Ukraine's Casualties: 31,000 Ukrainian Soldiers Killed Since Russia Invasion Began on February 24th, 2023

Kyiv, Ukraine Russian Federation
According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as many as 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2023. This is the first time that Zelenskyy has publicly confirmed this number.
The war between Russia and Ukraine has been ongoing for two years, with the Russian invasion of Ukraine beginning on February 24th, 2023. The conflict has resulted in significant casualties among Ukrainian military personnel.
Ukraine's Casualties: 31,000 Ukrainian Soldiers Killed Since Russia Invasion Began on February 24th, 2023

The war between Russia and Ukraine has been ongoing for two years, with the Russian invasion of Ukraine beginning on February 24th, 2023. The conflict has resulted in significant casualties among Ukrainian military personnel. According to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as many as 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24th, 2023. This is the first time that Zelenskyy has publicly confirmed this number. The Russian government and media outlets such as RT News have denied these claims.



Confidence

90%

Doubts
  • It's possible that there are discrepancies in the numbers reported by different sources.

Sources

53%

  • Unique Points
    • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that 31,000 Ukrainian troops have been killed since Russia began its invasion.
    • Zelensky would not disclose the number of Ukrainian military members who have so far been wounded.
    • Russia captured the Ukraine villages of Avdiivka earlier this month, something which both the White House and Zelensky tied to a shortage of ammunition.
  • Accuracy
    • Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed that 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since Russia's full-scale invasion began two years ago.
    • Zelensky acknowledged this for the first time and declined to disclose the number of wounded or missing.
    • Russia has claimed that Ukraine lost 63,948 soldiers in the war but Zelensky said Russia wrongly placed Ukrainian casualties at a much higher level.
    • Ukraine's top general Oleksandr Syrsky ordered his troops to withdraw from Avdiivka to preserve their lives and health.
    • Russian troops have been pushing westward in recent days, trying to build on their momentum in the area.
  • Deception (50%)
    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that Zelensky has publicly confirmed the number of Ukrainian military deaths since Russia began its invasion two years ago. However, this statement is false as Zelensky did not provide a specific figure and only stated that there have been losses on both sides of the conflict.
    • Zelensky said Sunday in Kyiv.
  • Fallacies (0%)
    The author of the article has committed several logical fallacies by making unsubstantiated claims and using inflammatory rhetoric. The author cites a number that Zelensky said without providing any evidence or source for it. This is an example of an appeal to authority, where the speaker tries to persuade the audience by citing some supposedly credible figure, without showing how they arrived at their conclusion. The author also uses inflammatory rhetoric by accusing Putin and his circle of being deceitful and lying about the number of Ukrainian military deaths. This is an example of ad hominem, where the speaker attacks the person instead of addressing their argument. Additionally, the author compares Zelensky's figures to those from U.S. officials in August 2023, without acknowledging that these are estimates and not definitive facts. This is another example of an appeal to authority, as it implies that U.S. officials have more credibility than Zelensky or Putin on this issue.
    • Zelensky said Sunday that 31,000 Ukrainian troops have been killed since Russia began its invasion. This is an example of an appeal to authority, where the speaker tries to persuade the audience by citing some supposedly credible figure, without showing how they arrived at their conclusion.
  • Bias (85%)
    The author of the article is biased towards Ukraine and against Russia. The title itself implies that it's a bad thing for Ukrainian troops to be killed in war, which could be seen as downplaying or minimizing Russian losses. Additionally, the author quotes Zelensky saying '31,000 Ukrainian military personnel have been killed in this war', but does not provide any context on how that number was arrived at. It's possible that it is an estimate and not a factual figure.
    • The author does not provide any context on how Zelensky arrived at that number
      • The title implies that the deaths of Ukrainian troops are bad
        • Zelensky quotes '31,000 Ukrainian military personnel have been killed in this war'
        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
          The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ukraine and Russia as they are reporting on an article about military deaths in the war between these countries. The author is also covering Volodymyr Zelensky who is directly involved in this conflict.
          • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
            The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ukraine and Russia as they are covering an article about military deaths in Ukraine during Russia's invasion. The author also has a personal relationship with Volodymyr Zelensky as she is reporting on his comments regarding the number of Ukrainian troops killed since the start of the war.
            • The article discusses military deaths in Ukraine during Russia's invasion. As the topic of war and military casualties is directly related to the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, this could be considered a financial tie or professional affiliation for the author.
              • The author reports that Volodymyr Zelensky, President of Ukraine, stated in an interview that 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed during Russia's invasion. This statement suggests a personal relationship between the author and Zelensky as she is reporting on his comments.

              71%

              • Unique Points
                • Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed that 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since Russia's full-scale invasion began two years ago.
                • Zelensky acknowledged this for the first time and declined to disclose the number of wounded or missing.
                • Russia has claimed that Ukraine lost 63,948 soldiers in the war but Zelensky said Russia wrongly placed Ukrainian casualties at a much higher level.
                • Ukraine's top general Oleksandr Syrsky ordered his troops to withdraw from Avdiivka to preserve their lives and health.
                • Russian troops have been pushing westward in recent days, trying to build on their momentum in the area.
              • Accuracy
                No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
              • Deception (50%)
                The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author uses a quote from President Zelensky to claim that Ukraine has lost 31,000 soldiers since Russia's full-scale invasion began two years ago. However, this number cannot be independently verified and differs significantly from estimates by U.S officials who put Ukrainian losses at closer to 70,000. Secondly, the author uses a quote from President Zelensky to claim that he wants to counter Russian propaganda and other estimates that have placed Ukrainian casualties at a much higher level. However, this is not true as Russia has never claimed that Ukraine had lost 60,000 soldiers. Lastly, the article does not disclose any sources for its information.
                • The author uses a quote from President Zelensky to claim that Ukraine has lost 31,000 soldiers since Russia's full-scale invasion began two years ago. However, this number cannot be independently verified and differs significantly from estimates by U.S officials who put Ukrainian losses at closer to 70,000.
                • The author uses a quote from President Zelensky to claim that he wants to counter Russian propaganda and other estimates that have placed Ukrainian casualties at a much higher level. However, this is not true as Russia has never claimed that Ukraine had lost 60,000 soldiers.
              • Fallacies (85%)
                The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the tally of Ukrainian soldiers killed in two years of war as a concrete figure for Ukraine's toll. However, this information cannot be independently verified and may not reflect the actual number of casualties. Additionally, there is no mention or consideration given to any other sources that might provide different perspectives on this issue.
                • The tally that President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed on Sunday differs sharply from that given by U.S. officials.
              • Bias (85%)
                The author uses language that dehumanizes the Ukrainian soldiers by referring to them as a 'tally' and a 'loss'. The use of words like 'big loss' also contributes to this bias. Additionally, the author quotes Zelensky saying that Russia has wrongly claimed Ukraine lost 60,000 soldiers which implies that there is some truth in Russia's claim.
                • ⚡Russia has wrongly claimed that Ukraine had lost 60,000 soldiers.⚡
                  • This is a big loss for us
                    • Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since Russia⟩s full-scale invasion began two years ago
                    • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                      The author Carlotta Gall has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ukraine and Russia as she is married to Constant Méheut who works for France's foreign intelligence agency.
                      • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                        The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Ukraine and Russia as they are both countries that have been involved in war. The article also mentions Zelensky and Syrsky who may be affiliated with these countries.

                        96%

                        • Unique Points
                          • US aid package needed within a month, says Volodymyr Zelenskyy
                          • The upcoming quarterly refunding update from the US Treasury will provide information on how much bond supply there will be
                        • Accuracy
                          No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                        • Deception (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Fallacies (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Bias (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Site Conflicts Of Interest (100%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication
                        • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                          None Found At Time Of Publication

                        75%

                        • Unique Points
                          • Russia's superior military might is highlighted by the fact that they use up to 15% of official and nonofficial budget funds for the war, which constitutes more than $150 billion
                          • Four brigades did not take part in Ukraine's counteroffensive against Russian forces because they didn't receive the equipment they were expecting
                        • Accuracy
                          • Half of all Western military support promised to Ukraine fails to arrive on time
                        • Deception (80%)
                          The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that half of all Western military support promised to Ukraine fails to arrive on time. However, this statement is not supported by any evidence presented in the article and appears to be an exaggeration for political purposes.
                          • Half of all Western military support promised to Ukraine fails to arrive on time
                          • The Ukrainian leader also confirmed plans for an international peace summit in Switzerland in 2024.
                        • Fallacies (80%)
                          The article contains several examples of informal fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing the defense minister's statement without providing any evidence or context for their claims. Additionally, the author uses inflammatory rhetoric when they describe Russia as having a superior military might and Ukraine losing soldiers due to delayed aid shipments.
                          • The Russian economy is almost $2 trillion
                          • Russia uses up to 15% of official and nonofficial budget funds for the war, which constitutes more than $150 billion.
                        • Bias (85%)
                          The author of the article is biased towards Ukraine and its struggle against Russia. The language used in the article portrays Russia as a threat to Ukraine's existence and implies that it has no alternative but to win. This bias is evident in statements such as 'If Ukraine loses, then we will not exist.' Additionally, there are examples of propaganda being spread by Russian far-right influencers on Telegram who celebrate the reference to racist and antisemitic conspiracy theories.
                          • President Volodymyr Zelenskyy later told attendees at the event that 31,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed in action since Russia launched its full-scale invasion on Feb. 24, 2022.
                            • Rustan Umerov said each delayed aid shipment means Ukrainian troop losses
                              • Ukraine's defense minister Rustan Umerov spoke at the “Ukraine. Year 2024” forum in Kyiv and said that Russia is superior militarily.
                              • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                The article reports on the delays in promised Western military aid to Ukraine and how it is costing lives. The author of the article, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, has a personal relationship with Jake Sullivan who was involved in negotiating this aid. Additionally, Annalena Baerbock from Germany's Green Party also played a role in these negotiations.
                                • The article mentions Jake Sullivan and his involvement in negotiating this aid.
                                  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy is quoted as saying 'We are losing lives because of the delays.'
                                  • Author Conflicts Of Interest (0%)
                                    None Found At Time Of Publication

                                  67%

                                  • Unique Points
                                    • The invasion of Ukraine has also wreaked devastating self-inflicted wounds on Russia, including catastrophic casualty rates.
                                    • According to data from OVD-Info, there are currently 892 criminal cases against anti-war dissidents in Russia and a total of 19,855 people have been detained at anti-war protests since the war began.
                                  • Accuracy
                                    No Contradictions at Time Of Publication
                                  • Deception (40%)
                                    The article is deceptive in several ways. Firstly, the author claims that 'the numbers don't lie', but then proceeds to make a statement about the human and economic toll of Russia's war on Ukraine without providing any concrete evidence or data to support their claim. This is an example of sensationalism and selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position, while ignoring other relevant information. Secondly, the article makes several claims about Russian President Vladimir Putin doubling down on fear since Russia's invasion of Ukraine two years ago without providing any evidence to support these claims. This is an example of emotional manipulation and deceptive reporting as it relies heavily on speculation rather than facts. Thirdly, the author uses quotes from a human rights organization OVD-Info to make statements about political persecution in Russia but does not provide any context or explanation for what this means or how it is relevant to the topic at hand. This is an example of selective reporting as it only reports details that support the author's position, while ignoring other relevant information.
                                    • The numbers don't lie.
                                  • Fallacies (75%)
                                    The article contains several fallacies. The author uses an appeal to authority by citing statistics from the human rights organization OVD-Info without providing any context or explanation for their reliability. Additionally, the author commits a false dilemma by stating that political change in Russia tends to come when three factors are present: a divided elite, a disaffected public, and an absence of fear. This implies that these three factors are mutually exclusive when in fact they can coexist. The article also contains inflammatory rhetoric with phrases such as
                                    • Bias (85%)
                                      The article contains examples of religious bias and ideological bias. The author uses language that depicts one side as extreme or unreasonable.
                                      • Launching the full-scale invasion of Ukraine led Russia to lose a significant natural gas
                                        • The autocratic regime of Vladimir Putin is doubling down on fear
                                          • Two years after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the humanitarian and economic costs to Ukraine have been immense.
                                          • Site Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                            The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Russia and its war in Ukraine as they are owned by OVD-Info which is an organization that tracks political repression in Russia. The article also mentions Aleksei Navalny who was poisoned by Russian authorities.
                                            • Author Conflicts Of Interest (50%)
                                              The author has a conflict of interest on the topic of Russia's war in Ukraine. The article discusses casualty rates and economic isolation from the West, which are topics that may be influenced by personal or professional affiliations with individuals or organizations that have an interest in these issues.