Tupac's Estate Threatens Lawsuit Against Drake Over AI-Generated Voice Use in Rap Feud

Los Angeles, California United States of America
Drake's use of an AI-generated version of Tupac's voice on his diss track, 'Taylor Made (Freestyle)', targeted Kendrick Lamar.
The estate claims that Drake's use of Tupac's voice and personality violates both publicity rights and their legal rights.
The letter demands that Drake cease and desist from any further publication or exploitation of the song, as well as remove it from all platforms where it is publicly available.
Tupac's estate threatens lawsuit against Drake over AI-generated voice use in rap feud.
Tupac's Estate Threatens Lawsuit Against Drake Over AI-Generated Voice Use in Rap Feud

In a recent turn of events, both Drake and Kendrick Lamar have found themselves at the center of a rap feud that has been fueled by AI-generated music. The latest development in this ongoing saga came when Tupac Shakur's estate threatened to sue Drake over his use of an AI-generated version of Tupac's voice on his diss track, 'Taylor Made (Freestyle)', which targeted Kendrick Lamar.

According to reports, the estate claims that Drake's use of Tupac's voice and personality in the song violates both publicity rights and their legal rights. The letter demands that Drake immediately cease and desist from any further publication or exploitation of the song, as well as remove it from all platforms where it is publicly available.

The controversy surrounding AI-generated music has raised concerns about its impact on the rap industry, particularly in regards to feuds and diss tracks. In recent years, there have been instances of fake songs being released under popular artists' names, causing confusion and muddying the waters of genuine beefs. Last year, an AI music creator named Ghostwriter dropped a fake Weeknd and Drake song that was later pulled from streaming platforms.

The use of AI-generated voices in music is not a new phenomenon. In fact, Kendrick Lamar himself incorporated Tupac's voice in his Grammy-winning 'To Pimp a Butterfly' album, released in 2015, without any legal issues. However, the recent developments have sparked debates about the ethical implications of using AI to create music and whether it undermines the authenticity of rap feuds.

Despite these concerns, some argue that AI-generated music can be a valuable tool for artists and producers looking to experiment with new sounds or pay homage to legendary figures. However, it is important for artists and record labels to ensure that they have the necessary permissions and clearances before using AI-generated voices or likenesses in their work.

As the rap world continues to grapple with these issues, one thing is clear: the use of AI in music is here to stay, and it will be up to artists, labels, and fans alike to navigate its complexities responsibly.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • Are there any legal precedents for cases involving AI-generated voices in music?
  • How will this controversy affect the public's perception of AI-generated music?
  • How will this lawsuit impact the use of AI-generated music in future rap feuds?

Sources

99%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Tupac Shakur’s Estate Threatens to Sue Drake Over Diss Track Featuring AI-Generated Tupac Voice

Billboard Magazine Bill Donahue Wednesday, 24 April 2024 17:25
  • Unique Points
    • ‖Tupac Shakur’s estate is threatening to sue Drake over a recent diss track against Kendrick Lamar that featured an AI-generated version of Tupac’s voice.‖
    • ‖The estate claims the use of Tupac’s voice in Drake’s 'Taylor Made (Freestyle)' violates publicity rights and the estate’s legal rights.‖
    • ‖The letter demands that Drake immediately cease and desist from any further publication and exploitation of the song, and remove it from all platforms where it is publicly available.‖
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

80%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Drake removes 'Taylor Made' after Tupac's estate threatens to sue over AI voice imitation

USA Today Wednesday, 24 April 2024 00:00
  • Unique Points
    • Drake removes 'Taylor Made' after Tupac’s estate threatens to sue over AI voice imitation.
    • The Tupac sound-alike in 'Taylor Made' raps lines that seem to take aim at Kendrick Lamar and his response to Drake’s previous diss track, 'Push Ups’.
    • The Tupac estate also requests written confirmation that 'Taylor Made' has been removed from all platforms by Thursday afternoon, as well as an explanation for how the sound-alike was created and the persons or company involved.
    • Kendrick Lamar incorporated Tupac’s voice in 'Mortal Man', a track on his Grammy-winning 'To Pimp a Butterfly' album released in 2015, without legal issues.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (0%)
    The article reports on a cease-and-desist letter sent by Tupac Shakur's estate to Drake regarding the use of an AI-generated imitation of Tupac's voice in one of Drake's songs. The article quotes extensively from the letter, which expresses disappointment and demands that Drake cease and desist from using the voice. This is a clear example of selective reporting, as the article only reports details that support the estate's position and does not provide any context or counter-arguments.
    • The unauthorized, equally dismaying use of Tupac’s voice against Kendrick Lamar, a good friend to the Estate who has given nothing but respect to Tupac and his legacy publicly and privately, compounds the insult.
    • The Estate of Tupac and his mother, Afeni Shakur, says it’s deeply dismayed and disappointed by your unauthorized use of Tupac’s voice and personality in the ‘Taylor Made (Freestyle)’ record.
    • We demand that you immediately cease and desist from any further publication and exploitation of the Record, and that you immediately take ALL NECESSARY steps to remove it from all platforms where it is publicly available.
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

99%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

The Kendrick Lamar/Drake Beef, Explained

GQ Magazine Frazier Tharpe Friday, 22 March 2024 15:23
  • Unique Points
    • Kendrick Lamar declared war against Drake on his album ‘We Don’t Trust You’,
    • The song ‘Like That’ from the album is considered a potential ‘Control’ sequel with dissing lyrics towards Drake,
    • Kendrick sets the tone by declaring he’s ‘choosing violence’ and it’s time for an opponent to ‘prove that he’s a problem’,
    • A reference to Drake’s song ‘First Person Shooter’ and album ‘For All the Dogs’ suggests this is more than a subliminal diss,
    • Kendrick casts himself as direct opposition to Drake by referencing MJ’s longtime Cold War enemy Prince,
    • Kendrick Lamar and Drake have a complicated history with over 10 years of static.
    • Drake embraced Kendrick Lamar and brought him along for the Club Paradise tour in 2011, but tension was present on the song ‘Buried Alive.’
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication

93%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

AI-Generated Tracks Are Muddying the Drake-Versus-Everybody Rap Feud

Rolling Stone Magazine Andre Gee Monday, 15 April 2024 21:03
  • Unique Points
    • Drake’s new track ‘Push Up’ had the rap world buzzing on Saturday.
    • Rick Ross’ response on ‘Champagne Stories’ turned a noteworthy day unforgettable.
    • The leak of Drake’s Kendrick diss and subsequent fake songs has raised concerns about AI-generated tracks muddying the rap feud.
    • Fans had to evaluate the validity of tracks based on vocal inflections and inside-baseball references, distinguishing real from AI-generated songs.
    • Last year, an AI music creator named Ghostwriter dropped a fake Weeknd and Drake song that was pulled from streaming, and labels have put protections in place to prevent the commercial retailing of AI vocals.
    • Universal Music Group asked DSPs to block AI services from utilizing their platforms to build their database.
    • Music publishers Universal, Concord, and ABKCO filed a copyright-infringement lawsuit against AI company Anthropic.
  • Accuracy
    • ]Drake's new track 'Push Up' had the rap world buzzing on Saturday.[
    • Rick Ross' response on 'Champagne Stories turned a noteworthy day unforgettable.',
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (95%)
    The author expresses a clear bias towards the idea that AI-generated music is not real and should not be taken seriously. He uses language like 'we'll keep coming across fake ones, and will eventually feel like it's about time we got the real thing.' This implies a disdain for AI-generated music and an expectation that it is inferior to human-created music. The author also expresses concern about the potential consequences of fake diss tracks, such as misinformation and ruined anticipation. These biases are not based on facts or evidence presented in the article, but rather on the author's personal opinions.
    • The suspense of anticipating the next diss will be ruined because we'll keep coming across fake ones, and will eventually feel like it's about time we got the real thing.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication