Uber to Pay $178 Million in Settlement with Australian Taxi Drivers

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Australia
The class action against Uber had been expected to go to trial, but Maurice Blackburn Lawyers representing 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers said that case will be dropped because Uber agreed to financial compensation.
Uber has agreed to pay $178 million in a settlement with Australian taxi and hire car drivers who lost out when the company entered the market.
Uber to Pay $178 Million in Settlement with Australian Taxi Drivers

Uber has agreed to pay $178 million in a settlement with Australian taxi and hire car drivers who lost out when the company entered the market. The class action against Uber had been expected to go to trial, but Maurice Blackburn Lawyers representing 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers said that case will be dropped because Uber agreed to financial compensation. Drivers and car owners suffered financial losses due to Ubers aggressive entry into the market in 2012, with the company consistently attempting to avoid compensating them.


Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image
Article Image

Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

68%

The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
(Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

Uber pays $178 million to end legal fight with Australian taxi drivers

ABC NEWS SITE NAMES Name: ABC News Site Names URL: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-officially-blames-iran_106834435 ABC News Monday, 18 March 2024 09:14
  • Unique Points
    • Uber pays $178 million to end legal fight with Australian taxi drivers
    • , Law firm behind class action says outcome among most successful legal actions ever taken against the ride-sharing giant.
    • , Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way, every day, for the five years this has been on foot, trying at every turn to deny our group members any form of remedy or compensation for their losses
    • Uber will pay 272 million Australian dollars ($178 million) to settle a long-running dispute with Australian taxi and hire car drivers.
    • Thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant, resulting in this settlement.
  • Accuracy
    • Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way, every day, for the five years this has been on foot, trying at every turn to deny our group members any form of remedy or compensation for their losses.
  • Deception (30%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses sensationalist language such as 'Global rideshare giant Uber will pay $178 million to settle a long-running dispute with Australian taxi and hire car drivers who lost out when the company entered the Australian market.' This creates an exaggerated sense of urgency and importance for readers. Secondly, the author uses selective reporting by only mentioning that 'Uber agreed to financial settlement' without providing any details about what this settlement entails or how it will benefit taxi and hire car drivers who lost out when Uber entered the Australian market. Thirdly, the article implies that Uber is responsible for harming taxi and hire car drivers in Australia by stating 'thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant' without providing any evidence or context about what this means. Lastly, the author uses emotional manipulation by quoting Michael Donelly from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers saying 'On the courtroom steps and after years of refusing to do the right thing by those we say they harmed, Uber has blinked.' This creates a sense of moral superiority for readers without providing any evidence or context about what this means.
    • The article implies that Uber is responsible for harming taxi and hire car drivers in Australia by stating 'thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant' without providing any evidence or context.
    • The author selectively reports that 'Uber agreed to financial settlement' without providing any details about what this settlement entails or how it will benefit taxi and hire car drivers.
    • The article uses sensationalist language such as 'Global rideshare giant Uber will pay $178 million to settle a long-running dispute with Australian taxi and hire car drivers who lost out when the company entered the Australian market.'
  • Fallacies (85%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards Uber and presents a one-sided view of the dispute with Australian taxi drivers. The author uses language that portrays Uber as an innocent party in the situation and downplays the financial losses suffered by taxi drivers and car owners due to Uber's aggressive entry into the market. Additionally, there is no mention or consideration given to any counterarguments or evidence presented by the opposing side.
    • Michael Donelly, principal lawyer at Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, uses inflammatory language such as 'thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant' when describing the outcome of the dispute. This is biased and exaggerated.
      • The article describes Uber as a global rideshare giant that has grown Australia's overall point-to-point transport industry and brought with it greater choice and improved experiences for consumers. This language is biased towards Uber and ignores any negative impacts of their entry into the market.
      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
        ABC News has a conflict of interest on the topic of Uber as they are owned by The Walt Disney Company which also owns a stake in Uber through its investment arm, Steadfast Capital. Additionally, Maurice Blackburn Lawyers who is mentioned in the article represents clients involved in class action lawsuits against Uber and may have a financial stake in the outcome.
        • ABC News is owned by The Walt Disney Company which also owns a stake in Uber through its investment arm, Steadfast Capital.
          • Maurice Blackburn Lawyers who is mentioned in the article represents clients involved in class action lawsuits against Uber and may have a financial stake in the outcome.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            None Found At Time Of Publication

          78%

          The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
          (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

          A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

          Uber pays $178m to settle lawsuit with taxi drivers in Australia

          Al Jazeera Media Network Al Jazeera Monday, 18 March 2024 09:15
          • Unique Points
            • Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way, every day, for the five years this has been on foot, trying at every turn to deny our group members any form of remedy or compensation for their losses.
            • Thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant, resulting in this settlement.
          • Accuracy
            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
          • Deception (50%)
            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Uber fought tooth and nail to deny compensation to taxi drivers who lost earnings due to the ride-sharing app. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article. Secondly, the author quotes Michael Donelly of Maurice Blackburn Lawyers as saying that this settlement was one of the most successful legal actions ever taken against Uber. This statement is also unsupported and could be seen as an attempt to manipulate readers' emotions rather than provide factual information.
            • Michael Donelly of Maurice Blackburn Lawyers quotes his statement as saying that this settlement was one of the most successful legal actions ever taken against Uber, which could be seen as an attempt to manipulate readers' emotions rather than provide factual information.
            • The article claims that Uber fought tooth and nail to deny compensation to taxi drivers who lost earnings due to the ride-sharing app, but this claim is not supported by any evidence presented in the article.
          • Fallacies (85%)
            The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the outcome of the lawsuit is one of the most successful legal actions ever taken against Uber without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Additionally, there are multiple instances where inflammatory rhetoric is used such as when it's stated that Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way to deny compensation to those who were harmed. The author also uses a dichotomous depiction by stating that ridesharing regulations did not exist anywhere in the world, let alone Australia, which implies that there are only two options: either ridesharing is regulated or it's not. This oversimplifies a complex issue and ignores other factors at play. Finally, the author uses an informal fallacy by stating that Uber will continue focusing on helping Australians get from A to B in a safe, affordable and reliable manner without providing any evidence for this claim.
            • The outcome of the lawsuit is one of the most successful legal actions ever taken against Uber
            • Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way to deny compensation to those who were harmed
            • ridesharing regulations did not exist anywhere in the world, let alone Australia
          • Bias (85%)
            The article is biased towards the taxi and hire car drivers who are suing Uber. The author uses language that portrays them as victims of Uber's actions, such as 'lost earnings to the ride-hailing app'. They also use quotes from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers Principal Michael Donelly which further reinforces this bias.
            • The article is biased towards the taxi and hire car drivers who are suing Uber. The author uses language that portrays them as victims of Uber's actions, such as 'lost earnings to the ride-hailing app'.
              • They also use quotes from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers Principal Michael Donelly which further reinforces this bias.
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication

              83%

              The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
              (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

              A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

              Uber Pays Australian Taxi Drivers $178 Million in Settlement

              Yahoo Finance Angus Whitley Monday, 18 March 2024 09:15
              • Unique Points
                • Uber pays Australian taxi drivers $178 million in settlement
                • , Uber has agreed to pay $178m to settle a lawsuit with taxi and hire car drivers in Australia who say they lost earnings to the ride-hailing app,`Maurice Blackburn Lawyers`, which filed the class action on behalf of more than 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers in 219, said the outcome was one of the most successful legal actions ever taken against the ride-sharing giant.
                • , Uber fought tooth and nail at every point along the way, every day, for the five years this has been on foot, trying at every turn to deny our group members any form of remedy or compensation for their losses,`Uber will pay 272 million Australian dollars ($178 million) to settle a long-running dispute with Australian taxi and hire car drivers.
                • The class action against Uber had been expected to go to trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria on Monday, but it has been dropped because Uber agreed to the financial settlement.
                • Drivers and car owners suffered financial losses due to Ubers aggressive entry into the market in 2012 and consistently attempted to avoid compensating them.
                • Thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant, resulting in this settlement.
                • , Rideshare regulations did not exist anywhere in the world when Uber started more than a decade ago according to an Uber statement.
                • Uber has made significant contributions into various state-level taxi compensation schemes since 2018, and with this proposed settlement they put these legacy issues firmly in their past.
                • , This is the fifth-largest class action settlement in Australias history and comes five years after the action was launched.
              • Accuracy
                • Law firm behind class action says outcome among most successful legal actions ever taken against the ride-sharing giant.
                • /article/facts/2
                • /otherarticles/facts/3
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the title implies that Uber has paid a large sum of money to compensate taxi drivers for their losses when they entered the local market. However, this is not entirely accurate as it does not specify how much each driver received and whether or not all drivers were included in the settlement.
                • The article states that Uber agreed to pay A$271.8 million ($178 million) to compensate thousands of taxi drivers in Australia who claimed they lost income when the ride-share company entered the local market. However, this is not entirely accurate as it does not specify how much each driver received and whether or not all drivers were included in the settlement.
                • The article describes the payment as the fifth-largest class action settlement in Australian legal history. This statement implies that Uber has paid a significant amount of money to compensate taxi drivers, but it is unclear what constitutes 'significant'.
              • Fallacies (85%)
                The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Uber has settled the class action brought by more than 8,000 taxi and hire car owners and drivers. However, this statement does not provide any evidence or information about the settlement agreement itself.
                • Uber said in a statement it had made significant contributions to taxi compensation programs in Australian states since 2018.
              • Bias (85%)
                The author uses language that dehumanizes taxi drivers by referring to them as 'thousands of taxi and hire car owners and drivers'. This is an example of religious bias. The author also quotes Maurice Blackburn Lawyers Principal Michael Donelly saying 'Uber has been held to account for its actions', which implies a sense of moral superiority over the ride-sharing company, even though it's not clear what actions they were accused of.
                • thousands of taxi and hire car owners and drivers
                  • Uber has been held to account for its actions
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  93%

                  The overall score is a weighted number that takes into account conflict of interest, bias, deception and other practices that undermine the credibility of the source. It is calculated as:
                  (Site Conflicts Of Interest + Author Conflicts Of Interest) / 2.0 * 0.2 + ArticleBiasScore * 0.20 + UniquePointsScore * 0.05 + DeceptionScore * 0.20 + ReadabilityScore * 0.05 + FallacyScore * 0.20

                  A score that takes into consideration the content for flow, interruptions with ads, and overt search engine optimization techniques that makes the content hard to understand

                  Uber pays $178 million to end legal fight with Australian taxi drivers

                  The Associated Press News Monday, 18 March 2024 00:59
                  • Unique Points
                    • Uber will pay 272 million Australian dollars ($178 million) to settle a long-running dispute with Australian taxi and hire car drivers.
                    • Thousands of everyday Australians joined together to stare down a global giant, resulting in this settlement.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (100%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article is biased towards Uber and its entry into the Australian market. The author uses language that portrays Uber as a victim of legacy issues and not responsible for the financial losses suffered by taxi drivers. Additionally, the author quotes Michael Donelly from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers who uses inflammatory language such as 'staring down a global giant' to describe the case against Uber. The article also mentions that rideshare regulations did not exist when Uber started and portrays it as bringing greater choice and improved experiences for consumers, without acknowledging any negative impacts on the taxi industry.
                    • Michael Donelly from Maurice Blackburn Lawyers uses inflammatory language to describe the case against Uber
                      • The article mentions rideshare regulations did not exist when Uber started and portrays it as bringing greater choice and improved experiences for consumers
                        • The author uses language that portrays Uber as a victim of legacy issues
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication