JD Vance's Background and Controversial Stances: Impact on Trump's Vice Presidential Pick and Women's Votes

Middletown, Ohio, Ohio United States of America
Biden's withdrawal from the race may make Vance a liability for Trump among women voters
JD Vance is Donald Trump's newly announced vice presidential pick
Joe Scarborough criticized Trump's pick of Vance due to his stance on women's rights and abortion
Vance grew up in poverty in America's Rust Belt and emphasizes Midwest background to connect with voters
Vice President Harris spoke at the White House honoring NCAA college athletes
JD Vance's Background and Controversial Stances: Impact on Trump's Vice Presidential Pick and Women's Votes

JD Vance, the Republican senator from Ohio and Donald Trump's newly announced vice presidential pick, is hitting the campaign trail with rallies in his hometown of Middletown, Ohio, and Radford, Virginia. Vance was raised in poverty in America's Rust Belt and has emphasized his background growing up in the Midwest as crucial to connecting with voters in critical battleground states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

Vice President Harris spoke at the White House on Monday morning during an event honoring NCAA college athletes. The Democratic National Convention is set for next month in Chicago, where Harris is expected to be officially nominated as the Democratic presidential nominee.

Meanwhile, Vance's wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, and their children have faced racist online backlash due to their Indian ancestry. Anti-Asian hate from far-right figures has garnered hundreds of thousands of views online.

Joe Scarborough criticized Trump's pick of Vance as his vice presidential candidate, expressing concerns about the Republican ticket's stance on women's rights and abortion. Vance has taken strong anti-abortion positions in the past, even suggesting a national abortion ban with no exceptions. Women currently comprise 51% of the voting-age population in the US, and their votes have been influential in recent elections.

Biden's decision to withdraw from the White House race may make Vance a liability for Trump due to his stance on women's rights and abortion. Trump already had an electability problem among women voters, and Vance's anti-abortion positions and past statements about divorce may compound this problem.

The sources used in this article include articles from Fox News, ABC News, ABC7 Chicago, The Hill, and Politico EU.



Confidence

85%

Doubts
  • It is unclear if Biden's decision to withdraw from the race will definitively make Vance a liability for Trump among women voters
  • The article does not provide specific details about the racist online backlash against Vance's wife and children

Sources

93%

  • Unique Points
    • Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance’s wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance, and their children have faced racist online backlash due to their Indian ancestry.
    • Anti-Asian hate from far-right figures has garnered hundreds of thousands of views online.
    • Stop AAPI Hate, an advocacy group, condemned the attacks and expressed concerns about heightened levels of fear and anxiety among Asian Americans and immigrants.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (90%)
    The article reports on racist online backlash against Usha Chilukuri Vance and Harmeet Dhillon due to their Indian ancestry. The author does not make any fallacious statements themselves, but there are a few instances of inflammatory rhetoric from far-right figures quoted in the article. These quotes do not constitute a significant enough proportion of the article to lower the score below 90.
    • ]They are coming in from every corner of the Earth, not just from South America, but from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East -- they're coming from everywhere,
  • Bias (80%)
    The article reports on racist online backlash against JD Vance's wife Usha Chilukuri Vance and her Indian ancestry from far-right figures. The author does not express any bias in the article but does mention the 'far-right figures' and their hateful rhetoric towards Indians, which could be seen as an example of religious and ideological bias. The article also mentions Trump's divisive rhetoric on race and immigration, which JD Vance had previously criticized.
    • JD Vance previously criticized Trump and his base for the rhetoric on race, a backdrop to the current onslaught of criticism facing Vance’s wife and children.
      • Posts appear to have spiked this week following Vance’s nomination criticizing Vance for marrying someone who is non-white, expressing concerns about an influx of Indian immigrants as a result and the so-called Great Replacement conspiracy have garnered hundreds of thousands of views according to individual post engagement figures.
        • The wife of Republican vice presidential candidate JD Vance, Usha Chilukuri Vance, and the couple’s children have become the targets of backlash for their Indian ancestry.
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        99%

        • Unique Points
          • JD Vance is hitting the campaign trail as Vice President Harris team scrambles to consolidate support from Democrats after President Biden announced he would no longer seek re-election.
          • Biden announced his withdrawal from the race on Sunday and endorsed Harris as the Democratic nominee, but has not been seen publicly since.
          • Campaign officials have reportedly made hundreds of calls to delegates urging them to name Harris as the Democrats’ presidential nominee during next month’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
          • Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear have endorsed Harris for president.
          • Sources told Reuters that the Trump campaign has been preparing for Harris’ possible entry into the race for weeks due to increasing calls from Democratic lawmakers and donors for Biden to step aside.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Fallacies (95%)
          The article contains some instances of appeals to authority and inflammatory rhetoric, but no formal or blatant logical fallacies are present. The author quotes Vice President Harris and other Democrats endorsing her as the Democratic nominee. These statements do not contain any fallacious reasoning on their own.
          • ][Vice President Kamala Harris speaks from the South Lawn of the White House, Monday, July 22, 2024, during an event with NCAA college athletes. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)] My intention is to earn and win this nomination,
        • Bias (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication
        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
          None Found At Time Of Publication

        59%

        • Unique Points
          • JD Vance was chosen by Donald Trump as his Vice Presidential candidate to boost the Republican ticket in Rust Belt states.
          • Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw from the White House race may make JD Vance a liability for Trump due to his stance on women’s rights and abortion.
          • Trump already had an electability problem among women voters, and Vance’s anti-abortion positions and past statements about divorce may compound this problem.
          • Vance has taken strong anti-abortion positions in the past, even suggesting a national abortion ban with no exceptions.
          • Women currently comprise 51% of the voting-age population in the US, and their votes have been influential in recent elections, particularly regarding reproductive rights.
        • Accuracy
          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
        • Deception (30%)
          The article makes several statements that are deceptive or misleading. The author implies that JD Vance's views on abortion and divorce are extreme and out of the mainstream, but he fails to mention that these views have shifted in recent years. In 2022, Vance said he would like to see a national abortion ban with no exceptions, but after Trump's Supreme Court appointees overturned Roe v. Wade, Vance has moderated his position and now argues that abortion should be left up to states to decide. The author also implies that Vance's views on divorce are harmful to women, but the author does not provide any evidence for this claim and it is an opinion rather than a fact. Additionally, the article uses emotional manipulation by implying that Trump has a 'problem with women voters' and that Vance will only exacerbate this problem. The author also engages in selective reporting by focusing on Vance's past statements on abortion and divorce while ignoring his more recent moderation of these views.
          • He’s also a strict pro-natalist, characterizing those who don’t have kids as ‘childless cat ladies,’ and suggesting that people with children should be given additional votes. He has taken aim at childcare subsidies as ‘class war against normal people,’ despite – or maybe because – such subsidies provide women with young kids more opportunities to work or go to school and be independent.
          • The former president has an electability problem among women, and his pick for vice president only compounds it.
          • He has even argued that federal action is needed to stop women seeking terminations traveling from states where abortion is illegal to states where it’s allowed.
          • Furthermore, Vance has only recently moderated his position on abortion to fall into line with Trump, who argues that abortion should be left up to states to decide individually. But in 2022, when he was an Ohio Senate candidate, Vance said on a podcast that he would like to see a national abortion ban with no exceptions – even for rape or incest.
          • Trump already has a problem with women voters – polls have consistently shown that the proportion of women planning to vote for him this November is smaller than those who did in 2020. And Vance has nothing to offer Trump on this score – quite the reverse, he risks compounding his boss’s problem.
        • Fallacies (55%)
          The author makes an appeal to authority by stating that Vice President Kamala Harris is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2024. Additionally, there are several instances of inflammatory rhetoric used to describe JD Vance's past statements and positions on abortion and divorce. The author also engages in dichotomous depiction by characterizing those who don't have children as 'childless cat ladies'.
          • Kamala Harris is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination in 2024.
          • JD Vance's strict anti-abortion positions and contentious statements about divorce risk compounding Trump's problem with women voters.
          • He has taken aim at childcare subsidies as a 'class war against normal people'.
          • Vance has even argued that federal action is needed to stop women seeking terminations traveling from states where abortion is illegal to states where it’s allowed.
        • Bias (15%)
          The author expresses a clear bias against JD Vance's stance on women's rights and abortion. The author repeatedly implies that Vance's views are extreme and out of touch with the majority of women voters.
          • But when it comes to the women’s vote, especially with young and urban women, Vance only exacerbates Trump’s problem – one that’s only been worsened by the former president’s recent legal cases involving women.
            • He has even argued that federal action is needed to stop women seeking terminations traveling from states where abortion is illegal to states where it’s allowed.
              • JD Vance only exacerbates Trump’s problem... He has taken aim at childcare subsidies as ‘class war against normal people’, despite or maybe because such subsidies provide women with young kids more opportunities to work or go to school and be independent.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              70%

              • Unique Points
                • MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough criticized Trump’s pick of Sen. JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate
                • Vance has faced criticism over his right-wing positions on issues such as abortion and LGBTQ rights
                • Vance ran for Senate as a hard-line anti-abortion candidate and at times advocated for a national abortion ban
                • Abortion rights issue has changed the landscape of American politics according to Scarborough
              • Accuracy
                • MSNBC's Joe Scarborough criticized Trump's pick of Sen. JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate
                • JD Vance previously criticized Trump and his base for racist and xenophobic rhetoric, but later aligned with him around 2021.
              • Deception (10%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Fallacies (90%)
                The author, Nick Robertson, expresses his opinion that the selection of JD Vance as Trump's vice presidential pick is one of the dumbest picks ever. He provides reasoning for this opinion by stating that Vance's stance on abortion and women's rights accentuates Trump's weaknesses in these areas. This is an example of an appeal to weakness or a negative appeal to authority fallacy, as the author is implying that Vance being selected will negatively impact Trump's campaign based on his personal beliefs about Vance and his stance on certain issues.
                • MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough blasted former President Trump’s pick of Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) as his vice presidential candidate on Monday, predicting that the selection could hurt Trump’s campaign. 'I’ve never got a good answer in my own mind figuring this out. I can usually figure some things out in politics, not all, but I’ve never figured out this JD Vance pick,' Scarborough said on ‘Morning Joe.’ 'It just strikes me as one of the dumbest picks ever,' he continued.
                • Why get somebody that doubles down in that area?
              • Bias (75%)
                The author expresses a negative opinion towards the Vice Presidential pick of Sen. JD Vance by Trump, implying that Vance's stance on abortion and women's rights will hurt Trump's campaign. The author also uses the phrase 'dumbest picks ever', which can be seen as an extreme or unreasonable statement.
                • It just strikes me as one of the dumbest picks ever,
                  • Why get somebody that doubles down in that area?
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  95%

                  • Unique Points
                    • > Sen. JD Vance is making his first solo campaign rally on the GOP presidential ticket in his hometown of Middletown, Ohio on Monday.<
                    • > Vance was raised in Middletown, Ohio.<
                    • > Trump offered Vance the opportunity to be his vice president to help him win Midwestern states like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin.<
                    • > ]Vance grew up in poverty in America’s Rust Belt and was surrounded by violence and addiction.[
                    • > Vance’s memoir, ‘Hillbilly Elegy’, shares his story of growing up in Middletown.
                  • Accuracy
                    • ]Vance grew up in poverty in America's Rust Belt and was surrounded by violence and addiction.[
                    • JD Vance previously criticized Trump and his base for racist and xenophobic rhetoric, but later aligned with him around 2021.
                  • Deception (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Fallacies (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Bias (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication