald Trump’s Thursday conviction on 34 felony counts in New York
        • Rank-and-file Republicans, including potential vice presidential picks like Sen. J.D. Vance (Ohio) and Byron Donalds (Fla.), made the trek up to New York to support Trump over the course of the weekslong trial.
        • This was a purely political exercise, not a legal one.
        • The Manhattan kangaroo court shows what happens when our justice system is weaponized by partisan prosecutors in front of a biased judge with an unfair process
      • Fallacies (75%)
        The article contains several instances of inflammatory rhetoric and appeals to authority. It also uses a dichotomous depiction of the situation by portraying the trial as a purely political effort to meddle in Trump's bid for presidency without acknowledging the possibility of it being a legitimate legal process. However, no formal fallacies were found.
        • The U.S. Capitol building is seen in Washington, on March 28, 2024.
      • Bias (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication
      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
        None Found At Time Of Publication

      67%

      The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
      (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

      A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

      'It's a disgrace': Trump's VP hopefuls come to his defense following conviction

      ABC NEWS SITE NAMES Name: ABC News Site Names URL: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-officially-blames-iran_106834435 ABC News Friday, 31 May 2024 19:59
      • Unique Points
        • Jury found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts in his New York criminal trial
        • J.D. Vance called the verdict an ‘absolute miscarriage of justice’
        • Elise Stefanik claimed the American justice system is rigged after Trump’s verdict
        • Senator J.D. Vance stated that measures will be necessary to appeal the verdict
        • Tim Scott reaffirmed his loyalty to Trump in a video post
        • Byron Donalds wrote that Trump is innocent on X
      • Accuracy
        • ][Article.facts[1]] and [[OtherArticles][0].facts[3]]: Both J.D. Vance and the articles state that the verdict is an 'absolute miscarriage of justice' or a 'mockery of our system of justice'. However, they do not directly contradict each other as they are both expressing opinions.
        • ][Article.facts[2]] and [[OtherArticles][1].facts[3]]: Both Elise Stefanik and the articles state that the American justice system is rigged after Trump's verdict. Again, they do not directly contradict each other as they are both expressing opinions.
        • ][Article.facts[4]] and [[OtherArticles][1].facts[5]]: Both J.D. Vance and the articles mention measures will be necessary to appeal the verdict.
        • ][Article.facts[6]] and [[OtherArticles][2].facts[3]]: Both Tim Scott and the articles reaffirm their loyalty to Trump.
        • ][Article.facts[7]] and [[OtherArticles][0].facts[1]]: Both Marco Rubio and the articles call the verdict a 'mockery of our system of justice'. Again, they do not directly contradict each other as they are both expressing opinions.
      • Deception (30%)
        The article contains multiple instances of emotional manipulation and selective reporting. The author reports on the reactions of Trump's potential vice presidential hopefuls to the verdict of his criminal trial, focusing solely on their statements that denounce the verdict as a 'disgrace', a 'mockery', and a 'weaponization' of the justice system. By only reporting these statements, which align with Trump's own claims, the author is selectively reporting information that supports Trump's position. Additionally, by using phrases like 'an absolute miscarriage of justice', 'disgrace to our judicial system', and 'mockery of our system of justice', the author is emotionally manipulating readers by appealing to their emotions and biases.
        • Today’s verdict shows how corrupt and rigged the American justice system has become under Joe Biden.
        • We, the people, stand with Donald Trump.
        • We, the people, will stand up against this in November! God be with President Trump and we are with him all the way in saving this country.
      • Fallacies (85%)
        The author reports on the reactions of several individuals to the verdict of Trump's criminal trial. The individuals quoted are making statements that can be considered appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. They claim that the justice system is rigged, a mockery, and a weaponization without providing any evidence or logical reasoning for their claims.
        • "Today's verdict shows how corrupt and rigged the American justice system has become under Joe Biden."
        • "We, the people, stand with Donald Trump."
        • "We, the people, will stand up against this in November! God be with President Trump and we are with him all the way in saving this country.#
      • Bias (50%)
        The author and several individuals quoted in the article repeatedly use the term 'disgrace' to describe the verdict of Trump's criminal trial. This language implies a strong negative bias towards the outcome of the trial and suggests that those making these statements believe it to be unjust or unfair.
        • "an absolute miscarriage of justice."
          • "It's a disgrace': Trump's VP hopefuls come to his defense following conviction
            • "We, the people, stand up against this in November!"
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication