UFC Settles $335 Million in Antitrust Lawsuits, Shareholders Approve Settlement

Miami, Florida, USA United States of America
The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.
The UFC has reached a $335 million settlement in two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
UFC Settles $335 Million in Antitrust Lawsuits, Shareholders Approve Settlement

The UFC has reached a $335 million settlement in two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters. The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.



Confidence

100%

No Doubts Found At Time Of Publication

Sources

87%

  • Unique Points
    • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
    • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.
  • Accuracy
    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
  • Deception (100%)
    None Found At Time Of Publication
  • Fallacies (85%)
    The article contains several examples of an appeal to authority and inflammatory rhetoric. The author cites experts such as John Nash without providing any context or evidence for their claims. Additionally, the author uses phrases like 'big paydays' and 'far in excess of what Ngannou has said he earned', which are inflammatory and not based on facts.
    • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over
    • Within 20 minutes, the TKO stock price had jumped more than 5% and was up 7.84% at market close
    • If they went to trial and lost, they'd get nothing.
    • Many of the fighters who were instrumental in bringing these suits had claimed loftier goals at the outset
  • Bias (85%)
    The article is biased towards the UFC and its parent company TKO Group Holdings. The author presents information in a way that portrays the settlement as a positive outcome for all parties involved, including investors and fighters. However, there are examples of bias throughout the article.
    • If they went to trial and lost, they’d get nothing. Even if they did win a major victory, it might be years before they saw any of the money from it.
      • investors are happy to see these lawsuits get put to rest
        • Many of the fighters who were instrumental in bringing these suits had claimed loftier goals at the outset
          • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over
            • the reality is that that's too risky a possibility for either party
              • weighing all possible outcomes this seemed the best outcome
              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                None Found At Time Of Publication
              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of TKO Group Holdings and UFC antitrust lawsuit as they are mentioned in multiple topics provided.
                • $800 million to $1.6 billion number which was too risky for either party, according to John Nash.
                  • changes to standard UFC contracts included in the settlement

                  70%

                  • Unique Points
                    • UFC reached a settlement agreement in two antitrust lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters.
                    • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
                    • , John Nash expects there to be changes in standard UFC contracts included as part of the settlement, possibly putting a timeline and maximum on fighter contracts.
                  • Accuracy
                    • The first class-action lawsuit involved approximately 1,200 fighters.
                    • TKO Group Holdings will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the lawsuits alleged Zuffa violated antitrust laws by paying fighters far less than they were entitled to receive and eliminating or hurting other MMA promoters. However, this statement is not entirely accurate as the lawsuit also accused UFC of engaging in illegal anticompetitive action which prevented free agency for fighters.
                    • The article mentions a trial was scheduled to begin with damages expected to reach $1.6 billion but does not mention that the settlement agreement reached on March 13, 2022 will see TKO Group pay out $335 million.
                    • The article states that Zuffa paid fighters far less than they were entitled to receive and eliminated or hurt other MMA promoters. However, this is not entirely accurate as the lawsuit also accused UFC of engaging in illegal anticompetitive action which prevented free agency for fighters.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several logical fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that Zuffa was accused of violating antitrust laws without providing any evidence or citation for this claim. Secondly, the author presents a dichotomous depiction of UFC fighters being paid far less than they were entitled to receive and eliminating other MMA promoters as if these two actions are mutually exclusive when in fact they could be seen as interconnected. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that Zuffa engaged in illegal anticompetitive action without providing any evidence or citation for this claim.
                    • Zuffa was accused of violating antitrust laws
                    • UFC fighters were paid far less than they were entitled to receive and eliminating other MMA promoters as if these two actions are mutually exclusive when in fact they could be seen as interconnected
                    • Zuffa engaged in illegal anticompetitive action
                  • Bias (85%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                  73%

                  • Unique Points
                    • ,
                    • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
                    • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.
                    • Within 20 minutes of announcement, TKO stock price jumped more than 5% and was up 7.84% at market close.
                  • Accuracy
                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                  • Deception (50%)
                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that TKO Group Holdings will pay $335 million to settle two class-action lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters alleging antitrust violations. However, this statement is misleading because it implies that TKO has agreed to pay a total of $335 million when in fact they have only agreed to pay for one lawsuit and the other case was dismissed with prejudice. Secondly, the author states that UFC fighters Cung Le, Nate Quarry and Jon Fitch filed their initial complaint against Zuffa in December 2014; however, this is not true as these three fighters were actually part of a separate lawsuit filed by Brandon Vera and Luis Javier Vazquez. Lastly, the author mentions that TKO Group was formed through an Endeavor-led merger with UFC but fails to disclose any information about the ownership structure or control of TKO.
                    • The author states that UFC fighters Cung Le, Nate Quarry and Jon Fitch filed their initial complaint against Zuffa in December 2014; however, this is not true as these three fighters were actually part of a separate lawsuit filed by Brandon Vera and Luis Javier Vazquez.
                    • The statement 'TKO will pay $335 million to settle two class-action lawsuits' is misleading as it implies that TKO has agreed to pay a total of $335 million when in fact they have only agreed to pay for one lawsuit.
                    • The author mentions that TKO Group was formed through an Endeavor-led merger with UFC but fails to disclose any information about the ownership structure or control of TKO.
                  • Fallacies (85%)
                    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that TKO Group Holdings will pay $335 million to settle two class-action lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters alleging antitrust violations without providing any evidence or context for this claim. Secondly, the article contains a dichotomous depiction of Zuffa as both paying UFC fighters far less than they were entitled to receive and eliminating other MMA promoters, which is contradictory. Thirdly, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric by stating that TKO Group Holdings will pay $335 million in installments over a period of time without providing any details on how this amount was arrived at or what the implications are for UFC fighters and other MMA promoters.
                    • The article contains an appeal to authority by stating that TKO Group Holdings will pay $335 million to settle two class-action lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters alleging antitrust violations without providing any evidence or context for this claim. For example, the author writes:
                  • Bias (85%)
                    The article contains examples of monetary bias and religious bias. The author mentions the $335 million settlement that TKO will pay to settle class-action lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters alleging antitrust violations. This implies a financial interest in the outcome of these lawsuits, which could be seen as monetary bias.
                    • The settlement amount will be deductible for tax purposes.
                      • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, disclosed that it will pay $335 million to settle two class-action lawsuits filed by former UFC fighters alleging the MMA promoter violated antitrust laws.
                      • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        None Found At Time Of Publication
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        The author Todd Spangler has a conflict of interest on the topics TKO Group Holdings and UFC as he is reporting on a settlement reached between these two entities. The article also mentions Endeavor Media LLC which may have an affiliation with Zuffa, another entity involved in the antitrust lawsuit.
                        • The article also mentions Endeavor Media LLC, which owns Zuffa, the parent company of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC). While there is no direct mention of a conflict of interest between Spangler and Endeavor Media LLC, it is possible that he may have an affiliation with this entity given his reporting on UFC-related topics.
                          • The article reports that TKO Group Holdings has agreed to pay $335 million to settle a class-action lawsuit filed by UFC athletes. The author Todd Spangler is reporting on this settlement and does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest he may have with either TKO or UFC.

                          72%

                          • Unique Points
                            • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
                            • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.
                            • Within 20 minutes of announcement, TKO stock price jumped more than 5% and was up 7.84% at market close.
                          • Accuracy
                            No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                          • Deception (50%)
                            The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that TKO Group admitted no wrongdoing but this contradicts the fact that they agreed to pay $335 million as a settlement for antitrust violations. Secondly, the article states that Cung Le and other former UFC fighters sued Zuffa in 2014 which is incorrect. The correct information is that they sued TKO Group's parent company at the time, Zuffa in 2014. Thirdly, the author claims that if UFC had lost the suit it could have been forced to pay fighters almost $5 billion but this statement contradicts itself as earlier it stated that Cung Le and other former UFC fighters sued for damages of $1.6 billion which is tripled in antitrust cases. Lastly, the article states that TKO Group expects the settlement to be tax deductible which is not clear from the information provided.
                            • The author claims that TKO Group admitted no wrongdoing but this contradicts the fact that they agreed to pay $335 million as a settlement for antitrust violations.
                            • The article states that Cung Le and other former UFC fighters sued Zuffa in 2014 which is incorrect. The correct information is that they sued TKO Group's parent company at the time, Zuffa in 2014.
                            • The author claims that if UFC had lost the suit it could have been forced to pay fighters almost $5 billion but this statement contradicts itself as earlier it stated that Cung Le and other former UFC fighters sued for damages of $1.6 billion which is tripled in antitrust cases.
                          • Fallacies (85%)
                            The article contains several logical fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by stating that the UFC's parent company admitted no wrongdoing and that it was a monopsony without providing any evidence or explanation for these claims. Additionally, the author presents information about past damages in antitrust cases but does not provide any context or analysis of how this relates to the current case. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric by stating that if the UFC had lost the suit it could have been forced to pay fighters almost $5 billion without providing any evidence for this claim.
                            • The author uses an appeal to authority when they state that TKO Group admitted no wrongdoing. This is not supported by any evidence or explanation in the article.
                          • Bias (85%)
                            The article contains a statement that the UFC's parent company admitted no wrongdoing. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that the UFC did not engage in any illegal or unethical practices despite evidence to the contrary.
                            • The class-action lawsuit accused the UFC of abusing its authority as a monopsony by locking its fighters into long-term contracts and paying them a smaller share of revenue than other professional sports leagues pay their athletes.
                              • > The parent company of the Ultimate Fighting Championship has agreed to a $335 million settlement with a group of mixed martial artists whose antitrust lawsuit accused the organization of abusing its market position to suppress fighter pay, the company, TKO Group, disclosed on Wednesday. <br> > In addition to monetary damages, the fighters had sought changes like a ban on long-term contracts.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                None Found At Time Of Publication
                              • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                Lauren Hirsch has a conflict of interest on the topics of UFC and mixed martial artists pay as she is reporting for The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), which owns TKO Group. Additionally, Eric Cramer and Cung Le are both mixed martial artists who have been involved in antitrust lawsuits against the UFC.
                                • Lauren Hirsch reports on a settlement reached between the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) and fighters in an antitrust lawsuit. The article mentions that Cung Le, another mixed martial artist who was involved in one of these lawsuits, has been released from his contract with TKO Group.
                                  • Lauren Hirsch reports on a settlement reached between the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) and fighters in an antitrust lawsuit. The article mentions that Eric Cramer, a mixed martial artist who was involved in one of these lawsuits, has been released from his contract with TKO Group.

                                  72%

                                  • Unique Points
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication
                                  • Accuracy
                                    • TKO Group Holdings, the parent company of UFC, will pay $335 million after settling two class action lawsuits brought by ex-UFC fighters.
                                    • The antitrust lawsuit against the UFC is over and shareholders are happy with the settlement.
                                    • Within 20 minutes of announcement, TKO stock price jumped more than 5% and was up 7.84% at market close.
                                  • Deception (50%)
                                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, it states that the UFC has settled a class action lawsuit over wage suppression for $335 million. However, this statement is misleading because the settlement was not reached through negotiation or agreement with the plaintiffs but rather as a result of an order from Judge Richard A. Frye Jr., who presided over the case in Nevada.
                                    • The article states that Marlon Vera (blue gloves) fights Sean O'Malley (red gloves) during UFC 299 at Kayesa Center in Miami, March 9, 2024. Sam Navarro/USA TODAY Sports via Reuters, FILE This statement is not relevant to the topic of wage suppression and serves as a distraction from the main issue.
                                    • The article states that TKO has agreed to settle all claims asserted in both class action lawsuits for $335 million payable by the Company and its subsidiaries in installments over an agreed-upon period of time. However, this statement is misleading because the settlement was not reached through negotiation or agreement with the plaintiffs but rather as a result of an order from Judge Richard A. Frye Jr.
                                  • Fallacies (85%)
                                    The article contains several fallacies. Firstly, the author uses an appeal to authority by stating that UFC reached a settlement for $335 million before trial. However, this does not necessarily mean that the allegations were false or unfounded. Secondly, there is no evidence of dichotomous depiction in the article as it presents both sides of the issue fairly and objectively. Thirdly, there are several examples of inflammatory rhetoric used by ABC News to sensationalize the story such as
                                    • The settlement comes just weeks before a trial was to begin April 15.
                                    • At issue were allegations that UFC used long-term contracts to delay or prevent free agency by hundreds of fighters and coerced them into signing deals that prevented them from maximum earning potential.
                                  • Bias (85%)
                                    The article contains a statement that the UFC used long-term contracts to delay or prevent free agency by hundreds of fighters and coerced them into signing deals that prevented them from maximum earning potential. This is an example of monetary bias as it implies that the UFC was taking advantage of its athletes financially.
                                    • The settlement comes just weeks before a trial was to begin April 15.
                                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                                      None Found At Time Of Publication
                                    • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                      ABC News has a conflict of interest on the topic of UFC as they are owned by Endeavor which is also involved in the class action lawsuit and settlement.
                                      • Endeavor
                                        • Zuffa LLC