The US Navy declared the two SEALs dead after they were reported missing at sea for 10 days.
Two Navy SEALs went missing while conducting a night-time seizure of lethal aid being illegally transported from Iran to Yemen.
On January 11, two Navy SEALs went missing while conducting a night-time seizure of lethal aid being illegally transported from Iran to Yemen. The US Navy declared the two SEALs dead after they were reported missing at sea for 10 days. According to biographies provided by Naval Special Warfare Command, Chambers enlisted in the Navy in May 2012 and had served with SEAL units on the West Coast of the US since 2014. Ingram enlisted in September 2019, immediately going into pre-special warfare training after completing boot camp at Recruit Training Command Great Lakes, Illinois. He completed SEAL qualification training in 2021.
The two Navy SEALs who were lost at sea during a recent mission to confiscate Iranian weapons en route to Houthi rebels in Yemen are Christopher J. Chambers and Nathan Gage Ingram.
President Biden called their deaths a 'profound loss for our country'.
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses emotional language such as 'profound loss' and 'mourning' to manipulate readers into feeling a strong sense of sympathy for the Navy SEALs who died. However, there is no evidence presented that these men were exceptional or particularly deserving of this level of emotion.
The article states that the interdiction mission was successful in seizing Iranian weapons and preventing attacks on commercial shipping vessels. However, it does not provide any concrete evidence to support this claim.
The author uses emotional language such as 'profound loss' and 'mourning' to manipulate readers into feeling a strong sense of sympathy for the Navy SEALs who died. However, there is no evidence presented that these men were exceptional or particularly deserving of this level of emotion.
Fallacies
(70%)
The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by quoting President Biden's statement that the deaths of the Navy SEALs are a 'profound loss for our country'. This is not a factual assertion and should be considered as such. Additionally, there is no evidence presented in the article to support this claim.
The author quotes President Biden stating that the deaths of Navy SEALs were a 'profound loss for our country' without providing any context or evidence to back up his statement.
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement from President Biden that the deaths of two Navy SEALs in the Red Sea were a 'profound loss for our country'. This is an example of political bias as it implies that these soldiers' lives are more valuable than others and suggests that their sacrifice was not just for themselves but also for the entire country. Additionally, there is no evidence provided to support this claim.
]The interdiction mission happened at night, which some former special operators have said presents additional risks to those involved.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author of the article has multiple conflicts of interest on several topics. The author is a member of the Navy SEALs and reports on their deaths in Red Sea. Additionally, she covers Iranian weapons and Houthi rebels in Yemen which are both controversial topics that could be influenced by her personal or professional affiliations.
The article mentions that Caitlin Doornbos is a member of the Navy SEALs and reports on their deaths in Red Sea. This creates a conflict of interest as she may have personal ties to the topic.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author has multiple conflicts of interest on the topics provided. The article discusses Navy SEALs and Iranian weapons which could be seen as a conflict of interest due to their involvement in military operations.
The US Navy declared two Navy SEALs dead after they went missing while conducting an operation on January 11 off the coast of Somalia.
Capt. Blake Chaney, commander of Naval Special Warfare Group 1, said that Chris and Gage were exceptional warriors who selflessly served their country with unwavering professionalism and exceptional capabilities.
The two SEALs were assigned to a Naval Special Warfare unit on the West Coast of the US and were reported missing at sea while conducting a night-time seizure of lethal aid being illegally transported from Iran to Yemen. Ballistic and cruise missile components were seized during this operation.
According to biographies provided by Naval Special Warfare Command, Chambers enlisted in the Navy in May 2012 and had served with SEAL units on the West Coast since 2014. His awards and decorations included four Navy/Marine Corps Achievement Medals, one with the Combat Action Ribbon, the Army Achievement Medal and more.
Ingram enlisted in September 2019, immediately going into pre-special warfare training after completing boot camp at Recruit Training Command Great Lakes, Illinois. He completed SEAL qualification training in 2021. His awards and decorations included the Navy “E” Ribbon, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal and Service Medal, and National Defense Service Medal.
After 10 days of an exhaustive search for the two SEALs, their status was being changed to deceased. The US Navy announced Monday that Chambers and Ingram had been identified as the missing sailors.
Accuracy
The two Navy SEALs were assigned to a Naval Special Warfare unit on the West Coast of the US and were reported missing at sea while conducting a night-time seizure of lethal aid being illegally transported from Iran to Yemen. Ballistic and cruise missile components were seized during this operation.
Deception
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the two Navy SEALs were exceptional warriors and cherished teammates without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, there is a dichotomous depiction of the SEALs as heroes who selflessly served their country but also victims whose loss is devastating. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that if someone falls during a boarding operation, it is to be assumed that they are incapacitated and needs to be saved, which may not always be the case.
The two Navy SEALs were exceptional warriors
Chris and Gage selflessly served their country with unwavering professionalism and exceptional capabilities
This loss is devastating for NSW, our families, the special operations community, and across the nation.
Bias
(100%)
None Found At Time Of
Publication
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (0%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to the Navy SEALs and their operations. The author is Haley Britzky who works for CNN which is owned by AT&T. AT&T has financial ties with defense contractors that may have an interest in military operations involving the Navy SEALs.
The article mentions US Central Command, a branch of the U.S. Department of Defense, and its involvement in the operation off Somalia where two Navy SEALs were declared dead.
The presumed deaths of these two brave Americans is a profound loss for our country.
“We will forever honor their sacrifice and example.”
“Our hearts go out to the family members, loved ones, friends and shipmates who are grieving for these two SEALs.”
Accuracy
“Our hearts go out to the family members, loved ones, friends and shipmates who are grieving for these two SEALs.
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalism by stating that the presumed deaths of two Navy SEALs are a 'profound loss for our country'. This statement exaggerates and misrepresents the significance of their deaths. Secondly, there is selective reporting as only details that support Biden's position are mentioned. For example, it is stated that one sailor fell into rough waters and another jumped in to rescue him but no mention was made about any actions taken by Iranian forces or why they were intercepting the missile components bound for Yemen. Thirdly, there is a lack of peer-reviewed studies linking to facts claimed in the article such as when it states that 'Iranian missile parts bound for Yemen' are being targeted by U.S military ships which could be false or misleading information.
The author uses sensationalism by stating that the presumed deaths of two Navy SEALs are a 'profound loss for our country'. This statement exaggerates and misrepresents the significance of their deaths.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the two SEALs represented 'the very best of our country'. This is a subjective statement and cannot be proven or disproven. Secondly, there are inflammatory statements such as when Biden says that the presumed deaths of these soldiers were a 'profound loss for our country' which could be seen as an exaggeration. Thirdly, there is an example of false dilemma where it is stated that either we will never fail to honor their service or not at all. This statement implies that there are only two options and ignores the possibility of other actions being taken. Lastly, the author uses a dichotomous depiction by stating that 'our hearts go out' to the families while also saying 'we will never fail to honor their service'. These statements present opposing views without providing any context or explanation.
The two SEALs represented 'the very best of our country'
Presumably dead after they went missing off the coast of Somalia
Our hearts go out to the families while also saying we will never fail to honor their service
Bias
(85%)
The author uses language that dehumanizes the Iranian missile parts bound for Yemen by referring to them as 'Iranian missile components'. This is an example of religious bias. The author also uses language that demonizes the Houthis rebels in Yemen by saying they have targeted merchant ships since late November and prompted full-blown conflict with the U.S military, which implies that the Houthis are responsible for all attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea.
Houthis rebels
Iranian missile components
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest with the topic 'Navy SEALs' as they are reporting on the death of two Navy SEALs. The article also mentions President Biden and U.S Central Command which could be seen as an attempt to gain favor or support from those entities.
The author is a member of the military, specifically the Navy.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Navy SEALs as they are reporting on an incident involving two presumed dead Navy SEALs. The article also mentions President Biden and U.S. Central Command which could be seen as having ties to the military.
The Navy Seals went missing during an operation to seize Iranian-made weapons bound for Houthis in Yemen on 11 January
One of the commandos was swept away and another jumped into the water to save him
Nathan Gage Ingram and Christopher J Chambers are now presumed dead after attempts were made to recover their bodies
Accuracy
No Contradictions at Time
Of
Publication
Deception
(50%)
The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'presumed dead' and 'two US Navy Seals who went missing during an operation to seize Iranian-made weapons - bound for Houthis in Yemen - are now presumed dead', which creates a false sense of urgency and importance. Secondly, the article omits key details about the incident such as when it happened, where it happened and what exactly led to the disappearance of the Navy Seals. This is an example of selective reporting. Thirdly, there are no quotes from any sources other than US Central Command or military officials which raises questions about bias and lack of objectivity in reporting.
The article uses sensationalist language such as 'presumed dead' to create a false sense of urgency and importance.
Fallacies
(85%)
The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the US military has identified the two missing Navy Seals and that they are presumed dead. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Additionally, there is a lack of context regarding why these weapons were being transported on this ship or what their intended use was. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the Houthis as
Bias
(85%)
The article contains a statement that the Navy Seals were presumed dead after an operation to seize weapons parts on this ship. The author does not provide any context or explanation for why they are presumed dead. This is an example of biased language as it implies that there was no other possible outcome and suggests a negative judgment about the situation.
The Navy Seals were presumed dead after an operation to seize weapons parts on this ship.
Site
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author of the article has a conflict of interest on several topics related to the Navy Seals and their mission in Yemen. The author is an employee of US Central Command which was involved in planning and executing the anti-Houthi mission.
Author
Conflicts
Of
Interest (50%)
The author has a conflict of interest on the topics of Navy Seals and anti-Houthi mission as she is reporting for US Central Command. The article does not disclose this conflict.
