Two Pilots Sleep During Flight, Causing Concerns Over Safety

India
The pilot in command slept for 1 hour and the second-in-command refused to trade places when he woke up. Both pilots have been temporarily suspended by Batik Air and strongly reprimanded by Indonesia's transport ministry.
Two pilots of an Airbus A320 aircraft fell asleep during a flight from Kendari, Indonesia to Jakarta.
Two Pilots Sleep During Flight, Causing Concerns Over Safety

The article discusses a recent incident where two pilots of an Airbus A320 aircraft fell asleep during a flight from Kendari, Indonesia to Jakarta. The pilot in command slept for 1 hour and the second-in-command refused to trade places when he woke up. Both pilots have been temporarily suspended by Batik Air and strongly reprimanded by Indonesia's transport ministry.



Confidence

80%

Doubts
  • It is not clear if there were any other crew members on board who could have taken over as pilot during the incident.

Sources

75%

  • Unique Points
    • The incident occurred on a roundtrip Batik Air Indonesia flight between Halu Oleo Airport in Kendari and Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in Jakarta on January 25.
    • On the first leg of the trip from Jakarta to Kendari, one of the pilots told another pilot that he did not have proper rest. The other pilot allowed him to rest for about half an hour during preparation for takeoff.
    • The commanding pilot woke up 28 minutes after the last recorded transmission and was immediately aware that the aircraft was not on course. He then saw that one of his co-pilots had fallen asleep mid-air.
  • Accuracy
    • Two pilots of an Indonesian airline fell asleep during a January flight with more than 150 people on board.
    • During this time, air traffic controllers and other pilots attempted to get in contact with both napping pilots but were unsuccessful.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that both pilots fell asleep during the flight when only one of them did so. Secondly, it states that air traffic controllers and other pilots attempted to get in contact with the napping pilot but failed to do so which is not true according to the incident report. Thirdly, it mentions a personal checklist for pilots which was recommended by KNKT as a measure to prevent such incidents from happening again when no mention of this recommendation was made in the incident report.
    • It states that air traffic controllers and other pilots attempted to get in contact with the napping pilot but failed to do so which is not true according to the incident report. This statement misrepresents what actually happened during the incident.
    • The title implies that both pilots fell asleep during the flight when only one of them did so. This is deceptive because it creates a false impression about what happened on the flight.
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSB) held a forum on pilots' mental health and officials spoke out about the existing rules being arcane. This statement implies that the NTSB has some sort of expertise in this area, but there is no evidence provided to support this claim. Additionally, using quotes from unnamed sources without providing any context or information about their credibility also undermines the authority of these statements.
    • The National Transportation Safety Committee (NTSB) held a forum on pilots' mental health and officials spoke out at NTSB mental health forum: "The existing rules are arcane"
    • Two pilots of an Indonesian airline have come under fire after an incident report revealed they both fell asleep during a January flight with more than 150 people on board. The pilots were unreachable for roughly half an hour, waking to find that the plane had veered off course, the report said.
    • The commanding pilot allowed the secondary to rest during that leg of the trip for about half an hour.
  • Bias (85%)
    The article reports on an incident where two pilots of Batik Air Indonesia fell asleep during a flight with more than 150 people on board. The commanding pilot allowed the secondary to rest for about half an hour and then woke up to find that the plane had veered off course. This is clearly a violation of safety regulations, which prohibit pilots from falling asleep while flying. Additionally, there are no details provided in the article regarding any other factors that may have contributed to this incident such as weather conditions or technical issues with the aircraft.
    • The commanding pilot allowed the secondary to rest for about half an hour and then woke up to find that the plane had veered off course.
    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication
    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
      None Found At Time Of Publication

    64%

    • Unique Points
      • The incident report found that the pilot in command fell asleep for an hour and his second-in-command refused to trade places when he woke up.
      • Both pilots have been temporarily suspended by Batik Air and strongly reprimanded by Indonesia's transport ministry.
    • Accuracy
      • On the first leg of the trip from Jakarta to Kendari, one of the pilots told another pilot that he did not have proper rest. The other pilot allowed him to rest for about half an hour during preparation for takeoff.
    • Deception (30%)
      The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that the pilots were asleep for nearly 30 minutes while on a flight with passengers. However, this is not entirely accurate as they only fell asleep for an hour and then woke up to find their plane off course.
      • The article states that 'air traffic controllers attempted to communicate with the plane but were met with silence'. This implies that the pilots did not respond when contacted by air traffic, which is false. According to the incident report, there was no response from the pilots because they had fallen asleep and their second-in-command was also napping.
      • The article states that 'the pilot awoke 28 minutes later to find that 'the aircraft was not on the correct flight path''. This implies that he woke up late and discovered his mistake, which is false. According to the incident report, the pilot had already been awake for 28 minutes when he realized his error.
    • Fallacies (70%)
      The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the incident report from the National Transportation Safety Committee found that Batik Air flight BTK6723 diverted from its path during a Jan. 25 flight after its two pilots dozed off for nearly 30 minutes.
      • The article states 'An incident report from the country's National Transportation Safety Committee found that Batik Air flight BTK6723 diverted from its path during a Jan. 25 flight after its two pilots dozed off for nearly 30 minutes.'
      • The appeal to authority fallacy is committed when an author presents information as true without providing evidence or reasoning, and instead relies on the credibility of the source.
    • Bias (85%)
      The article is biased towards the incident of a pilot falling asleep midflight. The author uses sensationalist language such as 'nearly 30 minutes' and 'midair nap came during a two-and-a-half hour flight'. Additionally, the use of phrases like 'incident report from the country's National Transportation Safety Committee found that Batik Air flight BTK6723 diverted from its path during a Jan. 25 flight after its two pilots dozed off for 28 minutes.' creates an implication that this is not normal and implies it was dangerous, when in fact the pilot managed to get the plane back on track and land safely.
      • incident report from the country's National Transportation Safety Committee found that Batik Air flight BTK6723 diverted from its path during a Jan. 25 flight after its two pilots dozed off for 28 minutes.
        • midair nap came during a two-and-a-half hour flight
          • nearly 30 minutes
          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          75%

          • Unique Points
            • , a report said.The plane, carrying 153 people, landed safely in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta.
            • On the first leg of the trip from Jakarta to Kendari, one of the pilots told another pilot that he did not have proper rest. The other pilot allowed him to rest for about half an hour during preparation for takeoff.
          • Accuracy
            • Two pilots of an Indonesian airline fell asleep during a January flight with more than 150 people on board.
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that the pilots fell asleep for a significant amount of time (28 minutes) which could be seen as dangerous or irresponsible. However, upon reading further it becomes clear that this was not an unusual occurrence and was actually part of a controlled rest period on short-haul flights. Secondly, the article quotes one pilot saying they suffered from poor sleep the day before the flight but does not provide any evidence to support this claim or mention if there were any other factors contributing to their fatigue. This could be seen as misleading as it implies that the pilots' actions were solely due to lack of rest when in reality, there may have been other reasons for their behavior. Lastly, the article mentions that investigators did not reveal the pilots' identities which could be seen as a way to avoid accountability or responsibility for their actions.
            • The article quotes one pilot saying they suffered from poor sleep but does not provide any evidence to support this claim.
            • The title implies that the pilots fell asleep for 28 minutes which is misleading and exaggerated.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains several fallacies. The first is an appeal to authority when it states that the incident occurred in January on a return flight from Kendari, in the Indonesian province of Southeast Sulawesi, to the country's capital, Jakarta. This statement implies that there must be some sort of official or expert source confirming this information. However, no such source is provided and it is not clear how this information was obtained.
            • The incident occurred in January on a return flight from Kendari, in the Indonesian province of Southeast Sulawesi, to the country's capital, Jakarta.
          • Bias (85%)
            The article reports that the captain and copilot of a domestic flight in Indonesia fell asleep for nearly 30 minutes during their return flight from Kendari to Jakarta. The author does not provide any context or background information about the incident, but it is clear that this behavior could potentially be dangerous if it were to happen on a long-haul flight with more passengers and cargo at stake. Additionally, the article mentions that one of the pilots had poor sleep before the flight, which may have contributed to their fatigue during takeoff. The author also notes that controlled rest periods are common on short-haul flights like this one, but it is unclear if there were any specific safety recommendations made by investigators in response to this incident.
            • The pilot and copilot of a domestic flight in Indonesia fell asleep for nearly 30 minutes during their return flight from Kendari to Jakarta.
            • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
              None Found At Time Of Publication
            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
              The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of pilot fatigue as they are reporting on an incident where two pilots fell asleep during a flight. The article also mentions that Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group which may have financial ties to the A320 aircraft manufacturer.
              • Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group which may have financial ties to the A320 aircraft manufacturer.
                • The captain and copilot of an A320 fell asleep for 28 minutes during a flight to Jakarta, report says

                70%

                • Unique Points
                  • , which took place in January.
                  • On the first leg of the trip from Jakarta to Kendari, one of the pilots told another pilot that he did not have proper rest. The other pilot allowed him to rest for about half an hour during preparation for takeoff.
                  • The incident caused the plane carrying 153 people to veer off course before landing safely.
                • Accuracy
                  • The passengers of the Indonesian aircraft were left unharmed in the incident.
                  • An investigation is being carried out in Indonesia after two pilots led a local airliner off course while falling asleep.
                  • The commanding pilot woke up 28 minutes after the last recorded transmission and was immediately aware that the aircraft was not on course. He then saw that one of his co-pilots had fallen asleep mid-air.
                • Deception (50%)
                  The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that both pilots were asleep at the same time when in fact only one of them was sleeping while the other was still awake and tending to his babies. Secondly, it states that medical tests determined their capabilities but does not provide any information on what those tests entailed or how they relate to this incident. Lastly, it mentions Batik Air's commitment to implementing safety recommendations without providing any specific details about the changes being made.
                  • It states that medical tests determined their capabilities but does not provide any information on what those tests entailed or how they relate to this incident.
                  • The title implies both pilots were asleep at the same time when in fact only one of them was sleeping while the other was still awake and tending to his babies.
                  • Lastly, it mentions Batik Air's commitment to implementing safety recommendations without providing any specific details about the changes being made.
                • Fallacies (85%)
                  The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that the pilots have been temporarily suspended following the incident. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric when describing the turbulence experienced by the co-pilot as 'light'. Additionally, there is a lack of context for why both pilots fell asleep in their duties.
                  • The article states that
                • Bias (85%)
                  The article reports that two pilots led a local airliner off course while falling asleep. The author does not provide any context or background information about the incident, which could have been caused by various factors such as fatigue due to long working hours or lack of proper training. Additionally, the article mentions that medical tests determined the pilots' capabilities to fly the airliner but did not align with what ended up happening. This suggests that there may be other underlying issues at play, which could have contributed to the incident.
                  • A Batik Air flight was sent in the wrong direction while traveling from Kendari, Indonesia, to Jakarta on Jan. 25 as both the pilot in command and secondary pilot slept on the plane
                    • “No one was injured in this occurrence and there was no damage to the aircraft”
                      • The passengers of the Indonesian aircraft were left unharmed in the incident
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        The article reports on a flight that veered off course after both pilots fell asleep in the cockpit. The co-pilot was tired from tending to his babies at home and also fell asleep while flying duties were handed over to him by the pilot in command who was taking a nap. The incident resulted in the plane straying off its flight path for approximately one hour and 45 minutes before both pilots woke up and landed safely.
                        • Both the pilot in command and secondary pilot slept on the plane.
                          • The co-pilot was tired after tending to his 1-month-old twin babies at home with his wife.
                          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                            None Found At Time Of Publication

                          68%

                          • Unique Points
                            • Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group, which has had several high-profile accidents in recent decades.
                            • Indonesia's aviation authority will review how the country's airlines operate night flights after both pilots on a Batik Air flight carrying 153 passengers fell asleep and caused the plane to briefly veer off course.
                            • The incident occurred on a roundtrip Batik Air Indonesia flight between Halu Oleo Airport in Kendari and Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in Jakarta on January 25.
                            • On the first leg of the trip from Jakarta to Kendari, one of the pilots told another pilot that he did not have proper rest. The other pilot allowed him to rest for about half an hour during preparation for takeoff.
                            • The commanding pilot woke up 28 minutes after the last recorded transmission and was immediately aware that the aircraft was not on course. He then saw that one of his co-pilots had fallen asleep mid-air.
                          • Accuracy
                            • The incident caused the plane carrying 153 people to veer off course before landing safely.
                            • The flight was a return leg for the crew and plane, which had spent less than an hour on the ground after arriving from Jakarta.
                            • Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group, Indonesia's largest air travel company, which has a troubled safety record. In 2018, one of its flights fell out of the sky moments after takeoff and killed all 189 people on board. In 2013, a Lion Air flight crashed into the sea while trying to land; all passengers were safely evacuated.
                            • In recent years, Lion Air Group has made significant investments into improving the safety of its flights but it is unclear whether these investments are addressing underlying issues or making quick fixes.
                          • Deception (30%)
                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it implies that the incident was a result of poor aviation safety record when Indonesia's aviation authority stated they would review how the country's airlines operate night flights after both pilots on a Batik Air flight carrying 153 passengers fell asleep, causing the plane to briefly veer off course. Secondly, it states that Lion Air Group has had several high-profile accidents in recent decades when only one of them is mentioned and none are linked to poor aviation safety record. Lastly, it implies that Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group when they have different owners.
                            • The article implies that the incident was a result of Indonesia's troubling aviation safety record when in reality it was due to pilot fatigue and lack of proper monitoring systems.
                          • Fallacies (70%)
                            The article contains an appeal to authority fallacy by stating that Indonesia's aviation authority will review how the country's airlines operate night flights after both pilots on a Batik Air flight carrying 153 passengers fell asleep. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric with phrases such as 'Indonesia's troubling aviation safety record'. Additionally, there is an example of a dichotomous depiction by stating that Lion Air Group has had several high-profile accidents in recent decades and then mentioning their investments into improving the safety of their flights. However, it is not clear whether these investments are addressing the underlying issues or making quick fixes.
                            • Indonesia's aviation authority will review how the country's airlines operate night flights after both pilots on a Batik Air flight carrying 153 passengers fell asleep.
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article contains examples of religious bias and monetary bias. The author uses the phrase 'Indonesia's troubling aviation safety record' to suggest that there is a problem with Indonesia as a country rather than just Lion Air Group which has had several high-profile accidents in recent decades.
                            • Batik Air is owned by Lion Air Group, Indonesia's largest air travel company,
                              • The incident, which caused the plane carrying 153 people to veer off course before landing safely, added to the country’s troubling aviation safety record.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                Muktita Suhartono and Yan Zhuang have a conflict of interest on the topic of Indonesia's aviation safety as they are reporting for Batik Air, which is part of Lion Air Group. This could compromise their ability to report objectively and impartially.
                                • The article mentions that Batik Air has been under scrutiny following a series of accidents involving its planes. As such, the authors' affiliation with the airline may raise questions about their independence and potential bias in reporting on this topic.